Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Texas N/A Yes 117.2 (116.1, 118.3) N/A 9,165 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.3)
United States N/A Yes 106.0 (105.5, 106.4) N/A 45,560 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.1)
Goliad County Urban No 179.2 (116.9, 265.3) 20 (1, 137) 5 stable stable trend 25.6 (-1.7, 55.5)
Pecos County Rural Yes 122.4 (92.6, 158.5) 80 (18, 142) 11 rising rising trend 8.1 (1.7, 24.3)
Walker County Rural Yes 115.5 (77.8, 163.1) 90 (12, 146) 8 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.8, 7.1)
Dimmit County Rural No 201.1 (160.2, 249.7) 9 (2, 62) 17 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.6, 3.2)
La Salle County Rural No 215.1 (152.7, 293.6) 5 (1, 88) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.8, 6.0)
Zavala County Rural No 198.3 (158.1, 245.5) 10 (2, 70) 17 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.1)
Jim Wells County Rural No 179.5 (159.6, 201.4) 19 (6, 48) 60 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.9, 7.5)
Aransas County Urban No 155.5 (113.2, 208.3) 33 (4, 129) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.2, 5.9)
Bandera County Urban Yes 101.8 (64.2, 153.9) 111 (17, 148) 5 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.3, 5.9)
Brooks County Rural No 182.0 (139.5, 233.6) 16 (2, 94) 13 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9)
Nolan County Rural No 183.1 (131.1, 248.4) 14 (2, 120) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.8, 4.8)
Randall County Urban No 151.0 (117.6, 189.7) 41 (6, 117) 19 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.3, 4.2)
Duval County Rural No 173.8 (137.6, 216.8) 24 (3, 87) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.2)
Frio County Rural No 171.8 (139.8, 208.8) 25 (5, 87) 20 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.5)
Wichita County Urban No 151.6 (123.0, 184.1) 40 (8, 109) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 9.4)
Bee County Rural No 162.6 (135.8, 193.1) 30 (7, 86) 26 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.2)
Jim Hogg County Rural No 236.5 (176.3, 310.9) 4 (1, 56) 11 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.7, 3.1)
Zapata County Rural No 134.0 (104.1, 169.4) 63 (14, 134) 14 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.6)
Hockley County Urban No 133.2 (96.6, 178.3) 64 (9, 139) 10 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 4.3)
Angelina County Rural Yes 101.3 (74.8, 133.3) 112 (38, 146) 11 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.8)
Terry County Rural No 180.5 (129.3, 244.4) 17 (2, 118) 9 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.9, 4.5)
Val Verde County Rural No 152.0 (134.8, 170.7) 37 (17, 79) 57 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Willacy County Rural No 138.2 (114.4, 165.4) 53 (18, 114) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.6)
Calhoun County Rural No 165.3 (127.3, 210.7) 29 (4, 110) 13 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.3)
Collin County Urban Yes 85.4 (75.8, 95.8) 134 (106, 143) 72 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 6.0)
Starr County Rural No 137.2 (123.5, 152.0) 57 (30, 92) 75 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Uvalde County Rural No 178.3 (150.1, 210.2) 21 (4, 69) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.8)
Hale County Rural No 150.6 (122.2, 183.3) 42 (10, 107) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 2.2)
Parker County Urban Yes 95.5 (67.2, 130.3) 122 (38, 148) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.0, 5.8)
Webb County Urban No 142.1 (134.7, 149.9) 50 (34, 72) 282 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.9)
Karnes County Rural No 178.3 (133.6, 232.4) 22 (2, 108) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.1)
Waller County Urban Yes 107.3 (77.3, 144.1) 102 (27, 146) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.0, 4.3)
Ward County Rural No 166.5 (117.9, 227.2) 27 (3, 129) 8 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.3)
Presidio County Rural Yes 82.7 (54.5, 121.5) 138 (51, 148) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.4)
Dawson County Rural No 191.4 (142.2, 251.6) 12 (1, 98) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 2.1)
Kleberg County Rural No 169.9 (144.7, 198.3) 26 (7, 70) 32 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 1.1)
Live Oak County Rural Yes 114.6 (76.2, 165.5) 93 (13, 147) 5 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.2)
Midland County Urban No 135.9 (118.3, 155.1) 59 (24, 103) 52 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.6)
Anderson County Rural No 255.7 (191.8, 332.7) 2 (1, 47) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-19.5, 17.1)
Ector County Urban No 177.5 (160.6, 195.5) 23 (8, 45) 96 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.0)
Tom Green County Urban No 137.2 (120.2, 155.9) 56 (26, 102) 49 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 1.1)
Victoria County Urban No 151.9 (134.2, 171.2) 38 (16, 82) 55 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 2.0)
Potter County Urban No 132.3 (112.0, 154.8) 67 (24, 116) 34 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 1.1)
Reeves County Rural No 160.0 (127.5, 198.3) 32 (7, 106) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.6)
Crosby County Urban No 137.6 (74.5, 230.1) 54 (2, 148) 3 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.2, 3.6)
Lubbock County Urban No 152.3 (139.0, 166.3) 35 (19, 68) 108 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Medina County Urban No 137.6 (117.2, 160.5) 55 (19, 108) 34 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.8, 0.9)
Wharton County Rural Yes 121.2 (95.1, 151.9) 82 (25, 137) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.6)
Cameron County Urban No 123.7 (118.4, 129.2) 79 (59, 93) 419 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Hays County Urban No 130.7 (115.7, 146.9) 69 (33, 107) 67 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 1.1)
Hidalgo County Urban Yes 118.9 (115.0, 122.8) 86 (70, 97) 749 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Maverick County Urban No 134.0 (119.7, 149.4) 62 (32, 99) 65 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.1)
Brazoria County Urban Yes 119.0 (106.9, 131.9) 85 (52, 116) 84 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.6)
Taylor County Urban No 139.1 (117.1, 163.8) 51 (19, 109) 31 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.7)
Burleson County Urban No 135.3 (79.2, 213.2) 60 (2, 148) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.2, 3.3)
Bexar County Urban No 128.4 (125.2, 131.8) 72 (55, 84) 1,243 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
El Paso County Urban No 128.0 (124.2, 131.9) 73 (56, 86) 873 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
Dallas County Urban Yes 105.7 (101.4, 110.1) 106 (88, 118) 596 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Harris County Urban Yes 106.8 (103.9, 109.8) 103 (87, 114) 1,267 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Refugio County Rural No 126.8 (81.7, 189.2) 76 (6, 147) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.7)
Runnels County Rural No 208.4 (140.2, 297.6) 7 (1, 117) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.5, 2.4)
Kerr County Rural Yes 120.9 (92.4, 154.8) 83 (21, 139) 13 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3)
Tarrant County Urban Yes 105.8 (100.4, 111.5) 104 (85, 120) 348 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4)
Wilson County Urban No 133.0 (110.1, 159.2) 65 (21, 120) 25 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.6, 0.6)
Guadalupe County Urban Yes 109.7 (96.9, 123.7) 99 (58, 129) 57 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.1)
Montgomery County Urban Yes 92.4 (82.0, 103.7) 128 (92, 140) 76 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.8)
San Patricio County Urban No 149.3 (131.3, 169.0) 44 (18, 84) 51 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4)
Smith County Urban Yes 66.8 (51.0, 85.5) 146 (114, 148) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.8)
Williamson County Urban Yes 95.3 (85.0, 106.3) 123 (87, 140) 76 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.5)
Bell County Urban Yes 112.0 (98.1, 127.1) 97 (57, 127) 55 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.8, 0.1)
Brown County Rural Yes 73.6 (43.6, 114.9) 142 (52, 148) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.3, 2.8)
Fort Bend County Urban Yes 94.4 (86.6, 102.7) 126 (95, 136) 126 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Lamb County Rural No 162.5 (119.6, 215.2) 31 (3, 124) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 1.0)
Atascosa County Urban No 139.1 (120.1, 160.3) 52 (21, 102) 40 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.3)
Caldwell County Urban No 127.8 (106.2, 152.4) 75 (25, 124) 26 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.2)
DeWitt County Rural No 151.9 (110.8, 202.7) 39 (5, 131) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.0)
Floyd County Rural No 153.0 (91.2, 239.2) 34 (2, 147) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 2.1)
Howard County Rural Yes 114.4 (86.5, 147.9) 94 (23, 143) 12 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Erath County Rural Yes 96.6 (52.8, 157.5) 120 (12, 148) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-7.6, 23.5)
Gonzales County Rural No 136.0 (99.6, 180.5) 58 (10, 138) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.7)
Liberty County Urban Yes 100.0 (71.4, 135.0) 115 (36, 147) 13 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.7, 2.6)
Nueces County Urban Yes 115.9 (109.4, 122.7) 89 (70, 109) 244 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Matagorda County Rural No 124.6 (96.8, 157.5) 78 (21, 136) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 1.0)
Sutton County Rural No 152.2 (89.8, 243.3) 36 (2, 147) 3 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.3)
McLennan County Urban Yes 110.0 (95.7, 125.7) 98 (56, 130) 47 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.6)
Gaines County Rural Yes 115.5 (77.0, 165.3) 91 (13, 147) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.9, 0.1)
Johnson County Urban Yes 94.9 (76.2, 116.4) 125 (63, 145) 22 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 1.0)
Jefferson County Urban Yes 73.1 (60.1, 87.7) 143 (115, 148) 26 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.2, 0.3)
Parmer County Rural Yes 113.3 (72.8, 167.0) 95 (12, 148) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 1.7)
Winkler County Rural Yes 96.2 (54.5, 156.4) 121 (14, 148) 3 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.7, 1.6)
Grayson County Urban Yes 98.7 (68.5, 136.0) 117 (29, 147) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 1.6)
Travis County Urban Yes 97.1 (90.9, 103.6) 119 (95, 132) 228 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.9, -1.5)
Brazos County Urban Yes 99.0 (81.1, 119.3) 116 (62, 142) 26 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.5)
Comal County Urban Yes 103.1 (88.0, 119.8) 109 (64, 137) 37 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.0)
Denton County Urban Yes 77.7 (69.0, 87.1) 140 (119, 145) 76 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -0.7)
Galveston County Urban Yes 107.4 (95.8, 119.9) 101 (68, 128) 70 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Bastrop County Urban Yes 95.0 (77.1, 115.4) 124 (68, 144) 24 stable stable trend -2.7 (-4.8, 0.0)
Kaufman County Urban Yes 105.7 (78.4, 138.4) 105 (29, 145) 15 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.4, 1.8)
Kendall County Urban Yes 100.9 (69.1, 141.0) 113 (29, 148) 7 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.3)
Ellis County Urban Yes 97.7 (79.6, 118.2) 118 (65, 142) 26 falling falling trend -3.4 (-16.4, -0.5)
Navarro County Rural Yes 113.1 (80.2, 153.7) 96 (20, 146) 9 stable stable trend -3.5 (-6.6, 0.5)
Gregg County Urban Yes 74.2 (49.7, 105.3) 141 (77, 148) 8 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.1, -0.5)
Burnet County Rural Yes 65.1 (38.5, 101.5) 147 (79, 148) 4 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.7, -0.4)
Gillespie County Rural Yes 84.2 (48.3, 134.7) 135 (28, 148) 3 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.8, -1.5)
Andrews County Rural Yes 105.2 (69.0, 152.3) 107 (21, 148) 6 falling falling trend -7.2 (-31.7, -2.4)
Brewster County Rural Yes 86.3 (52.4, 134.7) 133 (34, 148) 4 falling falling trend -7.5 (-22.3, -4.3)
Deaf Smith County Rural No 145.9 (110.4, 188.4) 47 (8, 130) 12 stable stable trend -21.0 (-37.0, 0.1)
Austin County Urban Yes 117.6 (74.9, 173.6) 87 (8, 147) 5
*
*
Bailey County Rural No 128.0 (77.5, 197.2) 74 (4, 148) 4
*
*
Castro County Rural Yes 122.1 (77.0, 183.3) 81 (6, 147) 5
*
*
Chambers County Urban Yes 92.6 (53.6, 146.8) 127 (23, 148) 5
*
*
Cherokee County Rural Yes 88.6 (54.0, 134.9) 132 (33, 148) 4
*
*
Colorado County Rural No 144.0 (96.5, 205.3) 48 (3, 143) 6
*
*
Cooke County Rural Yes 68.2 (37.5, 112.7) 144 (51, 148) 3
*
*
Coryell County Urban Yes 115.4 (82.6, 156.0) 92 (18, 145) 9
*
*
Crockett County Rural No 202.0 (125.7, 309.1) 8 (1, 143) 4
*
*
Fayette County Rural No 125.5 (76.7, 192.5) 77 (5, 148) 5
*
*
Freestone County Rural No 182.9 (99.3, 303.7) 15 (1, 147) 3
*
*
Grimes County Rural Yes 116.7 (72.1, 176.1) 88 (9, 148) 5
*
*
Henderson County Rural Yes 49.6 (28.6, 79.1) 148 (117, 148) 4
*
*
Hill County Rural Yes 120.0 (78.2, 174.2) 84 (11, 147) 5
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban No 362.1 (217.6, 558.9) 1 (1, 84) 4
*
*
Hunt County Urban Yes 83.1 (56.3, 117.2) 137 (54, 148) 7
*
*
Jackson County Rural No 132.8 (84.0, 198.0) 66 (6, 148) 5
*
*
Jones County Urban No 147.1 (96.6, 213.6) 46 (3, 146) 5
*
*
Kinney County Rural No 245.8 (141.6, 394.7) 3 (1, 139) 3
*
*
Lampasas County Urban No 180.1 (120.1, 257.7) 18 (1, 131) 6
*
*
Lavaca County Rural No 128.9 (78.2, 198.7) 70 (5, 148) 4
*
*
Lynn County Urban No 191.5 (119.7, 291.1) 11 (1, 139) 4
*
*
McCulloch County Rural No 214.0 (139.3, 315.4) 6 (1, 127) 5
*
*
Milam County Rural Yes 100.5 (61.6, 153.5) 114 (12, 148) 4
*
*
Mitchell County Rural No 142.3 (84.3, 224.6) 49 (3, 148) 3
*
*
Moore County Rural Yes 108.6 (75.9, 149.5) 100 (22, 146) 8
*
*
Nacogdoches County Rural Yes 81.9 (48.3, 127.2) 139 (41, 148) 4
*
*
Palo Pinto County Rural No 134.5 (80.6, 207.8) 61 (3, 147) 4
*
*
Polk County Rural No 149.5 (90.1, 228.8) 43 (2, 147) 5
*
*
Robertson County Urban No 165.8 (105.8, 247.1) 28 (2, 139) 5
*
*
Rockwall County Urban Yes 92.0 (62.6, 128.9) 130 (38, 148) 9
*
*
Rusk County Urban Yes 67.5 (38.9, 108.3) 145 (62, 148) 4
*
*
Scurry County Rural No 130.9 (87.1, 187.4) 68 (5, 146) 6
*
*
Swisher County Rural No 190.1 (119.8, 284.9) 13 (1, 138) 4
*
*
Titus County Rural Yes 102.6 (66.5, 150.0) 110 (20, 148) 7
*
*
Van Zandt County Rural Yes 83.7 (45.8, 137.9) 136 (24, 148) 3
*
*
Washington County Rural Yes 104.0 (58.3, 168.3) 108 (9, 148) 3
*
*
Wilbarger County Rural No 147.7 (86.7, 231.8) 45 (2, 148) 4
*
*
Wise County Urban Yes 90.4 (57.7, 133.2) 131 (32, 148) 6
*
*
Wood County Rural Yes 92.0 (53.5, 146.5) 129 (21, 148) 3
*
*
Yoakum County Rural No 128.8 (77.7, 199.3) 71 (4, 148) 4
*
*
Archer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bosque County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bowie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fannin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Harrison County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hopkins County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hutchinson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamar County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Leon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Limestone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Llano County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montague County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Panola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red River County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Jacinto County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Trinity County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upshur County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Young County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/16/2026 5:28 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top