Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Idaho N/A No 470.0 (462.3, 477.8) N/A 2,970 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.1, -1.0)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Boise County Urban No 304.7 (230.8, 395.2) 41 (30, 42) 13 falling falling trend -5.9 (-11.3, -3.2)
Bonner County Rural No 441.6 (403.6, 482.2) 33 (15, 38) 107 falling falling trend -5.8 (-11.5, -2.8)
Kootenai County Urban No 497.6 (473.7, 522.4) 19 (6, 26) 339 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.8, -2.9)
Valley County Rural No 375.5 (303.2, 459.8) 40 (16, 42) 21 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -0.9)
Blaine County Rural No 299.5 (253.9, 351.1) 42 (38, 42) 32 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -0.8)
Benewah County Rural No 554.0 (456.3, 666.7) 3 (1, 35) 24 falling falling trend -1.8 (-5.4, -0.5)
Boundary County Rural No 529.3 (447.1, 622.6) 7 (1, 36) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.1)
Gem County Urban No 463.0 (401.9, 531.0) 24 (4, 39) 42 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
Owyhee County Urban No 446.8 (363.3, 543.9) 29 (3, 41) 20 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Shoshone County Rural No 551.6 (472.1, 640.9) 4 (1, 32) 35 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Ada County Urban No 452.0 (437.2, 467.2) 27 (19, 34) 728 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1)
Lemhi County Rural No 496.6 (403.9, 604.4) 20 (1, 39) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.0)
Elmore County Rural No 519.0 (451.5, 593.8) 10 (1, 35) 44 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 411.6 (349.3, 481.9) 35 (11, 41) 33 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Oneida County Rural No 393.2 (277.2, 542.8) 38 (2, 42) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.3)
Fremont County Rural No 407.6 (329.9, 498.3) 36 (7, 42) 20 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Gooding County Rural No 442.5 (369.9, 525.5) 31 (5, 40) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Jerome County Urban No 481.3 (409.0, 562.6) 22 (2, 39) 33 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Latah County Rural No 446.3 (393.0, 504.9) 30 (8, 39) 52 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.2)
Nez Perce County Urban No 502.4 (457.4, 550.6) 15 (3, 32) 93 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.1)
Payette County Rural No 509.2 (448.2, 576.3) 13 (1, 34) 52 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Bingham County Rural No 442.4 (394.9, 494.0) 32 (11, 39) 65 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Adams County Rural No 459.4 (345.3, 600.5) 25 (1, 41) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.2)
Minidoka County Rural No 511.7 (439.5, 592.3) 12 (1, 35) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Twin Falls County Urban No 504.1 (469.1, 541.1) 14 (4, 28) 157 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.3)
Washington County Rural No 536.2 (452.9, 631.0) 6 (1, 35) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.3)
Bonneville County Urban No 451.9 (420.7, 484.7) 28 (14, 37) 160 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Teton County Rural No 438.9 (334.8, 564.6) 34 (2, 42) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 2.5)
Butte County Urban No 597.2 (414.7, 833.7) 1 (1, 41) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.4, 2.2)
Canyon County Urban No 492.4 (469.0, 516.6) 21 (7, 27) 346 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Lewis County Rural No 526.5 (392.3, 694.1) 8 (1, 40) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.7)
Cassia County Rural No 463.3 (396.0, 538.9) 23 (3, 40) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Bannock County Urban No 500.8 (462.0, 542.0) 17 (4, 30) 129 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Caribou County Rural No 501.6 (386.0, 641.5) 16 (1, 40) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Idaho County Rural No 549.4 (482.0, 624.0) 5 (1, 29) 51 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Lincoln County Rural No 523.0 (373.1, 713.0) 9 (1, 41) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.6, 2.5)
Custer County Rural No 517.5 (391.2, 671.7) 11 (1, 40) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.1)
Power County Rural No 499.2 (384.5, 637.6) 18 (1, 40) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.7, 2.8)
Franklin County Urban No 404.2 (324.5, 497.5) 37 (8, 42) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.8, 2.4)
Clearwater County Rural No 561.4 (472.6, 662.6) 2 (1, 34) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.8)
Bear Lake County Rural No 452.6 (345.4, 583.3) 26 (1, 42) 12 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Madison County Rural No 381.4 (313.3, 459.7) 39 (16, 42) 22 stable stable trend 8.8 (-2.7, 17.4)
Camas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clark County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 5:47 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top