Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New Jersey by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New Jersey N/A Yes 85.0 (82.9, 87.1) N/A 1,313 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
United States N/A Yes 106.0 (105.5, 106.4) N/A 45,560 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.1)
Hunterdon County Urban Yes 62.7 (39.1, 94.5) 21 (5, 21) 5
*
*
Ocean County Urban Yes 69.2 (59.1, 80.4) 20 (11, 21) 35 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.3)
Mercer County Urban Yes 69.3 (58.6, 81.3) 19 (9, 21) 34 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.6, 0.2)
Warren County Urban Yes 78.1 (51.9, 111.8) 18 (2, 21) 6
*
*
Burlington County Urban Yes 78.8 (62.9, 97.1) 17 (4, 21) 19 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.1)
Morris County Urban Yes 78.9 (68.3, 90.7) 16 (5, 21) 44 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.8, -1.1)
Sussex County Urban Yes 79.5 (55.2, 110.0) 15 (2, 21) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -0.5)
Somerset County Urban Yes 79.9 (66.2, 95.2) 14 (4, 21) 29 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.7, 0.4)
Union County Urban Yes 82.6 (76.0, 89.5) 13 (6, 19) 127 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Bergen County Urban Yes 83.0 (76.7, 89.7) 12 (6, 18) 138 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.5)
Passaic County Urban Yes 84.2 (78.2, 90.6) 11 (5, 18) 154 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.3)
Hudson County Urban Yes 84.6 (79.9, 89.5) 10 (6, 17) 247 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)
Essex County Urban Yes 84.6 (77.9, 91.6) 9 (5, 18) 131 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Monmouth County Urban Yes 85.7 (74.3, 98.2) 8 (4, 19) 46 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.2)
Middlesex County Urban Yes 90.2 (82.9, 97.9) 7 (4, 15) 125 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.4)
Gloucester County Urban Yes 92.2 (68.6, 120.6) 6 (1, 21) 11 falling falling trend -4.4 (-6.8, -1.3)
Atlantic County Urban Yes 95.7 (80.8, 112.4) 5 (2, 17) 34 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.5)
Camden County Urban Yes 108.7 (96.6, 121.8) 4 (1, 7) 66 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.6)
Cumberland County Urban Yes 116.2 (99.4, 134.8) 3 (1, 6) 38 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 1.1)
Salem County Urban Yes 120.2 (73.7, 183.0) 2 (1, 21) 4
*
*
Cape May County Urban Yes 122.6 (77.6, 181.8) 1 (1, 21) 5
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/18/2026 7:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top