Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Montana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Montana N/A Yes 39.3 (37.7, 41.1) N/A 482 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
United States N/A Yes 44.0 (43.9, 44.1) N/A 158,490 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Big Horn County Rural Yes 44.1 (28.9, 64.8) 16 (2, 33) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.6)
Broadwater County Urban Yes 33.2 (18.8, 57.2) 29 (5, 33) 3
*
*
Carbon County Urban Yes 23.5 (13.3, 41.0) 33 (15, 33) 3 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.7, -1.4)
Cascade County Urban Yes 38.9 (33.1, 45.4) 21 (10, 30) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.3)
Custer County Rural Yes 33.7 (21.4, 51.7) 28 (7, 33) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.0, -1.4)
Dawson County Rural Yes 53.3 (33.2, 81.8) 9 (1, 32) 4 rising rising trend 30.8 (5.6, 65.9)
Deer Lodge County Rural Yes 39.2 (24.3, 62.4) 20 (3, 33) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Fergus County Rural Yes 24.3 (14.1, 40.8) 32 (15, 33) 3 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.6, -1.9)
Flathead County Rural Yes 37.7 (32.8, 43.3) 23 (12, 29) 47 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Gallatin County Urban Yes 28.4 (24.0, 33.4) 31 (23, 33) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Glacier County Rural Yes 56.4 (40.1, 77.5) 7 (1, 26) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.7, 17.5)
Hill County Rural Yes 49.7 (34.6, 69.3) 12 (1, 31) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 49.3 (34.2, 70.0) 13 (1, 31) 8 rising rising trend 18.6 (7.1, 48.2)
Lake County Rural Yes 42.2 (32.6, 54.0) 17 (6, 31) 15 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 1.9)
Lewis and Clark County Urban Yes 38.1 (32.0, 45.2) 22 (10, 30) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Lincoln County Rural Yes 50.3 (37.4, 66.9) 11 (2, 27) 13 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.8)
Madison County Rural Yes 42.0 (24.3, 69.4) 18 (2, 33) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.2)
Mineral County Urban Yes 59.9 (32.7, 104.5) 4 (1, 33) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.6, 3.0)
Missoula County Urban Yes 34.3 (29.6, 39.5) 26 (16, 31) 40 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Musselshell County Rural Yes 57.3 (30.8, 100.4) 5 (1, 33) 3 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -1.1)
Park County Rural Yes 33.9 (23.2, 48.7) 27 (9, 33) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-10.4, 6.5)
Pondera County Rural Yes 63.7 (36.3, 104.2) 3 (1, 32) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.7)
Powell County Rural Yes 47.1 (29.2, 75.2) 14 (1, 33) 4 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.4, -0.1)
Ravalli County Rural Yes 34.9 (27.7, 43.6) 25 (12, 32) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.8)
Richland County Rural Yes 40.1 (25.5, 60.7) 19 (3, 33) 5 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.5, 1.1)
Roosevelt County Rural Yes 67.1 (46.0, 94.9) 1 (1, 22) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.8)
Rosebud County Rural Yes 52.0 (30.1, 83.5) 10 (1, 33) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.0, 2.3)
Sanders County Rural Yes 65.6 (46.8, 90.8) 2 (1, 20) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 2.0)
Silver Bow County Rural Yes 36.7 (28.5, 46.8) 24 (10, 32) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-10.9, 10.2)
Stillwater County Urban Yes 32.3 (18.3, 54.7) 30 (6, 33) 3 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 4.7)
Toole County Rural Yes 56.8 (33.0, 93.7) 6 (1, 32) 3
*
*
Valley County Rural Yes 55.1 (33.8, 86.3) 8 (1, 32) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.2, 3.1)
Yellowstone County Urban Yes 44.9 (40.4, 49.7) 15 (7, 22) 80 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Beaverhead County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carter County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chouteau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daniels County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fallon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garfield County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Golden Valley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Granite County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Judith Basin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Liberty County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meagher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Petroleum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Phillips County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Powder River County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Prairie County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sheridan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sweet Grass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Teton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treasure County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheatland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wibaux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 4:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top