Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Minnesota by County

Breast, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Minnesota N/A No 17.2 (16.5, 17.8) N/A 650 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -0.4)
United States N/A No 19.2 (19.1, 19.3) N/A 42,257 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Fillmore County Urban No 28.9 (17.8, 45.2) 1 (1, 39) 5
*
*
Steele County Rural No 26.2 (17.7, 37.7) 2 (1, 37) 6 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.1, 21.4)
Kandiyohi County Rural No 23.9 (16.4, 33.8) 3 (1, 38) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.5)
Faribault County Rural No 23.6 (13.3, 41.5) 4 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Rice County Rural No 22.4 (15.9, 30.8) 5 (1, 39) 8 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.7, 4.1)
Mille Lacs County Urban No 22.2 (13.9, 34.5) 6 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Chisago County Urban No 21.5 (15.2, 29.7) 7 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.2)
Morrison County Rural No 21.4 (13.4, 32.7) 8 (1, 43) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.9, 6.5)
Blue Earth County Urban No 20.9 (14.8, 28.8) 9 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.2, 1.7)
Brown County Rural No 20.9 (12.6, 33.3) 10 (1, 43) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.4, 4.6)
McLeod County Rural No 20.8 (13.9, 30.6) 11 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.7, 2.6)
Nicollet County Urban No 20.6 (12.7, 31.9) 12 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Meeker County Rural No 20.3 (12.0, 33.1) 13 (1, 43) 3 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.4, 21.7)
Martin County Rural No 19.9 (10.8, 34.7) 14 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Le Sueur County Urban No 19.4 (11.4, 31.4) 15 (1, 43) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.8, 1.5)
Winona County Rural No 19.1 (12.8, 27.8) 16 (1, 42) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.3, 2.2)
St. Louis County Urban No 19.1 (16.0, 22.7) 17 (4, 34) 30 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.9, 0.4)
Carlton County Urban No 19.0 (11.7, 29.5) 18 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Wright County Urban No 18.4 (14.3, 23.2) 19 (4, 40) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.3)
Hennepin County Urban No 18.2 (16.9, 19.7) 20 (9, 30) 143 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Freeborn County Rural No 17.9 (10.7, 28.7) 21 (1, 43) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.0, 1.4)
Washington County Urban No 17.2 (14.5, 20.3) 22 (8, 38) 30 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Sherburne County Urban No 17.2 (12.4, 23.3) 23 (3, 43) 8 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 2.1)
Isanti County Urban No 17.2 (11.2, 25.7) 24 (2, 43) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 2.3)
Ramsey County Urban No 17.0 (15.1, 19.2) 25 (11, 36) 60 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Olmsted County Urban No 16.8 (13.4, 20.8) 26 (7, 41) 17 stable stable trend 4.9 (-2.7, 17.6)
Anoka County Urban No 16.7 (14.3, 19.4) 27 (10, 39) 36 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 4.5)
Stearns County Urban No 16.6 (13.0, 21.0) 28 (6, 42) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Pine County Rural No 16.2 (9.8, 26.4) 29 (2, 43) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.8, 1.5)
Becker County Rural No 15.5 (8.9, 25.4) 30 (2, 43) 3 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.6)
Goodhue County Rural No 15.5 (10.2, 22.9) 31 (4, 43) 6 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.1)
Beltrami County Rural Yes 15.2 (9.1, 24.0) 32 (3, 43) 4
*
*
Dakota County Urban Yes 15.1 (13.1, 17.4) 33 (17, 41) 42 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.5)
Crow Wing County Rural Yes 14.6 (10.3, 20.5) 34 (8, 43) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.6, 0.2)
Clay County Urban Yes 14.5 (9.5, 21.4) 35 (7, 43) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.3, 0.6)
Otter Tail County Rural Yes 14.4 (9.8, 20.7) 36 (8, 43) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Polk County Urban Yes 13.9 (7.9, 23.3) 37 (4, 43) 3
*
*
Scott County Urban Yes 13.7 (10.2, 18.0) 38 (14, 43) 10 falling falling trend -4.0 (-21.5, -0.3)
Mower County Rural Yes 13.7 (8.2, 21.8) 39 (6, 43) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.2, -0.3)
Itasca County Rural Yes 13.4 (8.5, 20.8) 40 (8, 43) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.6, -0.2)
Cass County Rural Yes 13.1 (7.9, 21.7) 41 (7, 43) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.2, 3.6)
Douglas County Rural Yes 13.0 (7.9, 21.0) 42 (7, 43) 4 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.5, 0.5)
Carver County Urban Yes 12.4 (8.6, 17.2) 43 (15, 43) 7 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.4, -1.3)
Aitkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Big Stone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chippewa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clearwater County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cook County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottonwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dodge County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Houston County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hubbard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kanabec County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kittson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Koochiching County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lac qui Parle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake of the Woods County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mahnomen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Murray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nobles County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Norman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pennington County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pipestone County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pope County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Red Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Redwood County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Renville County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rock County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roseau County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sibley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stevens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swift County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Todd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Traverse County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wabasha County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wadena County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Waseca County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Watonwan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yellow Medicine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/13/2026 1:46 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top