Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington N/A No 872.1 (864.3, 879.8) N/A 10,055 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Columbia County Rural No 1,155.4 (887.4, 1,479.1) 1 (1, 36) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.4)
Cowlitz County Urban No 1,120.9 (1,055.0, 1,189.8) 2 (1, 7) 223 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Ferry County Rural No 1,057.6 (854.1, 1,295.5) 3 (1, 36) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.7)
Grays Harbor County Rural No 1,029.5 (957.9, 1,105.0) 4 (1, 17) 163 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Okanogan County Rural No 1,022.1 (929.3, 1,121.6) 5 (1, 24) 93 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.3)
Pend Oreille County Rural No 1,020.6 (865.7, 1,195.4) 6 (1, 34) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Lewis County Rural No 1,008.8 (939.9, 1,081.6) 7 (2, 20) 164 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.6)
Mason County Rural No 996.4 (922.4, 1,074.9) 8 (2, 24) 141 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Kittitas County Rural No 986.9 (883.6, 1,098.9) 9 (1, 30) 69 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Wahkiakum County Rural No 980.3 (758.8, 1,247.5) 10 (1, 39) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.8)
Pacific County Rural No 969.1 (864.4, 1,083.0) 11 (1, 32) 66 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.0)
Clallam County Rural No 946.2 (889.7, 1,005.4) 12 (4, 27) 213 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Klickitat County Rural No 945.2 (827.4, 1,075.2) 13 (2, 35) 48 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Skagit County Urban No 930.7 (878.6, 985.1) 14 (6, 28) 245 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Clark County Urban No 924.6 (893.1, 957.0) 15 (9, 26) 680 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Yakima County Urban No 924.5 (879.3, 971.5) 16 (7, 28) 319 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
Pierce County Urban No 923.6 (899.2, 948.5) 17 (9, 25) 1,126 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Snohomish County Urban No 918.2 (892.1, 944.8) 18 (9, 26) 981 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Spokane County Urban No 903.7 (875.0, 933.1) 19 (11, 28) 773 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.8)
Whitman County Rural No 902.2 (786.8, 1,029.5) 20 (3, 38) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Stevens County Urban No 894.3 (812.5, 982.2) 21 (5, 35) 93 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Benton County Urban No 891.6 (843.8, 941.5) 22 (10, 32) 267 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Thurston County Urban No 891.5 (854.0, 930.2) 23 (11, 31) 441 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 3.6)
Grant County Rural No 889.4 (818.4, 964.9) 24 (7, 35) 119 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
Island County Rural No 866.5 (808.8, 927.3) 25 (11, 35) 174 stable stable trend -2.4 (-6.0, 1.0)
Douglas County Urban No 864.3 (770.8, 965.9) 26 (7, 38) 63 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Garfield County Rural No 844.4 (528.5, 1,274.9) 27 (1, 39) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.2, 0.8)
Chelan County Urban No 834.9 (770.5, 903.1) 28 (14, 38) 127 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.5)
Whatcom County Urban No 834.6 (793.2, 877.6) 29 (20, 36) 315 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Kitsap County Urban No 833.7 (796.6, 872.2) 30 (22, 36) 394 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Skamania County Urban No 823.1 (673.0, 996.6) 31 (4, 39) 22 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.6)
Adams County Rural No 813.5 (653.7, 1,000.6) 32 (3, 39) 18 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Franklin County Urban No 810.4 (725.5, 902.6) 33 (13, 39) 71 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.5)
Walla Walla County Urban No 805.9 (735.0, 881.8) 34 (17, 39) 97 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Asotin County Urban No 790.9 (688.0, 904.8) 35 (12, 39) 42 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
Lincoln County Rural No 787.2 (645.6, 950.8) 36 (7, 39) 22 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
King County Urban No 764.1 (749.7, 778.6) 37 (31, 39) 2,220 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Jefferson County Rural No 764.0 (692.5, 841.0) 38 (24, 39) 89 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
San Juan County Rural No 691.9 (594.5, 800.6) 39 (27, 39) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.1)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 10:12 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top