Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee N/A Yes 55.1 (54.4, 55.9) N/A 4,221 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.7)
United States N/A Yes 44.0 (43.9, 44.1) N/A 158,490 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Hickman County Urban Yes 98.1 (82.0, 116.7) 1 (1, 25) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Campbell County Urban Yes 91.1 (78.8, 105.0) 2 (1, 25) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Meigs County Rural Yes 87.9 (66.8, 114.1) 3 (1, 75) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.3)
Benton County Rural Yes 84.5 (65.1, 108.3) 4 (1, 78) 15 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.3)
Overton County Rural Yes 84.3 (68.5, 103.0) 5 (1, 65) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Morgan County Urban Yes 83.0 (67.2, 102.0) 6 (1, 67) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Haywood County Rural Yes 83.0 (65.2, 104.6) 7 (1, 73) 17 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.2)
Lewis County Rural Yes 80.5 (60.0, 106.5) 8 (1, 84) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Rhea County Rural Yes 80.0 (67.3, 94.7) 9 (1, 59) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Hancock County Rural Yes 79.7 (53.8, 115.7) 10 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.7)
Henderson County Rural Yes 79.5 (65.2, 96.1) 11 (1, 67) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Crockett County Urban Yes 77.9 (58.0, 102.9) 12 (1, 88) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Hardin County Rural Yes 77.8 (63.6, 94.5) 13 (1, 73) 24 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 1.7)
Johnson County Rural Yes 76.5 (59.9, 97.0) 14 (1, 81) 16 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Cocke County Rural Yes 75.4 (64.0, 88.6) 15 (2, 68) 35 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Clay County Rural Yes 75.1 (49.9, 110.3) 16 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.7)
Polk County Urban Yes 74.9 (58.8, 94.8) 17 (1, 86) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.3, 0.5)
Trousdale County Urban Yes 73.8 (53.7, 99.6) 18 (1, 92) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.2)
Grundy County Rural Yes 73.0 (54.7, 96.3) 19 (1, 92) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.0)
Gibson County Urban Yes 72.8 (62.8, 84.1) 20 (4, 66) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Chester County Urban Yes 72.8 (55.5, 94.1) 21 (1, 89) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.5)
Obion County Rural Yes 71.7 (59.2, 86.4) 22 (2, 77) 25 rising rising trend 22.7 (9.1, 33.9)
Coffee County Rural Yes 71.2 (61.9, 81.6) 23 (4, 66) 46 stable stable trend 8.5 (-0.7, 15.6)
Claiborne County Rural Yes 70.8 (58.6, 85.0) 24 (3, 83) 26 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Scott County Rural Yes 70.6 (56.5, 87.7) 25 (2, 89) 18 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.9)
Lauderdale County Rural Yes 70.3 (56.7, 86.4) 26 (2, 87) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.5)
Union County Urban Yes 70.2 (55.4, 88.1) 27 (2, 89) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Van Buren County Rural Yes 70.0 (45.5, 105.6) 28 (1, 93) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 4.6)
Jackson County Rural Yes 69.2 (51.0, 93.1) 29 (1, 93) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Dyer County Rural Yes 69.1 (57.8, 82.1) 30 (5, 81) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Wayne County Rural Yes 68.8 (53.3, 88.3) 31 (1, 92) 14 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Monroe County Rural Yes 68.7 (58.6, 80.3) 32 (5, 76) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Dickson County Urban Yes 68.1 (59.1, 78.3) 33 (7, 76) 44 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Macon County Urban Yes 67.7 (54.3, 83.7) 34 (2, 89) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Hawkins County Urban Yes 67.4 (58.5, 77.3) 35 (9, 74) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.6)
Hamblen County Urban Yes 66.3 (57.9, 75.7) 36 (10, 77) 48 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Lake County Rural Yes 66.1 (43.4, 99.0) 37 (1, 93) 5 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -0.9)
Humphreys County Rural Yes 65.7 (51.3, 83.5) 38 (3, 92) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.7)
Henry County Rural Yes 65.2 (53.9, 78.5) 39 (6, 88) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Sequatchie County Urban Yes 65.2 (48.7, 85.9) 40 (2, 93) 12 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.1)
Marshall County Rural Yes 65.1 (54.0, 78.0) 41 (6, 85) 26 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Sullivan County Urban Yes 64.9 (59.6, 70.7) 42 (20, 68) 121 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Decatur County Rural Yes 64.2 (44.6, 90.3) 43 (1, 93) 8 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.5)
Carroll County Rural Yes 64.1 (51.6, 79.0) 44 (5, 90) 20 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
McMinn County Rural Yes 64.1 (55.0, 74.4) 45 (11, 83) 39 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Marion County Urban Yes 64.1 (52.5, 77.9) 46 (6, 90) 23 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.5)
Houston County Rural Yes 63.9 (43.9, 91.8) 47 (1, 93) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.9)
McNairy County Rural Yes 63.9 (51.4, 78.8) 48 (6, 91) 19 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
Hardeman County Rural Yes 63.7 (51.0, 79.0) 49 (5, 91) 18 falling falling trend -3.2 (-12.9, -1.6)
DeKalb County Rural Yes 63.6 (50.2, 80.1) 50 (4, 92) 16 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.4)
Weakley County Rural Yes 62.9 (51.1, 76.9) 51 (7, 92) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.4, 0.6)
Sevier County Rural Yes 62.1 (55.4, 69.4) 52 (19, 80) 71 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Fentress County Rural Yes 61.2 (47.2, 78.8) 53 (6, 93) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Lawrence County Rural Yes 61.2 (51.4, 72.4) 54 (14, 89) 30 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Warren County Rural Yes 61.1 (51.0, 72.8) 55 (11, 89) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Cumberland County Rural Yes 60.6 (52.1, 70.3) 56 (16, 88) 47 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Greene County Rural Yes 60.5 (53.0, 68.9) 57 (19, 85) 52 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Robertson County Urban Yes 60.5 (53.0, 68.7) 58 (20, 85) 51 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Putnam County Rural Yes 60.3 (52.8, 68.6) 59 (21, 85) 49 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Smith County Urban Yes 60.3 (46.9, 76.8) 60 (6, 93) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
Cheatham County Urban Yes 60.2 (50.7, 71.3) 61 (14, 90) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Unicoi County Urban Yes 59.8 (45.6, 77.8) 62 (7, 93) 13 falling falling trend -15.3 (-25.7, -3.4)
Giles County Rural Yes 59.8 (48.1, 73.6) 63 (9, 93) 21 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.1)
Tipton County Urban Yes 59.5 (51.5, 68.6) 64 (20, 88) 42 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.2)
Roane County Urban Yes 59.1 (50.7, 68.8) 65 (18, 90) 40 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Perry County Rural Yes 58.0 (37.9, 86.2) 66 (1, 94) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.5, -0.1)
Bedford County Rural Yes 57.6 (48.7, 67.7) 67 (19, 92) 31 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 57.6 (46.9, 70.2) 68 (16, 93) 23 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Bradley County Urban Yes 57.5 (51.5, 64.1) 69 (32, 85) 71 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 56.9 (48.8, 66.3) 70 (23, 91) 39 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Stewart County Urban Yes 56.6 (41.6, 76.3) 71 (6, 93) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 0.9)
Franklin County Rural Yes 56.4 (46.9, 67.5) 72 (19, 93) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Carter County Urban Yes 56.2 (48.2, 65.4) 73 (28, 92) 39 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Cannon County Urban Yes 56.1 (40.0, 76.9) 74 (5, 93) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.6, 2.7)
Anderson County Urban Yes 55.7 (48.7, 63.4) 75 (32, 91) 51 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.9)
Shelby County Urban Yes 55.1 (53.0, 57.4) 76 (55, 80) 519 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Loudon County Urban Yes 54.0 (45.6, 63.8) 77 (29, 93) 35 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Washington County Urban Yes 53.8 (48.5, 59.6) 78 (44, 90) 82 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Madison County Urban Yes 53.5 (47.2, 60.5) 79 (40, 92) 57 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
White County Rural Yes 53.0 (42.3, 65.9) 80 (24, 93) 18 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Grainger County Urban Yes 52.1 (40.6, 66.3) 81 (19, 93) 15 falling falling trend -10.6 (-24.1, -2.6)
Sumner County Urban Yes 50.8 (46.5, 55.3) 82 (61, 92) 112 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 50.4 (46.0, 55.1) 83 (61, 92) 100 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.3)
Moore County Rural Yes 49.6 (28.9, 81.3) 84 (2, 94) 3
*
*
Maury County Urban Yes 49.6 (43.9, 55.8) 85 (58, 93) 59 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 49.1 (46.0, 52.4) 86 (69, 92) 198 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Fayette County Urban Yes 47.8 (39.0, 58.3) 87 (42, 93) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.6)
Knox County Urban Yes 47.2 (44.5, 50.0) 88 (76, 93) 241 falling falling trend -3.9 (-9.0, -2.1)
Blount County Urban Yes 46.7 (41.9, 52.0) 89 (69, 93) 77 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.2)
Davidson County Urban Yes 46.0 (43.7, 48.4) 90 (79, 93) 317 falling falling trend -4.7 (-8.2, -2.7)
Wilson County Urban Yes 45.1 (40.6, 49.9) 91 (75, 93) 78 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Rutherford County Urban Yes 44.7 (41.5, 48.0) 92 (80, 93) 154 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Bledsoe County Rural Yes 44.4 (31.9, 61.4) 93 (26, 94) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.5, 1.2)
Williamson County Urban Yes 27.4 (24.6, 30.3) 94 (93, 94) 78 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Pickett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 6:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top