Death Rates Table
Death Rate Report for Illinois by County
All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65
Sorted by Recentaapc
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illinois | N/A | Yes | 43.9 (43.4, 44.4) | N/A | 6,111 |
falling 
|
-2.1 (-2.2, -2.0) |
| United States | N/A | Yes | 44.0 (43.9, 44.1) | N/A | 158,490 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.8, -1.3) |
| Cass County | Rural | Yes | 51.7 (35.2, 73.8) | 57 (1, 99) | 6 |
falling
|
-24.1 (-48.4, -1.7) |
| Henderson County | Rural | Yes | 36.0 (19.3, 64.9) | 96 (4, 99) | 3 |
falling
|
-15.0 (-42.8, -2.8) |
| Winnebago County | Urban | Yes | 49.7 (46.1, 53.5) | 67 (35, 79) | 156 |
falling
|
-8.2 (-16.0, -0.9) |
| Logan County | Rural | Yes | 47.6 (37.0, 60.6) | 73 (12, 98) | 15 |
falling
|
-6.4 (-13.2, -3.6) |
| Alexander County | Urban | Yes | 58.7 (31.6, 101.8) | 26 (1, 99) | 3 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-5.9, -0.4) |
| Monroe County | Urban | Yes | 38.0 (29.8, 48.2) | 93 (47, 99) | 16 |
falling
|
-2.8 (-5.2, -0.6) |
| Kendall County | Urban | Yes | 33.7 (29.4, 38.4) | 98 (81, 99) | 45 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-4.0, -1.3) |
| Wabash County | Rural | Yes | 52.5 (34.3, 77.6) | 54 (1, 99) | 6 |
falling
|
-2.7 (-5.3, -0.6) |
| Cook County | Urban | Yes | 41.7 (40.9, 42.5) | 84 (72, 89) | 2,299 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-2.8, -2.4) |
| Champaign County | Urban | Yes | 43.2 (38.8, 47.9) | 82 (53, 94) | 75 |
falling
|
-2.5 (-3.5, -1.7) |
| DuPage County | Urban | Yes | 32.6 (31.0, 34.2) | 99 (90, 99) | 339 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-2.7, -2.2) |
| Hancock County | Rural | Yes | 40.8 (29.2, 56.4) | 86 (18, 99) | 9 |
falling
|
-2.4 (-4.4, -0.7) |
| Clinton County | Urban | Yes | 37.4 (29.2, 47.4) | 94 (51, 99) | 15 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-4.5, -0.2) |
| Jasper County | Rural | Yes | 57.5 (39.2, 82.9) | 32 (1, 98) | 7 |
stable 
|
-2.3 (-5.5, 0.7) |
| Lake County | Urban | Yes | 34.4 (32.6, 36.4) | 97 (87, 99) | 274 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.8, -1.8) |
| Shelby County | Rural | Yes | 46.3 (34.9, 60.9) | 77 (10, 99) | 12 |
stable
|
-2.3 (-5.1, 0.3) |
| St. Clair County | Urban | Yes | 51.2 (47.4, 55.3) | 62 (29, 75) | 147 |
falling
|
-2.3 (-2.9, -1.7) |
| Coles County | Rural | Yes | 47.2 (38.5, 57.4) | 75 (18, 97) | 23 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-4.5, -0.1) |
| Mason County | Rural | Yes | 59.7 (43.6, 81.1) | 22 (1, 96) | 10 |
stable
|
-2.2 (-22.3, 5.0) |
| Menard County | Urban | Yes | 39.6 (25.7, 59.1) | 90 (11, 99) | 6 |
stable
|
-2.2 (-5.9, 1.0) |
| Saline County | Rural | Yes | 49.5 (38.4, 63.4) | 68 (9, 98) | 14 |
falling
|
-2.2 (-3.9, -0.8) |
| Christian County | Rural | Yes | 55.3 (45.0, 67.6) | 43 (6, 88) | 22 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.6, -0.6) |
| Montgomery County | Rural | Yes | 52.4 (41.4, 65.6) | 56 (7, 95) | 17 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.4, -0.8) |
| Pulaski County | Rural | Yes | 57.0 (32.8, 95.1) | 34 (1, 99) | 3 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-6.1, 1.3) |
| Wayne County | Rural | Yes | 48.5 (34.7, 66.5) | 71 (5, 99) | 9 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-4.3, 0.0) |
| Whiteside County | Rural | Yes | 50.3 (42.8, 59.1) | 64 (16, 90) | 35 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-3.3, -1.0) |
| Will County | Urban | Yes | 40.2 (38.2, 42.3) | 87 (73, 94) | 317 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.6, -1.5) |
| Jo Daviess County | Rural | Yes | 41.5 (29.7, 57.0) | 85 (16, 99) | 10 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-4.1, -0.1) |
| McLean County | Urban | Yes | 43.8 (39.3, 48.7) | 80 (49, 93) | 74 |
falling
|
-2.0 (-2.8, -1.3) |
| Effingham County | Rural | Yes | 47.4 (37.7, 58.9) | 74 (16, 97) | 19 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.6, -0.4) |
| Lee County | Rural | Yes | 52.7 (42.6, 64.9) | 52 (8, 93) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-3.2, -0.8) |
| Bureau County | Rural | Yes | 50.1 (40.4, 61.7) | 65 (11, 96) | 21 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.0, -0.7) |
| Lawrence County | Rural | Yes | 59.0 (43.5, 79.0) | 24 (1, 96) | 10 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-3.7, 0.1) |
| Piatt County | Urban | Yes | 38.7 (26.5, 55.1) | 92 (18, 99) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.8 (-3.8, 0.2) |
| Williamson County | Rural | Yes | 51.3 (44.2, 59.4) | 61 (16, 88) | 40 |
falling
|
-1.8 (-3.1, -0.6) |
| Edwards County | Rural | Yes | 67.7 (41.6, 105.8) | 6 (1, 99) | 4 |
stable
|
-1.7 (-5.2, 1.3) |
| Boone County | Urban | Yes | 39.7 (32.8, 47.9) | 89 (48, 99) | 24 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-3.0, -0.1) |
| Crawford County | Rural | Yes | 49.4 (36.9, 65.5) | 69 (4, 99) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-4.2, 0.8) |
| De Witt County | Rural | Yes | 63.3 (47.8, 82.8) | 11 (1, 90) | 12 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-4.2, 0.8) |
| Franklin County | Rural | Yes | 72.5 (60.9, 85.9) | 4 (1, 47) | 30 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.9, -0.2) |
| Jersey County | Urban | Yes | 46.6 (35.3, 60.9) | 76 (13, 99) | 13 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-4.4, 1.3) |
| Madison County | Urban | Yes | 52.8 (49.0, 56.8) | 51 (23, 72) | 159 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.2, -0.9) |
| Union County | Rural | Yes | 58.5 (43.4, 77.7) | 27 (1, 95) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.5 (-3.8, 0.6) |
| Bond County | Urban | Yes | 51.1 (36.7, 69.7) | 63 (3, 99) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-4.4, 1.3) |
| Clark County | Rural | Yes | 47.9 (33.9, 66.4) | 72 (5, 99) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-3.4, 0.5) |
| Cumberland County | Rural | Yes | 53.8 (35.8, 78.5) | 48 (1, 99) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-5.1, 1.9) |
| Sangamon County | Urban | Yes | 51.5 (47.2, 56.1) | 59 (25, 76) | 116 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.2, -0.7) |
| Adams County | Rural | Yes | 55.6 (47.8, 64.5) | 40 (8, 78) | 40 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.0, 0.4) |
| Douglas County | Rural | Yes | 55.3 (41.1, 73.0) | 44 (2, 97) | 11 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.3, 0.6) |
| Johnson County | Rural | Yes | 43.2 (29.7, 61.7) | 81 (8, 99) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.3, 0.8) |
| Scott County | Rural | Yes | 56.2 (31.0, 96.8) | 37 (1, 99) | 3 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-4.4, 1.6) |
| White County | Rural | Yes | 60.0 (42.8, 82.5) | 20 (1, 98) | 9 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-3.7, 0.8) |
| DeKalb County | Urban | Yes | 49.9 (43.4, 57.0) | 66 (19, 88) | 46 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.4, 0.0) |
| Grundy County | Urban | Yes | 44.1 (36.8, 52.7) | 79 (31, 98) | 26 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.4, 0.1) |
| Kane County | Urban | Yes | 38.7 (36.4, 41.2) | 91 (76, 96) | 218 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.0, 2.5) |
| Morgan County | Rural | Yes | 60.4 (49.1, 73.7) | 18 (2, 78) | 22 |
stable
|
-1.2 (-2.7, 0.3) |
| Tazewell County | Urban | Yes | 51.6 (46.3, 57.4) | 58 (21, 79) | 75 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-2.0, -0.5) |
| Ford County | Urban | Yes | 36.4 (24.3, 53.2) | 95 (25, 99) | 6 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-3.4, 1.1) |
| Jackson County | Rural | Yes | 55.8 (46.3, 66.9) | 38 (6, 86) | 26 |
stable
|
-1.1 (-2.9, 0.5) |
| Macon County | Urban | Yes | 57.7 (51.3, 64.8) | 30 (9, 70) | 65 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.1, -0.2) |
| Greene County | Rural | Yes | 55.5 (39.5, 77.0) | 42 (1, 99) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.9, 0.8) |
| Kankakee County | Urban | Yes | 56.9 (50.7, 63.7) | 35 (10, 70) | 67 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-2.0, -0.1) |
| La Salle County | Rural | Yes | 57.7 (51.6, 64.3) | 31 (9, 66) | 76 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.4) |
| Marshall County | Urban | Yes | 53.6 (36.0, 77.5) | 49 (1, 99) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.3, 1.3) |
| Rock Island County | Urban | Yes | 48.8 (43.8, 54.2) | 70 (31, 86) | 78 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
| Stephenson County | Rural | Yes | 54.5 (44.6, 66.0) | 45 (6, 89) | 25 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-2.8, 0.6) |
| Warren County | Rural | Yes | 52.7 (37.0, 72.9) | 53 (2, 99) | 8 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.7, 1.4) |
| Hamilton County | Rural | Yes | 60.5 (39.4, 90.4) | 17 (1, 99) | 5 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-3.8, 2.0) |
| Perry County | Rural | Yes | 66.2 (51.3, 84.5) | 7 (1, 83) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-2.9, 0.9) |
| Clay County | Rural | Yes | 59.4 (42.1, 81.9) | 23 (1, 97) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.7, 1.9) |
| Fayette County | Rural | Yes | 43.0 (31.8, 57.3) | 83 (16, 99) | 10 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.3, 1.6) |
| Henry County | Urban | Yes | 53.5 (44.9, 63.5) | 50 (9, 89) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.1, 0.5) |
| Macoupin County | Urban | Yes | 54.5 (45.3, 65.1) | 46 (7, 86) | 28 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.1, 0.5) |
| Massac County | Urban | Yes | 72.3 (53.5, 96.2) | 5 (1, 85) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.9, 1.3) |
| Peoria County | Urban | Yes | 59.0 (54.0, 64.4) | 25 (10, 58) | 109 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Knox County | Rural | Yes | 56.3 (47.2, 66.8) | 36 (6, 81) | 30 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-1.9, 0.4) |
| Livingston County | Rural | Yes | 51.3 (41.5, 63.0) | 60 (8, 94) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-2.8, 1.2) |
| Washington County | Rural | Yes | 52.5 (36.5, 73.8) | 55 (2, 99) | 8 |
stable
|
-0.7 (-3.7, 2.1) |
| Fulton County | Rural | Yes | 62.5 (51.4, 75.6) | 13 (2, 76) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.2, 1.0) |
| Gallatin County | Rural | Yes | 61.0 (33.9, 104.5) | 16 (1, 99) | 3 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-4.0, 2.4) |
| Pike County | Rural | Yes | 58.0 (42.1, 78.6) | 29 (1, 96) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-3.1, 1.8) |
| Randolph County | Rural | Yes | 58.2 (47.2, 71.5) | 28 (3, 86) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-2.1, 0.9) |
| Richland County | Rural | Yes | 53.9 (38.7, 73.5) | 47 (2, 99) | 9 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.5, 1.4) |
| Ogle County | Rural | Yes | 55.6 (47.0, 65.4) | 41 (9, 85) | 33 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.1, 1.2) |
| Schuyler County | Rural | Yes | 62.7 (40.0, 95.8) | 12 (1, 99) | 5 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-3.7, 2.9) |
| Vermilion County | Rural | Yes | 76.5 (67.8, 86.1) | 2 (1, 21) | 63 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.4) |
| Iroquois County | Rural | Yes | 64.9 (52.2, 80.1) | 9 (1, 75) | 21 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.6, 1.2) |
| McDonough County | Rural | Yes | 55.7 (42.6, 71.7) | 39 (3, 94) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-1.5, 1.1) |
| Mercer County | Urban | Yes | 60.3 (45.0, 79.9) | 19 (1, 92) | 11 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.7, 2.4) |
| Jefferson County | Rural | Yes | 61.8 (51.0, 74.4) | 15 (2, 76) | 25 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.4, 1.2) |
| Woodford County | Urban | Yes | 45.7 (36.6, 56.4) | 78 (20, 98) | 19 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.0, 2.1) |
| Marion County | Rural | Yes | 75.3 (63.6, 88.7) | 3 (1, 33) | 33 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.0, 1.4) |
| Moultrie County | Rural | Yes | 57.4 (40.7, 78.9) | 33 (1, 99) | 8 |
stable
|
2.2 (-1.5, 18.2) |
| Hardin County | Rural | Yes | 92.1 (51.6, 155.6) | 1 (1, 99) | 3 |
stable
|
2.5 (-2.0, 7.1) |
| McHenry County | Urban | Yes | 39.8 (36.8, 42.9) | 88 (72, 96) | 149 |
stable
|
2.8 (-2.3, 7.1) |
| Edgar County | Rural | Yes | 65.5 (49.3, 86.0) | 8 (1, 90) | 12 |
stable
|
7.3 (-0.4, 23.7) |
| Carroll County | Rural | Yes | 62.4 (46.6, 82.5) | 14 (1, 92) | 11 |
rising 
|
7.7 (0.9, 24.5) |
| Pope County | Rural | Yes | 60.0 (30.3, 115.4) | 21 (1, 99) | 3 |
|
|
| Putnam County | Rural | Yes | 63.9 (39.3, 101.5) | 10 (1, 99) | 4 |
|
|
| Brown County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Calhoun County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stark County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 11:44 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).
The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.
Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.