Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado N/A No 434.2 (429.8, 438.7) N/A 7,814 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Jackson County Rural No 587.8 (346.0, 932.3) 4 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Kiowa County Rural No 504.4 (282.1, 830.7) 16 (1, 61) 3
*
*
Dolores County Rural No 327.5 (199.0, 510.9) 54 (6, 61) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.9, 2.1)
Cheyenne County Rural No 636.2 (403.0, 955.8) 2 (1, 58) 5 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.5, 5.2)
Lake County Rural No 318.3 (212.8, 458.0) 55 (13, 61) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.8, 2.7)
Gilpin County Urban No 304.3 (198.0, 451.2) 56 (12, 61) 7 falling falling trend -6.1 (-8.8, -3.2)
Sedgwick County Rural No 512.5 (349.1, 729.0) 13 (1, 58) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.1)
Costilla County Rural No 411.0 (283.2, 577.8) 37 (3, 61) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.5, 1.1)
Crowley County Rural No 490.1 (353.1, 662.6) 18 (1, 58) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.3)
Bent County Rural No 372.1 (269.8, 501.2) 46 (7, 61) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.3, 2.0)
San Miguel County Rural No 380.5 (263.8, 530.0) 43 (4, 61) 8 stable stable trend -3.5 (-6.7, 1.1)
Ouray County Rural No 395.6 (281.9, 539.1) 40 (4, 60) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.0, 3.8)
Custer County Rural No 333.6 (240.3, 452.3) 52 (15, 61) 10 falling falling trend -5.4 (-19.0, -1.8)
Phillips County Rural No 439.8 (322.9, 586.7) 33 (2, 59) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.3)
Rio Blanco County Rural No 472.8 (352.1, 621.6) 24 (2, 57) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Washington County Rural No 519.5 (389.4, 679.5) 12 (1, 55) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.2)
Clear Creek County Urban No 287.2 (212.0, 380.3) 57 (32, 61) 11 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 532.9 (404.7, 688.7) 7 (1, 51) 11 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.2, 4.1)
Baca County Rural No 681.3 (519.4, 879.6) 1 (1, 37) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.4)
Kit Carson County Rural No 471.5 (366.6, 597.6) 25 (2, 54) 14 stable stable trend 15.8 (-1.2, 28.0)
Saguache County Rural No 551.8 (425.3, 703.7) 6 (1, 50) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.0, 2.7)
Grand County Rural No 280.2 (216.1, 357.0) 58 (40, 61) 16 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.2)
Conejos County Rural No 529.2 (417.7, 661.6) 9 (1, 49) 16 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.1, 11.2)
Pitkin County Rural No 232.3 (183.6, 290.0) 61 (53, 61) 17 stable stable trend -2.1 (-3.9, 0.0)
Gunnison County Rural No 357.8 (281.3, 448.7) 51 (17, 60) 17 stable stable trend 0.8 (-5.0, 9.0)
Yuma County Rural No 484.9 (389.5, 596.7) 20 (2, 52) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Summit County Rural No 246.3 (191.0, 311.8) 60 (50, 61) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 2.3)
Moffat County Rural No 470.2 (381.9, 572.5) 26 (3, 54) 21 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Rio Grande County Rural No 479.8 (394.1, 578.7) 21 (3, 51) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Alamosa County Rural No 463.2 (382.5, 556.0) 29 (4, 52) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.0)
Huerfano County Rural No 586.9 (483.3, 706.7) 5 (1, 33) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Archuleta County Rural No 365.8 (300.8, 441.0) 48 (21, 58) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.8, 1.3)
Routt County Rural No 328.7 (272.3, 393.1) 53 (34, 60) 27 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.6, 0.3)
Park County Urban No 358.1 (290.4, 437.2) 50 (20, 59) 27 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.6)
Prowers County Rural No 627.8 (526.3, 743.4) 3 (1, 23) 28 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Elbert County Urban No 374.7 (318.0, 438.5) 45 (21, 57) 35 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.6)
Chaffee County Rural No 395.6 (338.6, 459.5) 41 (17, 55) 37 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.2)
Eagle County Rural No 266.1 (225.9, 311.3) 59 (50, 61) 37 stable stable trend 9.5 (-1.9, 19.7)
Logan County Rural No 474.0 (409.1, 546.3) 23 (4, 45) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Las Animas County Rural No 531.9 (459.7, 612.5) 8 (2, 36) 40 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Otero County Rural No 508.9 (440.2, 585.5) 14 (2, 39) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Teller County Urban No 448.8 (387.6, 516.8) 31 (7, 50) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.3)
Morgan County Rural No 523.0 (460.5, 591.7) 11 (3, 35) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Montezuma County Rural No 485.2 (429.4, 546.4) 19 (4, 41) 58 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Garfield County Rural No 399.6 (356.4, 446.5) 39 (22, 53) 68 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
La Plata County Rural No 370.6 (333.0, 411.4) 47 (31, 55) 78 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Delta County Rural No 508.3 (459.1, 561.4) 15 (4, 33) 83 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Broomfield County Urban No 361.5 (327.8, 397.7) 49 (34, 56) 86 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.2, -2.9)
Montrose County Rural No 428.2 (389.4, 469.8) 35 (16, 49) 93 stable stable trend 5.7 (-3.6, 12.0)
Fremont County Rural No 500.1 (458.6, 544.4) 17 (5, 32) 110 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Mesa County Urban No 475.0 (451.1, 500.0) 22 (11, 33) 304 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)
Pueblo County Urban No 526.2 (501.6, 551.7) 10 (5, 21) 353 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Douglas County Urban No 376.9 (359.7, 394.8) 44 (36, 52) 383 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.1)
Weld County Urban No 448.3 (428.3, 468.9) 32 (18, 39) 401 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Boulder County Urban No 384.9 (368.0, 402.4) 42 (35, 51) 402 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.4, 0.3)
Larimer County Urban No 402.9 (386.7, 419.6) 38 (31, 47) 486 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Adams County Urban No 468.9 (451.3, 487.0) 27 (14, 33) 579 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Arapahoe County Urban No 424.5 (411.3, 438.1) 36 (27, 41) 811 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Denver County Urban No 456.3 (442.3, 470.7) 30 (17, 35) 833 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Jefferson County Urban No 429.9 (417.0, 443.1) 34 (25, 40) 875 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5)
El Paso County Urban No 466.4 (453.1, 480.0) 28 (15, 32) 976 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Hinsdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 6:21 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top