Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi N/A No 982.2 (969.4, 995.2) N/A 4,592 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.8)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Franklin County Rural No 854.2 (658.1, 1,090.6) 70 (8, 81) 13 stable stable trend -14.0 (-30.2, 0.8)
Yazoo County Urban No 1,229.0 (1,069.9, 1,405.0) 5 (1, 43) 44 falling falling trend -11.2 (-21.0, -1.2)
Alcorn County Rural No 856.8 (756.1, 967.3) 69 (31, 79) 53 falling falling trend -8.6 (-13.4, -2.5)
Calhoun County Rural No 802.8 (653.4, 975.7) 74 (25, 81) 20 falling falling trend -5.8 (-15.1, -2.5)
Jefferson Davis County Rural No 699.9 (563.3, 859.7) 79 (47, 81) 18 falling falling trend -5.2 (-15.2, -2.0)
Madison County Urban No 1,113.8 (1,037.0, 1,194.6) 16 (5, 42) 163 falling falling trend -5.2 (-13.8, -3.8)
Amite County Rural No 763.7 (631.6, 915.4) 77 (39, 81) 23 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.3)
Leake County Rural No 979.2 (838.3, 1,137.1) 42 (6, 76) 35 falling falling trend -2.7 (-15.8, -0.6)
Lee County Rural No 1,112.2 (1,028.3, 1,201.3) 18 (4, 45) 132 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -1.3)
Smith County Rural No 946.3 (793.4, 1,120.2) 48 (7, 79) 27 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.2)
Stone County Urban No 961.1 (798.3, 1,148.0) 46 (6, 80) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Benton County Urban No 866.7 (657.7, 1,120.8) 66 (7, 81) 11 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.2)
Greene County Rural No 781.4 (616.9, 976.5) 75 (25, 81) 15 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.3)
Lamar County Urban No 764.9 (685.2, 851.3) 76 (53, 81) 69 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Kemper County Rural No 647.9 (495.6, 831.6) 81 (51, 81) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.1)
Carroll County Rural No 863.5 (703.3, 1,049.8) 68 (13, 81) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Marion County Rural No 865.6 (746.3, 998.5) 67 (25, 80) 38 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Perry County Urban No 1,005.3 (820.5, 1,219.7) 36 (3, 79) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Grenada County Rural No 1,060.0 (915.0, 1,221.5) 24 (4, 69) 39 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.5)
Itawamba County Rural No 897.1 (772.4, 1,036.3) 59 (18, 80) 37 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Wilkinson County Rural No 970.3 (756.4, 1,225.8) 45 (2, 81) 14 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.1)
Webster County Rural No 1,036.4 (832.4, 1,275.5) 31 (1, 78) 18 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.3)
Winston County Rural No 923.7 (785.4, 1,079.1) 54 (12, 79) 32 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Copiah County Urban No 870.4 (756.1, 997.1) 65 (27, 79) 42 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Montgomery County Rural No 840.3 (673.8, 1,035.6) 72 (15, 81) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Oktibbeha County Rural No 849.7 (747.3, 962.1) 71 (33, 80) 50 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Warren County Rural No 1,000.6 (899.2, 1,110.3) 39 (11, 68) 74 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Washington County Rural No 1,088.2 (979.0, 1,206.4) 21 (4, 55) 76 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Chickasaw County Rural No 917.7 (771.7, 1,083.4) 56 (9, 80) 28 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Harrison County Urban No 1,059.3 (1,007.8, 1,112.7) 25 (13, 46) 330 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Jackson County Urban No 1,005.5 (946.0, 1,067.9) 35 (19, 56) 223 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Pike County Rural No 922.8 (820.9, 1,033.9) 55 (19, 76) 61 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.1, 0.2)
DeSoto County Urban No 1,059.0 (998.3, 1,122.5) 26 (10, 46) 239 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Hancock County Urban No 938.9 (851.0, 1,033.6) 50 (21, 72) 86 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Panola County Rural No 1,066.0 (944.1, 1,199.4) 23 (4, 63) 57 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Clay County Rural No 882.2 (744.5, 1,037.9) 60 (15, 80) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.5)
Lafayette County Rural No 924.3 (821.3, 1,036.7) 52 (20, 76) 62 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Lawrence County Rural No 1,093.5 (897.9, 1,319.3) 20 (1, 73) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.8)
Simpson County Urban No 876.9 (758.7, 1,008.5) 62 (23, 80) 40 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Yalobusha County Rural No 1,056.3 (879.6, 1,258.1) 27 (2, 74) 26 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Bolivar County Rural No 1,193.1 (1,055.3, 1,344.2) 10 (1, 47) 57 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Forrest County Urban No 1,001.5 (916.6, 1,092.1) 37 (14, 64) 104 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
George County Rural No 1,202.6 (1,024.2, 1,403.3) 8 (1, 58) 37 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.6)
Jasper County Rural No 934.4 (791.6, 1,095.5) 51 (11, 78) 30 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.9)
Lincoln County Rural No 1,139.9 (1,016.2, 1,274.5) 14 (2, 49) 64 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Pearl River County Rural No 1,121.4 (1,030.4, 1,218.3) 15 (3, 45) 116 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Quitman County Rural No 976.9 (715.8, 1,302.2) 43 (1, 81) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.4)
Walthall County Rural No 872.8 (720.4, 1,047.8) 63 (16, 81) 23 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.7)
Claiborne County Rural No 924.1 (712.6, 1,178.5) 53 (3, 81) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Tippah County Rural No 954.5 (815.2, 1,111.2) 47 (8, 78) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Monroe County Rural No 970.3 (866.3, 1,083.4) 44 (13, 73) 64 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Sunflower County Rural No 1,113.4 (961.0, 1,283.1) 17 (2, 64) 40 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8)
Coahoma County Rural No 1,201.4 (1,036.9, 1,385.0) 9 (1, 49) 39 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.0)
Holmes County Urban No 1,407.9 (1,206.5, 1,633.4) 1 (1, 23) 35 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Lowndes County Rural No 1,053.3 (961.6, 1,151.3) 29 (7, 56) 99 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Newton County Rural No 987.4 (843.1, 1,149.2) 41 (6, 76) 33 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.2)
Scott County Urban No 1,000.7 (866.3, 1,150.1) 38 (6, 73) 40 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.1)
Tallahatchie County Rural No 1,054.5 (863.7, 1,274.8) 28 (1, 75) 21 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Tate County Urban No 1,153.5 (1,009.8, 1,312.0) 12 (1, 53) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.8)
Adams County Rural No 1,034.9 (920.5, 1,159.5) 32 (6, 65) 61 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Clarke County Rural No 879.3 (739.4, 1,038.1) 61 (16, 80) 28 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Tishomingo County Rural No 1,101.3 (955.4, 1,263.2) 19 (2, 64) 41 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.4)
Attala County Rural No 1,151.2 (992.1, 1,328.5) 13 (1, 58) 38 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Hinds County Urban No 904.3 (858.1, 952.4) 58 (40, 70) 298 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Jefferson County Rural No 943.4 (716.6, 1,218.3) 49 (2, 81) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.1)
Rankin County Urban No 761.6 (713.1, 812.5) 78 (64, 81) 187 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 3.7)
Wayne County Rural No 1,013.6 (864.3, 1,181.5) 34 (4, 75) 33 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Covington County Rural No 1,052.4 (893.7, 1,231.3) 30 (3, 73) 31 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Prentiss County Rural No 988.0 (859.1, 1,130.8) 40 (8, 75) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.3)
Sharkey County Rural No 1,208.8 (868.5, 1,639.1) 6 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.3)
Noxubee County Rural No 872.4 (683.1, 1,097.8) 64 (7, 81) 14 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Choctaw County Rural No 689.2 (530.5, 880.5) 80 (40, 81) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.8)
Marshall County Urban No 1,203.7 (1,078.7, 1,339.3) 7 (1, 39) 70 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 4.4)
Tunica County Urban No 1,310.2 (1,001.2, 1,684.9) 3 (1, 66) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Union County Rural No 1,082.2 (949.2, 1,228.6) 22 (3, 63) 48 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.2)
Leflore County Rural No 1,317.3 (1,158.9, 1,491.4) 2 (1, 26) 52 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Neshoba County Rural No 1,030.1 (900.3, 1,173.6) 33 (5, 70) 46 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.6, 1.5)
Pontotoc County Rural No 1,161.0 (1,021.7, 1,314.0) 11 (1, 50) 51 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Lauderdale County Rural No 804.4 (735.6, 877.9) 73 (53, 80) 102 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.5, 7.2)
Jones County Rural No 912.2 (833.7, 996.1) 57 (30, 74) 101 rising rising trend 7.8 (0.8, 12.6)
Humphreys County Rural No 1,257.4 (1,005.4, 1,553.9) 4 (1, 66) 17 stable stable trend 14.9 (-0.7, 26.6)
Issaquena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 2:52 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top