Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | No | 913.8 (904.3, 923.3) | N/A | 7,235 | falling | -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5) |
United States | No | 855.4 (854.2, 856.5) | N/A | 431,628 | falling | -2.0 (-2.2, -1.7) |
Choctaw County | No | 707.9 (576.1, 860.7) | 67 (31, 67) | 20 | falling | -2.8 (-3.5, -2.1) |
Hale County | No | 735.1 (598.4, 893.6) | 66 (22, 67) | 20 | falling | -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1) |
Shelby County | No | 746.8 (703.7, 791.9) | 65 (56, 67) | 232 | falling | -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9) |
Greene County | No | 788.3 (610.7, 1,001.1) | 64 (4, 67) | 14 | falling | -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4) |
Limestone County | No | 806.6 (740.7, 876.8) | 63 (35, 67) | 114 | falling | -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3) |
Pickens County | No | 809.1 (684.1, 950.3) | 62 (10, 67) | 30 | falling | -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4) |
Cleburne County | No | 815.4 (671.7, 980.7) | 61 (7, 67) | 23 | falling | -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7) |
Perry County | No | 817.4 (640.4, 1,028.3) | 60 (3, 67) | 15 | falling | -5.3 (-9.3, -1.2) |
Tuscaloosa County | No | 825.7 (776.6, 877.1) | 59 (37, 65) | 218 | falling | -2.3 (-2.9, -1.8) |
Washington County | No | 829.3 (688.4, 990.5) | 58 (6, 67) | 25 | stable | -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2) |
Randolph County | No | 830.2 (716.2, 957.2) | 57 (12, 67) | 38 | stable | -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0) |
Autauga County | No | 838.0 (751.5, 931.6) | 56 (19, 67) | 69 | falling | -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0) |
Conecuh County | No | 840.6 (693.3, 1,009.9) | 55 (5, 67) | 23 | falling | -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0) |
Coosa County | No | 845.1 (687.6, 1,028.1) | 54 (4, 67) | 20 | falling | -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4) |
Houston County | No | 853.4 (793.7, 916.4) | 53 (24, 64) | 154 | falling | -2.3 (-3.2, -1.4) |
Butler County | No | 853.6 (727.6, 994.9) | 52 (6, 67) | 33 | stable | -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0) |
Lauderdale County | No | 857.2 (797.4, 920.3) | 51 (25, 64) | 154 | falling | -2.9 (-4.4, -1.4) |
Cullman County | No | 858.2 (791.8, 928.6) | 50 (22, 64) | 126 | falling | -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2) |
Coffee County | No | 863.5 (776.8, 957.1) | 49 (15, 65) | 74 | falling | -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
Winston County | No | 867.6 (755.9, 991.2) | 48 (7, 67) | 44 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
Madison County | No | 868.9 (833.5, 905.4) | 47 (31, 60) | 460 | falling | -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
Pike County | No | 869.1 (755.5, 994.9) | 46 (7, 67) | 42 | falling | -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9) |
Henry County | No | 875.7 (744.6, 1,023.1) | 45 (5, 67) | 33 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
Monroe County | No | 882.1 (758.8, 1,019.8) | 44 (5, 67) | 37 | falling | -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2) |
Baldwin County | No | 884.4 (844.0, 926.3) | 43 (25, 59) | 369 | falling | -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9) |
Clay County | No | 887.4 (735.8, 1,060.9) | 42 (2, 67) | 24 | stable | -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0) |
DeKalb County | No | 888.1 (812.8, 968.6) | 41 (12, 64) | 105 | stable | 1.4 (-1.1, 4.1) |
Marshall County | No | 898.9 (833.8, 967.8) | 40 (14, 60) | 143 | falling | -1.9 (-2.5, -1.2) |
Montgomery County | No | 905.2 (859.1, 953.3) | 39 (17, 56) | 294 | falling | -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4) |
Chilton County | No | 912.4 (814.4, 1,018.9) | 38 (6, 63) | 65 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.2) |
Mobile County | No | 916.6 (883.4, 950.7) | 37 (20, 51) | 588 | falling | -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6) |
Jefferson County | No | 923.2 (896.4, 950.6) | 36 (20, 47) | 927 | falling | -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1) |
Cherokee County | No | 923.6 (814.9, 1,042.8) | 35 (4, 65) | 53 | stable | -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0) |
Lamar County | No | 925.7 (778.0, 1,093.3) | 34 (2, 67) | 28 | falling | -1.9 (-2.7, -1.0) |
Colbert County | No | 928.3 (847.6, 1,014.5) | 33 (6, 61) | 98 | falling | -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4) |
Marengo County | No | 941.0 (805.1, 1,093.1) | 32 (2, 65) | 35 | falling | -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4) |
Morgan County | No | 943.4 (883.6, 1,006.2) | 31 (8, 54) | 188 | falling | -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1) |
Etowah County | No | 946.4 (884.5, 1,011.5) | 30 (7, 53) | 178 | falling | -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8) |
Elmore County | No | 953.2 (874.5, 1,036.9) | 29 (5, 58) | 112 | falling | -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4) |
Marion County | No | 958.9 (853.5, 1,073.8) | 28 (2, 61) | 60 | stable | -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4) |
Covington County | No | 965.0 (869.5, 1,068.2) | 27 (3, 58) | 75 | stable | -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0) |
Lawrence County | No | 967.3 (857.0, 1,088.0) | 26 (2, 61) | 57 | stable | -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1) |
Escambia County | No | 969.3 (864.3, 1,083.6) | 25 (2, 59) | 62 | falling | -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8) |
Bibb County | No | 970.0 (829.5, 1,127.6) | 24 (1, 65) | 35 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
Dale County | No | 970.5 (875.9, 1,072.4) | 23 (3, 57) | 78 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
St. Clair County | No | 974.8 (901.3, 1,052.6) | 22 (4, 49) | 135 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3) |
Fayette County | No | 976.0 (831.4, 1,138.5) | 21 (1, 64) | 33 | stable | -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4) |
Tallapoosa County | No | 976.5 (882.1, 1,078.2) | 20 (2, 56) | 80 | falling | -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1) |
Franklin County | No | 979.4 (860.5, 1,109.9) | 19 (2, 61) | 49 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
Calhoun County | No | 983.8 (921.3, 1,049.3) | 18 (4, 44) | 189 | falling | -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2) |
Clarke County | No | 989.6 (866.2, 1,125.6) | 17 (1, 61) | 46 | falling | -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1) |
Chambers County | No | 990.1 (882.0, 1,107.7) | 16 (2, 57) | 62 | stable | -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0) |
Barbour County | No | 992.0 (866.6, 1,130.4) | 15 (1, 60) | 46 | falling | -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1) |
Sumter County | No | 993.6 (813.6, 1,201.1) | 14 (1, 66) | 22 | stable | -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4) |
Macon County | No | 999.3 (856.1, 1,159.6) | 13 (1, 63) | 36 | falling | -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1) |
Jackson County | No | 1,003.4 (915.9, 1,097.0) | 12 (2, 49) | 99 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3) |
Dallas County | No | 1,003.7 (897.5, 1,119.0) | 11 (1, 56) | 66 | falling | -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5) |
Lee County | No | 1,004.1 (937.9, 1,073.6) | 10 (3, 41) | 178 | falling | -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2) |
Blount County | No | 1,013.3 (927.1, 1,105.4) | 9 (2, 48) | 103 | falling | -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5) |
Talladega County | No | 1,018.9 (943.9, 1,098.3) | 8 (2, 42) | 141 | falling | -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3) |
Geneva County | No | 1,042.3 (920.9, 1,175.1) | 7 (1, 51) | 54 | stable | -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3) |
Wilcox County | No | 1,051.8 (858.6, 1,275.4) | 6 (1, 63) | 21 | stable | -0.7 (-1.9, 0.4) |
Crenshaw County | No | 1,074.2 (899.0, 1,273.6) | 5 (1, 60) | 27 | stable | 0.2 (-0.6, 0.9) |
Lowndes County | No | 1,078.2 (876.6, 1,312.4) | 4 (1, 63) | 20 | stable | -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
Walker County | No | 1,108.8 (1,023.7, 1,199.2) | 3 (1, 21) | 129 | stable | -0.2 (-0.5, 0.2) |
Russell County | No | 1,124.4 (1,020.2, 1,236.4) | 2 (1, 25) | 88 | stable | -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2) |
Bullock County | No | 1,213.7 (984.4, 1,480.5) | 1 (1, 54) | 20 | stable | 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2024 9:48 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/16/2024 9:48 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.