Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York N/A No 729.6 (725.4, 733.7) N/A 24,399 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.8, -2.2)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Orleans County Urban No 1,103.3 (994.7, 1,220.5) 1 (1, 19) 78 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Schuyler County Rural No 1,101.8 (953.2, 1,267.0) 2 (1, 34) 41 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Chemung County Urban No 1,020.6 (950.3, 1,094.7) 3 (1, 21) 159 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Franklin County Rural No 983.8 (890.1, 1,084.5) 4 (1, 40) 82 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Steuben County Rural No 978.8 (914.6, 1,046.2) 5 (1, 29) 176 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Greene County Rural No 978.0 (895.2, 1,066.4) 6 (1, 37) 104 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Clinton County Rural No 969.7 (896.6, 1,047.2) 7 (1, 34) 133 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Fulton County Rural No 966.6 (881.7, 1,057.5) 8 (1, 41) 97 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Jefferson County Urban No 965.2 (897.9, 1,036.1) 9 (1, 34) 156 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.7, 3.3)
Washington County Urban No 962.8 (885.7, 1,044.9) 10 (1, 38) 117 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Hamilton County Rural No 941.9 (726.7, 1,200.6) 11 (1, 59) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.7, 0.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 941.5 (853.7, 1,035.7) 12 (2, 49) 87 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.8)
Yates County Rural No 940.1 (820.7, 1,071.9) 13 (1, 54) 45 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Genesee County Rural No 939.2 (859.4, 1,024.4) 14 (2, 45) 103 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Niagara County Urban No 936.1 (893.5, 980.1) 15 (4, 31) 372 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 1.4)
St. Lawrence County Rural No 928.9 (867.7, 993.4) 16 (3, 41) 174 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Oswego County Urban No 925.9 (864.4, 990.8) 17 (4, 43) 174 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Allegany County Rural No 923.2 (834.8, 1,018.3) 18 (2, 53) 81 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 2.9)
Schoharie County Urban No 918.6 (815.9, 1,030.7) 19 (1, 54) 59 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
Chautauqua County Rural No 916.3 (863.5, 971.4) 20 (5, 40) 230 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Cortland County Rural No 912.9 (817.8, 1,016.0) 21 (2, 54) 68 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Rensselaer County Urban No 911.4 (860.3, 964.6) 22 (6, 41) 245 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Chenango County Rural No 908.5 (824.7, 998.5) 23 (2, 53) 87 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Oneida County Urban No 907.7 (867.7, 949.1) 24 (7, 37) 394 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.6)
Essex County Rural No 896.5 (810.5, 989.0) 25 (3, 54) 80 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Seneca County Rural No 894.7 (791.6, 1,007.4) 26 (2, 54) 56 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Sullivan County Rural No 893.6 (822.8, 968.8) 27 (5, 52) 122 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Erie County Urban No 883.8 (863.7, 904.2) 28 (17, 37) 1,504 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.0)
Warren County Urban No 875.4 (807.2, 947.9) 29 (6, 54) 124 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Madison County Urban No 873.5 (800.7, 951.1) 30 (6, 54) 108 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Wayne County Urban No 872.1 (810.1, 937.5) 31 (8, 54) 150 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Saratoga County Urban No 865.3 (825.6, 906.5) 32 (15, 49) 366 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Wyoming County Rural No 862.3 (768.1, 964.9) 33 (4, 55) 62 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Tioga County Urban No 858.4 (778.6, 944.0) 34 (6, 54) 85 stable stable trend 6.2 (-1.5, 10.4)
Delaware County Rural No 845.0 (769.6, 925.8) 35 (8, 55) 93 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Broome County Urban No 843.0 (802.4, 885.2) 36 (19, 53) 330 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Herkimer County Urban No 843.0 (771.3, 919.6) 37 (10, 55) 103 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Orange County Urban No 841.1 (806.6, 876.7) 38 (23, 52) 458 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3)
Monroe County Urban No 840.0 (817.8, 862.6) 39 (28, 49) 1,108 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Otsego County Rural No 834.5 (762.7, 911.3) 40 (12, 55) 100 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Livingston County Urban No 834.2 (759.5, 914.2) 41 (11, 55) 93 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.1)
Albany County Urban No 832.5 (798.1, 867.9) 42 (25, 54) 452 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Lewis County Rural No 829.6 (718.1, 953.5) 43 (4, 58) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.0)
Ontario County Urban No 829.4 (776.7, 884.6) 44 (19, 54) 188 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Onondaga County Urban No 820.1 (792.3, 848.6) 45 (31, 54) 676 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.3, -1.7)
Columbia County Rural No 817.8 (752.8, 886.8) 46 (17, 55) 118 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Cattaraugus County Rural No 817.7 (752.2, 887.4) 47 (17, 55) 118 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Schenectady County Urban No 814.3 (766.5, 864.4) 48 (23, 54) 222 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.2)
Ulster County Urban No 811.3 (769.7, 854.5) 49 (27, 54) 291 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.3)
Dutchess County Urban No 802.9 (768.9, 838.1) 50 (33, 54) 425 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Richmond County Urban No 801.7 (773.5, 830.7) 51 (35, 54) 623 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Putnam County Urban No 799.0 (739.5, 862.0) 52 (24, 55) 136 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
Cayuga County Rural No 797.8 (734.2, 865.3) 53 (22, 56) 119 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Suffolk County Urban No 790.7 (775.3, 806.4) 54 (44, 54) 2,022 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7)
Nassau County Urban No 709.8 (694.9, 725.0) 55 (54, 57) 1,764 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Tompkins County Urban No 703.4 (644.4, 766.2) 56 (49, 59) 108 falling falling trend -3.5 (-9.7, -1.9)
Rockland County Urban No 668.1 (637.0, 700.2) 57 (55, 59) 351 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7)
Westchester County Urban No 655.4 (638.5, 672.7) 58 (56, 59) 1,161 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.8, -2.7)
Bronx County Urban No 636.6 (620.6, 652.8) 59 (57, 59) 1,230 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.1, -3.4)
New York County Urban No 587.6 (575.1, 600.3) 60 (60, 61) 1,701 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.1, -3.5)
Kings County Urban No 583.5 (572.7, 594.6) 61 (60, 61) 2,245 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.4, -3.5)
Queens County Urban No 559.1 (548.5, 569.8) 62 (61, 62) 2,165 falling falling trend -4.6 (-5.6, -3.8)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 4:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top