Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Fayette County Rural Yes 37.5 (24.2, 55.5) 1 (1, 28) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.8, 4.4)
Owen County Urban Yes 35.3 (21.8, 54.1) 2 (1, 35) 4
*
*
Fulton County Rural Yes 27.3 (15.6, 44.3) 3 (1, 51) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.9, 3.3)
Harrison County Urban Yes 26.8 (18.3, 37.9) 4 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.6, 5.2)
Henry County Rural Yes 26.3 (18.7, 36.0) 5 (1, 39) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.4, 2.7)
Washington County Urban Yes 25.6 (15.8, 39.1) 6 (1, 51) 4 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.7, 21.3)
Franklin County Urban Yes 24.9 (14.2, 40.5) 7 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Montgomery County Rural Yes 24.5 (15.9, 35.8) 8 (1, 49) 5
*
*
Greene County Rural Yes 23.6 (14.6, 36.2) 9 (1, 52) 4
*
*
Grant County Rural Yes 22.2 (15.8, 30.2) 10 (2, 47) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 0.8)
Scott County Rural Yes 21.5 (12.2, 34.9) 11 (1, 52) 3
*
*
Lawrence County Rural Yes 21.2 (14.2, 30.5) 12 (2, 50) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.5)
Marshall County Rural Yes 21.2 (14.1, 30.6) 13 (2, 50) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 4.4)
Howard County Urban Yes 21.0 (15.5, 27.8) 14 (3, 46) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.2)
Madison County Urban Yes 20.8 (16.5, 25.8) 15 (4, 41) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.9, 1.9)
Jefferson County Rural Yes 20.7 (12.6, 32.1) 16 (2, 52) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 3.9)
Noble County Rural Yes 20.4 (13.6, 29.3) 17 (2, 51) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Dearborn County Urban Yes 19.7 (13.1, 28.2) 18 (3, 51) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 1.9)
Jennings County Rural Yes 19.6 (11.2, 31.9) 19 (2, 52) 3
*
*
Delaware County Urban Yes 19.5 (14.7, 25.3) 20 (4, 48) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.3)
Vigo County Urban Yes 19.4 (14.6, 25.2) 21 (4, 48) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 1.8)
Ripley County Rural Yes 18.7 (10.7, 30.3) 22 (2, 52) 3
*
*
DeKalb County Rural Yes 18.3 (11.6, 27.3) 23 (3, 52) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.2, 0.4)
Wayne County Rural Yes 17.9 (12.4, 25.0) 24 (4, 52) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.5)
Vanderburgh County Urban Yes 17.7 (14.3, 21.8) 25 (8, 47) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 0.9)
Marion County Urban Yes 17.6 (16.1, 19.2) 26 (15, 37) 103 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
Kosciusko County Rural Yes 16.7 (11.8, 23.0) 27 (6, 52) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.1)
Floyd County Urban Yes 16.7 (12.0, 22.7) 28 (7, 51) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.9, 1.6)
Miami County Rural Yes 16.7 (10.0, 26.2) 29 (3, 52) 3
*
*
Allen County Urban Yes 16.4 (14.2, 18.9) 30 (15, 46) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Huntington County Rural Yes 16.1 (9.4, 25.8) 31 (3, 52) 3 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.6, -0.1)
Knox County Rural Yes 16.1 (9.1, 26.0) 32 (3, 52) 3 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.3)
St. Joseph County Urban Yes 16.0 (13.3, 19.0) 33 (14, 49) 25 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.5)
Clark County Urban Yes 15.5 (11.8, 20.0) 34 (12, 52) 12 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.5)
Monroe County Urban Yes 15.4 (11.6, 20.0) 35 (11, 52) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.6, -0.1)
Dubois County Rural Yes 15.3 (9.2, 23.8) 36 (5, 52) 3
*
*
Lake County Urban Yes 15.3 (13.4, 17.4) 37 (20, 48) 46 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Cass County Rural Yes 15.3 (8.9, 24.4) 38 (5, 52) 3 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.6, 2.4)
LaPorte County Urban Yes 15.2 (11.3, 20.0) 39 (12, 52) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.2)
Hancock County Urban Yes 15.1 (10.8, 20.7) 40 (10, 52) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.2)
Porter County Urban Yes 15.1 (12.0, 18.7) 41 (16, 52) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Warrick County Urban Yes 14.7 (9.9, 21.2) 42 (9, 52) 5 stable stable trend 20.6 (-2.7, 41.5)
Elkhart County Urban Yes 14.7 (11.8, 18.0) 43 (17, 51) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Johnson County Urban Yes 14.7 (11.6, 18.3) 44 (17, 52) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.3)
Shelby County Urban Yes 14.1 (8.5, 22.0) 45 (8, 52) 3 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 0.3)
Tippecanoe County Urban Yes 13.7 (10.6, 17.4) 46 (19, 52) 13 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.5)
Morgan County Urban Yes 13.3 (8.9, 19.1) 47 (13, 52) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.8, 1.8)
Bartholomew County Urban Yes 13.0 (9.0, 18.2) 48 (15, 52) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.7, 1.3)
Boone County Urban Yes 12.4 (8.4, 17.7) 49 (17, 52) 6 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.7, -1.6)
Jackson County Rural Yes 12.2 (7.1, 19.4) 50 (13, 52) 3
*
*
Hendricks County Urban Yes 11.7 (9.2, 14.8) 51 (30, 52) 14 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.6)
Hamilton County Urban Yes 11.3 (9.5, 13.4) 52 (39, 52) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fountain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gibson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
LaGrange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Posey County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steuben County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabash County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wells County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Whitley County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 4:01 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top