Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for North Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
North Carolina N/A No 895.4 (888.9, 902.0) N/A 14,845 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.0)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Hyde County Rural No 728.1 (506.0, 1,014.2) 97 (2, 100) 7 falling falling trend -12.9 (-36.1, -2.9)
Wake County Urban No 756.0 (734.5, 777.9) 95 (87, 100) 978 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -2.2)
Rowan County Urban No 956.6 (901.7, 1,014.0) 36 (13, 75) 233 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.6, -1.3)
Camden County Urban No 867.8 (674.3, 1,100.0) 79 (1, 100) 14 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -0.9)
Bertie County Rural No 871.6 (747.6, 1,010.2) 76 (5, 100) 36 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -1.1)
Tyrrell County Rural No 1,052.2 (763.4, 1,414.9) 9 (1, 100) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.5)
Orange County Urban No 727.5 (675.4, 782.4) 98 (83, 100) 150 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.6)
Clay County Rural No 714.7 (593.0, 854.4) 99 (43, 100) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Madison County Urban No 816.9 (704.1, 942.7) 86 (15, 100) 38 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.1)
Avery County Rural No 799.8 (675.3, 940.7) 90 (18, 100) 30 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Chowan County Rural No 920.0 (779.6, 1,078.3) 50 (2, 100) 31 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.8, -1.1)
Durham County Urban No 805.0 (766.4, 845.1) 88 (71, 97) 338 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)
Hertford County Rural No 906.4 (780.9, 1,046.3) 55 (4, 99) 38 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.9)
Jackson County Rural No 709.5 (628.3, 798.4) 100 (75, 100) 57 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.7)
Polk County Rural No 732.5 (641.2, 833.1) 96 (61, 100) 46 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.8, -0.8)
Cabarrus County Urban No 837.7 (789.9, 887.6) 85 (51, 94) 237 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.1)
Cherokee County Rural No 870.2 (781.9, 965.9) 77 (17, 98) 73 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.4, -0.9)
Franklin County Urban No 892.3 (813.5, 976.7) 62 (16, 94) 99 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.8)
Mecklenburg County Urban No 793.4 (770.7, 816.7) 91 (79, 96) 954 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Pamlico County Rural No 806.2 (679.1, 950.2) 87 (17, 100) 29 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.4)
Pasquotank County Rural No 872.0 (776.7, 975.8) 75 (11, 98) 62 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Buncombe County Urban No 783.1 (749.5, 817.9) 92 (78, 99) 416 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1)
Gates County Urban No 887.2 (716.1, 1,086.7) 65 (1, 100) 19 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.0)
Hoke County Urban No 1,008.2 (884.9, 1,144.2) 20 (1, 86) 53 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 0.0)
Pitt County Urban No 882.4 (828.1, 939.4) 70 (30, 90) 203 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Alleghany County Rural No 923.4 (773.2, 1,094.3) 49 (1, 100) 27 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Lenoir County Rural No 904.4 (826.7, 987.5) 57 (14, 92) 101 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
Catawba County Urban No 888.7 (839.2, 940.4) 64 (33, 87) 246 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Gaston County Urban No 918.1 (873.6, 964.4) 51 (24, 81) 327 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Nash County Urban No 883.4 (820.0, 950.3) 69 (22, 92) 150 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Person County Urban No 951.2 (853.1, 1,057.5) 40 (3, 89) 71 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.4)
Union County Urban No 868.1 (820.0, 918.2) 78 (40, 91) 254 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.6)
Carteret County Rural No 963.7 (896.4, 1,034.7) 32 (6, 77) 158 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.6)
Craven County Rural No 965.0 (903.7, 1,029.4) 31 (9, 73) 188 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Duplin County Rural No 856.1 (772.8, 945.9) 82 (26, 98) 78 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Granville County Rural No 952.7 (867.9, 1,043.6) 39 (5, 86) 96 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.5)
Greene County Rural No 904.5 (760.9, 1,067.3) 56 (2, 100) 29 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
New Hanover County Urban No 898.3 (856.4, 941.7) 60 (32, 84) 356 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Rockingham County Urban No 983.4 (919.2, 1,050.9) 29 (6, 71) 178 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
Scotland County Rural No 1,031.6 (917.1, 1,156.6) 14 (1, 80) 60 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3)
Beaufort County Rural No 934.8 (851.7, 1,023.8) 47 (7, 88) 96 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.2)
Iredell County Urban No 858.0 (810.2, 907.9) 81 (40, 92) 248 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Lee County Rural No 891.1 (810.6, 977.4) 63 (15, 94) 92 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.1)
Lincoln County Urban No 879.0 (812.6, 949.4) 72 (26, 93) 135 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Brunswick County Urban No 898.9 (854.7, 944.7) 59 (30, 85) 357 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Caswell County Rural No 960.1 (839.4, 1,093.5) 35 (1, 95) 46 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Moore County Urban No 858.3 (807.1, 912.0) 80 (41, 93) 210 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.5)
Wilson County Rural No 960.3 (888.0, 1,037.0) 34 (5, 79) 133 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Alexander County Urban No 936.6 (836.5, 1,045.5) 44 (4, 93) 65 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Chatham County Urban No 774.6 (719.2, 833.1) 93 (68, 100) 145 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Columbus County Rural No 992.2 (905.0, 1,085.5) 25 (2, 81) 97 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Forsyth County Urban No 946.5 (911.4, 982.6) 42 (20, 65) 562 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Wilkes County Rural No 896.8 (828.3, 969.5) 61 (20, 90) 128 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Yadkin County Urban No 954.4 (857.3, 1,059.6) 38 (3, 90) 71 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.7, 0.0)
Bladen County Rural No 934.2 (830.6, 1,047.3) 48 (4, 94) 61 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Burke County Urban No 904.1 (842.5, 969.0) 58 (21, 87) 162 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
Cumberland County Urban No 967.8 (924.6, 1,012.6) 30 (12, 63) 387 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4)
Graham County Rural No 943.0 (758.8, 1,158.5) 43 (1, 100) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.7)
Perquimans County Rural No 935.2 (794.9, 1,093.2) 45 (1, 98) 32 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.3)
Transylvania County Rural No 765.0 (690.9, 845.0) 94 (56, 100) 78 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.2)
Warren County Rural No 915.9 (797.3, 1,047.3) 52 (3, 98) 43 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.3)
Watauga County Rural No 803.1 (716.0, 897.9) 89 (36, 100) 63 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2)
Ashe County Rural No 883.5 (786.1, 989.7) 68 (11, 97) 60 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Caldwell County Urban No 1,018.1 (947.2, 1,092.9) 19 (2, 60) 158 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Cleveland County Rural No 990.0 (924.0, 1,059.5) 27 (5, 66) 174 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Davie County Urban No 885.9 (801.1, 977.3) 66 (15, 96) 80 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Guilford County Urban No 885.4 (856.1, 915.6) 67 (43, 83) 700 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.1, 0.9)
Henderson County Urban No 855.5 (808.2, 904.9) 83 (40, 92) 247 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Macon County Rural No 844.4 (763.7, 931.3) 84 (29, 98) 82 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Rutherford County Rural No 950.7 (877.6, 1,028.3) 41 (8, 84) 128 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Vance County Rural No 986.9 (888.7, 1,093.0) 28 (2, 85) 76 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Wayne County Urban No 1,042.1 (976.7, 1,110.8) 11 (2, 49) 193 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Yancey County Rural No 913.4 (794.6, 1,045.1) 53 (4, 98) 43 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Alamance County Urban No 993.1 (941.4, 1,047.0) 24 (7, 56) 279 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Johnston County Urban No 990.0 (935.6, 1,046.8) 26 (6, 59) 267 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Randolph County Urban No 954.9 (900.1, 1,012.0) 37 (12, 73) 234 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Halifax County Rural No 1,027.6 (938.6, 1,122.7) 17 (1, 67) 100 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Haywood County Rural No 874.9 (808.8, 945.0) 74 (26, 94) 131 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Montgomery County Rural No 912.6 (800.2, 1,036.6) 54 (3, 96) 49 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Jones County Rural No 999.8 (813.3, 1,216.4) 22 (1, 99) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Davidson County Urban No 1,022.0 (971.1, 1,074.9) 18 (4, 46) 308 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Onslow County Urban No 1,081.9 (1,014.9, 1,152.2) 5 (1, 37) 203 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
Surry County Rural No 1,070.5 (995.2, 1,150.1) 7 (1, 45) 151 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Stanly County Rural No 1,057.6 (972.5, 1,148.2) 8 (1, 52) 118 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
McDowell County Rural No 1,073.1 (978.0, 1,175.0) 6 (1, 52) 96 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.8)
Pender County Urban No 1,028.8 (940.3, 1,123.4) 16 (1, 61) 105 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 1.0)
Edgecombe County Urban No 1,036.0 (944.8, 1,133.8) 12 (1, 68) 98 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.8)
Anson County Urban No 1,030.7 (897.4, 1,178.2) 15 (1, 85) 43 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.9, 1.7)
Stokes County Urban No 960.6 (874.8, 1,052.6) 33 (4, 85) 93 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 6.1)
Robeson County Rural No 1,103.0 (1,032.3, 1,177.2) 3 (1, 30) 190 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 3.8)
Martin County Rural No 1,008.1 (886.9, 1,141.3) 21 (1, 86) 51 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 8.6)
Sampson County Rural No 1,101.8 (1,010.1, 1,199.6) 4 (1, 42) 109 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 5.3)
Swain County Rural No 1,154.9 (977.9, 1,354.9) 2 (1, 72) 30 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.9)
Richmond County Rural No 1,162.5 (1,052.5, 1,281.0) 1 (1, 27) 84 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.1, 7.1)
Harnett County Rural No 1,031.8 (963.7, 1,103.5) 13 (1, 49) 176 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.9, 6.0)
Washington County Rural No 994.8 (833.7, 1,177.9) 23 (1, 96) 27 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 12.9)
Currituck County Urban No 878.0 (751.5, 1,020.0) 73 (5, 100) 38 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.2, 11.4)
Dare County Rural No 880.4 (784.6, 984.7) 71 (13, 98) 66 stable stable trend 6.2 (-3.1, 13.3)
Northampton County Rural No 935.2 (816.5, 1,066.2) 46 (2, 96) 45 stable stable trend 9.9 (-1.5, 18.1)
Mitchell County Rural No 1,049.6 (903.4, 1,212.7) 10 (1, 86) 37 stable stable trend 10.6 (-0.9, 18.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 1:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top