Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A No 520.0 (516.7, 523.4) N/A 19,371 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.3, -1.2)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Swain County Rural No 717.0 (621.6, 823.1) 1 (1, 39) 41 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 2.4)
Richmond County Rural No 700.6 (643.1, 761.9) 2 (1, 23) 113 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.5, 8.3)
Robeson County Rural No 669.9 (633.2, 708.2) 3 (1, 21) 261 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.3, 3.8)
Edgecombe County Urban No 655.7 (606.1, 708.4) 4 (1, 39) 135 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 1.1)
Sampson County Rural No 649.7 (602.4, 699.9) 5 (1, 39) 143 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Onslow County Urban No 648.6 (614.2, 684.5) 6 (1, 27) 280 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Halifax County Rural No 647.4 (599.0, 698.6) 7 (1, 39) 138 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Scotland County Rural No 643.8 (582.2, 710.2) 8 (1, 54) 82 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Anson County Urban No 641.9 (569.5, 721.0) 9 (1, 64) 58 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.4, 1.2)
Columbus County Rural No 639.6 (591.5, 690.6) 10 (1, 46) 135 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Wayne County Urban No 637.0 (602.6, 672.8) 11 (1, 34) 265 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
McDowell County Rural No 631.9 (582.4, 684.5) 12 (1, 49) 124 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Vance County Rural No 630.6 (577.2, 687.7) 13 (1, 54) 106 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Tyrrell County Rural No 627.6 (471.9, 820.0) 14 (1, 100) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.2)
Caldwell County Urban No 623.0 (585.8, 662.0) 15 (3, 40) 216 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Mitchell County Rural No 622.8 (544.1, 709.7) 16 (1, 81) 46 stable stable trend 8.3 (-0.6, 14.2)
Surry County Rural No 622.0 (583.0, 663.0) 17 (2, 45) 192 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Martin County Rural No 608.8 (543.5, 679.8) 18 (1, 79) 65 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.7, 7.1)
Harnett County Rural No 608.3 (573.6, 644.5) 19 (4, 49) 239 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Cleveland County Rural No 607.8 (573.1, 644.1) 20 (5, 48) 238 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Stanly County Rural No 596.2 (553.0, 641.8) 21 (3, 65) 146 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Davidson County Urban No 595.4 (569.4, 622.3) 22 (10, 49) 404 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Washington County Rural No 590.1 (503.8, 687.4) 23 (1, 94) 34 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Hoke County Urban No 588.3 (527.1, 654.7) 24 (2, 81) 75 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Rutherford County Rural No 588.0 (548.7, 629.4) 25 (6, 64) 171 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Jones County Rural No 587.2 (489.3, 699.1) 26 (1, 95) 26 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Pender County Urban No 582.5 (538.3, 629.5) 27 (6, 74) 135 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Cumberland County Urban No 581.2 (558.9, 604.2) 28 (15, 54) 531 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Alamance County Urban No 579.8 (553.3, 607.2) 29 (14, 59) 366 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Rockingham County Urban No 577.5 (544.2, 612.2) 30 (10, 67) 231 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Craven County Rural No 576.1 (543.4, 610.3) 31 (11, 66) 240 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
Person County Urban No 573.6 (522.6, 628.4) 32 (6, 82) 96 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Alexander County Urban No 573.3 (520.3, 630.3) 33 (3, 83) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Wilson County Rural No 572.0 (534.3, 611.7) 34 (10, 73) 176 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Graham County Rural No 572.0 (470.1, 689.6) 35 (1, 97) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Bertie County Rural No 569.8 (498.7, 648.2) 36 (2, 90) 48 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.7)
Bladen County Rural No 569.6 (513.6, 630.2) 37 (4, 87) 79 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Carteret County Rural No 566.8 (531.4, 603.9) 38 (12, 71) 201 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Randolph County Urban No 565.3 (537.2, 594.4) 39 (18, 67) 314 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Caswell County Rural No 564.0 (501.0, 632.8) 40 (4, 91) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Granville County Rural No 563.8 (520.6, 609.8) 41 (10, 82) 131 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.8, 1.6)
Hertford County Rural No 563.7 (495.2, 639.0) 42 (3, 91) 51 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.8, 8.1)
Lenoir County Rural No 562.7 (520.4, 607.6) 43 (11, 79) 135 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Johnston County Urban No 556.6 (529.9, 584.3) 44 (21, 71) 356 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Rowan County Urban No 555.4 (527.5, 584.4) 45 (20, 75) 307 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.3, -1.5)
Greene County Rural No 554.0 (478.8, 637.7) 46 (2, 95) 40 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Gaston County Urban No 552.8 (529.9, 576.5) 47 (25, 71) 452 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Northampton County Rural No 551.0 (486.9, 621.5) 48 (5, 93) 55 stable stable trend 7.7 (-1.2, 14.9)
Perquimans County Rural No 551.0 (476.5, 634.4) 49 (3, 94) 40 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Chowan County Rural No 547.6 (471.5, 632.7) 50 (3, 95) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Burke County Urban No 546.9 (514.3, 581.0) 51 (21, 82) 214 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Yancey County Rural No 545.8 (481.4, 616.6) 52 (5, 93) 53 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Duplin County Rural No 544.2 (498.8, 592.7) 53 (15, 88) 108 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.4)
Camden County Urban No 542.8 (441.6, 660.4) 54 (1, 100) 21 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 12.3)
Stokes County Urban No 541.3 (497.5, 587.9) 55 (17, 88) 114 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 5.0)
Yadkin County Urban No 540.1 (490.6, 593.3) 56 (15, 89) 88 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Wilkes County Rural No 538.7 (502.5, 577.0) 57 (23, 86) 166 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Forsyth County Urban No 538.2 (520.5, 556.3) 58 (35, 74) 720 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Nash County Urban No 538.1 (504.9, 573.0) 59 (23, 85) 203 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Beaufort County Rural No 538.1 (494.9, 584.1) 60 (19, 89) 119 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 538.0 (478.9, 602.6) 61 (11, 94) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Warren County Rural No 533.6 (470.7, 602.8) 62 (9, 96) 54 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Pitt County Urban No 528.7 (500.6, 558.0) 63 (31, 85) 275 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Pasquotank County Rural No 527.3 (477.2, 581.4) 64 (19, 92) 83 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Currituck County Urban No 524.0 (460.5, 594.0) 65 (11, 98) 56 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Dare County Rural No 523.4 (473.7, 577.0) 66 (19, 93) 88 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Catawba County Urban No 523.3 (497.9, 549.8) 67 (40, 85) 325 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -1.0)
Haywood County Rural No 522.2 (486.5, 559.8) 68 (30, 89) 164 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Gates County Urban No 521.1 (431.3, 623.9) 69 (3, 100) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Ashe County Rural No 517.7 (466.1, 573.6) 70 (19, 95) 75 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Davie County Urban No 517.5 (473.2, 564.9) 71 (23, 93) 101 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Franklin County Urban No 515.9 (476.3, 558.0) 72 (28, 91) 133 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.0)
Brunswick County Urban No 514.4 (491.1, 538.4) 73 (46, 87) 431 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Lee County Rural No 514.1 (473.2, 557.7) 74 (29, 93) 120 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Alleghany County Rural No 514.1 (436.6, 601.7) 75 (7, 100) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-6.2, 7.2)
Lincoln County Urban No 508.5 (474.9, 543.7) 76 (37, 92) 179 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Moore County Urban No 506.1 (478.2, 535.2) 77 (45, 90) 255 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Guilford County Urban No 504.8 (490.0, 520.0) 78 (59, 86) 902 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Macon County Rural No 504.3 (460.2, 551.4) 79 (32, 95) 102 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
New Hanover County Urban No 502.9 (481.7, 524.7) 80 (54, 88) 438 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Madison County Urban No 502.1 (440.6, 569.8) 81 (19, 98) 50 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Henderson County Urban No 500.3 (475.0, 526.6) 82 (50, 91) 302 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Pamlico County Rural No 495.0 (424.6, 574.1) 83 (13, 100) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Iredell County Urban No 493.6 (469.6, 518.4) 84 (57, 91) 330 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Cherokee County Rural No 491.6 (444.6, 542.3) 85 (33, 97) 86 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9)
Union County Urban No 482.5 (459.0, 506.9) 86 (62, 94) 334 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.8)
Cabarrus County Urban No 476.7 (453.0, 501.3) 87 (64, 95) 316 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Durham County Urban No 460.3 (440.8, 480.4) 88 (80, 97) 439 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -1.9)
Buncombe County Urban No 460.1 (442.5, 478.4) 89 (80, 96) 526 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Clay County Rural No 452.2 (381.7, 532.4) 90 (29, 100) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Avery County Rural No 449.7 (386.0, 521.1) 91 (42, 100) 36 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0)
Watauga County Rural No 447.4 (403.6, 494.7) 92 (64, 100) 79 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Mecklenburg County Urban No 444.8 (433.6, 456.2) 93 (86, 97) 1,268 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Transylvania County Rural No 438.9 (397.7, 483.2) 94 (70, 100) 90 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Chatham County Urban No 429.6 (401.2, 459.6) 95 (84, 100) 172 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Jackson County Rural No 429.1 (385.4, 476.5) 96 (74, 100) 74 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.7)
Polk County Rural No 416.8 (367.6, 471.1) 97 (74, 100) 54 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Wake County Urban No 416.4 (406.0, 427.1) 98 (92, 100) 1,267 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.5)
Orange County Urban No 408.5 (382.4, 435.8) 99 (90, 100) 190 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Hyde County Rural No 407.4 (295.1, 549.5) 100 (16, 100) 9 falling falling trend -12.4 (-44.2, -2.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 10:32 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top