Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New Jersey by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <65

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Jersey N/A Yes 36.3 (35.8, 36.8) N/A 3,850 falling falling trend -2.8 (-2.9, -2.7)
United States N/A Yes 44.0 (43.9, 44.1) N/A 158,490 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Essex County Urban Yes 35.6 (33.9, 37.4) 13 (11, 15) 323 falling falling trend -3.4 (-3.8, -3.0)
Hudson County Urban Yes 32.0 (30.1, 34.0) 16 (14, 20) 222 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.9, -2.9)
Morris County Urban Yes 28.3 (26.4, 30.3) 20 (18, 21) 177 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.7, -2.8)
Union County Urban Yes 33.3 (31.2, 35.4) 15 (13, 18) 211 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.7, -2.7)
Middlesex County Urban Yes 31.9 (30.3, 33.6) 17 (15, 19) 310 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.4, -2.6)
Bergen County Urban Yes 30.3 (28.8, 31.8) 19 (16, 21) 341 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.2, -2.5)
Camden County Urban Yes 43.7 (41.2, 46.2) 7 (3, 10) 256 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Passaic County Urban Yes 37.5 (35.2, 40.0) 11 (9, 14) 207 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.2)
Ocean County Urban Yes 43.8 (41.5, 46.3) 6 (3, 10) 304 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.0, -2.2)
Hunterdon County Urban Yes 27.9 (24.2, 32.1) 21 (15, 21) 48 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.6)
Gloucester County Urban Yes 44.4 (41.3, 47.8) 5 (3, 10) 160 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.0)
Somerset County Urban Yes 30.3 (27.9, 32.8) 18 (15, 21) 129 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Sussex County Urban Yes 40.2 (35.9, 44.8) 10 (4, 14) 77 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.5)
Warren County Urban Yes 41.7 (36.7, 47.2) 8 (3, 14) 59 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.5)
Mercer County Urban Yes 37.3 (34.7, 40.1) 12 (9, 15) 158 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.2, 0.1)
Burlington County Urban Yes 41.4 (38.9, 44.0) 9 (5, 11) 232 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.5)
Cape May County Urban Yes 46.1 (40.2, 52.7) 4 (1, 11) 56 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Cumberland County Urban Yes 52.8 (47.7, 58.2) 2 (1, 4) 85 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Salem County Urban Yes 54.5 (47.1, 62.9) 1 (1, 5) 42 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Monmouth County Urban Yes 35.4 (33.5, 37.5) 14 (11, 16) 286 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 2.1)
Atlantic County Urban Yes 48.4 (44.9, 52.2) 3 (1, 7) 159 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 5.8)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 9:02 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top