Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa N/A No 879.2 (868.0, 890.5) N/A 4,823 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Ringgold County Rural No 991.0 (736.3, 1,303.3) 16 (1, 99) 10 falling falling trend -20.8 (-36.9, -1.1)
Bremer County Urban No 779.1 (672.0, 898.2) 82 (25, 99) 38 falling falling trend -11.2 (-17.5, -4.7)
Adams County Rural No 727.0 (497.0, 1,026.9) 94 (4, 99) 6 falling falling trend -8.7 (-30.2, -1.3)
Decatur County Rural No 817.5 (629.8, 1,043.0) 69 (2, 99) 13 falling falling trend -7.4 (-19.4, -2.8)
Taylor County Rural No 821.6 (617.2, 1,071.4) 68 (2, 99) 11 falling falling trend -3.5 (-18.1, -0.3)
Clay County Rural No 737.1 (615.0, 876.2) 93 (24, 99) 26 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -2.2)
Story County Urban No 777.1 (707.8, 851.2) 83 (43, 97) 94 falling falling trend -3.3 (-9.0, -1.4)
Johnson County Urban No 664.6 (612.7, 719.7) 99 (81, 99) 125 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.1, -2.0)
Dallas County Urban No 677.2 (613.3, 745.9) 98 (73, 99) 84 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Louisa County Rural No 956.6 (773.7, 1,169.3) 26 (1, 97) 19 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.2, -0.6)
Audubon County Rural No 758.5 (565.2, 995.7) 89 (5, 99) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.6)
Crawford County Rural No 803.5 (661.9, 965.9) 71 (10, 99) 23 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.2)
Hamilton County Rural No 780.2 (644.1, 936.1) 81 (14, 99) 23 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Page County Rural No 933.9 (794.9, 1,090.0) 37 (2, 90) 32 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.8)
Muscatine County Rural No 836.4 (744.0, 937.1) 61 (19, 93) 60 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Polk County Urban No 946.3 (912.1, 981.5) 32 (15, 50) 598 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.7, -0.9)
Union County Rural No 873.5 (714.1, 1,057.6) 51 (3, 98) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.1)
Harrison County Urban No 974.9 (816.4, 1,154.8) 20 (1, 88) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Iowa County Rural No 904.4 (760.9, 1,066.9) 45 (3, 94) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-16.6, 3.0)
Linn County Urban No 832.0 (790.7, 875.0) 63 (42, 83) 308 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Mills County Urban No 796.5 (648.4, 968.1) 72 (10, 99) 21 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.3, 0.6)
Wright County Rural No 780.7 (638.6, 944.5) 80 (12, 99) 21 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Carroll County Rural No 830.6 (712.3, 962.7) 64 (13, 98) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Cerro Gordo County Rural No 851.7 (770.4, 939.2) 57 (20, 89) 82 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Fayette County Rural No 754.2 (642.4, 879.8) 90 (29, 99) 33 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Humboldt County Rural No 759.0 (597.6, 949.8) 88 (8, 99) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
Kossuth County Rural No 707.2 (589.6, 840.9) 96 (40, 99) 26 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.0)
O'Brien County Rural No 822.6 (680.9, 984.4) 67 (8, 99) 25 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.6, -0.2)
Scott County Urban No 908.7 (859.2, 960.3) 43 (17, 67) 258 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Shelby County Rural No 767.0 (625.9, 929.9) 87 (14, 99) 21 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Winneshiek County Rural No 748.5 (636.5, 874.4) 91 (28, 99) 32 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Allamakee County Rural No 898.0 (753.1, 1,062.6) 49 (2, 96) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Dickinson County Rural No 771.1 (663.6, 891.0) 86 (27, 99) 37 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.2)
Dubuque County Urban No 850.9 (791.3, 913.7) 58 (29, 84) 154 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Jasper County Urban No 908.1 (812.0, 1,012.3) 44 (8, 85) 66 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Marshall County Rural No 949.7 (849.7, 1,058.0) 28 (3, 75) 66 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.4)
Plymouth County Rural No 790.0 (680.2, 912.4) 75 (20, 99) 37 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Sac County Rural No 789.4 (632.5, 972.8) 77 (10, 99) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.6)
Webster County Rural No 955.8 (855.4, 1,064.7) 27 (3, 77) 67 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.3)
Buena Vista County Rural No 771.3 (640.1, 921.0) 85 (16, 99) 25 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Guthrie County Urban No 835.7 (678.7, 1,017.7) 62 (4, 99) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.4)
Hardin County Rural No 853.2 (726.3, 995.7) 56 (7, 98) 33 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Lee County Rural No 963.6 (861.7, 1,074.2) 24 (3, 75) 66 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Woodbury County Urban No 937.4 (869.3, 1,009.3) 33 (10, 67) 144 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Worth County Rural No 823.2 (630.9, 1,055.0) 66 (2, 99) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.0)
Cherokee County Rural No 864.9 (716.9, 1,033.9) 52 (4, 98) 25 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Des Moines County Rural No 967.6 (871.3, 1,071.4) 22 (3, 71) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Jones County Urban No 789.6 (673.4, 919.9) 76 (19, 99) 33 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Pottawattamie County Urban No 1,029.8 (959.6, 1,103.8) 10 (2, 43) 163 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Black Hawk County Urban No 903.4 (847.1, 962.5) 47 (16, 72) 196 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Butler County Rural No 787.0 (655.0, 937.6) 78 (15, 99) 25 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.9, -0.1)
Henry County Rural No 929.7 (799.0, 1,075.6) 39 (3, 90) 36 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Sioux County Rural No 688.3 (595.4, 791.4) 97 (57, 99) 40 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Tama County Rural No 910.5 (769.4, 1,069.6) 42 (2, 94) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
Wayne County Rural No 830.5 (630.4, 1,073.0) 65 (2, 99) 11 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.1)
Adair County Rural No 843.3 (656.5, 1,066.1) 59 (2, 99) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.7)
Jefferson County Rural No 794.5 (665.9, 940.2) 73 (12, 99) 29 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.6)
Lyon County Rural No 739.2 (589.2, 915.6) 92 (19, 99) 17 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Warren County Urban No 858.3 (771.3, 952.4) 54 (17, 90) 72 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Clayton County Rural No 957.3 (826.5, 1,102.7) 25 (1, 86) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Davis County Rural No 713.1 (538.1, 926.3) 95 (14, 99) 11 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Wapello County Rural No 1,046.3 (933.2, 1,169.2) 7 (1, 57) 63 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Benton County Urban No 793.5 (684.3, 915.0) 74 (21, 99) 38 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Delaware County Rural No 854.9 (724.6, 1,001.8) 55 (7, 97) 31 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Fremont County Rural No 947.7 (737.3, 1,198.9) 29 (1, 99) 14 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.5)
Jackson County Rural No 923.7 (794.7, 1,067.6) 41 (3, 90) 37 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Keokuk County Rural No 775.4 (615.8, 963.2) 84 (11, 99) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Buchanan County Rural No 989.3 (846.6, 1,149.0) 18 (1, 83) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Clinton County Rural No 999.2 (908.1, 1,096.9) 15 (2, 58) 89 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Emmet County Rural No 929.8 (752.1, 1,136.5) 38 (1, 97) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.9)
Poweshiek County Rural No 899.6 (771.2, 1,043.1) 48 (3, 95) 35 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Boone County Urban No 947.4 (826.6, 1,080.6) 30 (2, 83) 45 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Calhoun County Rural No 903.8 (736.0, 1,098.0) 46 (1, 98) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.8)
Hancock County Rural No 781.5 (631.9, 955.4) 79 (8, 99) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 6.5)
Grundy County Urban No 1,016.1 (846.8, 1,209.1) 12 (1, 85) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Palo Alto County Rural No 1,078.1 (879.4, 1,307.6) 5 (1, 81) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.0, 1.4)
Cedar County Rural No 808.7 (682.9, 950.6) 70 (14, 99) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.5, 8.5)
Chickasaw County Rural No 936.2 (774.4, 1,121.4) 36 (1, 95) 24 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.5)
Floyd County Rural No 882.6 (746.4, 1,036.2) 50 (4, 97) 30 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Pocahontas County Rural No 1,042.5 (834.6, 1,286.1) 8 (1, 92) 17 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.2)
Howard County Rural No 1,001.4 (811.4, 1,222.6) 14 (1, 92) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.6)
Lucas County Rural No 989.8 (792.9, 1,220.2) 17 (1, 95) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Madison County Urban No 1,035.3 (866.5, 1,227.1) 9 (1, 82) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 1.9)
Marion County Rural No 981.6 (875.0, 1,097.7) 19 (2, 70) 62 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Osceola County Rural No 964.4 (740.6, 1,232.9) 23 (1, 99) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.3)
Van Buren County Rural No 1,112.6 (887.6, 1,376.8) 2 (1, 81) 17 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Washington County Urban No 842.1 (725.1, 972.4) 60 (11, 97) 37 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 860.2 (693.2, 1,054.6) 53 (3, 99) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
Appanoose County Rural No 936.5 (782.9, 1,111.3) 35 (1, 93) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Cass County Rural No 928.1 (780.8, 1,095.1) 40 (2, 92) 28 stable stable trend 0.3 (-6.8, 10.1)
Mahaska County Rural No 1,023.0 (887.2, 1,173.4) 11 (1, 72) 41 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.4)
Monona County Rural No 971.9 (788.5, 1,184.6) 21 (1, 96) 20 stable stable trend 0.3 (-7.7, 13.3)
Greene County Rural No 1,006.1 (819.6, 1,222.1) 13 (1, 93) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Ida County Rural No 1,058.0 (837.8, 1,317.8) 6 (1, 92) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.0)
Clarke County Rural No 1,090.3 (880.9, 1,333.9) 3 (1, 84) 19 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.5, 2.7)
Mitchell County Rural No 936.7 (766.0, 1,133.5) 34 (1, 96) 22 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.8)
Monroe County Rural No 1,118.3 (884.9, 1,394.3) 1 (1, 87) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.2, 2.4)
Winnebago County Rural No 946.3 (774.0, 1,145.3) 31 (1, 95) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 1.9)
Franklin County Rural No 1,081.0 (889.7, 1,300.9) 4 (1, 79) 22 rising rising trend 20.5 (2.2, 32.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 12:29 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top