Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for New York by County

Breast, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
New York N/A No 16.6 (16.3, 16.9) N/A 2,329 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.2)
United States N/A No 19.2 (19.1, 19.3) N/A 42,257 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Fulton County Rural No 27.0 (19.9, 36.2) 1 (1, 37) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.1)
Lewis County Rural No 26.9 (17.0, 40.9) 2 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.0, 3.5)
Schuyler County Rural No 25.0 (13.6, 43.1) 3 (1, 60) 3
*
*
Franklin County Rural No 24.3 (16.7, 34.3) 4 (1, 57) 7 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.4, 2.6)
Allegany County Rural No 24.0 (16.5, 33.9) 5 (1, 58) 7 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.1, 3.2)
Tioga County Urban No 22.9 (16.1, 32.1) 6 (1, 56) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.6, 1.8)
Dutchess County Urban No 22.4 (19.6, 25.6) 7 (1, 25) 49 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.4, 10.7)
Chemung County Urban No 22.0 (16.7, 28.5) 8 (1, 54) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.0, 1.9)
Greene County Rural No 21.1 (15.2, 29.2) 9 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.7)
Schenectady County Urban No 20.8 (17.0, 25.2) 10 (2, 49) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 0.8)
Oswego County Urban No 19.5 (15.1, 24.9) 11 (2, 57) 14 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Sullivan County Rural No 19.4 (14.1, 26.1) 12 (1, 59) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.8)
Livingston County Urban No 19.2 (13.4, 26.7) 13 (1, 60) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 6.6)
Orange County Urban No 19.1 (16.6, 21.8) 14 (5, 49) 45 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.6)
Warren County Urban No 19.0 (14.1, 25.5) 15 (2, 59) 11 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.2, -0.7)
Ulster County Urban No 18.9 (15.6, 22.8) 16 (4, 55) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Rensselaer County Urban No 18.6 (15.0, 22.8) 17 (4, 57) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Montgomery County Rural No 18.3 (12.5, 26.3) 18 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.7, 2.4)
Steuben County Rural No 18.3 (13.8, 23.9) 19 (2, 59) 12 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.7, -0.5)
Albany County Urban No 18.2 (15.7, 21.1) 20 (7, 53) 41 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.2, 2.3)
Orleans County Urban No 18.1 (11.6, 27.3) 21 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.6, 0.3)
Delaware County Rural No 18.1 (12.3, 26.2) 22 (1, 60) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Wyoming County Rural No 17.8 (11.4, 27.1) 23 (1, 60) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.1, 0.5)
Chautauqua County Rural No 17.8 (14.0, 22.4) 24 (4, 58) 17 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.9)
Broome County Urban No 17.8 (14.6, 21.4) 25 (5, 57) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.6)
Tompkins County Urban No 17.8 (13.0, 23.7) 26 (2, 60) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.0)
Columbia County Rural No 17.6 (12.8, 24.0) 27 (3, 60) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Erie County Urban No 17.6 (16.2, 19.1) 28 (13, 47) 125 falling falling trend -5.6 (-11.2, -2.8)
Oneida County Urban No 17.6 (14.7, 20.8) 29 (7, 57) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-13.0, 10.0)
Seneca County Rural No 17.5 (10.1, 28.7) 30 (1, 60) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.1, 1.7)
Rockland County Urban No 17.5 (15.0, 20.4) 31 (7, 56) 37 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Richmond County Urban No 17.5 (15.5, 19.7) 32 (10, 52) 59 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -2.0)
Ontario County Urban No 17.5 (13.6, 22.3) 33 (4, 60) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Monroe County Urban No 17.3 (15.7, 19.0) 34 (12, 50) 95 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.2)
Niagara County Urban No 17.2 (14.3, 20.7) 35 (7, 58) 27 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.2, -1.0)
Washington County Urban No 17.1 (11.9, 24.1) 36 (2, 60) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.2)
Nassau County Urban No 16.8 (15.7, 18.1) 37 (18, 51) 173 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.4, 2.0)
Kings County Urban No 16.7 (15.8, 17.6) 38 (22, 50) 281 falling falling trend -6.0 (-10.8, -3.0)
Bronx County Urban No 16.5 (15.3, 17.7) 39 (20, 52) 148 falling falling trend -5.2 (-12.9, -1.9)
Suffolk County Urban No 16.5 (15.4, 17.6) 40 (20, 52) 181 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.4, -2.5)
Onondaga County Urban No 16.2 (14.3, 18.4) 41 (15, 57) 54 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.5)
Saratoga County Urban No 16.2 (13.5, 19.2) 42 (11, 59) 28 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3)
Clinton County Rural No 16.1 (11.8, 21.8) 43 (5, 60) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.5)
St. Lawrence County Rural No 16.1 (12.2, 21.0) 44 (6, 60) 12 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.6, 0.9)
Cattaraugus County Rural No 16.0 (11.4, 22.0) 45 (5, 60) 9 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.5)
Otsego County Rural No 16.0 (10.4, 23.8) 46 (2, 60) 6 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.2)
Schoharie County Urban No 15.9 (9.2, 26.3) 47 (2, 60) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.2)
Herkimer County Urban No 15.8 (11.2, 22.1) 48 (5, 60) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.6)
Genesee County Rural No 15.8 (10.9, 22.5) 49 (4, 60) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 0.9)
Jefferson County Urban No 15.6 (11.6, 20.6) 50 (5, 60) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.8, -0.3)
Westchester County Urban No 15.5 (14.2, 16.8) 51 (26, 57) 117 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -2.0)
Cortland County Rural Yes 15.2 (9.4, 23.5) 52 (3, 60) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.5, 1.1)
Essex County Rural Yes 14.8 (9.5, 23.1) 53 (3, 60) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 2.5)
Cayuga County Rural Yes 14.7 (10.8, 20.0) 54 (8, 60) 9 falling falling trend -15.6 (-27.7, -1.0)
Wayne County Urban Yes 14.5 (10.3, 19.9) 55 (8, 60) 9 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -1.1)
New York County Urban Yes 14.3 (13.3, 15.3) 56 (40, 59) 169 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.6, -2.7)
Queens County Urban Yes 14.3 (13.4, 15.1) 57 (42, 59) 231 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.4, -2.2)
Putnam County Urban Yes 14.0 (10.3, 18.7) 58 (13, 60) 10 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.5, -1.5)
Madison County Urban Yes 13.4 (9.3, 19.2) 59 (10, 60) 7 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.6, -1.7)
Chenango County Rural Yes 12.9 (8.4, 19.4) 60 (9, 60) 5
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yates County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 5:40 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top