Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Illinois N/A No 504.6 (501.6, 507.6) N/A 22,580 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Brown County Rural No 469.8 (344.9, 624.7) 93 (7, 102) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 0.7)
Pope County Rural No 499.4 (381.0, 644.3) 84 (3, 102) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.9)
Scott County Rural No 560.4 (427.0, 722.6) 54 (1, 102) 12 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Hardin County Rural No 713.0 (549.7, 910.1) 3 (1, 98) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.2)
Stark County Urban No 534.1 (414.9, 677.7) 71 (2, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.1)
Calhoun County Urban No 632.3 (491.6, 800.8) 16 (1, 102) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.4)
Gallatin County Rural No 574.9 (446.3, 729.5) 46 (1, 102) 14 falling falling trend -2.2 (-12.0, -0.8)
Schuyler County Rural No 457.1 (358.7, 574.3) 101 (20, 102) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Putnam County Rural No 553.4 (434.0, 696.2) 58 (1, 102) 15 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.5)
Edwards County Rural No 602.7 (478.6, 749.1) 27 (1, 102) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.2)
Pulaski County Rural No 723.9 (574.1, 901.6) 2 (1, 92) 16 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.5, 2.5)
Henderson County Rural No 517.9 (418.1, 635.0) 78 (5, 102) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Alexander County Urban No 815.2 (664.5, 990.6) 1 (1, 56) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.5)
Hamilton County Rural No 585.3 (478.8, 708.7) 35 (1, 102) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Cumberland County Rural No 512.8 (420.9, 618.8) 81 (7, 102) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Jasper County Rural No 591.6 (490.4, 707.8) 31 (2, 101) 24 rising rising trend 10.8 (0.2, 18.5)
Cass County Rural No 530.5 (440.6, 633.3) 74 (7, 102) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.0)
Menard County Urban No 520.7 (435.1, 618.3) 76 (9, 102) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Marshall County Urban No 480.0 (401.7, 569.2) 90 (21, 102) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Johnson County Rural No 498.7 (418.8, 589.6) 85 (17, 102) 27 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.7)
Washington County Rural No 462.5 (388.6, 546.4) 96 (30, 102) 28 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Wabash County Rural No 580.0 (487.3, 685.3) 42 (2, 101) 29 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Clay County Rural No 625.1 (533.9, 727.4) 19 (1, 88) 34 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Lawrence County Rural No 576.6 (493.1, 670.3) 45 (3, 99) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 0.8)
Moultrie County Rural No 625.4 (535.1, 726.5) 18 (1, 91) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Ford County Urban No 638.6 (546.8, 741.5) 13 (1, 86) 35 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Greene County Rural No 684.4 (587.0, 793.7) 4 (1, 68) 36 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.2)
Bond County Urban No 571.9 (490.7, 662.6) 47 (4, 99) 36 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Piatt County Urban No 504.5 (433.1, 584.3) 82 (17, 102) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
White County Rural No 539.6 (462.8, 625.7) 68 (7, 102) 36 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.5)
Clark County Rural No 583.1 (501.4, 674.5) 38 (3, 97) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Massac County Urban No 582.9 (501.9, 673.2) 39 (3, 97) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Wayne County Rural No 518.1 (448.0, 596.4) 77 (16, 102) 39 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Richland County Rural No 581.1 (502.1, 669.1) 40 (3, 98) 40 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 0.0)
Warren County Rural No 584.8 (506.1, 672.5) 36 (3, 94) 40 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Mason County Rural No 660.6 (571.7, 759.5) 10 (1, 77) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Hancock County Rural No 467.2 (404.5, 536.9) 95 (44, 102) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Mercer County Urban No 595.0 (516.5, 682.1) 30 (3, 92) 42 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.7)
Douglas County Rural No 559.8 (486.0, 641.7) 55 (6, 99) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
De Witt County Rural No 677.5 (589.3, 775.3) 5 (1, 71) 43 stable stable trend 9.1 (-1.2, 15.8)
Pike County Rural No 659.6 (573.9, 754.5) 11 (1, 75) 43 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Carroll County Rural No 604.2 (527.4, 689.2) 26 (3, 89) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Perry County Rural No 535.3 (468.0, 609.5) 69 (13, 101) 46 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.4)
Union County Rural No 600.2 (524.6, 683.6) 28 (2, 90) 46 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Crawford County Rural No 615.1 (538.4, 699.8) 22 (2, 86) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Fayette County Rural No 563.4 (493.7, 640.2) 51 (6, 97) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Edgar County Rural No 623.1 (547.9, 706.0) 20 (2, 82) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
McDonough County Rural No 497.8 (438.4, 563.0) 86 (29, 102) 52 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Jersey County Urban No 628.2 (556.7, 706.2) 17 (1, 82) 57 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.1)
Jo Daviess County Rural No 469.1 (416.5, 526.8) 94 (51, 102) 60 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Shelby County Rural No 586.8 (522.0, 657.6) 34 (5, 88) 60 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Monroe County Urban No 458.7 (409.2, 512.5) 98 (58, 102) 64 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Saline County Rural No 645.0 (576.5, 719.4) 12 (1, 69) 66 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Clinton County Urban No 478.7 (428.2, 533.4) 91 (46, 102) 67 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Effingham County Rural No 544.0 (488.7, 603.8) 66 (15, 98) 72 stable stable trend -3.0 (-8.0, 1.4)
Logan County Rural No 638.4 (574.0, 708.1) 14 (2, 68) 73 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Montgomery County Rural No 605.1 (544.2, 671.0) 25 (3, 83) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Woodford County Urban No 491.8 (442.6, 545.0) 88 (41, 102) 75 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Randolph County Rural No 580.8 (523.3, 642.9) 41 (8, 87) 76 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Iroquois County Rural No 617.0 (556.2, 682.6) 21 (3, 77) 77 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
Christian County Rural No 570.7 (515.9, 629.6) 48 (10, 88) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.6)
Livingston County Rural No 549.1 (496.3, 606.1) 62 (18, 96) 81 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Morgan County Rural No 590.6 (534.9, 650.5) 32 (7, 84) 84 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Bureau County Rural No 544.2 (493.2, 599.0) 65 (17, 94) 85 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -1.0)
Lee County Rural No 577.0 (523.1, 635.0) 44 (9, 85) 86 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Boone County Urban No 494.4 (449.6, 542.3) 87 (43, 102) 92 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Coles County Rural No 534.1 (486.6, 585.1) 70 (24, 97) 95 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Jefferson County Rural No 637.1 (580.6, 697.6) 15 (2, 65) 95 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Fulton County Rural No 675.0 (615.9, 738.3) 7 (1, 44) 98 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Jackson County Rural No 551.7 (503.1, 603.8) 60 (16, 92) 98 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.3)
Grundy County Urban No 610.0 (557.1, 666.5) 24 (4, 75) 101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Marion County Rural No 675.9 (618.3, 737.3) 6 (1, 42) 105 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Franklin County Rural No 674.3 (618.3, 734.1) 8 (1, 38) 108 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Macoupin County Urban No 552.2 (506.1, 601.4) 59 (17, 90) 109 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Stephenson County Rural No 517.7 (474.8, 563.5) 79 (35, 98) 112 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Henry County Urban No 546.3 (502.4, 593.0) 64 (22, 90) 117 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Ogle County Rural No 554.9 (510.5, 602.0) 57 (19, 88) 117 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Knox County Rural No 597.1 (552.1, 644.7) 29 (7, 72) 134 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Whiteside County Rural No 588.7 (546.3, 633.6) 33 (11, 77) 146 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Williamson County Rural No 543.5 (504.8, 584.5) 67 (25, 89) 149 falling falling trend -2.8 (-7.7, -1.5)
Kendall County Urban No 480.3 (445.7, 516.9) 89 (64, 102) 151 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Adams County Rural No 547.0 (508.4, 587.7) 63 (22, 88) 154 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
DeKalb County Urban No 567.1 (528.5, 607.7) 50 (17, 83) 164 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Vermilion County Rural No 674.0 (632.9, 717.1) 9 (1, 29) 206 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Kankakee County Urban No 578.0 (544.5, 612.9) 43 (17, 76) 228 falling falling trend -3.1 (-7.9, -1.1)
Macon County Urban No 584.4 (552.4, 617.7) 37 (16, 69) 257 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
McLean County Urban No 503.3 (475.8, 531.9) 83 (57, 95) 259 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Champaign County Urban No 457.6 (432.9, 483.3) 100 (81, 102) 266 stable stable trend -1.2 (-1.8, 0.8)
La Salle County Rural No 614.1 (581.8, 647.9) 23 (8, 53) 277 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Tazewell County Urban No 560.4 (532.1, 589.9) 53 (26, 78) 299 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Rock Island County Urban No 534.0 (507.6, 561.3) 72 (41, 87) 316 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Peoria County Urban No 568.7 (543.2, 595.1) 49 (23, 72) 382 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Sangamon County Urban No 530.6 (507.5, 554.4) 73 (43, 87) 410 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
St. Clair County Urban No 557.2 (535.1, 579.8) 56 (30, 74) 503 stable stable trend -1.2 (-1.6, 0.1)
McHenry County Urban No 525.9 (505.9, 546.4) 75 (49, 86) 550 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 1.1)
Madison County Urban No 563.3 (542.5, 584.7) 52 (29, 71) 570 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Winnebago County Urban No 549.8 (530.0, 570.2) 61 (36, 78) 595 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Kane County Urban No 462.2 (447.4, 477.4) 97 (83, 101) 759 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Lake County Urban No 458.4 (445.9, 471.1) 99 (86, 101) 1,059 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.5)
Will County Urban No 517.6 (503.6, 531.9) 80 (61, 87) 1,086 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
DuPage County Urban No 433.5 (423.3, 443.9) 102 (94, 102) 1,419 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
Cook County Urban No 475.6 (471.0, 480.3) 92 (82, 97) 8,230 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.2, -2.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 2:05 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top