Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 854.0 (845.4, 862.6) N/A 7,782 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Cook County Rural No 618.9 (454.5, 824.2) 87 (33, 87) 9 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.1, 0.0)
Swift County Rural No 648.1 (507.6, 814.9) 86 (33, 87) 15 falling falling trend -4.5 (-21.3, -2.0)
Jackson County Rural No 691.5 (549.1, 859.6) 85 (25, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Nicollet County Urban No 728.6 (633.7, 833.6) 84 (35, 87) 43 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.1)
Carver County Urban No 739.8 (675.2, 808.7) 83 (53, 87) 100 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Olmsted County Urban No 744.4 (698.1, 793.0) 82 (60, 86) 196 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Todd County Rural No 749.2 (650.4, 858.8) 81 (36, 87) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Stevens County Rural No 751.6 (575.2, 964.2) 80 (10, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.0)
Marshall County Rural No 773.1 (612.1, 963.3) 79 (10, 87) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Dodge County Urban No 779.7 (644.1, 935.1) 78 (15, 87) 23 falling falling trend -5.1 (-17.6, -0.8)
Freeborn County Rural No 791.2 (700.9, 889.8) 77 (27, 86) 56 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Dakota County Urban No 791.2 (760.0, 823.4) 76 (54, 82) 496 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Roseau County Rural No 793.4 (651.0, 957.7) 75 (11, 87) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Washington County Urban No 803.1 (764.0, 843.6) 74 (46, 81) 323 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Murray County Rural No 804.9 (641.0, 997.4) 73 (6, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.7)
Scott County Urban No 807.1 (746.3, 871.5) 72 (36, 84) 135 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Douglas County Rural No 809.8 (729.4, 896.6) 71 (28, 85) 74 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Beltrami County Rural No 813.1 (723.0, 911.1) 70 (24, 86) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 815.0 (729.4, 907.8) 69 (24, 85) 68 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Houston County Urban No 815.3 (694.2, 951.2) 68 (15, 87) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Hennepin County Urban No 817.1 (798.2, 836.2) 67 (51, 76) 1,476 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Otter Tail County Rural No 821.4 (756.1, 890.8) 66 (31, 83) 119 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Morrison County Rural No 822.4 (727.9, 925.7) 65 (21, 86) 56 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Redwood County Rural No 824.5 (690.1, 977.0) 64 (11, 87) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Steele County Rural No 826.4 (732.0, 929.5) 63 (20, 85) 56 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Becker County Rural No 832.5 (740.0, 933.4) 62 (20, 85) 60 falling falling trend -7.3 (-11.9, -1.1)
Red Lake County Rural No 833.3 (583.1, 1,154.1) 61 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.5)
Mower County Rural No 837.3 (744.5, 938.1) 60 (21, 85) 62 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Sibley County Rural No 840.7 (694.1, 1,008.7) 59 (6, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Rice County Rural No 844.1 (765.9, 928.0) 58 (22, 84) 87 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 846.9 (667.1, 1,059.4) 57 (4, 87) 16 stable stable trend 11.7 (-0.2, 19.4)
Ramsey County Urban No 849.0 (820.3, 878.5) 56 (38, 70) 678 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
Stearns County Urban No 850.0 (798.3, 904.2) 55 (30, 78) 204 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Lincoln County Rural No 853.1 (649.6, 1,099.6) 54 (2, 87) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Anoka County Urban No 853.8 (817.4, 891.5) 53 (33, 72) 427 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Crow Wing County Rural No 858.4 (793.4, 927.2) 52 (24, 79) 130 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.6, -1.0)
McLeod County Rural No 859.3 (765.8, 960.9) 51 (17, 83) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Clay County Urban No 863.3 (778.3, 955.0) 50 (17, 83) 77 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Blue Earth County Urban No 868.0 (786.2, 955.9) 49 (17, 82) 84 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Hubbard County Rural No 868.7 (757.9, 991.2) 48 (11, 84) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.9)
Lake County Rural No 873.4 (725.6, 1,042.3) 47 (6, 86) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
St. Louis County Urban No 875.4 (833.8, 918.6) 46 (28, 68) 342 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Winona County Rural No 880.9 (793.8, 974.8) 45 (14, 80) 76 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Aitkin County Rural No 892.3 (779.8, 1,016.5) 44 (7, 82) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Martin County Rural No 895.1 (777.2, 1,025.7) 43 (6, 84) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Nobles County Rural No 900.4 (764.6, 1,052.8) 42 (5, 85) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
Pope County Rural No 906.9 (750.1, 1,086.5) 41 (3, 86) 23 stable stable trend 6.0 (-1.2, 18.2)
Lyon County Rural No 909.5 (785.8, 1,047.1) 40 (6, 83) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 909.9 (727.2, 1,124.0) 39 (2, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Itasca County Rural No 910.7 (830.1, 996.9) 38 (13, 75) 96 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Koochiching County Rural No 914.8 (768.0, 1,081.2) 37 (4, 85) 28 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Wright County Urban No 917.4 (854.6, 983.7) 36 (15, 66) 162 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Renville County Rural No 920.1 (773.2, 1,086.4) 35 (2, 85) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.3)
Cass County Rural No 927.9 (830.7, 1,033.4) 34 (8, 76) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Meeker County Rural No 931.1 (810.0, 1,065.1) 33 (5, 80) 43 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 5.2)
Rock County Urban No 936.9 (753.3, 1,151.2) 32 (1, 86) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Watonwan County Rural No 945.5 (772.6, 1,144.8) 31 (2, 85) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Isanti County Urban No 956.0 (851.5, 1,069.8) 30 (5, 74) 62 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Wabasha County Urban No 956.2 (835.0, 1,089.9) 29 (4, 79) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 956.3 (672.2, 1,318.7) 28 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Le Sueur County Urban No 957.5 (838.7, 1,088.4) 27 (4, 79) 47 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.9, 6.3)
Benton County Urban No 963.0 (849.1, 1,087.7) 26 (4, 73) 53 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Grant County Rural No 966.3 (745.5, 1,231.1) 25 (1, 86) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Kanabec County Rural No 967.2 (820.2, 1,133.1) 24 (2, 79) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Polk County Urban No 978.1 (865.2, 1,101.4) 23 (3, 71) 56 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Waseca County Rural No 983.2 (837.6, 1,146.7) 22 (2, 79) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Chippewa County Rural No 986.5 (824.8, 1,170.3) 21 (1, 80) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Big Stone County Rural No 989.6 (767.7, 1,254.9) 20 (1, 86) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Goodhue County Rural No 998.3 (908.3, 1,094.8) 19 (4, 54) 91 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Brown County Rural No 1,005.2 (890.3, 1,130.6) 18 (2, 67) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Wilkin County Rural No 1,005.4 (762.8, 1,299.6) 17 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.2)
Clearwater County Rural No 1,014.4 (810.5, 1,253.2) 16 (1, 85) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Sherburne County Urban No 1,022.5 (936.3, 1,114.6) 15 (3, 44) 108 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.9)
Chisago County Urban No 1,022.9 (928.4, 1,124.3) 14 (2, 49) 88 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 6.7)
Cottonwood County Rural No 1,030.2 (863.2, 1,219.6) 13 (1, 80) 28 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.3)
Traverse County Rural No 1,039.3 (747.9, 1,404.0) 12 (1, 87) 8 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.2, 11.5)
Fillmore County Urban No 1,045.8 (915.8, 1,188.8) 11 (1, 61) 48 stable stable trend 10.1 (-0.2, 17.5)
Pennington County Rural No 1,049.4 (877.2, 1,245.1) 10 (1, 75) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Faribault County Rural No 1,054.9 (901.8, 1,226.4) 9 (1, 70) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Carlton County Urban No 1,055.6 (944.0, 1,176.7) 8 (1, 48) 66 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Pine County Rural No 1,058.2 (942.0, 1,184.8) 7 (1, 46) 62 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Kittson County Rural No 1,087.3 (819.2, 1,413.4) 6 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.3)
Norman County Rural No 1,099.6 (862.2, 1,381.5) 5 (1, 83) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Pipestone County Rural No 1,138.1 (930.5, 1,377.1) 4 (1, 72) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 1,176.4 (1,039.9, 1,325.6) 3 (1, 28) 54 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Wadena County Rural No 1,201.9 (1,027.0, 1,397.9) 2 (1, 36) 34 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.8)
Mahnomen County Rural No 1,221.4 (916.3, 1,594.6) 1 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.1)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 3:20 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top