Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Oklahoma by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oklahoma N/A No 984.3 (973.0, 995.6) N/A 5,992 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.8, -0.5)
United States N/A No 846.2 (845.1, 847.3) N/A 447,280 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.3)
Greer County Rural No 786.5 (555.1, 1,080.5) 73 (10, 77) 7 falling falling trend -11.3 (-31.7, -1.5)
Creek County Urban No 1,021.9 (944.3, 1,104.3) 38 (17, 60) 130 falling falling trend -7.3 (-11.5, -2.9)
Custer County Rural No 947.1 (815.7, 1,093.4) 52 (16, 75) 37 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.7, -1.4)
Harmon County Rural No 767.8 (458.5, 1,203.7) 75 (1, 77) 3 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.7, 0.4)
Harper County Rural No 937.9 (633.3, 1,338.6) 54 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.1)
Cleveland County Urban No 822.9 (783.3, 863.9) 70 (58, 76) 333 falling falling trend -2.1 (-6.9, -0.9)
Beaver County Rural No 762.0 (540.0, 1,044.6) 76 (14, 77) 7 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.1)
Logan County Urban No 839.1 (749.2, 936.8) 69 (41, 77) 66 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.8)
Choctaw County Rural No 1,028.2 (865.1, 1,213.4) 36 (4, 73) 28 stable stable trend -1.6 (-13.0, 0.0)
Craig County Rural No 958.9 (800.0, 1,140.2) 47 (10, 76) 25 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Comanche County Urban No 970.2 (901.4, 1,042.9) 46 (26, 66) 150 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Pontotoc County Rural No 886.4 (786.3, 995.8) 64 (33, 76) 57 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Tulsa County Urban No 907.4 (880.0, 935.4) 58 (46, 68) 852 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Bryan County Rural No 929.1 (836.6, 1,029.1) 57 (29, 73) 74 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Canadian County Urban No 867.2 (809.2, 928.3) 66 (46, 75) 172 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.4)
Delaware County Rural No 861.5 (780.7, 948.5) 67 (39, 76) 85 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Grady County Urban No 929.2 (839.7, 1,025.7) 56 (28, 74) 81 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Noble County Rural No 952.8 (780.8, 1,151.1) 48 (9, 76) 21 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.2, -0.1)
Wagoner County Urban No 860.1 (790.0, 934.8) 68 (45, 76) 115 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.0)
Washita County Rural No 794.0 (627.0, 991.4) 72 (26, 77) 15 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.7, 0.4)
Lincoln County Urban No 1,038.3 (926.4, 1,160.2) 35 (9, 65) 63 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Pawnee County Urban No 1,043.5 (882.8, 1,225.3) 31 (3, 73) 30 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Woods County Rural No 907.3 (703.6, 1,150.9) 59 (7, 77) 13 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.2)
Garfield County Urban No 941.1 (857.9, 1,030.3) 53 (28, 72) 95 falling falling trend -0.9 (-2.7, -0.4)
Osage County Urban No 887.2 (801.8, 979.3) 63 (35, 75) 80 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Jackson County Rural No 888.3 (757.5, 1,035.2) 61 (23, 77) 33 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.0, 0.3)
McClain County Urban No 948.9 (840.1, 1,067.8) 51 (19, 74) 57 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6)
Cherokee County Rural No 1,008.8 (912.5, 1,112.7) 40 (15, 67) 81 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Murray County Rural No 1,005.0 (844.3, 1,187.7) 41 (4, 75) 27 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Payne County Rural No 990.7 (905.9, 1,081.3) 43 (19, 66) 101 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1)
Woodward County Rural No 887.6 (748.3, 1,045.4) 62 (21, 77) 29 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 0.9)
Kingfisher County Rural No 869.1 (712.3, 1,050.2) 65 (20, 77) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Muskogee County Rural No 1,171.1 (1,080.9, 1,266.9) 15 (3, 38) 127 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Stephens County Rural No 1,079.7 (982.6, 1,183.7) 29 (8, 56) 92 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Oklahoma County Urban No 990.7 (963.5, 1,018.5) 42 (32, 54) 1,037 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Kay County Rural No 1,086.4 (987.4, 1,192.7) 28 (7, 56) 89 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Pushmataha County Rural No 1,228.9 (1,037.4, 1,445.7) 10 (1, 56) 29 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Adair County Rural No 1,239.4 (1,064.7, 1,435.3) 9 (1, 50) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Haskell County Rural No 1,138.2 (952.6, 1,349.8) 21 (1, 67) 26 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Mayes County Rural No 1,064.6 (955.4, 1,182.9) 30 (8, 61) 72 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
McCurtain County Rural No 1,124.2 (999.1, 1,261.0) 24 (3, 54) 59 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Ottawa County Rural No 1,191.7 (1,061.7, 1,333.2) 12 (1, 45) 62 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Washington County Rural No 949.2 (866.9, 1,037.1) 50 (27, 71) 98 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.5)
Le Flore County Rural No 1,140.3 (1,038.5, 1,249.6) 20 (3, 45) 94 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Love County Rural No 1,123.0 (914.2, 1,365.4) 25 (1, 72) 20 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Marshall County Rural No 1,132.2 (976.8, 1,305.6) 22 (2, 61) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Rogers County Urban No 1,027.5 (956.5, 1,102.5) 37 (18, 59) 159 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Carter County Rural No 1,147.9 (1,042.1, 1,261.6) 17 (3, 47) 88 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.7)
Latimer County Rural No 952.4 (771.9, 1,162.1) 49 (8, 77) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Sequoyah County Urban No 1,270.2 (1,154.2, 1,394.8) 6 (1, 29) 89 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
McIntosh County Rural No 1,090.1 (959.5, 1,233.6) 27 (4, 63) 51 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.2)
Pittsburg County Rural No 1,126.3 (1,027.4, 1,232.2) 23 (5, 47) 96 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Tillman County Rural No 979.5 (759.0, 1,244.6) 45 (2, 77) 13 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 12.0)
Atoka County Rural No 989.2 (825.2, 1,176.4) 44 (6, 76) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.7)
Beckham County Rural No 1,041.0 (885.8, 1,215.4) 34 (5, 73) 32 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Jefferson County Rural No 1,304.0 (1,006.9, 1,661.4) 3 (1, 69) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 1.8)
Okmulgee County Urban No 1,187.5 (1,071.6, 1,312.6) 13 (2, 42) 77 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Garvin County Rural No 1,180.6 (1,041.4, 1,333.3) 14 (1, 50) 52 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Grant County Rural No 1,043.0 (767.5, 1,384.6) 32 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.7)
Major County Rural No 809.6 (622.7, 1,034.8) 71 (18, 77) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.8)
Pottawatomie County Rural No 1,141.1 (1,053.7, 1,233.9) 19 (5, 45) 129 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.8)
Texas County Rural No 937.4 (765.9, 1,135.9) 55 (9, 77) 21 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.2)
Alfalfa County Rural No 1,041.8 (782.8, 1,358.2) 33 (1, 77) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.7, 2.7)
Caddo County Rural No 1,327.2 (1,170.9, 1,498.5) 1 (1, 28) 53 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Hughes County Rural No 1,161.6 (976.6, 1,371.2) 16 (1, 68) 28 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Johnston County Rural No 1,104.6 (896.6, 1,346.5) 26 (1, 72) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.0, 2.1)
Seminole County Rural No 1,199.8 (1,055.1, 1,358.9) 11 (1, 49) 50 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.0, 4.8)
Roger Mills County Rural No 899.9 (614.0, 1,271.6) 60 (1, 77) 6 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.6, 5.5)
Coal County Rural No 1,146.5 (875.2, 1,475.4) 18 (1, 75) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 3.0)
Ellis County Rural No 779.5 (538.1, 1,092.0) 74 (8, 77) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.2, 3.9)
Nowata County Rural No 1,303.8 (1,072.4, 1,570.4) 4 (1, 52) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.3)
Cotton County Urban No 1,257.1 (972.2, 1,599.7) 7 (1, 71) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.4, 2.8)
Okfuskee County Rural No 1,287.5 (1,073.9, 1,531.5) 5 (1, 49) 25 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.3, 2.5)
Kiowa County Rural No 1,318.1 (1,078.7, 1,594.9) 2 (1, 54) 21 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.7, 3.3)
Dewey County Rural No 1,015.9 (727.6, 1,381.3) 39 (1, 77) 8 rising rising trend 1.5 (0.1, 3.5)
Blaine County Rural No 1,244.2 (1,016.2, 1,508.1) 8 (1, 62) 21 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.7, 17.6)
Cimarron County Rural No 730.1 (445.1, 1,130.6) 77 (3, 77) 4
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/21/2026 3:08 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top