Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report for Texas by County

Breast, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas N/A No 19.6 (19.3, 20.0) N/A 3,165 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.1)
United States N/A No 19.2 (19.1, 19.3) N/A 42,257 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Red River County Rural No 37.2 (20.3, 64.1) 1 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Kleberg County Rural No 35.9 (23.6, 52.3) 2 (1, 101) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.2, 5.1)
Hockley County Urban No 33.6 (20.2, 52.5) 3 (1, 118) 4
*
*
Polk County Rural No 33.3 (23.0, 46.6) 4 (1, 100) 8 rising rising trend 4.0 (0.7, 14.7)
Leon County Rural No 31.3 (18.1, 51.6) 5 (1, 121) 4
*
*
Cass County Rural No 30.0 (20.2, 43.5) 6 (1, 113) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.8)
Young County Rural No 28.8 (16.4, 47.4) 7 (1, 121) 3 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.5, 2.7)
Nacogdoches County Rural No 28.6 (21.3, 37.7) 8 (1, 95) 10 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.1)
Freestone County Rural No 28.3 (16.8, 45.4) 9 (1, 120) 4
*
*
Burleson County Urban No 28.2 (15.3, 47.8) 10 (1, 121) 3
*
*
Bowie County Urban No 28.0 (22.1, 35.1) 11 (1, 90) 16 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.3)
Jasper County Rural No 27.8 (18.8, 40.2) 12 (1, 116) 6 stable stable trend 3.4 (-3.7, 25.8)
Trinity County Rural No 27.8 (16.2, 47.2) 13 (1, 120) 3
*
*
Shelby County Rural No 27.7 (17.7, 42.1) 14 (1, 119) 4
*
*
Limestone County Rural No 27.7 (17.5, 42.6) 15 (1, 120) 5
*
*
Coryell County Urban No 26.6 (19.8, 34.9) 16 (1, 113) 10 rising rising trend 17.6 (4.4, 41.4)
Montague County Rural No 26.5 (16.1, 42.1) 17 (1, 121) 4
*
*
Liberty County Urban No 26.1 (19.9, 33.7) 18 (2, 105) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7)
Medina County Urban No 26.1 (18.8, 35.5) 19 (1, 114) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.7, 4.5)
Wichita County Urban No 26.0 (21.0, 31.9) 20 (3, 92) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.4, 2.2)
Victoria County Urban No 25.9 (20.2, 32.7) 21 (2, 103) 15 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.5, 2.6)
Hopkins County Rural No 25.7 (17.7, 36.4) 22 (1, 117) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.6)
Hale County Rural No 25.2 (15.8, 38.3) 23 (1, 121) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.9, 3.4)
Ector County Urban No 25.2 (20.1, 31.1) 24 (3, 97) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.5)
Gregg County Urban No 24.9 (20.0, 30.6) 25 (3, 100) 19 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.8)
Grayson County Urban No 24.6 (20.3, 29.6) 26 (5, 94) 24 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.5)
Kaufman County Urban No 24.4 (19.6, 30.1) 27 (5, 104) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.9)
Potter County Urban No 24.3 (19.0, 30.7) 28 (3, 108) 15 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 0.8)
Bee County Rural No 24.2 (13.8, 39.6) 29 (1, 121) 3
*
*
Orange County Urban No 24.2 (18.5, 31.2) 30 (4, 111) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 0.9)
Wood County Rural No 24.2 (17.2, 33.5) 31 (2, 116) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.8, 4.6)
Grimes County Rural No 24.0 (14.8, 37.2) 32 (1, 121) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 1.1)
Houston County Rural No 24.0 (13.7, 39.9) 33 (1, 121) 3 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 2.4)
DeWitt County Rural No 23.9 (13.4, 40.3) 34 (1, 121) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.3, 2.1)
Hutchinson County Rural No 23.6 (13.2, 39.7) 35 (1, 121) 3 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.4, 1.9)
Rockwall County Urban No 23.2 (18.1, 29.3) 36 (5, 112) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.7)
Wilson County Urban No 23.1 (16.2, 32.3) 37 (2, 119) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.0, 4.1)
Taylor County Urban No 23.1 (18.5, 28.4) 38 (7, 109) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Starr County Rural No 22.9 (16.0, 31.8) 39 (3, 120) 7 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.7, 4.2)
San Jacinto County Urban No 22.9 (13.3, 36.8) 40 (1, 121) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.2, 2.9)
Calhoun County Rural No 22.7 (13.2, 37.6) 41 (1, 121) 3 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.8, 3.2)
Lamar County Rural No 22.7 (15.8, 31.7) 42 (2, 119) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.7, 1.6)
Anderson County Rural No 22.6 (15.2, 32.5) 43 (3, 121) 6 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.0, 1.4)
Washington County Rural No 22.6 (15.0, 33.1) 44 (2, 120) 6 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.1, 1.6)
Hill County Rural No 22.5 (14.9, 33.0) 45 (2, 121) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.5, 5.5)
Llano County Rural No 22.5 (13.0, 37.9) 46 (1, 121) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.7)
Uvalde County Rural No 22.4 (12.9, 36.4) 47 (1, 121) 3
*
*
Henderson County Rural No 22.3 (17.2, 28.6) 48 (6, 114) 15 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Ellis County Urban No 21.9 (18.1, 26.3) 49 (11, 107) 24 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.3, 10.2)
Palo Pinto County Rural No 21.7 (13.6, 33.5) 50 (2, 121) 4
*
*
Austin County Urban No 21.5 (13.2, 33.5) 51 (2, 121) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.8)
Johnson County Urban No 21.4 (17.6, 25.8) 52 (13, 110) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.9)
Guadalupe County Urban No 21.3 (17.5, 25.8) 53 (14, 111) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 2.2)
Lavaca County Rural No 21.3 (13.0, 34.4) 54 (2, 121) 4
*
*
McLennan County Urban No 21.3 (18.1, 24.9) 55 (17, 104) 34 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
Bosque County Urban No 21.2 (12.0, 36.3) 56 (1, 121) 3 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.7, 2.9)
Van Zandt County Rural No 21.2 (15.1, 29.0) 57 (6, 120) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.3, 2.4)
Panola County Rural No 20.7 (11.4, 35.2) 58 (1, 121) 3
*
*
Dallas County Urban No 20.7 (19.6, 21.8) 59 (39, 83) 270 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Lubbock County Urban No 20.6 (17.6, 24.0) 60 (20, 107) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.1, 0.9)
Parker County Urban No 20.6 (16.6, 25.3) 61 (16, 115) 19 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.0, 0.5)
Jefferson County Urban No 20.5 (17.3, 24.1) 62 (20, 110) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Comal County Urban No 20.4 (16.8, 24.6) 63 (18, 112) 23 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.7)
Bastrop County Urban No 20.3 (15.5, 26.2) 64 (11, 119) 12 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 1.0)
Brazoria County Urban No 20.3 (17.6, 23.3) 65 (26, 105) 41 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6)
Cooke County Rural No 20.2 (13.5, 29.4) 66 (5, 121) 6 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.7)
Cameron County Urban No 20.2 (17.7, 23.1) 67 (26, 109) 47 stable stable trend 1.1 (-9.8, 8.4)
Walker County Rural No 20.2 (14.1, 28.3) 68 (6, 121) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.4, 2.6)
Tarrant County Urban No 20.1 (19.0, 21.4) 69 (42, 89) 224 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Brown County Rural No 20.0 (13.5, 29.2) 70 (6, 121) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.8, 3.3)
Matagorda County Rural No 20.0 (12.4, 30.5) 71 (3, 121) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.2, 1.9)
Harris County Urban No 19.8 (19.0, 20.6) 72 (49, 89) 465 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.2)
San Patricio County Urban No 19.7 (14.0, 27.1) 73 (9, 121) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.8)
El Paso County Urban No 19.6 (17.9, 21.6) 74 (38, 103) 92 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.4)
Burnet County Rural No 19.6 (13.6, 27.8) 75 (7, 121) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.6, 7.8)
Kerr County Rural No 19.5 (13.8, 27.2) 76 (7, 121) 10 stable stable trend 2.4 (-3.5, 31.0)
Wise County Urban No 19.5 (13.9, 26.7) 77 (7, 120) 8 falling falling trend -12.3 (-24.3, -5.7)
Webb County Urban No 19.5 (16.1, 23.4) 78 (23, 116) 23 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.7)
Hunt County Urban No 19.4 (14.8, 25.1) 79 (15, 119) 12 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 0.7)
Montgomery County Urban No 19.4 (17.4, 21.6) 80 (38, 105) 68 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Howard County Rural No 19.4 (11.3, 31.3) 81 (3, 121) 3 stable stable trend 30.5 (-0.8, 59.0)
Bexar County Urban No 19.2 (18.0, 20.4) 82 (51, 97) 208 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Rusk County Urban No 19.2 (13.0, 27.5) 83 (7, 121) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.9, 2.5)
Hays County Urban No 19.1 (15.7, 23.1) 84 (26, 116) 22 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.9)
Navarro County Rural No 18.9 (12.8, 27.2) 85 (7, 121) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.6, 0.9)
Randall County Urban No 18.9 (15.1, 23.5) 86 (21, 119) 17 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Hood County Rural No 18.8 (13.7, 25.5) 87 (14, 120) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.3, 15.2)
Jim Wells County Rural No 18.8 (11.7, 28.6) 88 (6, 121) 4 stable stable trend 26.1 (-0.8, 60.0)
Cherokee County Rural No 18.7 (12.6, 26.8) 89 (7, 121) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.6, 2.1)
Galveston County Urban No 18.6 (16.1, 21.5) 90 (35, 114) 40 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Upshur County Urban No 18.4 (11.9, 27.6) 91 (6, 121) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.7)
Maverick County Urban No 18.1 (11.9, 26.5) 92 (9, 121) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.5, 1.6)
Titus County Rural No 18.1 (10.2, 29.8) 93 (5, 121) 3
*
*
Bell County Urban No 18.1 (15.4, 21.1) 94 (38, 116) 33 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.8, -0.3)
Hidalgo County Urban No 17.9 (16.2, 19.9) 95 (55, 112) 76 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Midland County Urban No 17.8 (13.9, 22.5) 96 (25, 120) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Fayette County Rural No 17.8 (9.9, 30.4) 97 (3, 121) 3 falling falling trend -6.7 (-16.5, -2.3)
Atascosa County Urban No 17.8 (11.4, 26.5) 98 (9, 121) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.6)
Fannin County Rural No 17.8 (10.6, 28.2) 99 (6, 121) 4
*
*
Smith County Urban No 17.7 (14.8, 21.1) 100 (39, 118) 27 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2)
Williamson County Urban No 17.7 (15.7, 19.8) 101 (55, 114) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1)
Denton County Urban No 17.0 (15.4, 18.8) 102 (65, 116) 82 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.5)
Aransas County Urban No 17.0 (9.4, 29.3) 103 (5, 121) 3 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.5, 1.4)
Nueces County Urban No 16.8 (14.4, 19.5) 104 (53, 118) 37 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.5)
Fort Bend County Urban No 16.7 (15.0, 18.6) 105 (68, 116) 73 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.3)
Angelina County Rural No 16.6 (12.1, 22.4) 106 (24, 121) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-5.1, -0.1)
Harrison County Urban No 16.5 (11.5, 23.1) 107 (19, 121) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.3, 2.0)
Erath County Rural No 16.4 (9.9, 25.8) 108 (9, 121) 4
*
*
Travis County Urban No 16.2 (14.8, 17.8) 109 (79, 118) 99 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Caldwell County Urban No 16.2 (10.4, 24.3) 110 (14, 121) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.4, 0.6)
Collin County Urban No 16.1 (14.6, 17.6) 111 (81, 117) 91 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -0.9)
Milam County Rural No 16.0 (9.0, 27.3) 112 (8, 121) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.8, 3.1)
Tom Green County Urban No 16.0 (12.1, 20.8) 113 (41, 121) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 2.0)
Waller County Urban No 16.0 (9.8, 24.5) 114 (15, 121) 4 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.5, -3.0)
Chambers County Urban No 15.9 (9.5, 25.0) 115 (12, 121) 3
*
*
Brazos County Urban No 15.8 (12.4, 19.8) 116 (46, 121) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.6, 0.4)
Hardin County Urban Yes 14.9 (9.8, 22.0) 117 (26, 121) 5 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.5, -2.1)
Gillespie County Rural Yes 14.5 (8.9, 24.0) 118 (20, 121) 4 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.4, -2.0)
Val Verde County Rural Yes 13.8 (8.1, 22.0) 119 (23, 121) 3 stable stable trend 1.3 (-23.3, 25.3)
Kendall County Urban Yes 13.6 (8.8, 20.6) 120 (34, 121) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.9, 1.3)
Wharton County Rural Yes 13.1 (7.9, 20.9) 121 (30, 121) 4 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.9, 1.3)
Andrews County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Archer County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Armstrong County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bandera County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blanco County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brewster County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Callahan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camp County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Castro County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Childress County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coleman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Colorado County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Comanche County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crosby County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dawson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Deaf Smith County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Delta County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dimmit County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Eastland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Falls County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Frio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gaines County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Goliad County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gonzales County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gray County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Haskell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jack County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Karnes County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lamb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lampasas County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lee County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Live Oak County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Madison County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McCulloch County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Moore County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morris County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nolan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ochiltree County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pecos County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rains County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Real County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Refugio County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Robertson County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Runnels County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sabine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Augustine County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Saba County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scurry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Somervell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stephens County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Swisher County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ward County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilbarger County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Willacy County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yoakum County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/12/2026 3:40 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural–urban county classifications are based on the 2023 USDA Rural–Urban Continuum Codes (except for Connecticut Counties which use 2013 codes). State-level cancer rates for rural areas are calculated using cancer cases registered exclusively in rural counties, while state-level cancer rates for urban areas are calculated using cases registered exclusively in urban counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top