Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for South Dakota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Todd County Rural No 919.1 (697.3, 1,187.0) 1 (1, 21) 13 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.6)
Hanson County Rural No 855.7 (521.0, 1,304.8) 2 (1, 61) 5 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.8, 8.2)
Dewey County Rural No 853.8 (615.7, 1,152.3) 3 (1, 35) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 1.9)
Mellette County Rural No 824.7 (521.9, 1,242.9) 4 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.4, 3.7)
Hyde County Rural No 815.2 (517.3, 1,226.0) 5 (1, 57) 5
*
*
Oglala Lakota County Rural No 743.6 (586.9, 930.1) 6 (1, 33) 18
*
*
Jackson County Rural No 726.1 (489.2, 1,036.9) 7 (1, 58) 6 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 4.1)
McCook County Urban No 716.0 (560.3, 901.3) 8 (1, 38) 15 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.2, 3.1)
Jones County Rural No 671.7 (379.9, 1,104.7) 9 (1, 62) 3
*
*
Jerauld County Rural No 665.5 (430.9, 981.8) 10 (1, 62) 6
*
*
Faulk County Rural No 663.4 (463.4, 925.0) 11 (1, 59) 7 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.4, 4.6)
Lyman County Rural No 661.3 (473.4, 898.4) 12 (1, 58) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.9)
Hamlin County Rural No 654.0 (499.0, 841.6) 13 (2, 52) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.4)
Fall River County Rural No 651.4 (543.7, 774.7) 14 (3, 36) 27 stable stable trend 9.3 (-1.4, 17.5)
Corson County Rural No 620.4 (410.2, 898.7) 15 (1, 62) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.7, 3.1)
Minnehaha County Urban No 615.4 (585.3, 646.6) 16 (8, 24) 340 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.0)
Hutchinson County Rural No 612.7 (497.9, 746.2) 17 (4, 47) 21 stable stable trend 5.4 (-8.0, 25.1)
Haakon County Rural No 609.2 (396.9, 896.9) 18 (1, 62) 5 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.5, 0.5)
Butte County Rural No 601.6 (498.5, 719.8) 19 (5, 44) 25 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.4)
Hughes County Rural No 585.8 (504.6, 676.3) 20 (7, 41) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Grant County Rural No 578.1 (473.4, 699.4) 21 (5, 51) 22 stable stable trend 9.8 (-1.2, 22.9)
Aurora County Rural No 556.1 (381.7, 783.7) 22 (3, 62) 7 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 3.9)
Hand County Rural No 551.1 (393.8, 750.3) 23 (4, 61) 9 rising rising trend 27.7 (3.7, 50.6)
Beadle County Rural No 530.1 (456.7, 612.0) 24 (11, 51) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Turner County Urban No 529.1 (429.8, 645.0) 25 (8, 58) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.6)
Miner County Rural No 520.0 (329.2, 777.2) 26 (3, 62) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.0)
Union County Urban No 514.0 (437.6, 600.0) 27 (12, 54) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7)
Pennington County Urban No 513.6 (482.6, 546.1) 28 (19, 43) 218 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Clay County Rural No 509.9 (414.8, 620.7) 29 (10, 59) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Meade County Urban No 509.6 (448.0, 577.4) 30 (15, 52) 52 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Kingsbury County Rural No 505.1 (383.9, 652.8) 31 (7, 62) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 0.5)
Stanley County Rural No 504.3 (347.9, 708.9) 32 (4, 62) 6
*
*
Bennett County Rural No 502.0 (324.7, 741.2) 33 (4, 62) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.5)
Perkins County Rural No 500.5 (351.9, 692.5) 34 (5, 62) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.8, 2.2)
Codington County Rural No 490.7 (434.7, 552.0) 35 (19, 54) 57 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Marshall County Rural No 479.9 (350.7, 641.6) 36 (7, 62) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.4)
Custer County Urban No 477.1 (391.9, 575.4) 37 (14, 61) 24 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Sanborn County Rural No 473.9 (295.1, 722.6) 38 (4, 62) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.8)
Roberts County Rural No 472.6 (383.5, 576.4) 39 (14, 61) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Brookings County Rural No 467.8 (407.8, 534.1) 40 (20, 57) 45 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Walworth County Rural No 457.7 (349.3, 590.9) 41 (12, 62) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.3)
Clark County Rural No 457.7 (320.1, 634.2) 42 (7, 62) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.7)
Bon Homme County Rural No 455.9 (355.0, 576.7) 43 (13, 62) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 1.1)
Gregory County Rural No 454.8 (332.6, 608.7) 44 (11, 62) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.4)
Day County Rural No 450.4 (348.3, 574.5) 45 (13, 62) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Brown County Rural No 449.1 (400.9, 501.6) 46 (25, 58) 65 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Moody County Rural No 445.8 (338.1, 577.1) 47 (12, 62) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.4)
Potter County Rural No 440.1 (299.2, 628.2) 48 (9, 62) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.4)
Lawrence County Rural No 439.5 (386.5, 497.9) 49 (26, 60) 52 falling falling trend -2.2 (-7.0, -1.4)
Deuel County Rural No 435.5 (313.6, 590.0) 50 (11, 62) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.8)
Lake County Rural No 429.6 (343.9, 530.0) 51 (19, 62) 19 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
Edmunds County Rural No 426.7 (306.7, 578.9) 52 (13, 62) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.3)
Yankton County Rural No 423.8 (368.4, 485.2) 53 (29, 61) 43 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Tripp County Rural No 418.3 (317.7, 541.5) 54 (17, 62) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.7, -1.2)
McPherson County Rural No 411.3 (267.9, 605.8) 55 (10, 62) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 0.8)
Davison County Rural No 404.1 (344.8, 470.7) 56 (31, 62) 34 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Charles Mix County Rural No 389.5 (301.9, 494.7) 57 (23, 62) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Spink County Rural No 385.0 (293.4, 496.7) 58 (24, 62) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.6, 0.5)
Douglas County Rural No 384.7 (254.1, 561.5) 59 (13, 62) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.1)
Lincoln County Urban No 384.2 (346.0, 425.5) 60 (42, 62) 77 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.0, -1.7)
Brule County Rural No 377.6 (273.9, 508.1) 61 (21, 62) 9 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -1.0)
Campbell County Rural No 371.5 (215.8, 606.7) 62 (10, 62) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.4, 4.0)
Buffalo County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harding County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sully County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ziebach County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 5:03 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top