Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A No 595.0 (588.3, 601.8) N/A 6,243 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.9)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Issaquena County Rural No 924.3 (538.0, 1,471.7) 1 (1, 82) 3 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.8, 6.6)
Humphreys County Rural No 829.5 (687.4, 992.4) 2 (1, 41) 24 rising rising trend 18.9 (4.8, 28.8)
Tunica County Urban No 822.4 (664.0, 1,007.4) 3 (1, 57) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Holmes County Urban No 812.6 (709.7, 926.3) 4 (1, 29) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Leflore County Rural No 808.3 (724.9, 898.7) 5 (1, 21) 71 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.1, 1.5)
Quitman County Rural No 776.8 (620.0, 961.6) 6 (1, 68) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Coahoma County Rural No 774.3 (686.0, 871.1) 7 (1, 34) 58 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Bolivar County Rural No 751.8 (678.1, 831.5) 8 (1, 32) 79 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Sharkey County Rural No 742.0 (556.3, 969.8) 9 (1, 80) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.2)
Marshall County Urban No 735.7 (670.2, 805.9) 10 (2, 32) 97 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 3.7)
Yazoo County Urban No 731.5 (649.4, 821.1) 11 (1, 44) 59 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Sunflower County Rural No 724.3 (642.2, 814.0) 12 (1, 50) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Tishomingo County Rural No 718.6 (637.6, 807.3) 13 (1, 50) 58 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
George County Rural No 717.3 (627.6, 816.3) 14 (2, 55) 53 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Washington County Rural No 711.8 (652.8, 774.6) 15 (3, 38) 114 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Pontotoc County Rural No 697.6 (625.8, 775.4) 16 (3, 50) 71 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.4, 1.9)
Attala County Rural No 688.1 (603.2, 781.6) 17 (3, 62) 48 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.1)
Yalobusha County Rural No 682.2 (585.6, 790.4) 18 (2, 69) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Grenada County Rural No 679.8 (601.2, 765.8) 19 (4, 60) 55 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Tate County Urban No 673.7 (600.7, 753.3) 20 (4, 61) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Lee County Rural No 666.9 (623.7, 712.3) 21 (10, 47) 183 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.6, -1.4)
Panola County Rural No 662.3 (598.1, 731.6) 22 (5, 59) 81 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Neshoba County Rural No 659.4 (589.1, 735.8) 23 (5, 64) 66 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.7)
Covington County Rural No 656.9 (572.3, 750.6) 24 (4, 69) 44 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Adams County Rural No 645.3 (583.2, 712.4) 25 (8, 65) 83 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Pearl River County Rural No 643.2 (596.6, 692.6) 26 (12, 57) 146 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Perry County Urban No 641.6 (540.2, 756.7) 27 (3, 78) 29 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Tallahatchie County Rural No 641.3 (539.8, 756.4) 28 (4, 78) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Union County Rural No 640.7 (571.5, 715.9) 29 (8, 67) 63 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Lawrence County Rural No 632.7 (531.7, 747.5) 30 (4, 78) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Lincoln County Rural No 631.9 (570.1, 698.6) 31 (10, 66) 80 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Madison County Urban No 626.7 (588.7, 666.4) 32 (17, 58) 215 falling falling trend -5.3 (-10.7, -4.7)
Webster County Rural No 626.1 (517.7, 750.4) 33 (3, 81) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Wilkinson County Rural No 621.4 (505.1, 756.8) 34 (3, 81) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Harrison County Urban No 621.1 (595.0, 648.2) 35 (21, 54) 444 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Prentiss County Rural No 619.3 (549.8, 695.3) 36 (10, 73) 58 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Lowndes County Rural No 615.5 (568.2, 665.7) 37 (16, 65) 128 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Wayne County Rural No 611.4 (533.1, 698.1) 38 (8, 77) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Scott County Urban No 611.3 (541.1, 688.2) 39 (10, 74) 56 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Jasper County Rural No 606.0 (525.4, 695.5) 40 (9, 77) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
DeSoto County Urban No 600.1 (570.0, 631.3) 41 (24, 62) 319 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Forrest County Urban No 600.0 (555.8, 646.7) 42 (21, 68) 139 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.2)
Warren County Rural No 598.4 (545.8, 654.7) 43 (16, 71) 100 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Jackson County Urban No 596.6 (566.2, 628.2) 44 (26, 64) 303 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Claiborne County Rural No 594.5 (477.9, 731.4) 45 (4, 82) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Jefferson County Rural No 592.8 (471.0, 736.6) 46 (4, 82) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Monroe County Rural No 592.5 (536.7, 652.5) 47 (18, 73) 84 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Marion County Rural No 591.1 (523.6, 664.9) 48 (14, 76) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Chickasaw County Rural No 590.9 (510.6, 680.4) 49 (11, 79) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Pike County Rural No 589.7 (534.2, 649.3) 50 (17, 75) 86 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Leake County Rural No 584.6 (510.7, 666.2) 51 (13, 79) 46 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -2.0)
Itawamba County Rural No 580.2 (511.8, 655.2) 52 (14, 78) 52 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Carroll County Rural No 576.9 (482.9, 684.1) 53 (9, 82) 27 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Newton County Rural No 575.9 (501.6, 658.3) 54 (15, 80) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Tippah County Rural No 573.2 (500.5, 653.6) 55 (16, 80) 45 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Walthall County Rural No 571.3 (486.4, 666.7) 56 (13, 81) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Stone County Urban No 569.1 (485.9, 662.7) 57 (14, 81) 36 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Hancock County Urban No 565.9 (519.7, 615.1) 58 (29, 76) 116 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
Smith County Rural No 565.6 (484.0, 657.1) 59 (13, 82) 34 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.7, -0.2)
Hinds County Urban No 565.2 (540.8, 590.4) 60 (39, 70) 423 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.4)
Winston County Rural No 560.7 (486.1, 643.6) 61 (16, 82) 41 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Montgomery County Rural No 556.7 (461.4, 666.1) 62 (13, 82) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Jones County Rural No 556.4 (514.8, 600.6) 63 (33, 76) 136 stable stable trend 5.8 (-0.7, 10.2)
Copiah County Urban No 549.2 (488.0, 616.0) 64 (25, 81) 60 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Calhoun County Rural No 533.5 (449.2, 629.0) 65 (19, 82) 29 falling falling trend -6.3 (-13.2, -2.9)
Clay County Rural No 530.7 (458.2, 611.6) 66 (26, 82) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Clarke County Rural No 528.9 (453.6, 613.1) 67 (24, 82) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Simpson County Urban No 528.6 (466.5, 596.8) 68 (29, 82) 54 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Alcorn County Rural No 525.2 (471.8, 583.2) 69 (36, 81) 71 falling falling trend -7.9 (-13.4, -1.9)
Noxubee County Rural No 522.5 (423.6, 637.6) 70 (15, 82) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Greene County Rural No 521.9 (431.4, 625.9) 71 (18, 82) 23 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Benton County Urban No 520.8 (411.5, 650.2) 72 (14, 82) 16 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Jefferson Davis County Rural No 519.6 (434.1, 617.0) 73 (23, 82) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.1)
Oktibbeha County Rural No 511.2 (457.3, 569.7) 74 (38, 82) 67 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Lafayette County Rural No 510.8 (459.7, 565.9) 75 (44, 82) 78 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Amite County Rural No 499.8 (424.3, 585.1) 76 (31, 82) 32 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Lauderdale County Rural No 493.1 (456.5, 531.9) 77 (58, 82) 137 stable stable trend -1.1 (-6.2, 4.5)
Franklin County Rural No 491.4 (391.1, 610.3) 78 (20, 82) 17 falling falling trend -13.3 (-21.3, -2.2)
Choctaw County Rural No 470.5 (378.2, 578.8) 79 (31, 82) 18 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Kemper County Rural No 465.1 (372.1, 574.3) 80 (31, 82) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.2)
Lamar County Urban No 461.7 (420.4, 506.0) 81 (65, 82) 94 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Rankin County Urban No 451.9 (426.8, 478.0) 82 (73, 82) 248 falling falling trend -1.4 (-4.0, -0.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 1:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top