Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 50+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 490.2 (486.3, 494.1) N/A 12,659 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
United States N/A No 488.7 (488.1, 489.2) N/A 576,743 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Franklin County Urban No 467.4 (425.0, 512.7) 32 (13, 38) 96 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Skamania County Urban No 455.3 (379.1, 542.4) 34 (6, 39) 26 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.5)
Jefferson County Rural No 438.3 (398.9, 480.7) 35 (23, 39) 104 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Garfield County Rural No 428.9 (277.0, 638.9) 37 (1, 39) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.2)
Kitsap County Urban No 473.9 (455.0, 493.5) 29 (22, 36) 493 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Adams County Rural No 433.4 (355.0, 523.9) 36 (8, 39) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Clark County Urban No 512.9 (497.2, 528.9) 20 (11, 28) 854 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 573.9 (494.6, 662.5) 9 (1, 34) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Thurston County Urban No 509.0 (489.8, 528.7) 21 (11, 30) 551 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Benton County Urban No 498.2 (474.2, 523.2) 24 (12, 33) 332 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Pierce County Urban No 522.6 (510.5, 535.0) 16 (10, 25) 1,459 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Grant County Rural No 515.2 (478.9, 553.6) 18 (7, 33) 154 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 599.5 (562.2, 638.6) 4 (1, 12) 206 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Chelan County Urban No 466.6 (433.6, 501.5) 33 (17, 38) 153 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Douglas County Urban No 493.5 (445.3, 545.5) 26 (8, 37) 78 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
San Juan County Rural No 391.8 (340.0, 449.4) 39 (30, 39) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Snohomish County Urban No 507.5 (494.7, 520.6) 22 (13, 29) 1,266 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Spokane County Urban No 514.0 (499.5, 528.9) 19 (11, 27) 978 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Stevens County Urban No 537.0 (493.3, 583.5) 12 (4, 31) 120 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.5)
Wahkiakum County Rural No 584.6 (461.1, 732.5) 6 (1, 38) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.1)
Whatcom County Urban No 477.6 (456.3, 499.6) 28 (20, 36) 393 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Lewis County Rural No 578.4 (542.7, 615.8) 8 (2, 17) 204 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Skagit County Urban No 527.8 (500.8, 555.8) 15 (7, 28) 298 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Walla Walla County Urban No 469.8 (432.1, 510.0) 31 (15, 38) 118 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Asotin County Urban No 473.8 (418.0, 535.2) 30 (9, 39) 54 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Ferry County Rural No 602.3 (496.0, 725.2) 3 (1, 35) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.4)
Kittitas County Rural No 543.1 (491.6, 598.6) 11 (3, 32) 85 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Mason County Rural No 580.3 (541.6, 621.0) 7 (2, 16) 178 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Pacific County Rural No 569.9 (512.8, 631.7) 10 (1, 28) 80 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Klickitat County Rural No 520.5 (460.5, 586.3) 17 (3, 36) 57 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Yakima County Urban No 529.3 (506.3, 553.1) 14 (7, 27) 407 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Clallam County Rural No 530.5 (500.5, 561.9) 13 (7, 28) 248 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 489.1 (407.4, 582.4) 27 (3, 39) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Whitman County Rural No 504.0 (445.8, 567.6) 23 (5, 37) 55 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.2)
King County Urban No 422.9 (415.8, 430.0) 38 (33, 39) 2,799 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Cowlitz County Urban No 639.0 (605.4, 674.1) 2 (1, 7) 280 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Columbia County Rural No 650.0 (509.4, 819.0) 1 (1, 35) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Okanogan County Rural No 585.6 (537.1, 637.3) 5 (1, 21) 114 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Island County Rural No 494.6 (464.0, 526.7) 25 (11, 35) 208 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 4.0)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 5:03 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top