Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A No 584.5 (578.6, 590.3) N/A 7,923 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Greer County Rural No 557.8 (423.5, 721.2) 55 (3, 77) 11 falling falling trend -16.8 (-32.4, -0.4)
Okfuskee County Rural No 794.3 (680.8, 921.6) 1 (1, 39) 35 stable stable trend -8.0 (-17.1, 1.1)
Creek County Urban No 625.8 (584.8, 669.0) 35 (16, 55) 177 falling falling trend -7.1 (-10.5, -3.5)
Jackson County Rural No 547.6 (477.8, 624.7) 58 (23, 76) 45 falling falling trend -2.6 (-13.4, -0.7)
Harmon County Rural No 502.2 (324.3, 742.2) 69 (2, 77) 5 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.2)
Cleveland County Urban No 486.2 (465.9, 507.3) 72 (61, 76) 441 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.0, -0.8)
Harper County Rural No 477.8 (330.8, 670.3) 73 (7, 77) 7 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.1)
Choctaw County Rural No 645.9 (557.2, 745.0) 30 (3, 69) 39 falling falling trend -1.6 (-8.5, -0.3)
Logan County Urban No 489.6 (444.0, 538.6) 71 (51, 77) 89 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Craig County Rural No 570.8 (487.5, 664.5) 50 (13, 76) 33 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.2)
Comanche County Urban No 579.3 (543.7, 616.7) 47 (30, 64) 203 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Tulsa County Urban No 535.2 (521.2, 549.6) 60 (51, 68) 1,132 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Pawnee County Urban No 607.2 (523.8, 700.1) 39 (9, 73) 39 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.4)
Pontotoc County Rural No 528.4 (475.4, 585.8) 62 (36, 76) 74 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Beaver County Rural No 493.1 (366.0, 650.0) 70 (13, 77) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.8)
Canadian County Urban No 502.3 (473.1, 533.0) 68 (54, 76) 229 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Delaware County Rural No 524.0 (479.9, 571.2) 65 (40, 75) 108 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Grady County Urban No 565.2 (518.8, 614.7) 54 (29, 71) 114 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
Wagoner County Urban No 508.2 (472.0, 546.5) 67 (51, 76) 152 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Washita County Rural No 455.5 (368.8, 556.5) 76 (36, 77) 19 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.3)
Bryan County Rural No 591.6 (540.9, 645.9) 42 (21, 67) 101 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Murray County Rural No 579.9 (496.5, 673.5) 46 (13, 76) 35 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Osage County Urban No 528.0 (482.9, 576.1) 63 (38, 75) 104 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Woodward County Rural No 515.0 (442.4, 596.2) 66 (31, 77) 36 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.2)
Cimarron County Rural No 439.6 (276.1, 666.7) 77 (5, 77) 4 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.3, 2.3)
Kingfisher County Rural No 540.0 (455.0, 636.2) 59 (21, 77) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Lincoln County Urban No 624.6 (566.0, 687.7) 36 (11, 62) 85 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
McClain County Urban No 548.3 (493.4, 607.5) 57 (31, 74) 76 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Noble County Rural No 568.8 (476.6, 673.7) 53 (11, 76) 27 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Pushmataha County Rural No 726.4 (624.4, 840.5) 10 (1, 53) 37 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Oklahoma County Urban No 580.6 (566.7, 594.7) 45 (37, 58) 1,382 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Garfield County Urban No 573.1 (528.7, 620.3) 49 (29, 69) 126 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Stephens County Rural No 610.2 (560.1, 663.6) 38 (17, 63) 112 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.2, -0.1)
Woods County Rural No 527.4 (418.6, 655.9) 64 (11, 77) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.2)
Adair County Rural No 718.2 (629.3, 816.4) 12 (1, 49) 48 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Payne County Rural No 596.0 (550.8, 643.9) 41 (22, 64) 132 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
Rogers County Urban No 569.2 (533.8, 606.3) 52 (33, 67) 198 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Washington County Rural No 576.4 (531.8, 623.8) 48 (28, 69) 126 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Custer County Rural No 570.3 (500.8, 646.8) 51 (18, 75) 49 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Haskell County Rural No 679.5 (580.7, 790.6) 24 (1, 67) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Kay County Rural No 661.1 (607.6, 718.2) 26 (8, 49) 115 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Latimer County Rural No 582.1 (484.5, 694.0) 44 (7, 76) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Muskogee County Rural No 698.6 (651.5, 748.2) 19 (4, 36) 168 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Ottawa County Rural No 722.0 (653.1, 796.3) 11 (1, 38) 82 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Carter County Rural No 689.4 (634.2, 748.1) 22 (4, 42) 118 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Cherokee County Rural No 649.6 (596.5, 706.3) 29 (9, 55) 113 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Le Flore County Rural No 677.6 (624.3, 734.3) 25 (4, 44) 123 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Mayes County Rural No 639.1 (582.1, 700.2) 33 (10, 56) 96 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
McCurtain County Rural No 705.3 (637.7, 778.3) 15 (1, 43) 81 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Beckham County Rural No 644.2 (562.1, 734.9) 32 (4, 66) 45 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Love County Rural No 700.4 (587.0, 829.5) 18 (1, 64) 27 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
McIntosh County Rural No 644.6 (574.4, 721.1) 31 (6, 63) 63 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Sequoyah County Urban No 766.4 (705.4, 831.5) 4 (1, 26) 119 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.9)
Johnston County Rural No 655.6 (545.9, 781.3) 28 (1, 71) 25 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Marshall County Rural No 658.7 (576.3, 749.9) 27 (2, 63) 47 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Pittsburg County Rural No 702.3 (648.1, 759.9) 17 (3, 39) 127 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.6)
Caddo County Rural No 769.2 (689.1, 856.1) 2 (1, 34) 68 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Hughes County Rural No 703.0 (604.2, 813.5) 16 (1, 58) 36 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Jefferson County Rural No 768.2 (611.4, 953.3) 3 (1, 66) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Major County Rural No 456.6 (359.9, 572.0) 75 (34, 77) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.0, 2.2)
Okmulgee County Urban No 712.0 (650.7, 777.5) 14 (1, 38) 101 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7)
Seminole County Rural No 742.0 (664.3, 826.4) 9 (1, 38) 67 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Coal County Rural No 750.7 (597.5, 931.8) 7 (1, 65) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 694.7 (649.0, 742.7) 20 (4, 36) 178 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.7)
Roger Mills County Rural No 529.3 (378.9, 721.1) 61 (2, 77) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 4.2)
Garvin County Rural No 681.9 (609.8, 760.2) 23 (2, 52) 66 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Nowata County Rural No 752.2 (633.0, 887.4) 6 (1, 56) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Atoka County Rural No 602.9 (514.5, 702.3) 40 (8, 73) 33 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.9, 2.3)
Texas County Rural No 557.4 (470.0, 656.2) 56 (17, 77) 30 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.1)
Ellis County Rural No 473.5 (335.0, 650.0) 74 (12, 77) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.8)
Kiowa County Rural No 763.7 (638.6, 906.4) 5 (1, 53) 27 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 2.1)
Tillman County Rural No 611.0 (490.9, 752.1) 37 (1, 76) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.3, 5.4)
Alfalfa County Rural No 630.4 (493.1, 794.1) 34 (1, 77) 14 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.2, 2.7)
Cotton County Urban No 691.4 (547.4, 861.9) 21 (1, 73) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0)
Grant County Rural No 714.3 (546.9, 916.3) 13 (1, 74) 13 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.5)
Dewey County Rural No 586.3 (437.3, 770.8) 43 (1, 77) 10 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 4.1)
Blaine County Rural No 742.3 (620.7, 881.0) 8 (1, 60) 27 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.0, 10.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 4:42 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top