Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska N/A No 501.4 (493.8, 509.1) N/A 3,389 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Thurston County Rural No 847.6 (659.3, 1,072.1) 1 (1, 23) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.8, 3.4)
Nance County Rural No 847.4 (628.4, 1,116.2) 2 (1, 35) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.9, 3.5)
Hitchcock County Rural No 754.3 (548.8, 1,011.3) 3 (1, 67) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.6)
Webster County Rural No 733.4 (555.1, 951.9) 4 (1, 62) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 4.0)
Franklin County Rural No 673.5 (500.1, 889.3) 5 (1, 68) 10 rising rising trend 6.6 (1.7, 24.8)
Jefferson County Rural No 651.1 (537.5, 782.2) 6 (1, 49) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.4)
Greeley County Rural No 646.4 (446.1, 907.9) 7 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.1)
Harlan County Rural No 615.3 (453.9, 816.3) 8 (1, 75) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.9, 0.4)
Richardson County Rural No 613.8 (508.3, 735.1) 9 (2, 59) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.2)
Nemaha County Rural No 587.9 (467.8, 729.8) 10 (2, 71) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Boyd County Rural No 580.0 (400.1, 821.2) 11 (1, 78) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.4, 4.6)
Cheyenne County Rural No 575.0 (475.7, 689.2) 12 (3, 68) 24 rising rising trend 4.6 (0.4, 17.1)
Butler County Rural No 575.0 (468.4, 698.7) 13 (2, 69) 21 stable stable trend -9.7 (-28.1, 1.4)
Gage County Rural No 567.7 (501.5, 640.1) 14 (5, 53) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Lincoln County Rural No 558.6 (504.8, 616.6) 15 (6, 51) 81 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.0)
Dodge County Rural No 550.7 (498.0, 607.6) 16 (7, 52) 81 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Burt County Rural No 544.7 (437.5, 670.8) 17 (3, 74) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Johnson County Rural No 539.5 (404.7, 704.1) 18 (3, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 3.0)
Polk County Rural No 534.8 (411.4, 683.7) 19 (3, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.6, 1.9)
Clay County Rural No 529.6 (409.3, 674.6) 20 (3, 76) 13 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 0.7)
Thayer County Rural No 529.3 (408.7, 675.1) 21 (3, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.1, 2.3)
Washington County Urban No 527.0 (457.5, 604.0) 22 (6, 68) 43 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Keith County Rural No 526.8 (434.0, 634.1) 23 (5, 72) 23 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Colfax County Rural No 526.6 (417.5, 655.2) 24 (4, 76) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Douglas County Urban No 526.3 (510.5, 542.4) 25 (16, 41) 882 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.1)
Adams County Rural No 516.9 (460.5, 578.3) 26 (9, 66) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0)
Sarpy County Urban No 515.3 (487.0, 544.7) 27 (16, 52) 260 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Brown County Rural No 514.6 (358.9, 715.8) 28 (2, 78) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.1)
Box Butte County Rural No 513.6 (420.1, 621.8) 29 (5, 74) 22 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.9, 15.9)
York County Rural No 512.8 (435.2, 600.4) 30 (7, 73) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Dawes County Rural No 506.6 (403.9, 627.8) 31 (5, 76) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Chase County Rural No 506.6 (368.9, 679.8) 32 (3, 78) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.5, 2.6)
Otoe County Rural No 503.2 (430.7, 584.5) 33 (8, 73) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Seward County Urban No 497.2 (423.7, 579.9) 34 (8, 73) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Red Willow County Rural No 496.9 (411.9, 594.9) 35 (7, 75) 24 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Dixon County Rural No 492.3 (376.4, 633.6) 36 (4, 78) 12 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Sherman County Rural No 492.0 (350.2, 674.1) 37 (3, 78) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Scotts Bluff County Rural No 486.8 (437.5, 540.1) 38 (15, 69) 74 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Hamilton County Rural No 486.4 (393.6, 594.6) 39 (7, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Buffalo County Rural No 486.3 (439.8, 536.5) 40 (16, 70) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Lancaster County Urban No 483.3 (463.7, 503.5) 41 (28, 61) 473 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 1.5)
Phelps County Rural No 482.1 (390.5, 589.0) 42 (7, 76) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Valley County Rural No 480.7 (354.6, 638.2) 43 (4, 78) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.4, 3.2)
Cass County Urban No 480.6 (420.7, 546.7) 44 (14, 73) 48 falling falling trend -3.1 (-11.4, -1.3)
Fillmore County Rural No 478.4 (370.7, 608.4) 45 (5, 78) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.2)
Knox County Rural No 474.7 (386.6, 577.5) 46 (8, 77) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.7)
Furnas County Rural No 473.4 (355.4, 619.0) 47 (5, 78) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Cuming County Rural No 473.1 (381.3, 580.3) 48 (8, 77) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.4)
Holt County Rural No 471.6 (388.1, 568.4) 49 (9, 76) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Garfield County Rural No 468.5 (291.9, 713.7) 50 (2, 78) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.4, 3.7)
Madison County Rural No 468.2 (415.6, 525.6) 51 (18, 73) 60 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Saunders County Urban No 468.1 (405.6, 537.4) 52 (14, 74) 41 falling falling trend -2.8 (-8.4, -1.4)
Cedar County Rural No 467.4 (372.0, 579.7) 53 (8, 77) 18 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Morrill County Rural No 467.4 (346.1, 618.4) 54 (5, 78) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.6, 1.8)
Garden County Rural No 464.4 (307.7, 678.7) 55 (3, 78) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.8, 1.7)
Merrick County Urban No 464.4 (365.3, 582.1) 56 (7, 78) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 0.1)
Platte County Rural No 460.8 (408.7, 517.6) 57 (20, 75) 59 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Hall County Urban No 460.1 (419.0, 504.1) 58 (26, 72) 94 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Dakota County Urban No 459.5 (386.4, 542.4) 59 (13, 76) 28 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.1)
Perkins County Rural No 458.3 (305.3, 662.6) 60 (3, 78) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.0)
Kimball County Rural No 458.1 (325.9, 626.1) 61 (5, 78) 8 falling falling trend -23.3 (-46.0, -0.8)
Boone County Rural No 456.6 (351.0, 585.4) 62 (8, 78) 13 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.1)
Sheridan County Rural No 455.8 (346.5, 589.2) 63 (7, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.0)
Howard County Urban No 452.0 (347.9, 577.7) 64 (7, 78) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Dawson County Rural No 448.2 (386.0, 517.7) 65 (19, 76) 37 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Antelope County Rural No 443.9 (335.9, 575.0) 66 (7, 78) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.3)
Gosper County Rural No 442.1 (262.7, 695.8) 67 (2, 78) 3
*
*
Saline County Rural No 439.9 (359.9, 532.2) 68 (13, 78) 21 stable stable trend 6.7 (-7.4, 18.2)
Kearney County Rural No 436.1 (333.8, 560.2) 69 (9, 78) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.8)
Stanton County Rural No 431.9 (319.7, 570.4) 70 (7, 78) 10 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.6)
Custer County Rural No 423.7 (342.5, 518.3) 71 (15, 78) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.3)
Deuel County Rural No 421.5 (248.1, 666.6) 72 (3, 78) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.3, 1.9)
Pawnee County Rural No 417.9 (279.8, 602.5) 73 (6, 78) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.5, 2.1)
Pierce County Rural No 417.0 (321.1, 532.9) 74 (13, 78) 13 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -0.9)
Nuckolls County Rural No 414.0 (301.1, 556.5) 75 (9, 78) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 0.9)
Cherry County Rural No 413.1 (306.1, 545.6) 76 (10, 78) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.3)
Wayne County Rural No 347.0 (261.6, 451.5) 77 (38, 78) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
Frontier County Rural No 306.6 (182.0, 484.5) 78 (18, 78) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.1, 1.7)
Arthur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 4:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top