Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New Jersey by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Jersey N/A No 778.2 (771.8, 784.6) N/A 11,623 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -2.1)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Cape May County Urban No 864.0 (813.2, 917.1) 9 (3, 11) 220 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.8, -1.9)
Union County Urban No 700.5 (674.7, 727.1) 18 (14, 20) 569 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.7, -2.2)
Hudson County Urban No 639.2 (615.1, 664.0) 21 (20, 21) 539 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.0, -2.4)
Middlesex County Urban No 742.3 (721.1, 763.9) 13 (12, 17) 952 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.6, -1.8)
Essex County Urban No 675.6 (654.2, 697.5) 20 (17, 21) 772 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.0, -2.3)
Passaic County Urban No 725.3 (698.6, 752.9) 16 (13, 19) 563 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -2.1)
Somerset County Urban No 680.7 (650.1, 712.3) 19 (16, 21) 380 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.1)
Atlantic County Urban No 878.8 (841.9, 916.9) 7 (3, 10) 435 falling falling trend -2.3 (-6.4, -1.0)
Gloucester County Urban No 939.2 (899.3, 980.5) 3 (1, 6) 430 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -1.4)
Monmouth County Urban No 809.8 (786.2, 834.0) 11 (9, 12) 911 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -1.9)
Bergen County Urban No 711.2 (693.1, 729.7) 17 (14, 19) 1,187 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.9)
Hunterdon County Urban No 737.0 (689.2, 787.3) 15 (12, 19) 180 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Morris County Urban No 737.6 (712.4, 763.5) 14 (12, 18) 654 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.9)
Burlington County Urban No 835.9 (807.6, 864.9) 10 (7, 11) 669 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.7)
Mercer County Urban No 779.8 (747.6, 813.0) 12 (11, 14) 450 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.1, -1.4)
Camden County Urban No 901.9 (872.4, 932.1) 5 (2, 9) 725 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Sussex County Urban No 911.7 (857.0, 968.9) 4 (1, 10) 217 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Ocean County Urban No 876.9 (855.3, 899.0) 8 (4, 9) 1,249 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Warren County Urban No 881.7 (823.9, 942.5) 6 (2, 11) 176 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Salem County Urban No 980.0 (900.7, 1,064.4) 1 (1, 7) 115 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Cumberland County Urban No 978.7 (921.7, 1,038.4) 2 (1, 5) 223 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/20/2026 6:30 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top