Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 477.9 (473.6, 482.3) N/A 9,722 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Aitkin County Rural No 493.9 (433.9, 560.1) 49 (9, 84) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Anoka County Urban No 476.7 (458.7, 495.2) 64 (39, 74) 557 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Becker County Rural No 472.5 (424.6, 524.3) 67 (21, 84) 74 falling falling trend -2.4 (-7.4, -1.3)
Beltrami County Rural No 479.4 (432.3, 530.3) 59 (18, 84) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Benton County Urban No 535.9 (479.5, 597.1) 27 (6, 75) 68 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.4)
Big Stone County Rural No 596.4 (467.8, 749.4) 8 (1, 85) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.5)
Blue Earth County Urban No 481.6 (440.2, 525.9) 58 (21, 82) 102 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Brown County Rural No 553.0 (494.0, 617.2) 20 (3, 70) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Carlton County Urban No 582.2 (526.4, 642.3) 11 (2, 52) 82 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Carver County Urban No 401.6 (370.2, 434.9) 85 (68, 87) 127 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Cass County Rural No 514.0 (463.8, 568.3) 37 (9, 77) 81 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Chippewa County Rural No 566.4 (480.2, 663.8) 14 (1, 78) 32 falling falling trend -2.6 (-6.8, -0.6)
Chisago County Urban No 562.9 (516.4, 612.3) 15 (4, 52) 113 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 6.5)
Clay County Urban No 485.7 (442.6, 531.8) 54 (19, 83) 96 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Clearwater County Rural No 583.7 (477.0, 707.2) 10 (1, 83) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.2)
Cook County Rural No 345.9 (260.6, 451.6) 87 (36, 87) 11 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.1, 0.3)
Cottonwood County Rural No 535.7 (453.3, 629.3) 28 (2, 83) 31 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Crow Wing County Rural No 496.3 (461.9, 532.6) 46 (21, 76) 161 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Dakota County Urban No 437.1 (421.7, 452.9) 79 (64, 84) 629 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Dodge County Urban No 450.5 (381.7, 528.1) 75 (16, 87) 31 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Douglas County Rural No 474.8 (431.6, 521.3) 65 (22, 84) 92 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Faribault County Rural No 579.3 (501.0, 666.6) 12 (1, 72) 40 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Fillmore County Urban No 556.4 (491.3, 627.9) 19 (3, 72) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Freeborn County Rural No 472.3 (423.5, 525.3) 68 (20, 85) 70 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Goodhue County Rural No 542.4 (497.4, 590.5) 24 (6, 63) 109 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Grant County Rural No 561.1 (442.9, 701.7) 16 (1, 86) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.9, 2.5)
Hennepin County Urban No 449.9 (440.5, 459.3) 76 (61, 80) 1,831 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Houston County Urban No 464.6 (401.9, 534.3) 71 (16, 86) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Hubbard County Rural No 484.5 (427.7, 546.9) 56 (13, 85) 54 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Isanti County Urban No 533.8 (481.7, 589.9) 30 (7, 72) 79 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Itasca County Rural No 529.8 (487.1, 575.2) 34 (9, 67) 119 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Jackson County Rural No 402.8 (325.4, 493.1) 84 (27, 87) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Kanabec County Rural No 557.8 (481.4, 643.0) 18 (1, 77) 40 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 469.1 (424.5, 517.0) 69 (24, 85) 84 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Kittson County Rural No 607.8 (470.6, 773.4) 6 (1, 84) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Koochiching County Rural No 502.5 (427.3, 587.3) 43 (4, 86) 33 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 453.2 (361.7, 561.6) 74 (9, 87) 18 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Lake County Rural No 517.6 (436.6, 609.7) 36 (3, 85) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 486.2 (349.5, 659.0) 53 (1, 87) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.1)
Le Sueur County Urban No 532.7 (473.1, 597.9) 32 (5, 76) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.0, 5.3)
Lincoln County Rural No 501.0 (391.1, 633.2) 44 (2, 87) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.6)
Lyon County Rural No 513.4 (449.4, 583.8) 38 (6, 83) 48 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Mahnomen County Rural No 686.9 (530.5, 875.4) 1 (1, 76) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Marshall County Rural No 465.5 (377.5, 568.1) 70 (7, 87) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Martin County Rural No 492.3 (432.3, 558.6) 50 (10, 85) 50 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
McLeod County Rural No 478.0 (430.4, 529.5) 62 (16, 85) 75 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.5)
Meeker County Rural No 521.8 (460.1, 589.6) 35 (6, 80) 53 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.2)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 648.6 (580.2, 722.7) 5 (1, 25) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Morrison County Rural No 533.0 (480.3, 590.0) 31 (7, 74) 77 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Mower County Rural No 488.8 (440.5, 540.9) 52 (14, 81) 78 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.2)
Murray County Rural No 444.6 (360.6, 543.2) 78 (11, 87) 19 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Nicollet County Urban No 421.0 (371.2, 475.6) 83 (41, 87) 53 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.2, -1.2)
Nobles County Rural No 499.7 (431.1, 576.1) 45 (7, 85) 39 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Norman County Rural No 668.4 (539.2, 819.3) 3 (1, 61) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Olmsted County Urban No 422.9 (399.2, 447.7) 81 (64, 86) 243 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Otter Tail County Rural No 473.9 (439.2, 510.6) 66 (26, 82) 145 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Pennington County Rural No 574.9 (488.2, 672.8) 13 (1, 75) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Pine County Rural No 598.9 (539.9, 662.6) 7 (1, 43) 78 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Pipestone County Rural No 670.0 (560.3, 795.0) 2 (1, 48) 27 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Polk County Urban No 551.0 (493.5, 613.4) 21 (4, 70) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0)
Pope County Rural No 495.4 (414.2, 588.0) 48 (5, 86) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Ramsey County Urban No 478.9 (464.4, 493.7) 60 (40, 72) 852 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Red Lake County Rural No 507.6 (369.8, 680.7) 42 (1, 87) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
Redwood County Rural No 496.0 (422.6, 578.6) 47 (6, 86) 34 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Renville County Rural No 534.8 (457.6, 621.4) 29 (3, 82) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Rice County Rural No 477.0 (437.5, 519.1) 63 (26, 83) 109 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Rock County Urban No 510.2 (417.2, 617.9) 41 (3, 86) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.5)
Roseau County Rural No 462.5 (389.5, 545.2) 72 (11, 87) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Scott County Urban No 435.3 (406.0, 466.1) 80 (53, 86) 174 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Sherburne County Urban No 560.6 (518.8, 604.8) 17 (5, 50) 144 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Sibley County Rural No 490.8 (413.0, 578.7) 51 (5, 86) 29 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
St. Louis County Urban No 511.3 (489.5, 533.7) 40 (21, 63) 434 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Stearns County Urban No 481.9 (455.7, 509.3) 57 (31, 77) 257 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Steele County Rural No 478.2 (429.2, 531.2) 61 (17, 85) 71 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Stevens County Rural No 462.0 (360.8, 582.4) 73 (3, 87) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Swift County Rural No 395.4 (317.4, 486.9) 86 (26, 87) 19 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.1)
Todd County Rural No 421.1 (370.2, 477.2) 82 (40, 87) 50 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.6)
Traverse County Rural No 589.4 (439.6, 775.8) 9 (1, 86) 10 stable stable trend 2.6 (-1.2, 20.1)
Wabasha County Urban No 532.3 (469.6, 601.1) 33 (4, 80) 53 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Wadena County Rural No 656.7 (567.8, 755.9) 4 (1, 37) 40 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.5)
Waseca County Rural No 537.5 (464.6, 618.7) 26 (3, 80) 40 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Washington County Urban No 447.0 (427.6, 467.1) 77 (55, 83) 411 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Watonwan County Rural No 538.2 (446.6, 643.0) 25 (2, 84) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 2.1)
Wilkin County Rural No 544.4 (423.8, 688.4) 22 (1, 87) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.3)
Winona County Rural No 485.2 (441.1, 532.5) 55 (17, 82) 91 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Wright County Urban No 511.3 (480.3, 543.7) 39 (16, 67) 211 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 543.0 (445.0, 656.0) 23 (1, 85) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/23/2026 5:51 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top