Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New Mexico by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Mexico N/A Yes 14.0 (13.1, 15.0) N/A 171 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
United States N/A Yes 14.3 (14.3, 14.4) N/A 29,028 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.3)
Valencia County Urban Yes 11.9 (7.8, 17.3) 11 (3, 13) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -1.1)
Chaves County Rural Yes 12.8 (8.2, 18.9) 10 (2, 13) 4 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.0, -0.5)
Eddy County Rural Yes 18.2 (12.5, 25.5) 2 (1, 12) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.2, -0.2)
Sandoval County Urban Yes 11.8 (8.8, 15.4) 12 (5, 13) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.0)
Santa Fe County Urban Yes 11.4 (8.4, 15.2) 13 (5, 13) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.1)
Dona Ana County Urban Yes 15.3 (12.3, 18.9) 5 (1, 12) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Bernalillo County Urban Yes 13.7 (12.2, 15.4) 8 (4, 12) 56 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
McKinley County Rural Yes 19.1 (13.6, 26.1) 1 (1, 10) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 1.7)
San Juan County Urban Yes 14.5 (10.9, 19.0) 6 (1, 13) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.8, 1.6)
Lea County Rural Yes 17.4 (12.3, 23.8) 4 (1, 12) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.7)
Curry County Rural Yes 17.8 (11.2, 26.5) 3 (1, 13) 4
*
*
Otero County Rural Yes 13.4 (8.6, 19.7) 9 (1, 13) 5
*
*
Rio Arriba County Rural Yes 14.4 (8.2, 23.3) 7 (1, 13) 3
*
*
Catron County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cibola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colfax County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
De Baca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guadalupe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hidalgo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Los Alamos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Luna County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mora County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roosevelt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Miguel County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sierra County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Socorro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Torrance County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 6:15 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top