Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A Yes 43.8 (43.4, 44.1) N/A 12,882 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.8, -1.1)
United States N/A Yes 44.0 (43.9, 44.1) N/A 158,490 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Jim Hogg County Rural Yes 108.3 (67.0, 165.8) 1 (1, 181) 4 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.5, 6.5)
Baylor County Rural Yes 108.0 (63.7, 174.1) 2 (1, 194) 4
*
*
Red River County Rural Yes 94.3 (71.1, 123.7) 3 (1, 93) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.3)
Newton County Rural Yes 90.1 (66.0, 120.6) 4 (1, 111) 11 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.7, 2.3)
Anderson County Rural Yes 88.3 (78.2, 99.6) 5 (1, 29) 55 falling falling trend -14.4 (-24.3, -4.3)
Zavala County Rural Yes 86.6 (59.9, 121.2) 6 (1, 181) 7 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.9, 5.3)
Brooks County Rural Yes 85.4 (55.9, 125.4) 7 (1, 183) 5 stable stable trend 2.9 (-1.2, 7.9)
Hamilton County Rural Yes 83.5 (57.6, 118.2) 8 (1, 159) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 3.4)
Dimmit County Rural Yes 81.5 (55.6, 115.7) 9 (1, 178) 6
*
*
Jim Wells County Rural Yes 77.0 (64.6, 91.1) 10 (3, 91) 28 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 7.5)
Robertson County Urban Yes 76.0 (58.2, 97.8) 11 (1, 156) 14 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.3, 16.8)
Kimble County Rural Yes 75.9 (40.7, 131.4) 12 (1, 197) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.4)
Jasper County Rural Yes 75.9 (62.8, 91.2) 13 (2, 101) 27 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 1.9)
San Jacinto County Urban Yes 75.5 (61.7, 91.8) 14 (2, 107) 25 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.5)
Lynn County Urban Yes 74.3 (45.1, 116.1) 15 (1, 196) 4
*
*
Frio County Rural Yes 74.0 (55.0, 97.3) 16 (1, 154) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.2, 3.7)
Leon County Rural Yes 73.7 (55.6, 96.4) 17 (1, 151) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.5)
Terry County Rural Yes 73.7 (52.1, 101.3) 18 (1, 176) 8 rising rising trend 13.1 (1.7, 35.0)
Aransas County Urban Yes 73.7 (59.1, 91.2) 19 (1, 118) 22 falling falling trend -16.5 (-25.2, -7.0)
Palo Pinto County Rural Yes 72.3 (58.7, 88.2) 20 (3, 122) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Callahan County Urban Yes 72.2 (54.2, 95.0) 21 (1, 172) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Henderson County Rural Yes 71.4 (63.6, 80.0) 22 (5, 78) 70 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Duval County Rural Yes 71.0 (47.6, 101.9) 23 (1, 189) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.5)
Haskell County Rural Yes 70.8 (43.6, 111.6) 24 (1, 195) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.4)
Kleberg County Rural Yes 70.4 (55.9, 87.4) 25 (2, 140) 17 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.9, 3.7)
San Augustine County Rural Yes 69.8 (46.9, 102.0) 26 (1, 189) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 1.6)
Jones County Urban Yes 69.6 (54.2, 88.4) 27 (3, 156) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.1)
Mills County Rural Yes 69.4 (38.3, 119.2) 28 (1, 197) 3
*
*
Wilbarger County Rural Yes 69.4 (50.3, 93.8) 29 (2, 180) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.0)
Trinity County Rural Yes 69.3 (51.2, 92.8) 30 (1, 172) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 2.2)
Lamar County Rural Yes 69.0 (59.0, 80.4) 31 (5, 112) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.7)
Cass County Rural Yes 67.4 (54.6, 82.6) 32 (5, 138) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.7)
Franklin County Rural Yes 67.3 (46.8, 94.5) 33 (1, 189) 8 rising rising trend 5.2 (0.4, 24.3)
Freestone County Rural Yes 67.2 (51.9, 86.0) 34 (3, 164) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.3)
Wood County Rural Yes 67.0 (56.8, 78.8) 35 (7, 119) 37 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.9)
Hutchinson County Rural Yes 66.7 (51.7, 85.1) 36 (4, 168) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Hill County Rural Yes 66.3 (55.2, 79.2) 37 (7, 135) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.9)
Polk County Rural Yes 65.9 (56.7, 76.4) 38 (9, 121) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Tyler County Rural Yes 65.9 (50.6, 84.8) 39 (4, 166) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.4)
Upshur County Urban Yes 65.8 (55.4, 77.7) 40 (8, 127) 32 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Coleman County Rural Yes 65.8 (43.9, 96.8) 41 (1, 194) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.8, 3.2)
Liberty County Urban Yes 65.7 (58.5, 73.5) 42 (13, 99) 62 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Panola County Rural Yes 64.4 (50.7, 81.1) 43 (5, 160) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.1)
Runnels County Rural Yes 64.0 (43.9, 90.9) 44 (2, 193) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.4)
Angelina County Rural Yes 63.7 (56.1, 72.0) 45 (16, 113) 55 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.3, 5.9)
Sabine County Rural Yes 63.6 (43.7, 91.4) 46 (2, 193) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.1)
Eastland County Rural Yes 63.1 (47.2, 83.0) 47 (4, 174) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.3)
Camp County Rural Yes 63.1 (44.1, 87.7) 48 (3, 189) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Rains County Rural Yes 62.8 (45.4, 85.8) 49 (2, 188) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Limestone County Rural Yes 62.7 (48.8, 79.7) 50 (5, 172) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Orange County Urban Yes 62.7 (55.4, 70.6) 51 (17, 121) 58 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Childress County Rural Yes 62.5 (37.0, 99.4) 52 (1, 197) 3 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.3, 4.7)
Hunt County Urban Yes 62.4 (55.9, 69.6) 53 (20, 116) 71 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Llano County Rural Yes 62.2 (47.2, 81.3) 54 (4, 177) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Calhoun County Rural Yes 62.1 (47.5, 80.1) 55 (5, 174) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.6)
Brown County Rural Yes 61.9 (51.4, 74.3) 56 (11, 150) 27 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
McCulloch County Rural Yes 61.3 (38.7, 93.7) 57 (1, 197) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.3, 3.1)
Colorado County Rural Yes 61.2 (46.5, 79.4) 58 (6, 182) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Karnes County Rural Yes 61.0 (44.1, 82.6) 59 (4, 189) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.8, 18.0)
Uvalde County Rural Yes 60.8 (46.9, 77.7) 60 (5, 177) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.4)
Wichita County Urban Yes 60.5 (54.3, 67.1) 61 (26, 119) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Madison County Rural Yes 60.5 (42.1, 84.1) 62 (3, 195) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 2.3)
Bowie County Urban Yes 60.3 (53.3, 68.0) 63 (21, 122) 58 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Atascosa County Urban Yes 59.9 (50.5, 70.7) 64 (15, 157) 29 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Castro County Rural Yes 59.8 (34.3, 96.3) 65 (1, 197) 3 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.7, 7.8)
Bosque County Urban Yes 59.7 (44.9, 78.4) 66 (4, 183) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.1)
Swisher County Rural Yes 59.5 (35.8, 93.6) 67 (2, 197) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 3.9)
Ector County Urban Yes 59.3 (53.7, 65.4) 68 (31, 119) 83 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Nolan County Rural Yes 59.3 (43.0, 80.1) 69 (5, 187) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.2)
Bee County Rural Yes 59.2 (47.1, 73.5) 70 (11, 171) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Shelby County Rural Yes 58.8 (46.1, 74.2) 71 (11, 179) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Grayson County Urban Yes 58.8 (53.2, 64.8) 72 (31, 120) 91 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Fannin County Rural Yes 58.7 (48.6, 70.6) 73 (16, 158) 25 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Stephens County Rural Yes 58.2 (38.4, 85.6) 74 (3, 197) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.4)
Potter County Urban Yes 57.8 (51.6, 64.6) 75 (29, 134) 65 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Matagorda County Rural Yes 57.6 (47.0, 70.0) 76 (16, 172) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.2)
Clay County Urban Yes 57.5 (38.2, 84.0) 77 (3, 196) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.2)
San Patricio County Urban Yes 57.3 (49.4, 66.1) 78 (23, 152) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Taylor County Urban Yes 57.2 (51.3, 63.7) 79 (32, 134) 73 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Burleson County Urban Yes 57.1 (42.3, 75.7) 80 (9, 185) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Navarro County Rural Yes 57.1 (48.0, 67.4) 81 (23, 172) 31 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Starr County Rural Yes 57.0 (48.2, 66.9) 82 (21, 155) 30 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.5)
Hardin County Urban Yes 56.9 (48.6, 66.3) 83 (22, 156) 36 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6)
Young County Rural Yes 56.8 (42.1, 75.3) 84 (8, 191) 11 falling falling trend -3.2 (-10.9, -1.4)
Cherokee County Rural Yes 56.6 (47.8, 66.7) 85 (23, 163) 31 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Lampasas County Urban Yes 56.6 (43.9, 72.3) 86 (12, 182) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.7)
Dallam County Rural Yes 56.6 (33.4, 89.7) 87 (2, 197) 3
*
*
Nacogdoches County Rural Yes 56.4 (47.9, 66.1) 88 (24, 157) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.5)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 56.2 (52.2, 60.6) 89 (46, 122) 151 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Gregg County Urban Yes 55.7 (49.7, 62.2) 90 (33, 146) 68 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Van Zandt County Rural Yes 55.7 (47.6, 64.9) 91 (26, 157) 38 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Hockley County Urban Yes 55.6 (41.7, 72.7) 92 (8, 187) 11 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.6)
Comanche County Rural Yes 55.3 (37.8, 78.5) 93 (4, 196) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.5)
Morris County Rural Yes 55.2 (39.1, 76.9) 94 (8, 196) 8 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.7)
Reeves County Rural Yes 55.2 (37.7, 78.0) 95 (6, 197) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.9, 2.9)
Rusk County Urban Yes 55.1 (46.6, 64.8) 96 (24, 172) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Lubbock County Urban Yes 54.4 (50.5, 58.6) 97 (55, 132) 151 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Victoria County Urban Yes 54.2 (47.4, 61.8) 98 (38, 156) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Grimes County Rural Yes 53.8 (43.1, 66.6) 99 (19, 180) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Hopkins County Rural Yes 53.5 (43.6, 65.2) 100 (21, 179) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
McLennan County Urban Yes 53.3 (49.2, 57.7) 101 (57, 138) 133 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Lee County Rural Yes 53.2 (39.5, 70.7) 102 (12, 194) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.7)
Coryell County Urban Yes 53.2 (45.7, 61.5) 103 (37, 165) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Kerr County Rural Yes 53.1 (44.3, 63.4) 104 (30, 173) 31 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Gray County Rural Yes 52.8 (39.7, 69.1) 105 (14, 193) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Titus County Rural Yes 52.8 (41.6, 66.1) 106 (22, 184) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.2, 0.0)
Galveston County Urban Yes 52.4 (49.2, 55.9) 107 (70, 137) 208 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Milam County Rural Yes 52.4 (40.6, 66.9) 108 (16, 191) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.6)
Live Oak County Rural Yes 52.3 (34.3, 77.0) 109 (5, 197) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 2.9)
Lavaca County Rural Yes 52.3 (39.1, 68.9) 110 (12, 193) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.8)
Mitchell County Rural Yes 52.3 (32.1, 80.7) 111 (3, 197) 4
*
*
Howard County Rural Yes 51.6 (41.4, 63.6) 112 (26, 187) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Harrison County Urban Yes 51.5 (44.3, 59.6) 113 (32, 172) 40 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
DeWitt County Rural Yes 51.4 (38.7, 67.3) 114 (17, 195) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.1, 0.7)
Moore County Rural Yes 50.4 (36.8, 67.3) 115 (17, 196) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.0, 2.1)
Falls County Urban Yes 50.2 (36.5, 67.9) 116 (9, 195) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Chambers County Urban Yes 50.2 (41.5, 60.1) 117 (38, 183) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Johnson County Urban Yes 50.0 (45.6, 54.7) 118 (74, 160) 99 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Kaufman County Urban Yes 49.9 (45.0, 55.2) 119 (65, 164) 78 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Carson County Urban Yes 49.8 (27.5, 84.7) 120 (3, 197) 3
*
*
Hood County Rural Yes 49.6 (42.0, 58.3) 121 (43, 179) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 7.7)
Fayette County Rural Yes 49.5 (37.7, 64.2) 122 (26, 193) 14 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.4)
Yoakum County Rural Yes 49.3 (28.8, 79.2) 123 (3, 197) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 3.1)
Nueces County Urban Yes 49.1 (45.8, 52.6) 124 (87, 153) 175 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
San Saba County Rural Yes 49.0 (28.4, 82.0) 125 (5, 197) 3 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.6, 3.7)
Houston County Rural Yes 49.0 (37.6, 63.3) 126 (24, 193) 13 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5)
Wharton County Rural Yes 49.0 (39.8, 59.7) 127 (33, 186) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.3)
Dawson County Rural Yes 48.6 (32.4, 70.3) 128 (12, 197) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.7, 4.2)
Refugio County Rural Yes 48.4 (29.2, 78.0) 129 (4, 197) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.4, 4.1)
Smith County Urban Yes 48.2 (44.2, 52.5) 130 (83, 166) 114 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 8.0)
Wise County Urban Yes 48.1 (41.4, 55.7) 131 (61, 179) 40 falling falling trend -10.5 (-21.5, -1.5)
Webb County Urban Yes 47.7 (43.7, 51.9) 132 (88, 167) 108 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Hale County Rural Yes 47.4 (37.1, 59.9) 133 (36, 193) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Caldwell County Urban Yes 47.4 (39.1, 57.0) 134 (50, 189) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.3)
Bell County Urban Yes 47.4 (44.1, 50.8) 135 (95, 162) 161 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Val Verde County Rural Yes 47.2 (38.2, 57.7) 136 (46, 189) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Waller County Urban Yes 47.0 (38.8, 56.3) 137 (54, 187) 25 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -0.9)
Ward County Rural Yes 46.8 (29.4, 70.7) 138 (7, 197) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.6, 2.1)
Austin County Urban Yes 46.5 (36.4, 58.8) 139 (35, 194) 16 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Tom Green County Urban Yes 46.2 (40.6, 52.4) 140 (75, 181) 52 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Brazoria County Urban Yes 46.2 (43.2, 49.4) 141 (105, 166) 182 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Parmer County Rural Yes 45.9 (28.0, 71.2) 142 (10, 197) 4
*
*
Gaines County Rural Yes 45.7 (32.6, 62.3) 143 (21, 197) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.2)
Gonzales County Rural Yes 45.7 (32.9, 61.9) 144 (19, 197) 9 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.3)
Cooke County Rural Yes 45.6 (36.9, 55.9) 145 (57, 193) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.0)
Bandera County Urban Yes 45.4 (34.6, 59.5) 146 (32, 195) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.4, 0.5)
Bastrop County Urban Yes 45.2 (39.5, 51.5) 147 (87, 184) 49 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4)
Ellis County Urban Yes 45.2 (41.1, 49.5) 148 (100, 178) 95 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
Pecos County Rural Yes 45.1 (30.9, 63.9) 149 (21, 197) 6 stable stable trend 12.2 (-2.2, 46.2)
Cameron County Urban Yes 44.9 (41.8, 48.1) 150 (110, 173) 164 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Burnet County Rural Yes 44.7 (37.1, 53.6) 151 (67, 189) 29 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.4)
Bexar County Urban Yes 44.4 (43.1, 45.8) 152 (128, 163) 854 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.4, 0.7)
Delta County Rural Yes 44.4 (25.6, 75.4) 153 (9, 197) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.6, 2.3)
Montague County Rural Yes 44.1 (32.6, 58.8) 154 (42, 197) 11 falling falling trend -5.5 (-23.0, -2.0)
Winkler County Rural Yes 43.9 (26.4, 69.8) 155 (13, 197) 3 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.4)
Midland County Urban Yes 43.8 (39.1, 48.8) 156 (99, 184) 67 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Washington County Rural Yes 43.7 (34.2, 55.2) 157 (51, 195) 17 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.8)
Dallas County Urban Yes 43.4 (42.3, 44.6) 158 (134, 168) 1,106 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
Parker County Urban Yes 43.1 (38.7, 47.8) 159 (110, 184) 77 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Guadalupe County Urban Yes 43.1 (38.9, 47.6) 160 (110, 183) 79 falling falling trend -2.4 (-9.6, -0.8)
Jack County Rural Yes 43.0 (25.4, 68.8) 161 (11, 197) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 2.1)
Archer County Urban Yes 42.8 (26.2, 67.5) 162 (13, 197) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 2.0)
Medina County Urban Yes 42.7 (35.3, 51.4) 163 (73, 193) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Randall County Urban Yes 42.1 (37.4, 47.3) 164 (111, 185) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
El Paso County Urban Yes 42.1 (40.1, 44.2) 165 (135, 179) 337 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Wilson County Urban Yes 41.9 (34.7, 50.3) 166 (90, 194) 26 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 41.6 (39.5, 43.8) 167 (139, 180) 296 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Harris County Urban Yes 41.3 (40.5, 42.2) 168 (148, 175) 1,907 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Maverick County Urban Yes 41.2 (33.4, 50.3) 169 (82, 196) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.3)
Erath County Rural Yes 40.9 (32.1, 51.4) 170 (77, 196) 16 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Tarrant County Urban Yes 40.7 (39.5, 42.0) 171 (149, 179) 884 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
Jackson County Rural Yes 40.7 (27.6, 58.4) 172 (32, 197) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.8, 0.5)
Walker County Rural Yes 40.7 (34.6, 47.6) 173 (105, 193) 33 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.3)
Goliad County Urban Yes 40.6 (23.3, 68.4) 174 (14, 197) 3 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.9, 4.6)
Marion County Rural Yes 40.6 (25.9, 62.9) 175 (25, 197) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.0, -0.5)
Willacy County Rural Yes 40.6 (28.0, 56.8) 176 (51, 197) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.5, 2.4)
Scurry County Rural Yes 40.0 (27.4, 56.8) 177 (39, 197) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.7)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 39.6 (37.5, 41.9) 178 (146, 184) 272 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Comal County Urban Yes 39.4 (35.4, 43.7) 179 (130, 190) 78 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Brewster County Rural Yes 39.4 (22.8, 64.2) 180 (19, 197) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.5)
Zapata County Rural Yes 39.2 (24.5, 59.5) 181 (31, 197) 4 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.8, 5.2)
Lamb County Rural Yes 38.0 (24.6, 56.8) 182 (37, 197) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.2, 0.0)
Rockwall County Urban Yes 37.7 (33.0, 43.1) 183 (131, 195) 46 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.8)
Deaf Smith County Rural Yes 37.5 (24.9, 54.2) 184 (42, 197) 5 falling falling trend -2.6 (-11.2, -0.6)
Somervell County Rural Yes 37.3 (22.3, 59.8) 185 (32, 197) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.4)
Andrews County Rural Yes 36.6 (24.8, 52.0) 186 (63, 197) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.8)
Ochiltree County Rural Yes 36.0 (20.6, 58.5) 187 (24, 197) 3 stable stable trend -7.3 (-35.4, 0.0)
Kendall County Urban Yes 35.8 (28.6, 44.5) 188 (123, 197) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-12.7, 15.6)
Brazos County Urban Yes 34.8 (30.9, 38.9) 189 (153, 196) 62 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.0, -2.5)
Hays County Urban Yes 34.1 (30.8, 37.6) 190 (169, 196) 80 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Fort Bend County Urban Yes 33.3 (31.6, 35.1) 191 (175, 195) 294 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.0)
Gillespie County Rural Yes 33.0 (23.5, 45.4) 192 (100, 197) 9 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.2)
Williamson County Urban Yes 32.0 (30.1, 34.1) 193 (177, 196) 202 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -2.7)
Denton County Urban Yes 31.8 (30.3, 33.5) 194 (179, 196) 315 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Travis County Urban Yes 31.1 (29.7, 32.5) 195 (182, 196) 397 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.1, -2.4)
Blanco County Rural Yes 29.4 (18.1, 47.1) 196 (92, 197) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 2.0)
Collin County Urban Yes 28.6 (27.3, 30.0) 197 (188, 197) 332 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -1.9)
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:49 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top