Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A No 531.1 (526.4, 535.9) N/A 9,898 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Sumter County Rural No 484.3 (396.8, 585.2) 61 (6, 67) 22 falling falling trend -17.6 (-30.0, -2.5)
Dallas County Rural No 505.4 (454.9, 560.0) 55 (20, 66) 76 falling falling trend -12.7 (-18.4, -6.4)
Wilcox County Rural No 525.1 (432.7, 631.6) 48 (1, 67) 23 stable stable trend -9.4 (-25.7, 0.3)
Morgan County Urban No 512.7 (483.8, 543.0) 53 (29, 63) 241 falling falling trend -7.3 (-12.6, -1.5)
Washington County Rural No 517.3 (440.8, 603.4) 50 (4, 67) 33 falling falling trend -5.1 (-17.1, -1.4)
Walker County Urban No 617.3 (574.8, 662.1) 7 (1, 33) 162 falling falling trend -3.2 (-7.7, -1.5)
Lauderdale County Urban No 474.3 (444.2, 506.0) 63 (45, 66) 188 stable stable trend -2.8 (-4.4, 0.1)
Winston County Rural No 529.9 (470.1, 595.4) 44 (6, 66) 57 falling falling trend -2.6 (-8.5, -1.4)
Tuscaloosa County Urban No 451.8 (429.0, 475.6) 65 (55, 66) 307 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -2.1)
Perry County Rural No 448.7 (354.9, 560.0) 66 (11, 67) 16 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.8)
Shelby County Urban No 399.0 (379.1, 419.7) 67 (64, 67) 310 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Limestone County Urban No 473.0 (441.4, 506.3) 64 (44, 66) 173 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -1.3)
Macon County Urban No 556.0 (483.6, 636.3) 30 (2, 65) 44 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Autauga County Urban No 516.0 (473.0, 562.0) 51 (16, 65) 108 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Madison County Urban No 475.1 (458.4, 492.2) 62 (51, 66) 631 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Marengo County Rural No 488.9 (422.7, 562.6) 59 (15, 67) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Hale County Urban No 587.8 (503.0, 682.9) 17 (1, 64) 35 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Pickens County Urban No 596.4 (521.5, 679.1) 15 (1, 59) 47 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.8)
Coffee County Rural No 505.2 (461.0, 552.5) 56 (21, 66) 98 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Coosa County Rural No 522.2 (436.3, 620.0) 49 (2, 67) 27 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Cullman County Rural No 502.3 (469.4, 536.9) 58 (29, 65) 178 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Mobile County Urban No 561.2 (544.0, 578.9) 27 (16, 44) 829 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 525.7 (480.0, 574.6) 47 (13, 65) 101 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Baldwin County Urban No 484.3 (465.0, 504.2) 60 (47, 65) 495 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Montgomery County Urban No 539.3 (515.9, 563.5) 41 (20, 56) 413 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Dale County Rural No 551.8 (504.5, 602.5) 34 (6, 60) 102 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Franklin County Rural No 595.9 (534.3, 662.7) 16 (1, 54) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Lamar County Rural No 569.6 (488.6, 660.4) 25 (1, 65) 36 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Lee County Urban No 539.7 (509.9, 570.8) 40 (16, 57) 260 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Houston County Urban No 525.7 (494.4, 558.4) 46 (21, 61) 216 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Jefferson County Urban No 536.5 (523.0, 550.2) 42 (28, 52) 1,244 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
St. Clair County Urban No 548.0 (513.2, 584.6) 35 (12, 57) 189 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.3, 1.4)
Calhoun County Urban No 584.3 (552.1, 617.8) 18 (5, 43) 256 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Chambers County Rural No 572.9 (518.3, 631.7) 23 (3, 58) 82 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Colbert County Urban No 546.1 (504.9, 589.7) 38 (10, 60) 132 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Conecuh County Rural No 525.8 (443.1, 619.6) 45 (3, 67) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.0)
Covington County Rural No 603.6 (552.3, 658.4) 13 (1, 47) 104 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Marshall County Rural No 553.1 (518.4, 589.4) 33 (11, 55) 195 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Bibb County Urban No 546.6 (477.7, 622.8) 36 (2, 65) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Bullock County Rural No 508.9 (413.2, 620.4) 54 (3, 67) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
Clay County Rural No 574.6 (493.7, 665.2) 21 (1, 65) 36 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Henry County Urban No 545.9 (475.8, 623.6) 39 (3, 66) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Jackson County Rural No 607.5 (562.1, 655.5) 9 (1, 43) 137 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Lowndes County Urban No 562.2 (465.7, 673.1) 26 (1, 66) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Randolph County Rural No 513.6 (451.9, 581.4) 52 (11, 66) 51 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Butler County Rural No 553.4 (482.2, 632.3) 32 (2, 65) 44 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Chilton County Urban No 604.2 (550.9, 661.2) 11 (1, 49) 98 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
DeKalb County Rural No 534.8 (495.5, 576.5) 43 (15, 62) 141 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Elmore County Urban No 559.6 (522.0, 599.2) 29 (8, 55) 172 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Choctaw County Rural No 546.3 (466.1, 636.5) 37 (1, 66) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Etowah County Urban No 604.0 (570.5, 638.9) 12 (3, 35) 252 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Talladega County Rural No 576.2 (539.1, 615.1) 20 (6, 50) 187 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Blount County Urban No 560.4 (517.7, 605.7) 28 (6, 57) 130 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Monroe County Rural No 505.1 (440.0, 577.3) 57 (9, 67) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Russell County Urban No 671.1 (619.0, 726.3) 1 (1, 18) 129 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Escambia County Rural No 630.1 (573.1, 691.4) 5 (1, 36) 91 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Geneva County Urban No 571.3 (510.0, 637.9) 24 (2, 61) 64 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.2)
Greene County Urban No 573.0 (463.3, 700.8) 22 (1, 67) 20 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.8)
Lawrence County Urban No 608.9 (550.0, 672.4) 8 (1, 51) 81 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 2.8)
Barbour County Rural No 596.6 (530.8, 668.5) 14 (1, 57) 61 stable stable trend -0.4 (-12.3, 7.6)
Marion County Rural No 619.9 (560.6, 683.9) 6 (1, 47) 80 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Pike County Rural No 584.1 (520.5, 653.5) 19 (1, 57) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Cherokee County Rural No 606.8 (544.6, 674.3) 10 (1, 51) 72 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Fayette County Rural No 554.8 (479.1, 639.2) 31 (1, 66) 39 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Clarke County Rural No 665.4 (595.3, 741.7) 2 (1, 31) 66 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Crenshaw County Rural No 656.8 (563.7, 761.3) 3 (1, 51) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Cleburne County Rural No 640.8 (554.6, 736.7) 4 (1, 53) 40 stable stable trend 6.5 (-0.7, 16.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/24/2026 4:00 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top