Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A No 529.7 (526.4, 533.0) N/A 20,162 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.2, -1.1)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Manistee County Rural No 554.3 (497.9, 615.4) 41 (7, 77) 74 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.3, -1.1)
Gogebic County Rural No 469.9 (404.3, 543.3) 76 (25, 83) 38 falling falling trend -4.1 (-12.6, -2.3)
Wexford County Rural No 535.1 (481.5, 593.1) 56 (10, 80) 75 falling falling trend -2.9 (-10.6, -0.9)
Mackinac County Rural No 518.0 (439.5, 606.6) 62 (6, 83) 32 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.6)
Keweenaw County Rural No 442.2 (299.5, 637.0) 82 (3, 83) 6 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.4)
Wayne County Urban No 544.9 (536.5, 553.3) 47 (35, 59) 3,337 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.7)
Benzie County Urban No 455.3 (395.1, 522.1) 79 (34, 83) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Van Buren County Rural No 552.9 (514.7, 593.3) 42 (12, 71) 165 stable stable trend -1.7 (-9.2, 0.2)
Washtenaw County Urban No 448.2 (430.9, 465.9) 81 (72, 83) 521 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Barry County Urban No 516.3 (475.5, 559.7) 65 (22, 80) 124 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Oakland County Urban No 461.0 (452.4, 469.8) 78 (71, 82) 2,216 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Clinton County Urban No 453.3 (419.2, 489.5) 80 (63, 83) 134 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Dickinson County Rural No 466.3 (414.2, 523.2) 77 (40, 83) 59 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.6)
Livingston County Urban No 495.5 (472.6, 519.1) 72 (54, 79) 374 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Mason County Rural No 563.7 (509.3, 622.4) 34 (6, 76) 82 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Arenac County Rural No 543.5 (470.6, 624.8) 48 (5, 82) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Eaton County Urban No 515.4 (485.2, 546.9) 66 (34, 77) 225 falling falling trend -1.2 (-5.0, -0.5)
Genesee County Urban No 562.5 (545.8, 579.7) 35 (21, 54) 879 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Kalamazoo County Urban No 523.4 (501.7, 545.7) 60 (37, 73) 451 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Otsego County Rural No 507.7 (449.6, 571.2) 69 (16, 82) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Saginaw County Urban No 539.7 (516.7, 563.4) 49 (24, 69) 425 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Antrim County Rural No 498.1 (442.7, 558.6) 71 (21, 83) 62 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.3)
Iron County Rural No 528.6 (451.1, 615.7) 58 (5, 82) 37 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Lapeer County Urban No 535.5 (501.1, 571.5) 54 (20, 74) 193 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Macomb County Urban No 537.1 (525.9, 548.5) 52 (38, 63) 1,795 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.8)
Marquette County Rural No 510.2 (471.7, 551.1) 68 (28, 80) 135 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Monroe County Urban No 562.0 (535.5, 589.5) 36 (14, 62) 349 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Newaygo County Rural No 578.7 (532.3, 628.0) 27 (6, 67) 120 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Ogemaw County Rural No 605.9 (541.1, 676.5) 15 (1, 67) 67 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
St. Joseph County Rural No 550.4 (507.9, 595.5) 43 (12, 73) 128 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Alger County Rural No 485.0 (393.7, 591.1) 73 (7, 83) 21 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Bay County Urban No 567.1 (535.9, 599.8) 32 (12, 64) 254 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Branch County Rural No 535.1 (486.9, 586.9) 55 (13, 78) 94 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Jackson County Urban No 587.2 (560.2, 615.1) 24 (9, 48) 367 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Kent County Urban No 513.3 (499.1, 527.8) 67 (50, 73) 1,030 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
St. Clair County Urban No 572.1 (546.1, 599.0) 30 (13, 56) 380 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Allegan County Rural No 546.7 (515.4, 579.4) 46 (17, 70) 240 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Berrien County Urban No 538.7 (513.5, 564.7) 51 (24, 70) 354 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
Charlevoix County Rural No 522.8 (468.2, 582.1) 61 (13, 81) 70 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Cheboygan County Rural No 550.1 (495.2, 609.6) 44 (8, 77) 77 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Grand Traverse County Urban No 477.1 (446.9, 508.7) 74 (56, 82) 194 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Leelanau County Urban No 401.3 (354.8, 452.5) 83 (73, 83) 57 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Lenawee County Rural No 536.7 (504.4, 570.4) 53 (21, 74) 214 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Presque Isle County Rural No 498.9 (430.0, 576.0) 70 (14, 83) 41 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Tuscola County Rural No 569.4 (526.5, 615.0) 31 (7, 69) 134 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Cass County Urban No 575.8 (531.7, 622.6) 29 (6, 68) 132 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 2.1)
Delta County Rural No 548.9 (501.7, 599.4) 45 (11, 75) 103 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Emmet County Rural No 517.8 (468.5, 571.0) 63 (17, 81) 84 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Isabella County Rural No 599.1 (548.4, 653.3) 19 (2, 60) 107 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Muskegon County Urban No 585.1 (558.7, 612.5) 25 (9, 49) 383 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Shiawassee County Rural No 566.2 (526.3, 608.3) 33 (8, 68) 155 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Calhoun County Urban No 601.6 (571.5, 632.9) 17 (6, 42) 309 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Montcalm County Urban No 594.7 (552.1, 639.8) 21 (5, 59) 149 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.2, 0.0)
Osceola County Rural No 606.9 (539.7, 680.3) 14 (1, 69) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Ottawa County Urban No 470.6 (451.6, 490.1) 75 (67, 82) 473 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Clare County Rural No 665.5 (606.4, 728.8) 4 (1, 32) 99 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Houghton County Rural No 578.7 (522.0, 640.0) 26 (4, 72) 78 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Huron County Rural No 557.4 (506.9, 611.7) 39 (6, 76) 93 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Ionia County Urban No 561.7 (516.2, 610.0) 38 (8, 72) 119 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Missaukee County Rural No 576.6 (495.5, 667.2) 28 (1, 79) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Ontonagon County Rural No 528.1 (434.7, 636.9) 59 (2, 83) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Mecosta County Rural No 591.9 (538.7, 649.0) 22 (4, 67) 95 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Sanilac County Rural No 562.0 (514.6, 612.6) 37 (8, 73) 107 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Lake County Rural No 669.9 (579.6, 770.6) 3 (1, 63) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Schoolcraft County Rural No 615.4 (513.6, 731.6) 12 (1, 79) 27 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Gladwin County Rural No 601.1 (542.6, 664.3) 18 (2, 67) 82 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Kalkaska County Urban No 693.6 (610.5, 785.0) 2 (1, 43) 54 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Alpena County Rural No 601.9 (546.0, 662.1) 16 (2, 66) 88 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Hillsdale County Rural No 616.2 (566.8, 668.8) 11 (2, 53) 119 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Menominee County Rural No 556.1 (497.4, 619.9) 40 (5, 77) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Montmorency County Rural No 664.7 (568.6, 772.6) 5 (1, 65) 37 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Gratiot County Rural No 588.2 (535.0, 645.3) 23 (3, 70) 91 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Alcona County Rural No 619.6 (535.9, 712.8) 10 (1, 75) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Ingham County Urban No 533.1 (511.0, 556.0) 57 (31, 70) 455 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 1.5)
Iosco County Rural No 649.4 (589.8, 713.4) 7 (1, 41) 94 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Roscommon County Rural No 630.3 (571.0, 694.2) 9 (1, 51) 92 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Crawford County Rural No 652.9 (570.2, 744.4) 6 (1, 59) 47 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Oceana County Rural No 539.6 (480.7, 603.9) 50 (8, 80) 63 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Chippewa County Rural No 630.6 (573.1, 692.4) 8 (1, 55) 90 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.6, 1.0)
Baraga County Rural No 615.2 (505.9, 741.2) 13 (1, 81) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Oscoda County Rural No 716.4 (605.8, 841.8) 1 (1, 53) 32 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.0, 2.2)
Luce County Rural No 595.6 (477.2, 735.0) 20 (1, 82) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.9, 14.1)
Midland County Urban No 517.2 (483.8, 552.3) 64 (30, 77) 182 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.1, 5.8)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 3:45 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top