Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Nebraska by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Nebraska N/A No 877.1 (862.2, 892.3) N/A 2,681 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.9)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Kimball County Rural No 780.5 (541.2, 1,087.7) 58 (4, 75) 7 stable stable trend -25.4 (-54.7, 2.6)
Wayne County Rural No 659.2 (485.1, 873.9) 73 (16, 75) 9 stable stable trend -20.1 (-41.3, 0.9)
Butler County Rural No 997.0 (791.2, 1,239.2) 12 (2, 69) 16 stable stable trend -7.9 (-31.7, 4.0)
Saunders County Urban No 832.6 (709.9, 970.3) 47 (11, 71) 33 falling falling trend -2.8 (-9.2, -1.4)
Stanton County Rural No 712.2 (504.8, 974.3) 71 (8, 75) 8 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.2)
Cherry County Rural No 725.4 (525.6, 975.2) 69 (8, 75) 8 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.4)
Box Butte County Rural No 806.6 (639.8, 1,003.0) 55 (7, 75) 16 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.4)
Howard County Urban No 740.9 (552.7, 972.1) 65 (9, 75) 10 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.4)
Custer County Rural No 636.2 (500.0, 797.8) 75 (35, 75) 15 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.5)
Dixon County Rural No 831.5 (611.5, 1,104.6) 49 (4, 75) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.2)
Pierce County Rural No 713.0 (526.4, 942.9) 70 (10, 75) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.6)
Platte County Rural No 811.4 (711.6, 921.0) 53 (16, 70) 48 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Nuckolls County Rural No 734.7 (525.2, 998.6) 68 (8, 75) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 0.7)
Keith County Rural No 940.3 (765.4, 1,143.3) 18 (3, 68) 20 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Clay County Rural No 905.6 (676.7, 1,186.7) 26 (3, 74) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.3, 1.1)
Hall County Urban No 819.3 (737.8, 907.2) 52 (19, 68) 75 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Perkins County Rural No 759.5 (486.4, 1,128.4) 62 (3, 75) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.1)
Sherman County Rural No 841.0 (583.5, 1,173.3) 43 (3, 75) 7 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.0)
Antelope County Rural No 653.6 (482.6, 864.9) 74 (18, 75) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.8)
Cass County Urban No 874.1 (753.3, 1,008.6) 37 (8, 68) 39 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Douglas County Urban No 930.2 (898.6, 962.6) 22 (14, 38) 680 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Fillmore County Rural No 884.1 (671.1, 1,142.7) 33 (4, 75) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Kearney County Rural No 711.1 (521.3, 946.7) 72 (10, 75) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.8, 1.3)
Pawnee County Rural No 781.0 (517.9, 1,127.9) 57 (4, 75) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.3, 1.4)
Saline County Rural No 740.8 (587.9, 921.0) 66 (16, 75) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.5)
Boone County Rural No 839.5 (629.9, 1,096.5) 44 (5, 75) 11 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.3, 1.1)
Buffalo County Rural No 856.4 (765.7, 954.7) 40 (13, 66) 66 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Dawes County Rural No 863.9 (673.7, 1,090.4) 39 (5, 74) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.7)
Madison County Rural No 835.1 (731.9, 948.4) 46 (13, 69) 49 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Seward County Urban No 884.7 (740.7, 1,048.4) 32 (6, 71) 27 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
Sheridan County Rural No 753.1 (556.7, 994.8) 63 (9, 75) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.6)
Burt County Rural No 954.9 (752.9, 1,193.7) 17 (3, 72) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 0.9)
Phelps County Rural No 811.0 (639.6, 1,014.1) 54 (8, 75) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.6)
Red Willow County Rural No 911.2 (741.5, 1,107.6) 25 (4, 70) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.3)
Sarpy County Urban No 935.8 (878.2, 996.2) 21 (10, 45) 203 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
Knox County Rural No 844.4 (676.9, 1,040.3) 42 (6, 74) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.1)
Scotts Bluff County Rural No 828.6 (735.4, 930.2) 50 (16, 69) 58 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Adams County Rural No 905.2 (796.8, 1,024.2) 27 (8, 64) 51 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Colfax County Rural No 939.1 (724.6, 1,196.7) 19 (3, 72) 13 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.0)
Richardson County Rural No 1,023.5 (827.4, 1,251.2) 9 (2, 65) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.4)
Washington County Urban No 923.2 (786.7, 1,076.5) 23 (5, 66) 33 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Brown County Rural No 922.9 (630.8, 1,300.1) 24 (2, 75) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.0)
Gage County Rural No 963.4 (839.0, 1,100.8) 16 (5, 59) 44 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 988.9 (884.5, 1,102.1) 15 (5, 48) 66 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Cuming County Rural No 765.4 (599.2, 962.7) 61 (10, 75) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.3)
Dakota County Urban No 826.4 (680.0, 995.1) 51 (8, 73) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.9, 7.7)
Furnas County Rural No 736.2 (529.6, 996.1) 67 (8, 75) 8 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Merrick County Urban No 745.7 (566.1, 963.5) 64 (10, 75) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.5)
Otoe County Rural No 869.4 (729.4, 1,028.0) 38 (7, 71) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Chase County Rural No 901.2 (636.8, 1,236.9) 28 (2, 75) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.8, 2.1)
Dodge County Rural No 938.5 (838.0, 1,047.6) 20 (6, 57) 64 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9)
York County Rural No 892.8 (744.0, 1,062.5) 31 (5, 70) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Garden County Rural No 877.7 (560.2, 1,309.3) 36 (2, 75) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.9, 3.7)
Morrill County Rural No 893.1 (648.9, 1,197.9) 30 (3, 75) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.8)
Holt County Rural No 881.1 (713.9, 1,075.3) 34 (5, 73) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.5)
Jefferson County Rural No 1,160.4 (942.2, 1,413.7) 5 (1, 47) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Johnson County Rural No 837.8 (593.4, 1,146.6) 45 (3, 75) 7 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 1.9)
Nance County Rural No 1,406.4 (995.1, 1,924.8) 2 (1, 59) 8 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.2)
Polk County Rural No 878.2 (649.0, 1,160.5) 35 (3, 75) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.4, 2.5)
Thayer County Rural No 1,013.2 (771.7, 1,305.4) 11 (1, 72) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 1.9)
Cedar County Rural No 772.3 (602.8, 974.5) 60 (9, 75) 14 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Garfield County Rural No 775.1 (475.7, 1,189.4) 59 (3, 75) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.2, 2.7)
Valley County Rural No 792.1 (564.9, 1,079.9) 56 (5, 75) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.1, 2.5)
Nemaha County Rural No 1,030.0 (800.2, 1,304.5) 8 (2, 69) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.2, 2.6)
Thurston County Rural No 1,466.3 (1,096.1, 1,919.4) 1 (1, 36) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.0)
Dawson County Rural No 846.9 (721.3, 988.1) 41 (10, 71) 32 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.6, 11.6)
Hamilton County Rural No 893.8 (711.3, 1,108.3) 29 (4, 73) 16 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 13.1)
Hitchcock County Rural No 1,215.9 (865.6, 1,658.7) 4 (1, 71) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.0, 4.1)
Boyd County Rural No 1,127.6 (757.3, 1,613.7) 6 (1, 75) 6 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.4, 5.0)
Lancaster County Urban No 831.7 (793.4, 871.3) 48 (29, 60) 367 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 4.4)
Webster County Rural No 1,378.3 (1,016.7, 1,825.9) 3 (1, 54) 9 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.2, 4.4)
Cheyenne County Rural No 990.2 (803.0, 1,207.7) 14 (3, 68) 20 rising rising trend 4.5 (0.7, 16.6)
Franklin County Rural No 1,063.1 (758.7, 1,446.4) 7 (1, 73) 8 rising rising trend 6.7 (1.9, 22.1)
Greeley County Rural No 995.3 (661.5, 1,438.1) 13 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Harlan County Rural No 1,019.9 (730.5, 1,385.3) 10 (1, 74) 8
*
*
Arthur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Banner County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blaine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deuel County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dundy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frontier County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gosper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hayes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hooker County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Keya Paha County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Logan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loup County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McPherson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sioux County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Thomas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 6:23 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top