Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 479.1 (477.0, 481.3) N/A 39,991 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Anderson County Rural No 726.1 (672.0, 783.5) 8 (3, 48) 138 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.3, 4.0)
Andrews County Rural No 554.4 (454.5, 669.4) 110 (9, 228) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Angelina County Rural No 538.1 (501.4, 576.7) 135 (66, 184) 163 stable stable trend 4.0 (-1.2, 7.6)
Aransas County Urban No 562.9 (506.6, 623.9) 102 (26, 197) 76 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Archer County Urban No 421.1 (332.5, 526.1) 219 (71, 240) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Armstrong County Urban No 542.5 (332.0, 838.2) 128 (1, 241) 4
*
*
Atascosa County Urban No 521.2 (471.4, 574.8) 148 (49, 212) 82 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Austin County Urban No 472.2 (420.1, 529.1) 192 (99, 230) 61 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Bailey County Rural No 436.2 (317.0, 585.1) 216 (22, 241) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.3)
Bandera County Urban No 504.7 (448.3, 566.5) 163 (56, 222) 61 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Bastrop County Urban No 473.7 (439.8, 509.5) 190 (130, 218) 155 falling falling trend -4.5 (-9.1, -2.0)
Baylor County Rural No 860.1 (665.3, 1,093.7) 3 (1, 130) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.1, 1.9)
Bee County Rural No 541.6 (472.9, 617.5) 129 (26, 216) 45 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Bell County Urban No 525.0 (504.1, 546.6) 147 (101, 173) 496 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Bexar County Urban No 460.5 (452.4, 468.7) 205 (178, 210) 2,530 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Blanco County Rural No 520.0 (440.1, 610.5) 150 (21, 231) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Bosque County Urban No 666.8 (594.2, 746.0) 21 (4, 119) 63 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
Bowie County Urban No 620.9 (583.4, 660.2) 50 (18, 114) 208 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 3.3)
Brazoria County Urban No 530.6 (510.2, 551.6) 141 (92, 168) 543 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 1.7)
Brazos County Urban No 447.4 (420.8, 475.2) 212 (162, 225) 218 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Brewster County Rural No 336.0 (261.4, 425.5) 240 (182, 241) 14 falling falling trend -5.2 (-10.7, -3.2)
Briscoe County Rural No 527.0 (312.8, 833.3) 146 (1, 241) 3
*
*
Brooks County Rural No 551.7 (427.3, 701.4) 113 (5, 237) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.6)
Brown County Rural No 535.1 (485.6, 588.4) 137 (44, 204) 88 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Burleson County Urban No 569.4 (496.8, 649.7) 95 (14, 206) 46 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Burnet County Rural No 507.7 (467.1, 551.0) 160 (84, 211) 121 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.3)
Caldwell County Urban No 547.9 (495.5, 604.2) 119 (31, 199) 83 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Calhoun County Rural No 627.3 (550.9, 711.5) 44 (6, 162) 49 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.6)
Callahan County Urban No 547.3 (466.3, 638.4) 121 (11, 222) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8)
Cameron County Urban No 413.0 (397.1, 429.3) 223 (204, 232) 518 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.4, 5.7)
Camp County Rural No 604.4 (507.8, 714.3) 63 (5, 207) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Carson County Urban No 594.8 (460.8, 755.8) 71 (3, 235) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.1)
Cass County Rural No 641.8 (581.3, 706.9) 29 (8, 120) 84 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Castro County Rural No 382.7 (284.2, 505.0) 234 (75, 241) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.4)
Chambers County Urban No 529.2 (471.6, 591.9) 142 (43, 212) 66 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Cherokee County Rural No 554.3 (507.4, 604.3) 111 (41, 189) 105 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Childress County Rural No 680.8 (536.5, 852.3) 14 (1, 207) 15 stable stable trend 16.4 (-1.9, 31.8)
Clay County Urban No 541.0 (452.1, 642.5) 131 (17, 227) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Cochran County Urban No 644.0 (429.7, 928.7) 28 (1, 241) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.4, 0.6)
Coke County Rural No 684.8 (521.5, 884.3) 13 (1, 222) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.4)
Coleman County Rural No 770.3 (650.2, 906.8) 6 (1, 108) 30 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.0)
Collin County Urban No 391.0 (380.2, 402.1) 232 (214, 236) 1,058 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7)
Collingsworth County Rural No 631.6 (422.4, 910.0) 39 (1, 240) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.4)
Colorado County Rural No 587.0 (517.7, 662.8) 80 (13, 186) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Comal County Urban No 469.7 (445.7, 494.6) 196 (147, 216) 303 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Comanche County Rural No 444.9 (374.6, 524.8) 214 (77, 238) 29 falling falling trend -3.6 (-10.2, -2.1)
Concho County Rural No 574.1 (409.3, 783.4) 89 (2, 239) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Cooke County Rural No 556.2 (505.8, 610.2) 108 (31, 192) 92 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Coryell County Urban No 613.5 (564.3, 665.8) 54 (14, 132) 119 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Crane County Rural No 575.7 (400.8, 799.9) 87 (1, 240) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.0, 2.1)
Crockett County Rural No 786.8 (572.3, 1,056.6) 4 (1, 221) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.3)
Crosby County Urban No 565.8 (424.3, 739.6) 99 (3, 237) 11 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.0)
Culberson County Rural No 449.2 (271.4, 698.2) 210 (5, 241) 4 rising rising trend 21.3 (1.8, 59.0)
Dallam County Rural No 513.0 (369.3, 693.5) 157 (5, 240) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.5, 1.4)
Dallas County Urban No 480.5 (472.8, 488.3) 186 (159, 197) 3,136 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Dawson County Rural No 542.8 (442.4, 659.6) 126 (10, 233) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.4)
DeWitt County Rural No 570.7 (500.4, 648.2) 92 (17, 203) 48 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 490.6 (406.2, 587.3) 178 (34, 236) 24 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Delta County Rural No 634.1 (497.4, 797.8) 36 (2, 223) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.6, 2.8)
Denton County Urban No 402.2 (390.0, 414.6) 228 (211, 234) 912 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Dickens County Rural No 498.8 (301.7, 775.5) 167 (1, 241) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.1)
Dimmit County Rural No 667.2 (540.9, 814.5) 20 (1, 194) 19 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.3)
Donley County Rural No 468.0 (327.5, 650.1) 201 (10, 241) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.6)
Duval County Rural No 504.9 (405.6, 621.3) 162 (16, 237) 18 falling falling trend -7.3 (-18.3, -2.2)
Eastland County Rural No 609.4 (535.1, 691.4) 57 (7, 176) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Ector County Urban No 640.5 (602.8, 680.0) 30 (13, 90) 227 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Edwards County Rural No 742.9 (465.6, 1,121.8) 7 (1, 239) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.3, 5.3)
El Paso County Urban No 437.8 (425.8, 449.9) 215 (192, 222) 1,049 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 2.8)
Ellis County Urban No 543.4 (515.4, 572.5) 125 (71, 167) 301 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Erath County Rural No 469.7 (418.1, 525.9) 195 (90, 231) 62 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.6)
Falls County Urban No 549.7 (473.6, 634.7) 116 (16, 217) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.5, -0.1)
Fannin County Rural No 606.1 (549.0, 667.6) 61 (14, 157) 84 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Fayette County Rural No 470.8 (417.7, 528.8) 194 (97, 232) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Fisher County Rural No 609.7 (459.8, 794.2) 56 (1, 236) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Floyd County Rural No 577.1 (439.7, 744.2) 86 (3, 236) 12 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.4)
Fort Bend County Urban No 392.1 (379.6, 404.9) 231 (214, 236) 838 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -0.6)
Franklin County Rural No 538.9 (447.9, 643.1) 133 (13, 231) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-5.8, 7.8)
Freestone County Rural No 610.4 (537.2, 690.9) 55 (9, 171) 51 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Frio County Rural No 488.8 (403.0, 587.6) 180 (28, 237) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.2)
Gaines County Rural No 472.7 (384.0, 575.4) 191 (32, 238) 21 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Galveston County Urban No 540.4 (521.1, 560.3) 132 (89, 159) 625 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Garza County Urban No 629.9 (457.2, 846.0) 42 (1, 236) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
Gillespie County Rural No 404.1 (361.2, 451.0) 225 (169, 238) 68 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
Goliad County Urban No 474.8 (378.1, 589.4) 188 (27, 239) 17 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Gonzales County Rural No 541.5 (467.6, 623.7) 130 (25, 221) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Gray County Rural No 580.2 (504.7, 663.8) 83 (12, 204) 43 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Grayson County Urban No 599.9 (570.0, 631.0) 68 (30, 118) 311 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Gregg County Urban No 567.0 (534.9, 600.7) 97 (46, 152) 238 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Grimes County Rural No 527.6 (469.4, 591.1) 145 (40, 214) 62 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Guadalupe County Urban No 468.1 (442.5, 494.7) 200 (145, 218) 258 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Hale County Rural No 486.9 (426.6, 553.3) 182 (70, 231) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Hall County Rural No 491.7 (343.7, 683.8) 177 (5, 240) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 0.9)
Hamilton County Rural No 691.6 (582.7, 815.4) 11 (2, 153) 30 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.8)
Hansford County Rural No 689.4 (522.3, 893.0) 12 (1, 224) 11 stable stable trend 2.0 (0.0, 4.2)
Hardeman County Rural No 494.5 (351.2, 677.3) 174 (6, 240) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.6)
Hardin County Urban No 555.1 (509.9, 603.1) 109 (44, 180) 115 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.1)
Harris County Urban No 448.6 (443.0, 454.3) 211 (189, 216) 5,256 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
Harrison County Urban No 501.4 (462.6, 542.7) 166 (90, 213) 127 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Hartley County Rural No 416.8 (294.7, 572.6) 220 (28, 241) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.6)
Haskell County Rural No 550.6 (430.1, 695.7) 115 (7, 236) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 1.8)
Hays County Urban No 458.2 (433.3, 484.2) 207 (156, 222) 278 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Hemphill County Rural No 370.9 (230.0, 566.5) 236 (22, 241) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.2, 1.1)
Henderson County Rural No 644.6 (608.2, 682.6) 27 (12, 83) 243 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.9, 7.6)
Hidalgo County Urban No 375.4 (364.0, 387.1) 235 (221, 238) 825 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Hill County Rural No 639.1 (583.3, 698.8) 32 (10, 122) 99 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Hockley County Urban No 591.5 (512.6, 679.2) 75 (10, 208) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Hood County Rural No 479.5 (445.4, 515.5) 187 (114, 218) 153 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.9)
Hopkins County Rural No 561.5 (507.9, 619.3) 103 (28, 188) 81 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Houston County Rural No 528.3 (466.5, 596.2) 143 (39, 217) 53 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Howard County Rural No 598.3 (530.0, 672.9) 69 (11, 174) 58 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Hudspeth County Urban No 869.9 (585.7, 1,242.8) 2 (1, 222) 6
*
*
Hunt County Urban No 591.8 (555.9, 629.4) 74 (26, 131) 210 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.6, -0.8)
Hutchinson County Rural No 498.6 (429.3, 576.0) 168 (39, 230) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Irion County Urban No 511.2 (298.4, 819.2) 158 (1, 241) 3 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 1.3)
Jack County Rural No 625.0 (505.0, 765.1) 45 (3, 216) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Jackson County Rural No 513.3 (436.3, 600.3) 156 (29, 232) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Jasper County Rural No 630.2 (571.6, 693.2) 41 (10, 138) 87 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Jeff Davis County Rural No 402.8 (270.3, 581.4) 227 (27, 241) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.8)
Jefferson County Urban No 520.5 (498.6, 543.1) 149 (95, 181) 439 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Jim Hogg County Rural No 639.7 (473.8, 844.7) 31 (1, 234) 10 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.3)
Jim Wells County Rural No 594.3 (536.1, 657.2) 72 (16, 164) 77 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 6.5)
Johnson County Urban No 580.8 (552.1, 610.6) 82 (43, 132) 325 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Jones County Urban No 533.4 (456.2, 619.8) 139 (20, 223) 34 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Karnes County Rural No 552.3 (458.3, 659.9) 112 (13, 226) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Kaufman County Urban No 592.7 (557.0, 630.1) 73 (28, 136) 224 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Kendall County Urban No 404.8 (365.9, 446.7) 224 (183, 238) 80 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Kerr County Rural No 496.4 (460.7, 534.2) 170 (100, 214) 151 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Kimble County Rural No 464.2 (345.6, 610.8) 203 (12, 240) 11 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.1, -0.3)
Kinney County Rural No 513.6 (369.9, 697.9) 155 (6, 240) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.2)
Kleberg County Rural No 569.6 (500.5, 645.6) 94 (17, 199) 49 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Knox County Rural No 638.7 (468.2, 852.9) 33 (1, 237) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 2.9)
La Salle County Rural No 527.7 (396.9, 688.3) 144 (7, 239) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.4)
Lamar County Rural No 635.1 (586.2, 687.0) 34 (10, 112) 127 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Lamb County Rural No 549.2 (458.2, 653.1) 117 (9, 228) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Lampasas County Urban No 624.0 (553.2, 701.3) 48 (7, 156) 58 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Lavaca County Rural No 573.3 (507.7, 645.2) 90 (18, 196) 57 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Lee County Rural No 510.6 (438.9, 590.8) 159 (37, 228) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Leon County Rural No 635.1 (554.8, 723.9) 35 (5, 158) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Liberty County Urban No 649.2 (604.1, 697.0) 25 (9, 100) 166 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Limestone County Rural No 545.4 (479.8, 617.5) 123 (27, 212) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Lipscomb County Rural No 495.0 (325.2, 720.5) 173 (3, 241) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.4, 3.0)
Live Oak County Rural No 469.0 (385.8, 565.2) 197 (44, 238) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Llano County Rural No 495.4 (444.3, 551.0) 171 (74, 222) 76 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Lubbock County Urban No 531.3 (509.6, 553.8) 140 (90, 170) 463 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Lynn County Urban No 520.0 (389.1, 681.6) 151 (6, 240) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 2.8)
Madison County Rural No 600.3 (501.6, 712.9) 67 (5, 207) 26 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Marion County Rural No 548.0 (461.7, 646.3) 118 (15, 224) 29 rising rising trend 13.3 (4.7, 22.0)
Martin County Urban No 627.4 (450.8, 851.9) 43 (1, 238) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.3)
Mason County Rural No 569.6 (436.3, 731.9) 93 (4, 237) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.2)
Matagorda County Rural No 603.2 (544.7, 666.2) 64 (14, 162) 80 stable stable trend 1.1 (-6.8, 10.8)
Maverick County Urban No 456.7 (408.3, 509.4) 208 (121, 232) 66 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
McCulloch County Rural No 631.2 (520.4, 759.4) 40 (3, 210) 23 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.5)
McLennan County Urban No 519.2 (497.4, 541.6) 152 (101, 180) 439 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 2.1)
Medina County Urban No 480.6 (437.0, 527.5) 185 (101, 222) 92 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Menard County Rural No 383.1 (248.0, 571.6) 233 (20, 241) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 2.6)
Midland County Urban No 468.1 (438.1, 499.6) 199 (141, 219) 191 falling falling trend -2.2 (-5.6, -0.7)
Milam County Rural No 561.0 (500.1, 627.4) 104 (24, 206) 63 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Mills County Rural No 588.4 (456.2, 747.0) 77 (3, 233) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.8)
Mitchell County Rural No 577.3 (455.8, 721.5) 85 (4, 233) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.5)
Montague County Rural No 577.5 (510.8, 650.8) 84 (17, 193) 55 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Montgomery County Urban No 471.3 (456.9, 485.9) 193 (157, 209) 875 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Moore County Rural No 460.5 (381.0, 551.4) 206 (63, 238) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Morris County Rural No 679.0 (583.9, 785.6) 15 (2, 149) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Motley County Rural No 542.7 (294.5, 918.8) 127 (1, 241) 3 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.1)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 587.1 (540.7, 636.4) 79 (24, 156) 122 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Navarro County Rural No 567.0 (518.9, 618.4) 98 (32, 177) 105 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Newton County Rural No 574.5 (489.3, 670.5) 88 (10, 212) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Nolan County Rural No 665.1 (572.7, 768.2) 22 (3, 149) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Nueces County Urban No 450.7 (433.4, 468.5) 209 (174, 220) 527 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Ochiltree County Rural No 365.6 (269.6, 485.0) 237 (109, 241) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.7)
Oldham County Urban No 596.8 (335.8, 974.3) 70 (1, 241) 3
*
*
Orange County Urban No 600.5 (560.8, 642.4) 66 (21, 137) 175 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 648.9 (585.0, 718.0) 26 (6, 122) 78 stable stable trend 1.0 (-5.0, 8.5)
Panola County Rural No 624.7 (553.8, 702.2) 46 (8, 158) 58 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Parker County Urban No 557.5 (528.3, 587.8) 106 (56, 160) 289 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Parmer County Rural No 468.3 (367.4, 588.3) 198 (27, 239) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.7, 2.4)
Pecos County Rural No 515.0 (421.0, 623.9) 153 (14, 237) 21 stable stable trend 3.2 (-1.3, 15.1)
Polk County Rural No 903.8 (828.6, 983.6) 1 (1, 10) 145 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 1.9)
Potter County Urban No 568.4 (533.3, 605.2) 96 (45, 157) 201 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Presidio County Rural No 242.8 (167.3, 342.1) 241 (220, 241) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.3)
Rains County Rural No 606.0 (519.0, 703.7) 62 (7, 189) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Randall County Urban No 483.0 (454.5, 512.7) 184 (127, 211) 222 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Reagan County Rural No 676.6 (412.3, 1,040.7) 16 (1, 241) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.1, 3.4)
Real County Rural No 786.4 (605.8, 1,006.3) 5 (1, 167) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.8)
Red River County Rural No 661.0 (570.5, 762.0) 24 (4, 158) 39 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Reeves County Rural No 606.8 (494.7, 736.8) 60 (4, 221) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.2)
Refugio County Rural No 662.4 (539.1, 805.9) 23 (2, 193) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Robertson County Urban No 602.7 (524.7, 689.3) 65 (9, 187) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Rockwall County Urban No 461.2 (426.8, 497.6) 204 (135, 226) 142 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -0.9)
Runnels County Rural No 667.7 (562.7, 786.9) 19 (2, 164) 29 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Rusk County Urban No 607.7 (558.1, 660.6) 59 (16, 145) 114 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.8, 6.3)
Sabine County Rural No 538.3 (457.0, 630.4) 134 (16, 223) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
San Augustine County Rural No 670.6 (562.9, 793.2) 18 (2, 179) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4)
San Jacinto County Urban No 590.4 (530.9, 654.9) 76 (16, 177) 76 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
San Patricio County Urban No 550.7 (507.5, 596.6) 114 (45, 181) 123 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
San Saba County Rural No 585.4 (460.5, 734.7) 81 (4, 233) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.6)
Schleicher County Rural No 404.0 (248.3, 624.6) 226 (9, 241) 4 stable stable trend -7.9 (-17.6, 15.1)
Scurry County Rural No 564.3 (477.3, 662.5) 101 (12, 218) 30 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Shackelford County Rural No 355.3 (224.6, 535.0) 238 (51, 241) 4 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.5, -1.7)
Shelby County Rural No 674.8 (600.3, 756.2) 17 (4, 126) 60 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Smith County Urban No 498.1 (476.9, 520.0) 169 (120, 195) 423 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.1, 2.0)
Somervell County Rural No 490.5 (395.5, 601.4) 179 (20, 238) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Starr County Rural No 432.5 (388.0, 480.7) 217 (146, 236) 70 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Stephens County Rural No 564.5 (462.9, 682.3) 100 (9, 228) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Stonewall County Rural No 618.4 (356.0, 993.5) 51 (1, 241) 3 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.0, 2.8)
Sutton County Rural No 573.2 (409.0, 782.7) 91 (2, 239) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.9)
Swisher County Rural No 633.9 (501.6, 790.5) 37 (2, 228) 16 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.9)
Tarrant County Urban No 487.3 (478.8, 495.8) 181 (153, 191) 2,703 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
Taylor County Urban No 537.1 (507.1, 568.4) 136 (70, 177) 244 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Terry County Rural No 556.5 (454.7, 674.3) 107 (9, 227) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 1.8)
Throckmorton County Rural No 399.5 (239.4, 636.4) 229 (10, 241) 3 falling falling trend -6.1 (-30.3, -1.9)
Titus County Rural No 547.0 (482.8, 617.4) 122 (29, 209) 53 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Tom Green County Urban No 483.4 (453.4, 514.8) 183 (124, 213) 198 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Travis County Urban No 393.4 (382.9, 404.0) 230 (215, 236) 1,170 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
Trinity County Rural No 695.0 (609.8, 789.1) 10 (2, 107) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Tyler County Rural No 558.1 (489.9, 633.1) 105 (18, 211) 50 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Upshur County Urban No 614.0 (560.6, 671.2) 53 (13, 148) 100 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 2.0)
Upton County Rural No 347.5 (203.3, 553.0) 239 (17, 241) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.0, 1.0)
Uvalde County Rural No 608.9 (536.5, 688.4) 58 (8, 174) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Val Verde County Rural No 495.4 (444.4, 550.6) 172 (75, 221) 69 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Van Zandt County Rural No 547.5 (507.5, 589.8) 120 (51, 179) 142 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Victoria County Urban No 514.4 (479.4, 551.2) 154 (89, 200) 165 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Walker County Rural No 492.5 (451.4, 536.4) 176 (99, 216) 110 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Waller County Urban No 534.3 (481.0, 592.0) 138 (42, 207) 78 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Ward County Rural No 502.0 (398.8, 623.6) 165 (16, 239) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.8)
Washington County Rural No 467.7 (421.5, 517.7) 202 (108, 230) 77 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Webb County Urban No 446.1 (422.0, 471.2) 213 (167, 223) 265 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.5)
Wharton County Rural No 503.0 (454.4, 555.4) 164 (77, 220) 80 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Wheeler County Rural No 616.9 (476.9, 786.7) 52 (2, 232) 13 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Wichita County Urban No 633.1 (598.9, 668.6) 38 (16, 96) 265 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Wilbarger County Rural No 544.7 (455.3, 646.5) 124 (14, 229) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Willacy County Rural No 427.4 (357.6, 507.0) 218 (98, 239) 26 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.7)
Williamson County Urban No 414.2 (400.4, 428.4) 222 (203, 231) 710 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Wilson County Urban No 507.2 (461.1, 556.7) 161 (77, 216) 93 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Winkler County Rural No 474.6 (352.0, 627.1) 189 (12, 240) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.2, -0.1)
Wise County Urban No 587.3 (542.8, 634.5) 78 (24, 155) 138 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Wood County Rural No 624.1 (579.2, 671.7) 47 (13, 127) 153 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.6, 11.8)
Yoakum County Rural No 492.9 (363.6, 653.3) 175 (9, 240) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.6, 4.0)
Young County Rural No 695.0 (611.6, 786.7) 9 (3, 109) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Zapata County Rural No 416.0 (329.1, 518.8) 221 (78, 240) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Zavala County Rural No 623.7 (498.5, 770.9) 49 (3, 220) 17 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.1)
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 4:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top