Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado N/A No 779.2 (770.4, 788.1) N/A 6,175 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Gilpin County Urban No 587.8 (364.1, 915.8) 53 (6, 60) 5 falling falling trend -6.1 (-9.2, -2.8)
Custer County Rural No 615.9 (427.0, 859.5) 52 (7, 60) 8 falling falling trend -5.7 (-17.5, -2.4)
Adams County Urban No 834.2 (798.2, 871.3) 22 (11, 33) 429 falling falling trend -4.4 (-8.5, -0.9)
Broomfield County Urban No 666.3 (598.0, 740.2) 47 (29, 55) 70 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.8, -2.3)
Clear Creek County Urban No 499.5 (348.5, 693.8) 58 (30, 60) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.3, 0.5)
Costilla County Rural No 689.1 (457.8, 999.3) 43 (3, 60) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.4, 0.3)
Elbert County Urban No 673.4 (557.4, 806.5) 45 (15, 57) 26 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -0.9)
Gunnison County Rural No 636.4 (482.1, 825.1) 50 (10, 60) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.6, 0.1)
Rio Blanco County Rural No 894.5 (645.5, 1,207.2) 12 (1, 56) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.2)
Park County Urban No 626.5 (488.4, 793.0) 51 (14, 60) 19 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.1, 0.7)
Phillips County Rural No 735.7 (524.2, 1,005.7) 37 (3, 60) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.4, 0.3)
Pitkin County Rural No 433.5 (334.8, 552.4) 60 (49, 60) 14 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.7, 0.3)
Teller County Urban No 812.0 (687.0, 953.2) 28 (5, 50) 37 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.5, 0.1)
Douglas County Urban No 700.1 (664.4, 737.2) 42 (32, 50) 301 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.1)
Routt County Rural No 582.9 (469.3, 715.5) 54 (32, 60) 20 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.6, 0.3)
Grand County Rural No 534.4 (400.5, 698.6) 56 (31, 60) 13 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.8)
Montrose County Rural No 746.0 (673.1, 824.7) 36 (15, 51) 77 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Ouray County Rural No 671.2 (451.8, 956.6) 46 (3, 60) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.2, 3.6)
Kit Carson County Rural No 784.2 (590.7, 1,020.2) 31 (3, 57) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
Bent County Rural No 657.0 (459.4, 910.8) 49 (5, 60) 7 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 1.5)
Crowley County Rural No 834.9 (568.5, 1,182.9) 21 (1, 59) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.6)
Garfield County Rural No 751.7 (662.2, 849.7) 35 (11, 51) 55 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.4)
Larimer County Urban No 730.1 (697.8, 763.6) 38 (27, 47) 397 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -0.9)
Yuma County Rural No 843.9 (660.3, 1,062.2) 20 (2, 54) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.5)
Arapahoe County Urban No 764.4 (737.6, 791.9) 34 (23, 42) 637 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Boulder County Urban No 701.0 (666.8, 736.5) 41 (32, 50) 325 stable stable trend -1.3 (-1.7, 0.2)
Denver County Urban No 818.4 (790.2, 847.3) 27 (14, 34) 661 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
La Plata County Rural No 679.7 (603.9, 762.5) 44 (26, 54) 64 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.4)
Otero County Rural No 847.0 (720.1, 989.7) 19 (4, 48) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Weld County Urban No 796.7 (756.4, 838.6) 29 (16, 39) 307 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.7)
Fremont County Rural No 872.4 (792.3, 958.4) 15 (5, 36) 89 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Huerfano County Rural No 1,011.9 (822.7, 1,231.4) 6 (1, 41) 20 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Jefferson County Urban No 783.1 (757.1, 809.7) 32 (20, 39) 708 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Mesa County Urban No 855.4 (808.2, 904.5) 17 (8, 32) 252 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Logan County Rural No 820.1 (696.0, 959.6) 25 (5, 50) 31 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
El Paso County Urban No 819.7 (793.1, 846.9) 26 (14, 33) 746 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Montezuma County Rural No 823.2 (717.0, 940.7) 24 (5, 48) 45 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Rio Grande County Rural No 830.6 (671.5, 1,016.1) 23 (3, 53) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Moffat County Rural No 854.5 (676.3, 1,064.9) 18 (2, 53) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Alamosa County Rural No 795.5 (639.2, 978.3) 30 (4, 54) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Chaffee County Rural No 717.9 (606.4, 843.9) 39 (11, 55) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.9)
Pueblo County Urban No 907.0 (859.7, 956.3) 11 (5, 23) 281 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Delta County Rural No 874.5 (783.7, 973.1) 14 (4, 38) 69 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Morgan County Rural No 868.9 (750.1, 1,000.9) 16 (3, 45) 39 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Las Animas County Rural No 936.9 (796.0, 1,095.4) 8 (2, 40) 32 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Prowers County Rural No 1,058.4 (865.5, 1,281.2) 3 (1, 35) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Sedgwick County Rural No 937.5 (635.9, 1,330.1) 7 (1, 57) 6 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.6)
Washington County Rural No 930.5 (679.1, 1,243.1) 9 (1, 55) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 4.0)
Saguache County Rural No 1,053.2 (791.2, 1,372.4) 4 (1, 48) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.7, 5.0)
Baca County Rural No 1,227.8 (919.6, 1,605.2) 1 (1, 37) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.3, 3.5)
Cheyenne County Rural No 888.8 (496.5, 1,460.6) 13 (1, 60) 3 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.1, 5.6)
Archuleta County Rural No 707.7 (573.6, 863.8) 40 (8, 57) 22 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.7, 10.2)
Conejos County Rural No 914.8 (702.0, 1,172.1) 10 (1, 52) 13 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.2, 8.8)
Lincoln County Rural No 1,048.6 (783.6, 1,372.9) 5 (1, 48) 10 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.2, 5.0)
Eagle County Rural No 500.3 (416.1, 596.6) 57 (47, 60) 29 stable stable trend 6.7 (-1.2, 19.8)
Dolores County Rural No 660.6 (389.9, 1,048.8) 48 (2, 60) 3
*
*
Jackson County Rural No 1,215.3 (702.8, 1,948.5) 2 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Lake County Rural No 537.3 (329.8, 829.3) 55 (10, 60) 4
*
*
San Miguel County Rural No 777.5 (527.4, 1,107.1) 33 (1, 60) 7
*
*
Summit County Rural No 442.2 (327.3, 583.0) 59 (46, 60) 12
*
*
Hinsdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 10:14 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top