Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama N/A No 890.0 (880.9, 899.3) N/A 7,432 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.4)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Autauga County Urban No 851.4 (768.4, 940.9) 51 (13, 65) 78 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Baldwin County Urban No 830.7 (793.6, 869.2) 57 (36, 62) 389 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Barbour County Rural No 930.6 (811.6, 1,062.3) 25 (2, 63) 44 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.9)
Bibb County Urban No 894.8 (764.6, 1,041.1) 40 (3, 66) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Blount County Urban No 921.9 (841.1, 1,008.5) 30 (5, 58) 97 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Bullock County Rural No 874.3 (687.6, 1,096.2) 46 (1, 67) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.5)
Butler County Rural No 838.8 (712.8, 980.4) 53 (6, 67) 32 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.2)
Calhoun County Urban No 970.6 (909.2, 1,035.1) 16 (4, 45) 191 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.6)
Chambers County Rural No 948.3 (844.9, 1,060.8) 20 (2, 60) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Cherokee County Rural No 942.2 (829.3, 1,066.3) 21 (2, 62) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Chilton County Urban No 976.8 (875.4, 1,086.8) 13 (1, 57) 70 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Choctaw County Rural No 912.8 (762.6, 1,083.9) 32 (1, 66) 26 stable stable trend -4.9 (-13.4, 3.8)
Clarke County Rural No 1,134.8 (1,001.3, 1,281.2) 2 (1, 31) 52 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.8)
Clay County Rural No 987.3 (831.2, 1,164.3) 10 (1, 63) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.4)
Cleburne County Rural No 1,024.1 (864.9, 1,204.4) 5 (1, 60) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Coffee County Rural No 840.3 (756.0, 931.5) 52 (13, 65) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Colbert County Urban No 887.0 (810.3, 969.0) 43 (8, 62) 99 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Conecuh County Rural No 858.2 (709.4, 1,029.2) 48 (2, 67) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Coosa County Rural No 851.7 (693.6, 1,035.0) 50 (3, 67) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.4)
Covington County Rural No 923.4 (831.9, 1,022.2) 29 (4, 59) 75 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Crenshaw County Rural No 1,066.3 (890.1, 1,267.4) 3 (1, 60) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Cullman County Rural No 838.3 (775.3, 905.0) 54 (24, 64) 134 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Dale County Rural No 948.6 (856.8, 1,047.5) 19 (3, 58) 79 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Dallas County Rural No 826.3 (732.0, 929.3) 58 (14, 67) 57 falling falling trend -11.8 (-20.9, -2.3)
DeKalb County Rural No 901.0 (825.0, 982.3) 38 (8, 60) 106 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Elmore County Urban No 933.1 (859.9, 1,011.0) 23 (5, 54) 124 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Escambia County Rural No 971.7 (868.3, 1,084.2) 15 (1, 55) 64 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Etowah County Urban No 986.6 (923.3, 1,053.1) 11 (3, 42) 188 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Fayette County Rural No 950.3 (806.2, 1,112.8) 18 (1, 64) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Franklin County Rural No 1,009.5 (890.8, 1,139.6) 7 (1, 56) 53 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Geneva County Urban No 976.2 (859.3, 1,104.7) 14 (1, 61) 51 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Greene County Urban No 859.3 (671.5, 1,082.5) 47 (1, 67) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Hale County Urban No 879.3 (729.6, 1,050.8) 44 (2, 67) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.5, -0.1)
Henry County Urban No 903.9 (773.9, 1,049.7) 36 (2, 66) 35 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -1.1)
Houston County Urban No 890.4 (830.2, 953.8) 41 (12, 59) 165 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Jackson County Rural No 984.7 (899.9, 1,075.5) 12 (2, 49) 102 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Jefferson County Urban No 916.3 (890.0, 943.2) 31 (18, 45) 949 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Lamar County Rural No 903.5 (757.1, 1,070.1) 37 (1, 66) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -0.9)
Lauderdale County Urban No 766.2 (710.5, 825.1) 63 (46, 67) 142 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.4)
Lawrence County Urban No 1,018.3 (905.1, 1,142.1) 6 (1, 50) 60 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 3.3)
Lee County Urban No 937.6 (878.1, 1,000.2) 22 (6, 52) 194 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Limestone County Urban No 799.4 (737.1, 865.7) 59 (36, 66) 125 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.8)
Lowndes County Urban No 967.1 (781.0, 1,184.2) 17 (1, 67) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.5)
Macon County Urban No 925.7 (790.2, 1,077.8) 28 (1, 65) 34 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Madison County Urban No 833.2 (799.8, 867.6) 56 (37, 62) 477 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Marengo County Rural No 772.0 (650.5, 909.5) 62 (16, 67) 29 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
Marion County Rural No 1,005.5 (895.8, 1,125.0) 9 (1, 53) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Marshall County Rural No 930.8 (863.9, 1,001.6) 24 (5, 54) 147 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Mobile County Urban No 927.5 (894.4, 961.6) 27 (13, 45) 610 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Monroe County Rural No 791.8 (672.3, 926.5) 60 (13, 67) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Montgomery County Urban No 895.3 (850.3, 942.2) 39 (15, 55) 304 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Morgan County Urban No 855.4 (799.9, 913.9) 49 (21, 62) 180 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Perry County Rural No 745.0 (571.4, 954.5) 65 (7, 67) 12 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.1, -0.6)
Pickens County Urban No 1,034.5 (889.3, 1,196.9) 4 (1, 60) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Pike County Rural No 910.3 (793.7, 1,039.2) 34 (3, 65) 44 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Randolph County Rural No 836.6 (720.7, 966.0) 55 (8, 67) 38 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.1)
Russell County Urban No 1,142.2 (1,039.8, 1,252.0) 1 (1, 15) 95 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Shelby County Urban No 702.3 (662.7, 743.6) 66 (60, 67) 242 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
St. Clair County Urban No 911.7 (844.7, 982.6) 33 (7, 57) 141 falling falling trend -1.8 (-6.1, -1.0)
Sumter County Rural No 695.2 (547.0, 870.9) 67 (20, 67) 15 falling falling trend -14.9 (-31.3, -2.4)
Talladega County Rural No 930.2 (860.5, 1,004.3) 26 (5, 55) 136 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Tallapoosa County Rural No 890.1 (803.3, 983.9) 42 (6, 63) 79 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Tuscaloosa County Urban No 763.4 (718.8, 810.0) 64 (50, 67) 228 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)
Walker County Urban No 1,005.9 (926.0, 1,091.0) 8 (2, 43) 120 falling falling trend -3.1 (-9.5, -1.1)
Washington County Rural No 876.9 (729.2, 1,045.7) 45 (2, 67) 25 stable stable trend -4.0 (-21.7, 0.2)
Wilcox County Rural No 785.6 (623.7, 976.5) 61 (4, 67) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2)
Winston County Rural No 904.8 (790.3, 1,031.3) 35 (3, 65) 45 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/25/2026 12:52 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top