Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for California by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
California N/A No 784.4 (781.1, 787.7) N/A 44,600 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.3)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Humboldt County Rural No 1,038.0 (979.0, 1,099.6) 1 (1, 7) 244 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 3.6)
Del Norte County Rural No 1,031.2 (906.4, 1,168.4) 2 (1, 25) 51 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.5)
Butte County Urban No 988.5 (942.4, 1,036.3) 3 (1, 10) 354 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Tehama County Rural No 964.2 (888.0, 1,045.1) 4 (1, 21) 119 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Siskiyou County Rural No 952.7 (870.6, 1,040.5) 5 (1, 25) 103 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Yuba County Urban No 952.7 (866.4, 1,045.3) 6 (1, 27) 94 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Shasta County Urban No 948.7 (903.8, 995.2) 7 (2, 15) 341 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Lake County Rural No 944.5 (875.1, 1,018.0) 8 (1, 23) 141 stable stable trend 3.3 (-2.5, 7.5)
Glenn County Rural No 940.2 (815.4, 1,078.6) 9 (1, 43) 41 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Stanislaus County Urban No 909.5 (877.9, 941.9) 10 (5, 19) 639 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
Solano County Urban No 901.8 (869.9, 934.4) 11 (5, 20) 625 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.4)
Amador County Rural No 888.3 (808.1, 974.4) 12 (2, 41) 93 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Sacramento County Urban No 877.6 (860.0, 895.4) 13 (9, 22) 1,948 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Calaveras County Rural No 872.4 (798.3, 951.6) 14 (3, 42) 105 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Sonoma County Urban No 866.7 (839.7, 894.4) 15 (9, 28) 802 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
San Bernardino County Urban No 860.3 (843.6, 877.2) 16 (11, 26) 2,105 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
Tulare County Urban No 849.7 (814.0, 886.4) 17 (10, 36) 441 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Lassen County Rural No 848.4 (731.2, 979.0) 18 (1, 53) 38 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Merced County Urban No 846.9 (801.0, 894.8) 19 (8, 39) 260 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Modoc County Rural No 844.6 (687.6, 1,027.0) 20 (1, 55) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.9)
Yolo County Urban No 844.6 (795.8, 895.6) 21 (9, 40) 227 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Mendocino County Rural No 842.7 (785.3, 903.2) 22 (8, 44) 168 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Kern County Urban No 839.4 (813.2, 866.2) 23 (13, 35) 811 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.4, 0.3)
San Joaquin County Urban No 829.4 (803.8, 855.6) 24 (15, 37) 814 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Madera County Urban No 827.1 (771.8, 885.2) 25 (9, 45) 172 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Tuolumne County Rural No 823.8 (757.3, 894.5) 26 (8, 47) 115 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Riverside County Urban No 822.9 (809.5, 836.5) 27 (19, 35) 2,912 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
San Diego County Urban No 821.7 (810.0, 833.5) 28 (20, 35) 3,852 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1)
Placer County Urban No 817.3 (789.5, 845.9) 29 (16, 39) 654 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Kings County Urban No 814.6 (751.4, 881.6) 30 (9, 48) 125 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Sutter County Urban No 814.3 (751.9, 880.5) 31 (9, 48) 127 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
San Benito County Urban No 810.9 (723.9, 905.4) 32 (5, 52) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Fresno County Urban No 806.3 (783.6, 829.5) 33 (20, 40) 976 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Plumas County Rural No 798.7 (692.6, 916.7) 34 (5, 55) 43 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.2, -1.6)
Ventura County Urban No 795.7 (774.2, 817.6) 35 (23, 42) 1,058 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
El Dorado County Urban No 788.7 (749.2, 829.6) 36 (19, 47) 310 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Napa County Urban No 782.8 (736.5, 831.3) 37 (18, 49) 214 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
San Luis Obispo County Urban No 780.1 (747.5, 813.8) 38 (23, 47) 439 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Colusa County Rural No 773.5 (640.6, 925.9) 39 (3, 56) 24 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Contra Costa County Urban No 765.5 (747.5, 783.8) 40 (32, 46) 1,397 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.6)
Los Angeles County Urban No 755.1 (748.6, 761.6) 41 (37, 47) 10,485 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
Santa Barbara County Urban No 751.9 (723.4, 781.2) 42 (32, 50) 536 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Mariposa County Rural No 751.5 (645.6, 869.9) 43 (8, 56) 36 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Orange County Urban No 751.3 (740.3, 762.5) 44 (37, 48) 3,583 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.2)
Inyo County Rural No 750.4 (639.8, 874.5) 45 (8, 56) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Santa Cruz County Urban No 742.3 (705.8, 780.3) 46 (32, 52) 323 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -0.9)
Nevada County Rural No 734.0 (688.7, 781.5) 47 (30, 54) 200 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Alameda County Urban No 718.7 (703.2, 734.4) 48 (43, 51) 1,683 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.8)
Monterey County Urban No 706.6 (676.5, 737.6) 49 (41, 54) 425 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Sierra County Rural No 705.3 (482.4, 996.4) 50 (1, 57) 6 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.5, -0.4)
Marin County Urban No 698.1 (667.9, 729.3) 51 (43, 55) 406 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
San Francisco County Urban No 682.7 (663.5, 702.4) 52 (46, 55) 978 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
San Mateo County Urban No 680.0 (659.6, 700.8) 53 (47, 55) 858 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Santa Clara County Urban No 661.4 (647.6, 675.4) 54 (50, 56) 1,775 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.8)
Imperial County Urban No 643.3 (597.9, 691.3) 55 (47, 56) 150 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Trinity County Rural No 565.2 (468.2, 676.7) 56 (47, 56) 25 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.0, -1.8)
Mono County Rural No 329.2 (227.9, 461.4) 57 (56, 57) 7 falling falling trend -5.0 (-7.6, -2.4)
Alpine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 5:22 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top