Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas N/A No 512.1 (505.9, 518.4) N/A 5,277 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Anderson County Rural No 553.0 (446.5, 677.6) 42 (6, 100) 19 falling falling trend -13.8 (-27.6, -0.6)
Clark County Rural No 525.6 (312.5, 822.9) 56 (2, 104) 4 stable stable trend -8.6 (-32.9, 0.6)
Shawnee County Urban No 505.3 (481.7, 529.7) 69 (43, 83) 356 falling falling trend -3.9 (-8.8, -1.1)
Ottawa County Rural No 489.1 (373.5, 630.0) 75 (7, 104) 12 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.4, -0.1)
Coffey County Rural No 483.2 (389.1, 593.7) 77 (13, 103) 18 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.5)
Chautauqua County Rural No 504.2 (364.8, 680.9) 71 (4, 104) 9 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.1)
Scott County Rural No 405.7 (293.6, 547.6) 101 (20, 104) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.1)
Stafford County Rural No 446.7 (320.3, 607.1) 94 (10, 104) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.4)
Jackson County Urban No 469.7 (391.4, 559.2) 82 (26, 103) 25 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.5)
Wyandotte County Urban No 580.6 (549.5, 613.0) 31 (16, 56) 275 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Norton County Rural No 443.1 (327.8, 585.7) 95 (15, 104) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.0, 0.5)
Pottawatomie County Urban No 451.0 (387.4, 522.1) 92 (37, 103) 37 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Rice County Rural No 535.4 (435.8, 651.3) 49 (8, 100) 20 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.3)
Gray County Rural No 511.6 (379.7, 674.6) 67 (5, 104) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.5)
Johnson County Urban No 428.3 (415.3, 441.6) 99 (81, 100) 847 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 378.5 (250.1, 551.1) 102 (17, 104) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.7)
Atchison County Rural No 503.5 (426.6, 590.5) 72 (17, 101) 31 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.3)
Barber County Rural No 622.6 (467.9, 811.8) 14 (2, 100) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.0)
Chase County Rural No 548.6 (373.4, 777.8) 45 (2, 104) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.9, 1.8)
Haskell County Rural No 376.6 (236.6, 567.9) 103 (11, 104) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 543.6 (488.4, 603.4) 47 (16, 87) 72 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Pawnee County Rural No 447.4 (343.5, 572.8) 93 (20, 104) 13 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.2)
Graham County Rural No 453.6 (313.8, 640.1) 90 (8, 104) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.5, 0.7)
Greenwood County Rural No 544.9 (434.6, 675.8) 46 (5, 101) 17 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.1)
Sedgwick County Urban No 522.4 (506.9, 538.2) 58 (41, 73) 893 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Sheridan County Rural No 409.4 (266.2, 607.0) 100 (9, 104) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.1, 1.3)
Osage County Urban No 513.3 (437.9, 598.0) 63 (16, 99) 34 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Allen County Rural No 559.5 (472.7, 657.8) 40 (7, 97) 30 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Douglas County Urban No 471.5 (438.0, 507.0) 81 (53, 96) 152 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Miami County Urban No 465.0 (413.6, 521.0) 86 (40, 101) 61 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Stevens County Rural No 434.8 (306.8, 597.1) 98 (11, 104) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.0, 1.7)
Butler County Urban No 532.3 (490.2, 577.1) 51 (25, 83) 123 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Geary County Urban No 577.9 (499.1, 665.7) 32 (8, 84) 39 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Harvey County Urban No 513.7 (461.6, 570.0) 62 (26, 93) 74 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Morris County Rural No 587.0 (465.7, 730.9) 30 (3, 98) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Osborne County Rural No 476.2 (345.9, 641.3) 79 (7, 104) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.3)
Smith County Rural No 462.8 (336.7, 621.9) 87 (9, 104) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.4)
Ford County Rural No 491.3 (427.0, 562.5) 74 (24, 99) 44 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Leavenworth County Urban No 540.2 (500.9, 581.6) 48 (24, 79) 146 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Thomas County Rural No 467.7 (363.2, 593.4) 84 (12, 104) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Finney County Rural No 459.3 (399.6, 525.4) 88 (36, 102) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Labette County Rural No 622.4 (549.4, 702.5) 15 (5, 67) 53 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.5)
Mitchell County Rural No 527.6 (409.0, 670.6) 55 (6, 103) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.7)
Sherman County Rural No 452.7 (343.5, 586.9) 91 (13, 104) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.3)
Sumner County Urban No 602.1 (532.5, 678.3) 25 (6, 71) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Barton County Rural No 530.9 (469.3, 598.4) 54 (16, 92) 57 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Cherokee County Urban No 630.8 (554.6, 714.8) 13 (5, 66) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Comanche County Rural No 615.7 (404.6, 902.7) 17 (2, 104) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.3, 2.5)
Ellis County Rural No 465.9 (404.6, 534.0) 85 (34, 102) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.1)
Kearny County Rural No 468.5 (321.3, 661.1) 83 (5, 104) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.0, 2.5)
McPherson County Rural No 482.6 (429.7, 540.2) 78 (34, 99) 65 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 570.7 (496.3, 653.1) 36 (8, 87) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Reno County Rural No 519.3 (480.3, 560.7) 59 (31, 86) 135 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Rush County Rural No 592.1 (428.3, 798.4) 29 (2, 103) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.2)
Saline County Rural No 511.7 (469.6, 556.5) 66 (31, 88) 111 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Seward County Rural No 516.5 (430.7, 614.2) 61 (12, 100) 26 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Woodson County Rural No 505.2 (354.3, 699.1) 70 (3, 104) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.1)
Bourbon County Rural No 489.1 (410.1, 579.0) 76 (20, 102) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Brown County Rural No 671.1 (560.2, 797.5) 10 (2, 74) 27 stable stable trend -0.5 (-13.9, 2.6)
Cowley County Rural No 631.0 (571.2, 695.4) 12 (5, 53) 83 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Doniphan County Urban No 603.9 (485.0, 743.3) 23 (3, 96) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Neosho County Rural No 600.6 (518.4, 692.2) 27 (5, 82) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Clay County Rural No 512.2 (415.9, 624.6) 65 (10, 102) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Decatur County Rural No 439.7 (303.6, 618.7) 96 (9, 104) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.4)
Elk County Rural No 840.1 (628.6, 1,101.2) 3 (1, 74) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.5)
Lyon County Rural No 524.6 (463.6, 591.5) 57 (20, 94) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Rawlins County Rural No 506.8 (352.3, 708.7) 68 (4, 104) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.0)
Riley County Urban No 512.4 (461.2, 567.7) 64 (25, 92) 76 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Washington County Rural No 439.5 (335.6, 566.5) 97 (16, 104) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Grant County Rural No 549.8 (419.1, 708.9) 44 (4, 103) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.7, 2.1)
Hamilton County Rural No 613.8 (374.4, 949.3) 19 (1, 104) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.6, 3.4)
Dickinson County Rural No 615.1 (539.9, 697.8) 18 (5, 72) 50 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Pratt County Rural No 519.3 (421.6, 633.2) 60 (9, 101) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Rooks County Rural No 554.6 (424.2, 712.7) 41 (4, 103) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Russell County Rural No 577.6 (463.6, 711.1) 33 (4, 98) 19 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.7)
Wabaunsee County Urban No 577.1 (458.7, 716.6) 34 (4, 100) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.9)
Franklin County Rural No 612.1 (543.1, 687.4) 20 (6, 71) 59 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Linn County Urban No 620.5 (519.3, 735.8) 16 (3, 86) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Marshall County Rural No 564.4 (467.7, 675.1) 38 (6, 96) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Phillips County Rural No 601.1 (468.6, 760.4) 26 (3, 100) 14 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Crawford County Rural No 673.2 (610.9, 740.3) 9 (4, 38) 87 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Jewell County Rural No 550.8 (403.5, 737.3) 43 (3, 103) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.8, 1.7)
Cheyenne County Rural No 501.1 (339.6, 713.9) 73 (4, 104) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.3)
Logan County Rural No 459.2 (302.4, 672.5) 89 (5, 104) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.0)
Marion County Rural No 531.9 (450.4, 624.3) 52 (9, 97) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Cloud County Rural No 570.6 (467.6, 689.7) 37 (5, 98) 22 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Ness County Rural No 531.4 (372.4, 738.6) 53 (3, 104) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Gove County Rural No 560.0 (395.4, 773.7) 39 (3, 104) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Harper County Rural No 685.4 (542.9, 854.3) 8 (2, 85) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.0)
Wilson County Rural No 605.0 (499.2, 726.9) 22 (4, 94) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Lane County Rural No 611.9 (378.1, 934.2) 21 (1, 104) 4 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 2.9)
Ellsworth County Rural No 534.0 (417.7, 672.4) 50 (5, 102) 15 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.3)
Edwards County Rural No 725.8 (528.4, 973.0) 6 (1, 94) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.5, 3.3)
Meade County Rural No 709.3 (533.5, 924.4) 7 (2, 94) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.1)
Kingman County Rural No 1,119.0 (958.1, 1,299.6) 1 (1, 4) 36 stable stable trend 1.0 (-14.2, 12.0)
Nemaha County Rural No 603.6 (504.4, 716.8) 24 (4, 89) 28 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Morton County Rural No 852.3 (624.4, 1,135.4) 2 (1, 74) 9 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.1, 4.1)
Kiowa County Rural No 572.5 (383.9, 822.8) 35 (2, 104) 6 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 4.8)
Trego County Rural No 752.0 (563.1, 985.2) 5 (1, 89) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (0.0, 4.0)
Republic County Rural No 646.1 (508.2, 810.7) 11 (2, 93) 16 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.9, 10.2)
Greeley County Rural No 770.2 (427.7, 1,267.9) 4 (1, 104) 3
*
*
Hodgeman County Rural No 599.9 (376.5, 907.2) 28 (2, 104) 4
*
*
Stanton County Rural No 474.0 (279.1, 752.9) 80 (3, 104) 3
*
*
Wichita County Rural No 346.5 (192.9, 574.1) 104 (12, 104) 3
*
*
Wallace County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/22/2026 2:07 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top