Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A No 441.8 (440.1, 443.4) N/A 56,521 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.5, -1.5)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Trinity County Rural No 325.9 (274.7, 384.3) 57 (48, 58) 30 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.4, -2.4)
Mono County Rural No 206.2 (152.7, 272.8) 58 (57, 58) 10 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.4, -1.6)
Sierra County Rural No 389.2 (273.1, 540.3) 51 (3, 58) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.4, -1.0)
Contra Costa County Urban No 421.7 (412.8, 430.8) 44 (37, 49) 1,727 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -1.9)
Tulare County Urban No 494.8 (476.8, 513.3) 14 (10, 28) 593 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.2)
Solano County Urban No 507.5 (491.5, 523.9) 13 (9, 22) 791 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.9, -1.2)
Plumas County Rural No 463.5 (406.3, 526.7) 32 (6, 53) 52 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Napa County Urban No 436.4 (412.7, 461.1) 38 (25, 49) 257 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
San Mateo County Urban No 374.7 (364.6, 385.1) 55 (49, 57) 1,046 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.1)
Alameda County Urban No 400.3 (392.6, 408.1) 49 (44, 52) 2,119 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -2.0)
Imperial County Urban No 385.6 (361.9, 410.4) 52 (42, 57) 201 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Mariposa County Rural No 432.0 (374.6, 496.0) 39 (10, 56) 43 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Santa Clara County Urban No 368.8 (361.9, 375.8) 56 (52, 57) 2,235 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.2, -1.9)
Marin County Urban No 380.7 (365.5, 396.3) 54 (47, 57) 477 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
San Francisco County Urban No 385.3 (375.5, 395.3) 53 (47, 56) 1,200 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
El Dorado County Urban No 422.5 (403.0, 442.6) 43 (32, 51) 368 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Nevada County Rural No 418.9 (394.7, 444.1) 45 (31, 53) 238 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.3)
Stanislaus County Urban No 520.5 (504.6, 536.8) 11 (7, 16) 832 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -1.1)
Colusa County Rural No 408.9 (343.7, 482.9) 48 (11, 57) 28 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Mendocino County Rural No 492.3 (461.8, 524.4) 16 (8, 36) 206 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Santa Cruz County Urban No 410.8 (392.6, 429.7) 47 (35, 53) 398 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2)
Yuba County Urban No 556.3 (512.6, 602.7) 8 (1, 17) 127 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.0)
Inyo County Rural No 425.8 (367.6, 490.8) 41 (11, 57) 40 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.7)
Monterey County Urban No 396.8 (381.7, 412.4) 50 (43, 55) 531 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Sonoma County Urban No 476.4 (462.9, 490.3) 23 (14, 33) 964 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Amador County Rural No 493.8 (452.4, 538.0) 15 (6, 39) 110 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Kern County Urban No 487.4 (474.3, 500.8) 19 (12, 29) 1,105 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Los Angeles County Urban No 427.7 (424.5, 431.0) 40 (36, 45) 13,504 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.5, -1.4)
Orange County Urban No 415.6 (410.1, 421.1) 46 (40, 49) 4,479 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.6, -1.4)
San Joaquin County Urban No 477.2 (464.3, 490.3) 22 (14, 33) 1,075 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
Tuolumne County Rural No 474.9 (439.4, 512.6) 24 (10, 44) 139 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Lake County Rural No 572.4 (535.0, 611.8) 4 (1, 13) 183 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Lassen County Rural No 471.3 (412.4, 536.2) 26 (5, 53) 47 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Sacramento County Urban No 492.0 (483.2, 500.8) 18 (12, 25) 2,472 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.2)
San Bernardino County Urban No 492.3 (484.0, 500.7) 17 (12, 25) 2,842 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
San Diego County Urban No 458.8 (453.0, 464.7) 33 (25, 36) 4,816 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.3)
San Luis Obispo County Urban No 438.2 (421.3, 455.6) 37 (28, 47) 525 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Yolo County Urban No 473.6 (449.1, 499.1) 25 (12, 39) 285 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Riverside County Urban No 466.6 (459.8, 473.4) 28 (21, 34) 3,689 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Tehama County Rural No 564.2 (524.4, 606.2) 6 (1, 14) 152 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Santa Barbara County Urban No 425.1 (410.5, 440.1) 42 (33, 49) 656 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Sutter County Urban No 464.3 (432.4, 497.9) 30 (12, 45) 159 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Fresno County Urban No 463.5 (452.1, 475.2) 31 (20, 37) 1,276 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Shasta County Urban No 545.4 (522.1, 569.5) 10 (3, 13) 424 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Kings County Urban No 467.3 (435.7, 500.6) 27 (11, 45) 167 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Merced County Urban No 480.0 (457.1, 503.8) 21 (11, 36) 341 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Siskiyou County Rural No 554.9 (510.8, 601.8) 9 (1, 20) 125 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Madera County Urban No 465.5 (437.7, 494.5) 29 (12, 42) 217 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Butte County Urban No 566.3 (542.4, 590.9) 5 (2, 11) 437 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
San Benito County Urban No 455.0 (411.8, 501.3) 34 (10, 51) 85 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Calaveras County Rural No 481.7 (443.7, 522.3) 20 (9, 43) 124 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Humboldt County Rural No 597.5 (566.9, 629.3) 3 (1, 9) 304 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Modoc County Rural No 513.3 (424.1, 616.1) 12 (1, 53) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.5)
Glenn County Rural No 557.3 (491.9, 629.0) 7 (1, 32) 54 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 5.5)
Placer County Urban No 445.1 (431.1, 459.5) 35 (26, 43) 770 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 1.9)
Ventura County Urban No 442.0 (431.3, 452.9) 36 (30, 43) 1,319 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 2.8)
Del Norte County Rural No 620.1 (553.9, 692.1) 1 (1, 13) 67 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.5, 7.6)
Alpine County Rural No 612.0 (368.7, 968.1) 2 (1, 57) 4
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 12:10 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top