Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Kentucky by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kentucky N/A No 1,014.6 (1,004.1, 1,025.3) N/A 7,278 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.9)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Carlisle County Urban No 1,468.3 (1,144.0, 1,855.8) 1 (1, 101) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.3, 3.9)
Cumberland County Rural No 1,433.0 (1,152.2, 1,762.0) 2 (1, 90) 18 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.6)
Lawrence County Urban No 1,416.2 (1,213.9, 1,642.7) 3 (1, 56) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Clay County Rural No 1,383.6 (1,197.9, 1,590.6) 4 (1, 55) 42 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1)
Owsley County Rural No 1,382.9 (1,034.1, 1,812.4) 5 (1, 115) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1)
Monroe County Rural No 1,361.5 (1,142.2, 1,611.5) 6 (1, 83) 28 rising rising trend 15.2 (3.2, 28.0)
Powell County Rural No 1,338.1 (1,101.1, 1,612.1) 7 (1, 100) 24 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Perry County Rural No 1,336.2 (1,186.5, 1,499.8) 8 (1, 51) 61 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Metcalfe County Rural No 1,317.0 (1,095.9, 1,570.0) 9 (1, 89) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
Lee County Rural No 1,314.8 (1,042.0, 1,636.7) 10 (1, 112) 16 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Clinton County Rural No 1,299.7 (1,071.3, 1,563.3) 11 (1, 102) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Knox County Rural No 1,275.4 (1,139.9, 1,422.7) 12 (1, 69) 65 stable stable trend 6.0 (0.0, 10.8)
Leslie County Rural No 1,254.4 (1,033.4, 1,509.5) 13 (1, 108) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
McCreary County Rural No 1,223.1 (1,036.7, 1,434.2) 14 (1, 103) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Grayson County Rural No 1,220.1 (1,075.4, 1,379.1) 15 (2, 93) 54 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Butler County Urban No 1,217.9 (1,017.4, 1,446.6) 16 (1, 109) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Lewis County Rural No 1,215.5 (1,020.6, 1,436.8) 17 (1, 108) 28 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.2)
Harlan County Rural No 1,206.7 (1,067.6, 1,359.2) 18 (3, 87) 57 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Livingston County Urban No 1,201.9 (987.0, 1,450.1) 19 (1, 117) 22 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Taylor County Rural No 1,194.9 (1,052.5, 1,351.1) 20 (3, 96) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Bath County Rural No 1,192.4 (988.1, 1,426.7) 21 (1, 116) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.3)
Ballard County Urban No 1,183.7 (955.6, 1,449.9) 22 (1, 118) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Pendleton County Urban No 1,179.4 (977.7, 1,410.3) 23 (1, 113) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 1.6)
Menifee County Rural No 1,169.6 (912.5, 1,477.7) 24 (1, 120) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.8)
Carter County Urban No 1,168.8 (1,036.7, 1,313.2) 25 (4, 96) 58 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Floyd County Rural No 1,159.5 (1,039.6, 1,289.6) 26 (6, 94) 72 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Calloway County Rural No 1,159.4 (1,040.6, 1,288.1) 27 (6, 97) 70 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.0)
Nelson County Urban No 1,156.9 (1,044.6, 1,277.9) 28 (6, 90) 81 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.5, 11.4)
Todd County Rural No 1,152.8 (948.2, 1,388.7) 29 (2, 116) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.4)
Bell County Rural No 1,151.2 (1,014.4, 1,301.4) 30 (4, 105) 52 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Henry County Urban No 1,149.8 (972.0, 1,351.3) 31 (2, 113) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Hart County Rural No 1,149.7 (982.4, 1,337.4) 32 (3, 111) 34 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.7, 0.1)
Harrison County Rural No 1,146.5 (985.4, 1,326.4) 33 (3, 110) 37 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.5, 1.9)
Mercer County Rural No 1,141.5 (996.6, 1,301.7) 34 (5, 108) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Union County Rural No 1,137.2 (947.9, 1,353.4) 35 (2, 118) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.8)
Laurel County Rural No 1,133.1 (1,039.2, 1,233.3) 36 (11, 87) 111 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Pulaski County Rural No 1,128.2 (1,043.7, 1,217.9) 37 (13, 85) 135 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Estill County Rural No 1,124.9 (942.0, 1,333.6) 38 (3, 116) 28 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5)
Fulton County Rural No 1,124.4 (874.0, 1,424.1) 39 (1, 120) 14 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Whitley County Rural No 1,124.1 (1,001.2, 1,258.1) 40 (8, 103) 62 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Martin County Rural No 1,124.1 (910.5, 1,372.7) 41 (2, 119) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Crittenden County Rural No 1,121.2 (910.5, 1,366.3) 42 (1, 118) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Rockcastle County Rural No 1,113.2 (947.0, 1,300.7) 43 (3, 116) 32 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.7)
Gallatin County Urban No 1,108.6 (849.7, 1,423.4) 44 (1, 120) 13 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.4)
Marshall County Rural No 1,100.4 (988.6, 1,221.4) 45 (10, 105) 72 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
Mason County Rural No 1,100.3 (933.4, 1,288.5) 46 (5, 116) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Ohio County Rural No 1,097.9 (958.6, 1,251.8) 47 (8, 112) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Casey County Rural No 1,097.6 (935.7, 1,279.7) 48 (5, 115) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 1.0)
Bracken County Urban No 1,092.2 (847.9, 1,384.7) 49 (1, 120) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.6)
Grant County Urban No 1,091.8 (930.4, 1,273.4) 50 (6, 116) 35 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.1)
Wolfe County Rural No 1,091.6 (840.2, 1,395.4) 51 (1, 120) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Morgan County Rural No 1,091.4 (900.3, 1,311.6) 52 (4, 118) 24 falling falling trend -3.2 (-8.3, -1.1)
Graves County Rural No 1,088.4 (977.4, 1,208.6) 53 (13, 107) 71 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Elliott County Rural No 1,087.2 (861.0, 1,354.9) 54 (1, 120) 16 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.2)
Simpson County Rural No 1,077.0 (913.5, 1,261.5) 55 (4, 117) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Breathitt County Rural No 1,076.5 (888.6, 1,293.4) 56 (4, 119) 24 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Adair County Rural No 1,075.8 (924.6, 1,244.5) 57 (6, 117) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
Fleming County Rural No 1,073.0 (900.6, 1,269.0) 58 (6, 118) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Pike County Rural No 1,070.8 (982.5, 1,164.9) 59 (19, 105) 113 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Breckinridge County Rural No 1,069.1 (923.8, 1,231.0) 60 (9, 116) 40 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Hardin County Urban No 1,066.4 (993.9, 1,142.9) 61 (25, 98) 165 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Letcher County Rural No 1,060.7 (919.8, 1,217.5) 62 (9, 116) 43 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.1)
Trigg County Urban No 1,058.0 (899.4, 1,237.2) 63 (6, 118) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.5)
Carroll County Rural No 1,056.9 (845.4, 1,305.4) 64 (3, 120) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.1)
Allen County Urban No 1,055.6 (907.7, 1,221.2) 65 (8, 118) 38 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Barren County Rural No 1,055.1 (953.0, 1,165.1) 66 (17, 111) 79 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Boyd County Urban No 1,050.6 (958.5, 1,149.2) 67 (23, 110) 97 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.5)
Garrard County Rural No 1,044.2 (884.8, 1,224.2) 68 (8, 118) 31 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Marion County Rural No 1,042.1 (887.0, 1,216.4) 69 (10, 118) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Russell County Rural No 1,041.0 (895.3, 1,203.8) 70 (10, 118) 37 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6)
Bourbon County Urban No 1,040.9 (900.4, 1,197.0) 71 (12, 117) 39 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)
Webster County Rural No 1,039.5 (852.2, 1,255.7) 72 (4, 120) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.2)
Montgomery County Rural No 1,033.6 (901.5, 1,179.6) 73 (13, 118) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.5)
Green County Rural No 1,032.2 (852.1, 1,239.4) 74 (6, 119) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Hickman County Rural No 1,031.5 (784.4, 1,331.3) 75 (1, 120) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.7, 5.0)
Edmonson County Urban No 1,027.7 (853.3, 1,227.6) 76 (8, 120) 25 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.5)
Johnson County Rural No 1,027.6 (885.7, 1,185.9) 77 (12, 118) 39 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Meade County Urban No 1,026.4 (889.6, 1,178.7) 78 (15, 118) 43 falling falling trend -2.0 (-4.0, -0.8)
Greenup County Urban No 1,023.6 (922.6, 1,132.6) 79 (22, 113) 76 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Logan County Rural No 1,023.3 (899.3, 1,159.7) 80 (15, 117) 49 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Rowan County Rural No 1,023.2 (875.1, 1,189.5) 81 (12, 119) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.3)
Lincoln County Rural No 1,021.9 (889.8, 1,168.3) 82 (16, 118) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Christian County Urban No 1,021.0 (929.4, 1,119.2) 83 (24, 112) 92 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Daviess County Urban No 1,012.8 (945.2, 1,083.9) 84 (38, 109) 170 stable stable trend 5.7 (-1.1, 9.5)
Hancock County Rural No 1,008.6 (798.3, 1,257.4) 85 (5, 120) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.4)
Henderson County Rural No 1,006.9 (908.5, 1,112.9) 86 (26, 115) 79 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Owen County Rural No 1,006.0 (819.9, 1,221.8) 87 (7, 120) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.3)
Nicholas County Rural No 998.6 (762.9, 1,285.1) 88 (3, 120) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Madison County Rural No 985.5 (908.3, 1,067.4) 89 (42, 114) 124 falling falling trend -1.1 (-5.5, -0.1)
McLean County Urban No 981.3 (783.0, 1,215.3) 90 (8, 120) 17 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Spencer County Urban No 978.7 (808.3, 1,174.9) 91 (11, 120) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.9)
Anderson County Rural No 976.7 (836.1, 1,134.5) 92 (16, 120) 35 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Kenton County Urban No 973.5 (916.8, 1,032.9) 93 (56, 111) 229 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.1)
Warren County Urban No 972.6 (906.3, 1,042.5) 94 (51, 113) 164 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Hopkins County Rural No 967.0 (872.6, 1,069.0) 95 (34, 118) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Scott County Urban No 965.5 (857.3, 1,083.5) 96 (32, 119) 62 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Shelby County Urban No 960.3 (859.2, 1,069.9) 97 (35, 118) 68 stable stable trend -2.0 (-9.9, 1.3)
Woodford County Urban No 953.1 (833.4, 1,085.1) 98 (28, 120) 47 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Larue County Urban No 952.4 (783.1, 1,148.0) 99 (15, 120) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.4)
Jefferson County Urban No 951.5 (926.8, 976.6) 100 (79, 108) 1,162 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Boyle County Rural No 950.9 (839.9, 1,072.4) 101 (34, 119) 53 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Wayne County Rural No 948.1 (816.8, 1,094.8) 102 (26, 120) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Campbell County Urban No 941.1 (871.0, 1,015.4) 103 (60, 117) 138 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Washington County Rural No 940.7 (767.7, 1,140.7) 104 (17, 120) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
Clark County Urban No 940.2 (834.9, 1,055.1) 105 (38, 119) 59 falling falling trend -4.0 (-8.2, -1.8)
Muhlenberg County Rural No 932.5 (825.1, 1,050.1) 106 (40, 120) 55 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -1.0)
Jessamine County Urban No 927.4 (835.2, 1,027.1) 107 (47, 119) 76 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Caldwell County Rural No 922.5 (764.2, 1,104.1) 108 (23, 120) 24 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
McCracken County Urban No 917.5 (845.1, 994.5) 109 (63, 118) 120 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Knott County Rural No 912.2 (753.0, 1,095.9) 110 (23, 120) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.3)
Magoffin County Rural No 911.0 (726.2, 1,129.4) 111 (14, 120) 17 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.5)
Bullitt County Urban No 910.1 (835.2, 990.0) 112 (67, 119) 114 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.5)
Jackson County Rural No 905.9 (731.4, 1,110.9) 113 (19, 120) 19 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.4)
Lyon County Rural No 895.9 (716.4, 1,106.9) 114 (16, 120) 17 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Franklin County Rural No 870.2 (783.0, 964.4) 115 (71, 120) 75 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.9, -2.6)
Oldham County Urban No 862.3 (775.1, 956.7) 116 (73, 120) 75 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.8)
Fayette County Urban No 859.5 (820.1, 900.3) 117 (100, 120) 367 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
Boone County Urban No 805.4 (746.8, 867.4) 118 (103, 120) 145 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.8)
Trimble County Rural No 795.0 (596.7, 1,038.2) 119 (26, 120) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Robertson County Rural No 712.7 (427.8, 1,116.4) 120 (8, 120) 3
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 5:50 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top