Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 854.0 (845.4, 862.6) N/A 7,782 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Becker County Rural No 832.5 (740.0, 933.4) 62 (20, 85) 60 falling falling trend -7.3 (-11.9, -1.1)
Dodge County Urban No 779.7 (644.1, 935.1) 78 (15, 87) 23 falling falling trend -5.1 (-17.6, -0.8)
Swift County Rural No 648.1 (507.6, 814.9) 86 (33, 87) 15 falling falling trend -4.5 (-21.3, -2.0)
Cook County Rural No 618.9 (454.5, 824.2) 87 (33, 87) 9 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.1, 0.0)
Nicollet County Urban No 728.6 (633.7, 833.6) 84 (35, 87) 43 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.1)
Morrison County Rural No 822.4 (727.9, 925.7) 65 (21, 86) 56 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Murray County Rural No 804.9 (641.0, 997.4) 73 (6, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.7)
Big Stone County Rural No 989.6 (767.7, 1,254.9) 20 (1, 86) 14 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.6)
Washington County Urban No 803.1 (764.0, 843.6) 74 (46, 81) 323 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Carver County Urban No 739.8 (675.2, 808.7) 83 (53, 87) 100 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Hennepin County Urban No 817.1 (798.2, 836.2) 67 (51, 76) 1,476 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Roseau County Rural No 793.4 (651.0, 957.7) 75 (11, 87) 22 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Scott County Urban No 807.1 (746.3, 871.5) 72 (36, 84) 135 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Crow Wing County Rural No 858.4 (793.4, 927.2) 52 (24, 79) 130 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.6, -1.0)
Dakota County Urban No 791.2 (760.0, 823.4) 76 (54, 82) 496 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Koochiching County Rural No 914.8 (768.0, 1,081.2) 37 (4, 85) 28 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Rice County Rural No 844.1 (765.9, 928.0) 58 (22, 84) 87 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Todd County Rural No 749.2 (650.4, 858.8) 81 (36, 87) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Anoka County Urban No 853.8 (817.4, 891.5) 53 (33, 72) 427 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Cass County Rural No 927.9 (830.7, 1,033.4) 34 (8, 76) 69 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Jackson County Rural No 691.5 (549.1, 859.6) 85 (25, 87) 16 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Lake County Rural No 873.4 (725.6, 1,042.3) 47 (6, 86) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Ramsey County Urban No 849.0 (820.3, 878.5) 56 (38, 70) 678 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.1)
St. Louis County Urban No 875.4 (833.8, 918.6) 46 (28, 68) 342 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Beltrami County Rural No 813.1 (723.0, 911.1) 70 (24, 86) 60 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Itasca County Rural No 910.7 (830.1, 996.9) 38 (13, 75) 96 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Redwood County Rural No 824.5 (690.1, 977.0) 64 (11, 87) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Wilkin County Rural No 1,005.4 (762.8, 1,299.6) 17 (1, 87) 11 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.2)
Lincoln County Rural No 853.1 (649.6, 1,099.6) 54 (2, 87) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Marshall County Rural No 773.1 (612.1, 963.3) 79 (10, 87) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.1)
Olmsted County Urban No 744.4 (698.1, 793.0) 82 (60, 86) 196 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.6)
Steele County Rural No 826.4 (732.0, 929.5) 63 (20, 85) 56 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Aitkin County Rural No 892.3 (779.8, 1,016.5) 44 (7, 82) 45 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Benton County Urban No 963.0 (849.1, 1,087.7) 26 (4, 73) 53 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Renville County Rural No 920.1 (773.2, 1,086.4) 35 (2, 85) 28 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.3)
Lyon County Rural No 909.5 (785.8, 1,047.1) 40 (6, 83) 39 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Mower County Rural No 837.3 (744.5, 938.1) 60 (21, 85) 62 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Otter Tail County Rural No 821.4 (756.1, 890.8) 66 (31, 83) 119 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4)
Winona County Rural No 880.9 (793.8, 974.8) 45 (14, 80) 76 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Douglas County Rural No 809.8 (729.4, 896.6) 71 (28, 85) 74 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
Kanabec County Rural No 967.2 (820.2, 1,133.1) 24 (2, 79) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 815.0 (729.4, 907.8) 69 (24, 85) 68 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Stevens County Rural No 751.6 (575.2, 964.2) 80 (10, 87) 13 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.0)
Clay County Urban No 863.3 (778.3, 955.0) 50 (17, 83) 77 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Wabasha County Urban No 956.2 (835.0, 1,089.9) 29 (4, 79) 45 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Freeborn County Rural No 791.2 (700.9, 889.8) 77 (27, 86) 56 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.3)
Pennington County Rural No 1,049.4 (877.2, 1,245.1) 10 (1, 75) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Sibley County Rural No 840.7 (694.1, 1,008.7) 59 (6, 87) 23 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Wright County Urban No 917.4 (854.6, 983.7) 36 (15, 66) 162 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Blue Earth County Urban No 868.0 (786.2, 955.9) 49 (17, 82) 84 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Hubbard County Rural No 868.7 (757.9, 991.2) 48 (11, 84) 45 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.9)
Martin County Rural No 895.1 (777.2, 1,025.7) 43 (6, 84) 42 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Norman County Rural No 1,099.6 (862.2, 1,381.5) 5 (1, 83) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.8)
Red Lake County Rural No 833.3 (583.1, 1,154.1) 61 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.8, 2.5)
Stearns County Urban No 850.0 (798.3, 904.2) 55 (30, 78) 204 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Waseca County Rural No 983.2 (837.6, 1,146.7) 22 (2, 79) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Yellow Medicine County Rural No 909.9 (727.2, 1,124.0) 39 (2, 87) 17 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.2)
Brown County Rural No 1,005.2 (890.3, 1,130.6) 18 (2, 67) 57 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Lake of the Woods County Rural No 956.3 (672.2, 1,318.7) 28 (1, 87) 7 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Carlton County Urban No 1,055.6 (944.0, 1,176.7) 8 (1, 48) 66 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
McLeod County Rural No 859.3 (765.8, 960.9) 51 (17, 83) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Clearwater County Rural No 1,014.4 (810.5, 1,253.2) 16 (1, 85) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Rock County Urban No 936.9 (753.3, 1,151.2) 32 (1, 86) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Watonwan County Rural No 945.5 (772.6, 1,144.8) 31 (2, 85) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Houston County Urban No 815.3 (694.2, 951.2) 68 (15, 87) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Pine County Rural No 1,058.2 (942.0, 1,184.8) 7 (1, 46) 62 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.8)
Chippewa County Rural No 986.5 (824.8, 1,170.3) 21 (1, 80) 26 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Isanti County Urban No 956.0 (851.5, 1,069.8) 30 (5, 74) 62 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Nobles County Rural No 900.4 (764.6, 1,052.8) 42 (5, 85) 32 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
Goodhue County Rural No 998.3 (908.3, 1,094.8) 19 (4, 54) 91 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Sherburne County Urban No 1,022.5 (936.3, 1,114.6) 15 (3, 44) 108 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.9)
Le Sueur County Urban No 957.5 (838.7, 1,088.4) 27 (4, 79) 47 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.9, 6.3)
Mahnomen County Rural No 1,221.4 (916.3, 1,594.6) 1 (1, 81) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 2.1)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 1,176.4 (1,039.9, 1,325.6) 3 (1, 28) 54 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.3)
Polk County Urban No 978.1 (865.2, 1,101.4) 23 (3, 71) 56 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.2)
Grant County Rural No 966.3 (745.5, 1,231.1) 25 (1, 86) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Meeker County Rural No 931.1 (810.0, 1,065.1) 33 (5, 80) 43 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 5.2)
Faribault County Rural No 1,054.9 (901.8, 1,226.4) 9 (1, 70) 34 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Pipestone County Rural No 1,138.1 (930.5, 1,377.1) 4 (1, 72) 21 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Chisago County Urban No 1,022.9 (928.4, 1,124.3) 14 (2, 49) 88 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 6.7)
Cottonwood County Rural No 1,030.2 (863.2, 1,219.6) 13 (1, 80) 28 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.0, 2.3)
Wadena County Rural No 1,201.9 (1,027.0, 1,397.9) 2 (1, 36) 34 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.5, 1.8)
Kittson County Rural No 1,087.3 (819.2, 1,413.4) 6 (1, 85) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.3)
Traverse County Rural No 1,039.3 (747.9, 1,404.0) 12 (1, 87) 8 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.2, 11.5)
Pope County Rural No 906.9 (750.1, 1,086.5) 41 (3, 86) 23 stable stable trend 6.0 (-1.2, 18.2)
Fillmore County Urban No 1,045.8 (915.8, 1,188.8) 11 (1, 61) 48 stable stable trend 10.1 (-0.2, 17.5)
Lac qui Parle County Rural No 846.9 (667.1, 1,059.4) 57 (4, 87) 16 stable stable trend 11.7 (-0.2, 19.4)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 7:55 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top