Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A Yes 38.3 (37.6, 39.1) N/A 2,380 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
United States N/A Yes 44.0 (43.9, 44.1) N/A 158,490 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Big Stone County Rural Yes 71.8 (39.8, 120.4) 1 (1, 79) 3
*
*
Norman County Rural Yes 64.6 (40.6, 99.5) 2 (1, 77) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.2, 3.9)
Grant County Rural Yes 62.4 (36.4, 101.3) 3 (1, 79) 3 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.6, 4.3)
Morrison County Rural Yes 61.1 (50.1, 74.1) 4 (1, 32) 24 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.5)
Yellow Medicine County Rural Yes 60.2 (39.3, 88.9) 5 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.1, 2.2)
Clearwater County Rural Yes 55.8 (35.1, 85.1) 6 (1, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 4.0)
Pipestone County Rural Yes 54.2 (35.9, 79.9) 7 (1, 78) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.3)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 52.8 (28.7, 90.9) 8 (1, 79) 3
*
*
Lake County Rural Yes 51.5 (34.2, 75.9) 9 (1, 78) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Freeborn County Rural Yes 50.1 (39.3, 63.1) 10 (1, 69) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Marshall County Rural Yes 49.6 (30.8, 76.5) 11 (1, 79) 5
*
*
Renville County Rural Yes 49.3 (34.4, 69.1) 12 (1, 77) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.6)
Mille Lacs County Urban Yes 49.1 (38.0, 62.6) 13 (2, 70) 15 falling falling trend -3.0 (-10.8, -1.1)
Pennington County Rural Yes 49.0 (33.4, 69.8) 14 (1, 78) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.0)
Brown County Rural Yes 49.0 (36.9, 63.9) 15 (2, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Itasca County Rural Yes 48.2 (39.7, 58.3) 16 (3, 65) 26 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Houston County Urban Yes 48.1 (34.8, 65.3) 17 (1, 78) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.8)
Chippewa County Rural Yes 47.4 (31.1, 69.6) 18 (1, 79) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 4.0)
Watonwan County Rural Yes 46.9 (29.7, 70.7) 19 (1, 79) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.8)
Beltrami County Rural Yes 46.6 (37.7, 57.1) 20 (3, 71) 21 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Lyon County Rural Yes 46.4 (34.7, 61.0) 21 (2, 76) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.3)
Le Sueur County Urban Yes 45.8 (35.4, 58.5) 22 (3, 75) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.6)
Otter Tail County Rural Yes 45.7 (38.0, 54.5) 23 (5, 70) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.4, 7.3)
Sibley County Rural Yes 45.5 (31.0, 64.9) 24 (1, 79) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.4)
Stevens County Rural Yes 44.8 (25.0, 73.6) 25 (1, 79) 3
*
*
Kandiyohi County Rural Yes 44.8 (36.0, 55.2) 26 (5, 73) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.7, 10.1)
Redwood County Rural Yes 44.2 (30.5, 62.7) 27 (2, 79) 7 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Faribault County Rural Yes 44.1 (29.9, 63.5) 28 (2, 79) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6)
Crow Wing County Rural Yes 44.1 (37.2, 52.0) 29 (7, 71) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Stearns County Urban Yes 43.7 (39.0, 48.9) 30 (11, 61) 67 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Kanabec County Rural Yes 43.6 (31.0, 60.2) 31 (2, 78) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.4, -0.9)
St. Louis County Urban Yes 43.4 (39.5, 47.7) 32 (13, 58) 102 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Cass County Rural Yes 43.0 (32.7, 55.7) 33 (4, 77) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Wadena County Rural Yes 42.7 (28.8, 61.5) 34 (2, 79) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.5, 2.1)
Aitkin County Rural Yes 42.7 (28.2, 63.0) 35 (2, 79) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.8, 3.5)
Chisago County Urban Yes 42.6 (35.6, 50.6) 36 (8, 73) 29 stable stable trend 0.4 (-10.1, 10.2)
Pope County Rural Yes 42.5 (26.1, 65.9) 37 (1, 79) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.2)
Polk County Urban Yes 42.4 (32.9, 54.1) 38 (5, 76) 15 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Mower County Rural Yes 42.3 (33.8, 52.4) 39 (6, 75) 18 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Rice County Rural Yes 42.3 (35.4, 50.2) 40 (8, 72) 29 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.4, -0.1)
Todd County Rural Yes 42.0 (30.8, 56.1) 41 (4, 79) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.3, -1.1)
Pine County Rural Yes 41.4 (32.7, 52.4) 42 (7, 77) 17 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
Swift County Rural Yes 41.1 (24.9, 64.9) 43 (1, 79) 4 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.1, 0.2)
Waseca County Rural Yes 41.0 (29.1, 56.4) 44 (3, 79) 8 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.4)
Martin County Rural Yes 41.0 (29.1, 56.4) 45 (4, 79) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Becker County Rural Yes 40.5 (31.5, 51.5) 46 (6, 78) 16 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.3)
Ramsey County Urban Yes 40.4 (38.0, 43.0) 47 (27, 60) 219 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Carlton County Urban Yes 40.3 (32.0, 50.3) 48 (9, 77) 17 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.1)
Douglas County Rural Yes 40.2 (32.0, 50.1) 49 (9, 77) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Wabasha County Urban Yes 40.1 (29.0, 54.6) 50 (5, 79) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.1)
Isanti County Urban Yes 39.8 (32.1, 49.1) 51 (10, 77) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Dodge County Urban Yes 39.7 (28.7, 53.7) 52 (6, 79) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.5)
Jackson County Rural Yes 39.7 (23.6, 63.5) 53 (2, 79) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.4)
Rock County Urban Yes 39.4 (23.8, 62.5) 54 (2, 79) 4 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.0, 0.7)
Winona County Rural Yes 39.4 (31.4, 49.0) 55 (10, 78) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.0)
Steele County Rural Yes 39.4 (31.0, 49.5) 56 (9, 78) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.8)
Nobles County Rural Yes 39.1 (28.1, 53.3) 57 (5, 79) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Goodhue County Rural Yes 38.8 (31.3, 47.6) 58 (11, 78) 21 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Wright County Urban Yes 38.5 (34.2, 43.3) 59 (24, 73) 60 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Anoka County Urban Yes 38.1 (35.4, 41.0) 60 (32, 69) 159 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Clay County Urban Yes 37.4 (30.8, 45.2) 61 (16, 78) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Sherburne County Urban Yes 37.4 (32.4, 43.0) 62 (23, 76) 41 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.4)
Olmsted County Urban Yes 36.9 (32.7, 41.5) 63 (29, 75) 60 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.3)
Hubbard County Rural Yes 36.8 (26.6, 50.3) 64 (8, 79) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Meeker County Rural Yes 36.8 (27.1, 49.2) 65 (9, 79) 11 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.1)
Fillmore County Urban Yes 36.6 (25.9, 50.6) 66 (6, 79) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 0.9)
McLeod County Rural Yes 36.2 (28.2, 46.1) 67 (12, 79) 15 falling falling trend -5.4 (-15.1, -2.1)
Benton County Urban Yes 36.2 (28.7, 45.2) 68 (15, 79) 16 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.8)
Blue Earth County Urban Yes 35.9 (29.3, 43.6) 69 (18, 78) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 6.4)
Roseau County Rural Yes 35.5 (24.6, 50.6) 70 (7, 79) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.5, 1.3)
Nicollet County Urban Yes 35.3 (26.7, 46.1) 71 (13, 79) 12 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.8)
Dakota County Urban Yes 34.9 (32.5, 37.4) 72 (47, 75) 169 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
Washington County Urban Yes 34.7 (31.7, 38.0) 73 (43, 76) 107 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Hennepin County Urban Yes 34.3 (32.8, 35.8) 74 (54, 74) 453 falling falling trend -3.0 (-8.2, -2.4)
Carver County Urban Yes 29.5 (25.2, 34.4) 75 (55, 79) 35 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.4)
Cottonwood County Rural Yes 29.2 (16.8, 48.2) 76 (10, 79) 3 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.1, 0.3)
Scott County Urban Yes 28.8 (25.3, 32.8) 77 (63, 79) 49 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.5, -2.7)
Murray County Rural Yes 28.3 (15.5, 50.1) 78 (9, 79) 3 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 1.7)
Koochiching County Rural Yes 26.6 (16.8, 42.5) 79 (25, 79) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.1, -0.6)
Cook County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 6:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top