Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Michigan N/A No 914.1 (907.6, 920.6) N/A 15,565 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Clare County Rural No 1,067.7 (958.1, 1,186.4) 8 (1, 62) 73 falling falling trend -7.6 (-12.7, -1.1)
Mecosta County Rural No 1,034.0 (930.1, 1,146.4) 11 (2, 68) 75 falling falling trend -7.5 (-13.8, -0.6)
Manistee County Rural No 966.6 (860.5, 1,082.3) 33 (4, 79) 61 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.8, -0.9)
Gogebic County Rural No 789.2 (669.0, 924.7) 79 (25, 83) 31 falling falling trend -4.2 (-13.6, -2.4)
Wexford County Rural No 870.6 (770.2, 980.4) 69 (14, 82) 56 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.2, 3.0)
Keweenaw County Rural No 718.0 (469.7, 1,060.5) 82 (2, 83) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.4)
Mackinac County Rural No 857.9 (713.9, 1,022.5) 70 (6, 83) 25 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.7, -0.8)
Benzie County Urban No 692.0 (589.2, 807.7) 83 (65, 83) 32 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Wayne County Urban No 926.2 (909.7, 942.8) 50 (35, 61) 2,501 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -0.8)
Washtenaw County Urban No 806.2 (771.8, 841.8) 78 (64, 81) 422 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Arenac County Rural No 919.0 (779.0, 1,076.9) 51 (4, 82) 32 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Barry County Urban No 906.7 (825.7, 993.5) 58 (12, 79) 96 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Clinton County Urban No 807.5 (739.6, 879.9) 77 (49, 83) 106 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.6)
Oakland County Urban No 819.5 (802.2, 837.0) 76 (66, 80) 1,749 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Antrim County Rural No 849.6 (746.7, 962.7) 71 (15, 83) 50 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Livingston County Urban No 890.8 (844.7, 938.8) 65 (31, 76) 291 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
St. Joseph County Rural No 893.8 (813.9, 979.4) 64 (13, 80) 94 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Genesee County Urban No 951.5 (919.0, 984.9) 43 (19, 61) 663 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Lapeer County Urban No 927.6 (859.5, 999.9) 49 (14, 76) 145 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Leelanau County Urban No 720.6 (631.7, 818.4) 81 (62, 83) 48 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Marquette County Rural No 875.5 (801.6, 954.3) 67 (22, 81) 107 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Saginaw County Urban No 902.7 (859.1, 947.9) 60 (27, 74) 327 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Bay County Urban No 930.0 (871.5, 991.3) 46 (17, 72) 192 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Dickinson County Rural No 832.1 (729.8, 944.5) 72 (23, 83) 48 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Kalamazoo County Urban No 902.2 (860.1, 945.7) 61 (31, 73) 353 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Otsego County Rural No 909.3 (793.9, 1,036.8) 54 (7, 82) 46 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Alger County Rural No 749.6 (590.0, 938.9) 80 (13, 83) 15 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.1)
Berrien County Urban No 907.2 (859.3, 957.0) 57 (25, 74) 274 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Branch County Rural No 908.3 (815.1, 1,009.3) 56 (9, 80) 71 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Charlevoix County Rural No 908.5 (804.7, 1,021.9) 55 (7, 81) 57 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Cheboygan County Rural No 941.5 (837.9, 1,054.3) 44 (6, 80) 62 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Grand Traverse County Urban No 831.7 (773.4, 893.3) 73 (45, 82) 155 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Jackson County Urban No 990.5 (938.3, 1,044.7) 26 (8, 57) 277 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Lenawee County Rural No 902.9 (841.2, 968.0) 59 (19, 77) 164 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Newaygo County Rural No 979.1 (889.9, 1,074.9) 30 (5, 71) 91 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.2)
Ogemaw County Rural No 997.5 (877.9, 1,129.0) 24 (3, 77) 52 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.0)
Macomb County Urban No 929.3 (907.3, 951.8) 48 (31, 62) 1,373 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Monroe County Urban No 986.5 (934.1, 1,041.1) 28 (8, 58) 273 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Osceola County Rural No 1,013.7 (887.1, 1,153.5) 18 (1, 76) 47 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
St. Clair County Urban No 989.4 (938.1, 1,042.7) 27 (7, 58) 289 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Tuscola County Rural No 955.5 (873.5, 1,043.1) 41 (6, 75) 102 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Van Buren County Rural No 954.0 (878.9, 1,033.8) 42 (8, 72) 126 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.1)
Allegan County Rural No 962.9 (900.6, 1,028.5) 35 (10, 68) 185 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Eaton County Urban No 898.2 (839.3, 960.2) 62 (23, 77) 177 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Isabella County Rural No 1,029.5 (929.8, 1,136.9) 13 (2, 67) 81 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Montcalm County Urban No 998.6 (916.1, 1,086.6) 23 (4, 67) 111 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Ottawa County Urban No 822.0 (784.8, 860.4) 75 (60, 81) 372 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.2)
Presque Isle County Rural No 827.0 (704.6, 964.6) 74 (17, 83) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Shiawassee County Rural No 957.6 (880.1, 1,040.2) 40 (7, 73) 116 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Cass County Urban No 1,010.7 (924.1, 1,103.3) 20 (3, 67) 104 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Delta County Rural No 960.3 (870.3, 1,057.1) 36 (6, 74) 85 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Emmet County Rural No 931.7 (835.2, 1,036.3) 45 (6, 79) 70 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Iron County Rural No 878.3 (742.2, 1,031.8) 66 (6, 83) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Sanilac County Rural No 929.8 (839.9, 1,026.6) 47 (9, 78) 80 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Alpena County Rural No 1,006.9 (902.4, 1,120.2) 22 (2, 71) 68 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Calhoun County Urban No 1,032.6 (974.0, 1,093.8) 12 (4, 45) 237 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Huron County Rural No 990.5 (893.5, 1,095.2) 25 (4, 73) 77 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Ionia County Urban No 972.3 (881.9, 1,069.6) 31 (5, 75) 88 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Luce County Rural No 1,048.5 (823.4, 1,316.3) 10 (1, 82) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-9.7, 11.7)
Muskegon County Urban No 1,013.7 (961.8, 1,067.6) 19 (6, 49) 296 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Houghton County Rural No 964.9 (859.7, 1,079.4) 34 (4, 78) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Iosco County Rural No 1,050.1 (945.3, 1,163.4) 9 (2, 65) 74 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Kalkaska County Urban No 1,181.4 (1,019.3, 1,362.1) 3 (1, 54) 41 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.2)
Lake County Rural No 1,150.9 (979.1, 1,344.4) 4 (1, 63) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.0)
Mason County Rural No 959.1 (856.2, 1,070.9) 37 (4, 78) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 4.5)
Ontonagon County Rural No 971.3 (788.8, 1,183.8) 32 (1, 83) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.4)
Hillsdale County Rural No 1,020.4 (926.7, 1,120.9) 16 (2, 67) 89 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Kent County Urban No 915.1 (886.6, 944.2) 52 (33, 68) 804 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.8)
Missaukee County Rural No 1,014.9 (856.4, 1,194.2) 17 (1, 80) 30 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.5)
Alcona County Rural No 958.5 (816.6, 1,118.2) 39 (3, 81) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Gladwin County Rural No 1,008.8 (899.5, 1,128.0) 21 (2, 73) 64 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Gratiot County Rural No 982.1 (880.7, 1,092.0) 29 (4, 75) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Roscommon County Rural No 1,028.8 (921.7, 1,144.9) 14 (2, 70) 72 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Menominee County Rural No 958.6 (846.9, 1,080.8) 38 (4, 79) 54 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Schoolcraft County Rural No 1,027.1 (836.5, 1,248.0) 15 (1, 82) 21 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Crawford County Rural No 1,099.2 (943.9, 1,272.9) 7 (1, 69) 36 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Baraga County Rural No 1,134.9 (917.7, 1,387.9) 5 (1, 79) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.8)
Chippewa County Rural No 1,112.6 (1,000.2, 1,234.2) 6 (1, 53) 73 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Oceana County Rural No 897.3 (785.8, 1,020.1) 63 (8, 82) 48 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.6)
Ingham County Urban No 910.0 (866.8, 954.7) 53 (27, 72) 347 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.6)
Montmorency County Rural No 1,200.6 (1,014.1, 1,411.3) 2 (1, 56) 31 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.0)
Oscoda County Rural No 1,252.5 (1,042.3, 1,492.6) 1 (1, 52) 26 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.8)
Midland County Urban No 873.6 (809.9, 941.0) 68 (27, 80) 141 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.2, 8.2)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 4:27 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top