Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Arkansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Arkansas N/A No 940.6 (928.6, 952.8) N/A 4,725 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -1.1)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Polk County Rural No 912.5 (786.8, 1,052.8) 55 (13, 75) 38 falling falling trend -13.4 (-23.1, -2.9)
Bradley County Rural No 771.7 (604.1, 971.3) 75 (19, 75) 14 stable stable trend -6.6 (-24.2, 13.7)
Benton County Urban No 858.7 (816.8, 902.2) 67 (48, 73) 320 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.8, -0.7)
Howard County Rural No 896.2 (730.9, 1,087.8) 58 (7, 75) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.8)
Prairie County Rural No 895.0 (716.7, 1,104.1) 59 (6, 75) 17 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.4, -1.2)
Logan County Rural No 1,027.0 (892.5, 1,176.3) 24 (3, 71) 42 falling falling trend -2.1 (-8.2, -1.2)
Monroe County Rural No 1,186.0 (951.5, 1,460.3) 7 (1, 71) 17 falling falling trend -2.1 (-14.1, -0.1)
St. Francis County Rural No 933.4 (796.8, 1,086.7) 52 (7, 75) 34 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.9)
Garland County Urban No 835.3 (783.5, 889.7) 70 (49, 75) 195 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -1.4)
Independence County Rural No 814.9 (720.3, 918.5) 73 (38, 75) 54 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Lafayette County Rural No 802.6 (613.6, 1,031.5) 74 (9, 75) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.1, 0.2)
Woodruff County Rural No 918.3 (708.7, 1,170.4) 54 (3, 75) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.5)
Pike County Rural No 907.2 (729.4, 1,115.5) 56 (6, 75) 18 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.1)
Pulaski County Urban No 888.9 (855.1, 923.8) 62 (43, 70) 536 falling falling trend -1.6 (-4.2, -0.8)
Columbia County Rural No 943.4 (809.5, 1,093.0) 49 (9, 75) 35 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.5)
Grant County Urban No 953.2 (807.1, 1,118.3) 45 (7, 75) 30 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Greene County Rural No 943.7 (846.4, 1,049.2) 48 (14, 73) 69 falling falling trend -1.5 (-5.0, -0.5)
Washington County Urban No 874.7 (826.1, 925.4) 65 (42, 73) 247 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Sebastian County Urban No 876.3 (819.3, 936.2) 64 (37, 73) 179 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -1.0)
Faulkner County Urban No 815.5 (754.0, 880.7) 72 (50, 75) 132 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Baxter County Rural No 945.0 (871.3, 1,023.3) 47 (20, 69) 121 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Hempstead County Rural No 1,025.6 (881.0, 1,187.2) 26 (3, 71) 36 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Hot Spring County Rural No 936.0 (829.7, 1,052.3) 50 (13, 74) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Union County Rural No 976.9 (874.1, 1,088.5) 41 (10, 71) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Carroll County Rural No 926.3 (821.0, 1,041.4) 53 (14, 74) 57 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Little River County Urban No 983.2 (815.5, 1,175.6) 39 (3, 75) 24 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Phillips County Rural No 1,204.6 (1,034.5, 1,394.6) 4 (1, 51) 37 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Crittenden County Urban No 1,133.5 (1,019.6, 1,256.9) 11 (1, 45) 74 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Pope County Rural No 946.6 (862.4, 1,036.8) 46 (16, 71) 94 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Scott County Rural No 1,078.1 (885.5, 1,300.3) 18 (1, 74) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.5)
Craighead County Urban No 957.5 (887.5, 1,031.5) 44 (19, 68) 141 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.4)
Izard County Rural No 892.7 (756.9, 1,045.6) 60 (13, 75) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Marion County Rural No 890.8 (772.8, 1,021.9) 61 (16, 75) 42 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.5)
Mississippi County Rural No 1,095.0 (975.7, 1,225.0) 15 (2, 54) 63 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Montgomery County Rural No 826.9 (667.7, 1,012.8) 71 (13, 75) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Newton County Rural No 858.6 (680.1, 1,070.1) 68 (8, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.3)
Sevier County Rural No 984.6 (805.2, 1,192.6) 37 (2, 75) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
White County Rural No 935.0 (859.6, 1,015.4) 51 (21, 70) 114 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Ashley County Rural No 968.4 (835.5, 1,116.5) 42 (7, 74) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Cleburne County Rural No 885.5 (787.4, 992.5) 63 (23, 75) 59 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.1)
Drew County Rural No 1,000.9 (847.0, 1,174.6) 33 (3, 74) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Franklin County Rural No 1,011.0 (864.3, 1,175.5) 30 (4, 73) 34 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.4)
Jefferson County Rural No 1,018.8 (935.8, 1,107.2) 27 (9, 58) 115 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Lonoke County Urban No 1,010.1 (922.7, 1,103.7) 32 (9, 62) 101 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.3)
Crawford County Urban No 1,000.7 (914.5, 1,092.9) 34 (10, 65) 100 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Dallas County Rural No 1,035.8 (819.4, 1,291.5) 23 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Madison County Urban No 1,010.8 (859.2, 1,181.6) 31 (3, 74) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Saline County Urban No 871.2 (815.8, 929.4) 66 (41, 74) 188 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Stone County Rural No 901.4 (762.9, 1,057.8) 57 (12, 75) 30 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Chicot County Rural No 1,161.9 (963.5, 1,389.0) 8 (1, 67) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Yell County Rural No 984.8 (843.1, 1,143.6) 36 (5, 74) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Boone County Rural No 1,018.1 (918.9, 1,125.1) 28 (8, 66) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Conway County Rural No 849.7 (724.7, 990.2) 69 (20, 75) 33 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Cross County Rural No 1,195.3 (1,022.8, 1,388.6) 5 (1, 53) 35 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4)
Desha County Rural No 1,159.8 (955.2, 1,395.5) 9 (1, 66) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Miller County Urban No 1,016.8 (912.7, 1,129.6) 29 (6, 66) 71 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Ouachita County Rural No 983.5 (855.7, 1,125.0) 38 (7, 74) 44 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Randolph County Rural No 1,085.5 (937.6, 1,250.0) 17 (1, 66) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Cleveland County Rural No 1,048.1 (830.9, 1,304.6) 22 (1, 75) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Johnson County Rural No 982.0 (852.4, 1,125.8) 40 (7, 74) 42 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Jackson County Rural No 1,099.3 (934.0, 1,285.7) 14 (1, 69) 32 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.0)
Lee County Rural No 1,073.3 (863.0, 1,319.2) 19 (1, 75) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.2)
Searcy County Rural No 1,195.2 (985.5, 1,436.4) 6 (1, 63) 23 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Sharp County Rural No 1,067.8 (934.3, 1,215.3) 21 (2, 63) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Van Buren County Rural No 1,026.2 (888.7, 1,179.1) 25 (4, 70) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Nevada County Rural No 993.8 (794.1, 1,228.3) 35 (1, 75) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Perry County Urban No 967.9 (783.9, 1,182.5) 43 (2, 75) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Poinsett County Urban No 1,298.6 (1,143.2, 1,469.4) 1 (1, 24) 51 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Arkansas County Rural No 1,221.7 (1,055.1, 1,406.9) 3 (1, 42) 39 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.7)
Calhoun County Rural No 1,105.6 (834.5, 1,436.3) 13 (1, 75) 11 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Fulton County Rural No 1,088.2 (929.3, 1,266.3) 16 (1, 67) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9)
Clark County Rural No 1,128.3 (972.2, 1,302.3) 12 (1, 60) 37 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Clay County Rural No 1,225.4 (1,055.9, 1,414.3) 2 (1, 43) 37 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.6)
Lincoln County Rural No 1,069.4 (870.9, 1,299.7) 20 (1, 74) 20 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.4)
Lawrence County Rural No 1,154.2 (989.2, 1,338.9) 10 (1, 58) 35 stable stable trend 1.5 (-9.9, 11.3)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 4:33 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top