Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 828.1 (823.8, 832.4) N/A 29,883 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Polk County Rural No 1,646.6 (1,490.3, 1,814.4) 1 (1, 8) 108 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.4)
Hudspeth County Urban No 1,636.0 (1,057.6, 2,418.8) 2 (1, 210) 5
*
*
Crockett County Rural No 1,421.2 (998.4, 1,965.4) 3 (1, 219) 7 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 3.7)
Real County Rural No 1,354.5 (1,012.3, 1,775.4) 4 (1, 191) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.6, 4.1)
Coleman County Rural No 1,316.0 (1,088.1, 1,578.2) 5 (1, 94) 24 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.6, 2.3)
Hansford County Rural No 1,278.5 (941.1, 1,696.5) 6 (1, 211) 9 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.4, 6.0)
Baylor County Rural No 1,267.0 (946.0, 1,660.8) 7 (1, 209) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.8)
Reagan County Rural No 1,264.1 (720.5, 2,051.2) 8 (1, 235) 4
*
*
Knox County Rural No 1,249.1 (894.8, 1,695.8) 9 (1, 226) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.8, 2.7)
Young County Rural No 1,222.2 (1,061.0, 1,400.9) 10 (2, 93) 42 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Garza County Urban No 1,195.4 (839.3, 1,653.0) 11 (1, 232) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.0, 2.5)
Morris County Rural No 1,172.3 (989.1, 1,379.9) 12 (2, 146) 29 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.1, 15.3)
Wheeler County Rural No 1,169.0 (885.7, 1,515.4) 13 (1, 217) 11 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.4)
Bosque County Urban No 1,165.9 (1,028.1, 1,317.0) 14 (4, 104) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Shelby County Rural No 1,157.4 (1,013.3, 1,316.4) 15 (3, 125) 47 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.6)
Trinity County Rural No 1,156.7 (1,000.5, 1,330.7) 16 (3, 127) 40 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Refugio County Rural No 1,146.5 (911.2, 1,424.1) 17 (2, 197) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.7)
Fisher County Rural No 1,143.3 (846.5, 1,509.6) 18 (1, 228) 10 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.8)
Childress County Rural No 1,134.3 (868.8, 1,455.1) 19 (2, 222) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.8, 1.3)
Jack County Rural No 1,134.1 (897.3, 1,414.9) 20 (2, 206) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.5)
Runnels County Rural No 1,122.2 (924.9, 1,348.9) 21 (3, 195) 22 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Crane County Rural No 1,114.9 (753.5, 1,587.5) 22 (1, 233) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.9, 2.5)
Ector County Urban No 1,102.5 (1,026.7, 1,182.3) 23 (10, 89) 163 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.1, 7.0)
Lampasas County Urban No 1,102.4 (962.3, 1,257.1) 24 (5, 153) 45 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.2)
Nolan County Rural No 1,098.3 (926.8, 1,292.4) 25 (4, 184) 29 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
Coke County Rural No 1,097.4 (811.1, 1,450.9) 26 (1, 229) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.5)
Collingsworth County Rural No 1,097.3 (699.1, 1,646.5) 27 (1, 234) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.1, 1.6)
Hamilton County Rural No 1,095.5 (904.6, 1,314.3) 28 (3, 199) 23 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.1, 2.2)
McCulloch County Rural No 1,094.5 (885.0, 1,339.1) 29 (3, 200) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.0)
Anderson County Rural No 1,094.1 (993.8, 1,201.9) 30 (8, 113) 90 rising rising trend 7.6 (0.1, 12.7)
Martin County Urban No 1,089.1 (737.8, 1,555.5) 31 (1, 233) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.3)
Delta County Rural No 1,079.8 (817.7, 1,400.0) 32 (2, 225) 11 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.1, 3.3)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 1,074.6 (954.4, 1,206.0) 33 (6, 140) 59 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.1, 11.0)
Wichita County Urban No 1,074.2 (1,008.2, 1,143.3) 34 (14, 93) 201 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Coryell County Urban No 1,070.3 (972.8, 1,175.2) 35 (10, 121) 91 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Cass County Rural No 1,069.0 (956.3, 1,191.4) 36 (7, 133) 66 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Liberty County Urban No 1,067.1 (978.2, 1,162.1) 37 (10, 115) 114 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Swisher County Rural No 1,061.6 (814.6, 1,359.2) 38 (2, 225) 12 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
San Augustine County Rural No 1,053.1 (864.4, 1,270.6) 39 (4, 205) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.8)
Madison County Rural No 1,052.7 (861.9, 1,273.1) 40 (5, 207) 21 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.3)
Bowie County Urban No 1,052.0 (980.0, 1,127.9) 41 (16, 105) 161 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.4, 4.5)
Panola County Rural No 1,051.8 (916.1, 1,202.0) 42 (7, 174) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Wise County Urban No 1,048.4 (958.3, 1,144.9) 43 (13, 131) 105 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Calhoun County Rural No 1,046.7 (902.2, 1,207.8) 44 (6, 182) 38 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.7)
Eastland County Rural No 1,043.5 (902.8, 1,200.0) 45 (6, 182) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Hill County Rural No 1,042.3 (938.5, 1,154.4) 46 (13, 146) 74 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.2)
Mitchell County Rural No 1,041.3 (800.9, 1,331.6) 47 (2, 229) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.4)
Henderson County Rural No 1,040.8 (973.6, 1,111.4) 48 (18, 110) 183 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.4, 9.2)
Jasper County Rural No 1,040.2 (930.1, 1,159.9) 49 (11, 149) 66 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Montague County Rural No 1,037.7 (906.7, 1,182.5) 50 (8, 177) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Briscoe County Rural No 1,037.6 (613.7, 1,640.8) 51 (1, 235) 3
*
*
Freestone County Rural No 1,037.3 (899.0, 1,190.9) 52 (8, 182) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.1)
Kaufman County Urban No 1,037.2 (964.7, 1,113.8) 53 (18, 120) 162 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Lamar County Rural No 1,035.8 (944.7, 1,133.4) 54 (13, 134) 95 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Rusk County Urban No 1,035.5 (939.1, 1,139.1) 55 (14, 145) 87 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Howard County Rural No 1,032.7 (896.9, 1,183.3) 56 (8, 188) 43 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.2)
Upshur County Urban No 1,030.8 (927.4, 1,142.7) 57 (12, 155) 74 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 4.5)
Floyd County Rural No 1,028.3 (766.9, 1,350.1) 58 (2, 229) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Carson County Urban No 1,024.1 (769.2, 1,335.9) 59 (3, 232) 11 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.4, 16.1)
Camp County Rural No 1,022.9 (838.6, 1,235.9) 60 (4, 214) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Dimmit County Rural No 1,019.4 (793.3, 1,289.1) 61 (3, 228) 14 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.2, 3.5)
Andrews County Rural No 1,016.0 (811.5, 1,256.4) 62 (4, 222) 17 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Grayson County Urban No 1,015.3 (957.4, 1,075.8) 63 (25, 117) 235 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.3, 2.5)
Matagorda County Rural No 1,011.4 (899.6, 1,133.3) 64 (12, 170) 60 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Johnson County Urban No 1,010.8 (953.4, 1,070.8) 65 (25, 117) 243 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 3.0)
Reeves County Rural No 1,010.4 (795.1, 1,266.0) 66 (4, 229) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Wood County Rural No 1,010.1 (930.1, 1,095.2) 67 (20, 141) 120 stable stable trend 3.9 (-1.0, 13.2)
Fannin County Rural No 1,006.0 (896.5, 1,125.2) 68 (12, 175) 62 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Hockley County Urban No 1,002.3 (851.1, 1,172.8) 69 (8, 201) 31 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Gray County Rural No 1,001.7 (855.3, 1,165.8) 70 (9, 202) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.4)
Parker County Urban No 1,001.1 (942.2, 1,062.8) 71 (29, 123) 225 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Cooke County Rural No 993.8 (894.3, 1,101.4) 72 (14, 166) 74 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Leon County Rural No 992.4 (852.4, 1,149.1) 73 (10, 201) 36 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Uvalde County Rural No 992.2 (860.3, 1,138.5) 74 (11, 197) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
San Saba County Rural No 986.7 (754.6, 1,268.3) 75 (3, 230) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.3)
Blanco County Rural No 982.7 (821.3, 1,166.8) 76 (8, 218) 27 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 2.0)
Lavaca County Rural No 981.9 (858.8, 1,117.4) 77 (13, 194) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 981.6 (893.4, 1,076.2) 78 (20, 170) 93 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Burleson County Urban No 981.5 (842.3, 1,137.0) 79 (11, 206) 36 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Kinney County Rural No 981.0 (705.7, 1,328.0) 80 (2, 233) 8 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.5)
Scurry County Rural No 980.9 (812.3, 1,173.9) 81 (7, 217) 24 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.3)
Rains County Rural No 976.9 (817.1, 1,159.4) 82 (8, 215) 28 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Zavala County Rural No 975.4 (746.4, 1,252.6) 83 (5, 230) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.6)
Orange County Urban No 974.4 (898.8, 1,054.8) 84 (28, 160) 125 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Hunt County Urban No 972.6 (903.2, 1,045.9) 85 (33, 148) 150 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.6, -0.8)
Lamb County Rural No 971.2 (794.0, 1,176.0) 86 (9, 223) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
DeWitt County Rural No 970.9 (836.8, 1,120.2) 87 (12, 206) 37 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Red River County Rural No 968.0 (814.3, 1,142.4) 88 (9, 216) 28 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.0)
Marion County Rural No 966.8 (799.6, 1,159.0) 89 (9, 218) 24 rising rising trend 18.0 (3.4, 29.9)
Edwards County Rural No 964.9 (548.3, 1,568.2) 90 (1, 235) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.8, 4.1)
Robertson County Urban No 964.8 (821.6, 1,125.9) 91 (11, 212) 32 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.1, 8.1)
Milam County Rural No 964.6 (848.3, 1,092.4) 92 (16, 201) 50 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.6)
Ellis County Urban No 964.5 (907.7, 1,024.0) 93 (38, 143) 226 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 3.1)
Gregg County Urban No 963.5 (901.5, 1,028.5) 94 (41, 147) 183 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Hopkins County Rural No 960.2 (856.7, 1,072.9) 95 (19, 190) 63 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Navarro County Rural No 959.0 (866.3, 1,058.9) 96 (23, 178) 80 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.5)
Sutton County Rural No 956.3 (645.3, 1,365.9) 97 (1, 235) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.5)
Mason County Rural No 953.4 (721.5, 1,236.4) 98 (3, 232) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Colorado County Rural No 949.0 (825.5, 1,085.6) 99 (16, 203) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Concho County Rural No 947.5 (642.6, 1,345.8) 100 (2, 235) 6
*
*
Gonzales County Rural No 944.8 (801.8, 1,105.9) 101 (12, 217) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Potter County Urban No 944.3 (876.7, 1,015.7) 102 (37, 166) 148 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Stephens County Rural No 939.2 (748.9, 1,163.2) 103 (6, 228) 17 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Waller County Urban No 938.7 (831.6, 1,055.9) 104 (26, 202) 58 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 937.1 (764.0, 1,137.3) 105 (8, 226) 21 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Van Zandt County Rural No 935.4 (858.7, 1,017.2) 106 (40, 182) 111 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Ward County Rural No 933.7 (723.7, 1,185.1) 107 (7, 230) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Falls County Urban No 933.4 (788.8, 1,096.9) 108 (13, 218) 29 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Cochran County Urban No 932.8 (559.3, 1,461.6) 109 (1, 235) 3
*
*
Caldwell County Urban No 932.3 (830.0, 1,043.7) 110 (23, 199) 62 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.2)
San Patricio County Urban No 931.9 (848.2, 1,021.8) 111 (38, 194) 93 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Titus County Rural No 928.0 (803.2, 1,066.8) 112 (16, 212) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Clay County Urban No 928.0 (760.5, 1,121.4) 113 (11, 226) 21 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Newton County Rural No 928.0 (772.6, 1,105.7) 114 (14, 224) 25 stable stable trend 4.5 (-0.9, 15.8)
San Jacinto County Urban No 924.5 (816.3, 1,043.2) 115 (23, 206) 55 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.9)
Dawson County Rural No 918.0 (723.8, 1,148.2) 116 (9, 232) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Brazoria County Urban No 916.3 (875.4, 958.7) 117 (73, 157) 395 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 2.2)
Galveston County Urban No 915.2 (877.0, 954.7) 118 (78, 153) 454 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Mills County Rural No 912.9 (694.1, 1,178.7) 119 (5, 233) 11 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 0.8)
Hardin County Urban No 911.3 (825.2, 1,003.9) 120 (37, 198) 84 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Crosby County Urban No 906.7 (649.4, 1,231.5) 121 (4, 234) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 2.8)
Cherokee County Rural No 901.6 (813.9, 996.2) 122 (45, 200) 79 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Chambers County Urban No 900.3 (785.6, 1,027.1) 123 (28, 214) 47 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.2)
Jim Wells County Rural No 899.5 (794.8, 1,014.2) 124 (32, 209) 54 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Jackson County Rural No 897.9 (749.8, 1,066.4) 125 (18, 226) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Bell County Urban No 897.4 (856.0, 940.2) 126 (83, 171) 366 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Somervell County Rural No 895.7 (706.0, 1,120.6) 127 (11, 231) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 2.0)
Wilson County Urban No 894.0 (801.8, 994.0) 128 (41, 206) 71 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.2)
Bee County Rural No 890.6 (759.1, 1,038.4) 129 (23, 223) 33 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Lubbock County Urban No 888.1 (846.1, 931.6) 130 (89, 172) 344 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Kleberg County Rural No 885.5 (761.0, 1,024.8) 131 (30, 225) 36 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Pecos County Rural No 883.8 (699.3, 1,102.4) 132 (11, 231) 16 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Taylor County Urban No 877.8 (821.7, 936.7) 133 (79, 191) 183 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Aransas County Urban No 875.0 (775.8, 983.5) 134 (44, 217) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Houston County Rural No 874.8 (759.4, 1,002.8) 135 (34, 221) 41 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Angelina County Rural No 873.4 (804.2, 947.0) 136 (75, 199) 119 stable stable trend 4.5 (-1.6, 8.7)
Tyler County Rural No 873.3 (753.3, 1,007.1) 137 (28, 224) 38 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
La Salle County Rural No 869.4 (628.4, 1,172.0) 138 (7, 235) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.2, 1.7)
Karnes County Rural No 868.8 (694.2, 1,073.3) 139 (12, 230) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.2)
Walker County Rural No 867.1 (784.7, 955.9) 140 (62, 208) 84 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Haskell County Rural No 866.1 (645.8, 1,137.2) 141 (7, 233) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.4)
McLennan County Urban No 863.6 (822.2, 906.6) 142 (100, 187) 331 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 2.8)
Yoakum County Rural No 860.4 (603.1, 1,189.8) 143 (6, 235) 7 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.8, 5.0)
Tarrant County Urban No 860.1 (842.9, 877.4) 144 (122, 170) 2,005 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Grimes County Rural No 857.3 (747.5, 978.9) 145 (44, 222) 45 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Burnet County Rural No 856.3 (779.9, 938.0) 146 (69, 210) 94 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Limestone County Rural No 854.5 (736.6, 985.8) 147 (36, 225) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Franklin County Rural No 853.7 (688.5, 1,046.6) 148 (19, 231) 18 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Smith County Urban No 853.0 (812.2, 895.3) 149 (107, 190) 331 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.6, 2.9)
Terry County Rural No 852.7 (667.6, 1,073.0) 150 (14, 233) 14 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Bandera County Urban No 852.0 (744.7, 970.4) 151 (51, 226) 48 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.5)
Randall County Urban No 851.4 (795.2, 910.6) 152 (94, 200) 175 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.1)
Jefferson County Urban No 850.4 (808.4, 894.0) 153 (104, 194) 315 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Brown County Rural No 849.9 (759.7, 947.8) 154 (66, 218) 65 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.1)
Victoria County Urban No 848.3 (782.3, 918.3) 155 (82, 210) 124 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Wharton County Rural No 847.7 (754.9, 948.7) 156 (63, 219) 61 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Hardeman County Rural No 843.6 (580.1, 1,185.4) 157 (3, 235) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.4)
Sabine County Rural No 839.3 (698.9, 999.8) 158 (33, 229) 25 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.1)
Comal County Urban No 837.6 (789.7, 887.7) 159 (108, 201) 240 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Callahan County Urban No 837.0 (690.6, 1,005.2) 160 (24, 231) 23 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.6)
Dallas County Urban No 836.6 (821.0, 852.4) 161 (135, 181) 2,284 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Lipscomb County Rural No 836.2 (520.9, 1,267.8) 162 (3, 235) 4 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.4, 2.3)
Gaines County Rural No 835.6 (655.9, 1,048.8) 163 (13, 233) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Rockwall County Urban No 833.3 (763.0, 908.5) 164 (89, 211) 108 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Montgomery County Urban No 831.9 (802.9, 861.7) 165 (127, 192) 659 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.2)
Dallam County Rural No 831.7 (555.9, 1,195.9) 166 (5, 235) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.2, 1.7)
Kerr County Rural No 831.5 (767.5, 899.3) 167 (100, 211) 125 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Medina County Urban No 831.1 (745.7, 923.6) 168 (81, 218) 71 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Jones County Urban No 830.2 (687.4, 993.9) 169 (31, 232) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.4)
Wilbarger County Rural No 829.0 (669.9, 1,014.4) 170 (23, 231) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.1)
Erath County Rural No 828.0 (726.5, 939.6) 171 (72, 226) 49 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.3)
Atascosa County Urban No 827.4 (733.9, 929.5) 172 (70, 224) 58 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Lee County Rural No 827.4 (693.7, 979.5) 173 (35, 229) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Jim Hogg County Rural No 825.9 (569.0, 1,159.8) 174 (6, 235) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.1)
Hays County Urban No 824.6 (773.8, 878.0) 175 (108, 209) 214 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Guadalupe County Urban No 823.3 (772.3, 876.8) 176 (114, 208) 199 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Throckmorton County Rural No 821.9 (484.7, 1,306.6) 177 (3, 235) 3
*
*
Parmer County Rural No 819.2 (620.9, 1,060.5) 178 (11, 234) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.5)
Tom Green County Urban No 817.8 (760.9, 877.9) 179 (106, 211) 155 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Goliad County Urban No 816.2 (633.3, 1,035.8) 180 (18, 234) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Harrison County Urban No 815.8 (742.0, 894.9) 181 (96, 218) 92 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Dickens County Rural No 814.3 (488.6, 1,278.2) 182 (3, 235) 3 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.6, 1.1)
Brooks County Rural No 814.0 (597.5, 1,083.2) 183 (10, 235) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Hale County Rural No 813.6 (697.7, 943.3) 184 (51, 229) 35 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.2)
Val Verde County Rural No 812.4 (717.2, 916.6) 185 (79, 227) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 5.9)
Washington County Rural No 808.5 (721.5, 903.0) 186 (83, 225) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Austin County Urban No 805.8 (705.6, 916.4) 187 (79, 228) 48 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Bastrop County Urban No 804.5 (737.8, 875.7) 188 (104, 219) 114 falling falling trend -5.0 (-11.4, -1.8)
Live Oak County Rural No 802.2 (647.2, 983.2) 189 (28, 233) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Hood County Rural No 801.0 (738.3, 867.6) 190 (119, 218) 122 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.0, 1.0)
Brazos County Urban No 797.9 (744.3, 854.3) 191 (123, 217) 169 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Hartley County Rural No 796.1 (547.4, 1,118.2) 192 (8, 235) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.1)
Llano County Rural No 794.5 (708.4, 888.3) 193 (84, 226) 62 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
Midland County Urban No 791.7 (732.5, 854.5) 194 (122, 220) 138 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Hutchinson County Rural No 791.6 (662.0, 939.1) 195 (48, 232) 27 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.4)
Armstrong County Urban No 788.2 (443.6, 1,300.5) 196 (3, 235) 3
*
*
Bexar County Urban No 787.9 (771.8, 804.2) 197 (164, 203) 1,880 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
Duval County Rural No 786.0 (610.1, 996.7) 198 (23, 234) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Maverick County Urban No 783.4 (688.5, 887.9) 199 (91, 228) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Harris County Urban No 778.6 (767.3, 790.0) 200 (174, 205) 3,813 falling falling trend -1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)
Lynn County Urban No 776.8 (543.1, 1,078.3) 201 (10, 235) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.4)
Frio County Rural No 773.4 (614.2, 961.4) 202 (37, 234) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.3)
Moore County Rural No 768.1 (613.5, 949.7) 203 (45, 234) 17 stable stable trend 23.2 (-2.9, 42.1)
Fayette County Rural No 757.3 (665.0, 858.7) 204 (108, 230) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Winkler County Rural No 756.6 (521.5, 1,064.3) 205 (11, 235) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.6, 0.6)
El Paso County Urban No 751.2 (727.7, 775.1) 206 (178, 217) 792 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.6, 3.4)
Zapata County Rural No 750.1 (578.5, 956.7) 207 (39, 235) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.7)
Webb County Urban No 749.5 (701.9, 799.5) 208 (155, 225) 188 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Comanche County Rural No 746.8 (617.0, 895.9) 209 (77, 233) 23 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Schleicher County Rural No 744.8 (437.6, 1,187.8) 210 (5, 235) 3 falling falling trend -6.3 (-34.6, -0.1)
Menard County Rural No 743.3 (474.8, 1,108.6) 211 (5, 235) 4
*
*
Nueces County Urban No 740.1 (707.2, 774.2) 212 (176, 223) 387 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.5)
Williamson County Urban No 738.6 (710.8, 767.2) 213 (180, 222) 551 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -0.9)
Gillespie County Rural No 735.0 (654.2, 823.0) 214 (130, 231) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Kendall County Urban No 734.4 (657.2, 818.2) 215 (137, 231) 66 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Hall County Rural No 727.5 (469.8, 1,075.0) 216 (10, 235) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 1.6)
Donley County Rural No 726.1 (493.0, 1,032.1) 217 (15, 235) 6 falling falling trend -5.5 (-18.4, -2.1)
Denton County Urban No 724.8 (699.7, 750.5) 218 (188, 223) 674 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
Willacy County Rural No 723.6 (592.1, 875.8) 219 (82, 234) 21 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Kimble County Rural No 716.4 (516.2, 967.5) 220 (28, 235) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.9, -0.9)
Collin County Urban No 714.0 (691.7, 736.9) 221 (196, 226) 807 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
Travis County Urban No 700.8 (679.4, 722.7) 222 (200, 228) 865 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Fort Bend County Urban No 696.2 (670.7, 722.5) 223 (200, 228) 617 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -0.9)
Castro County Rural No 693.5 (498.6, 938.8) 224 (35, 235) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.5)
Cameron County Urban No 692.8 (662.5, 724.1) 225 (199, 229) 397 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.5, 6.3)
Bailey County Rural No 686.7 (471.8, 964.7) 226 (18, 235) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.4)
Archer County Urban No 673.6 (511.6, 870.9) 227 (69, 235) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.7)
Starr County Rural No 667.7 (584.7, 759.2) 228 (170, 234) 47 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.2)
Jeff Davis County Rural No 650.0 (411.8, 977.3) 229 (19, 235) 4
*
*
Shackelford County Rural No 640.7 (388.1, 997.2) 230 (14, 235) 4 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.5, -1.3)
Ochiltree County Rural No 627.9 (439.5, 870.7) 231 (68, 235) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 0.8)
Hidalgo County Urban No 625.2 (603.3, 647.8) 232 (218, 233) 616 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.1, 1.0)
Hemphill County Rural No 606.4 (351.0, 973.1) 233 (13, 235) 3
*
*
Brewster County Rural No 551.9 (417.8, 715.6) 234 (163, 235) 11 falling falling trend -5.7 (-16.0, -3.3)
Presidio County Rural No 451.1 (309.2, 635.1) 235 (204, 235) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.4, 1.5)
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 2:34 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top