Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites, 2019-2023

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States Yes 106.0 (105.5, 106.4) N/A 45,560 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.1)
Alabama Yes 50.1 (44.5, 56.2) 51 (49, 51) 69 falling falling trend -3.2 (-11.0, -0.8)
West Virginia Yes 53.1 (40.5, 68.1) 50 (41, 51) 12
*
*
Louisiana Yes 64.5 (59.9, 69.3) 49 (43, 50) 153 stable stable trend -1.7 (-2.6, 1.7)
Kentucky Yes 65.2 (57.7, 73.2) 48 (39, 50) 68 stable stable trend 9.8 (-4.6, 20.2)
Maine Yes 67.7 (51.4, 87.1) 47 (21, 51) 12
*
*
Mississippi Yes 69.0 (59.5, 79.6) 46 (31, 50) 42 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.2, 5.4)
Tennessee Yes 69.6 (64.2, 75.3) 45 (37, 49) 159 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.8, 2.0)
Arkansas Yes 71.8 (64.3, 79.9) 44 (31, 49) 86 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.7)
District of Columbia Yes 72.7 (61.5, 85.3) 43 (24, 50) 34 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.2, -0.2)
Maryland Yes 73.9 (69.9, 78.1) 42 (34, 47) 303 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 0.4)
Missouri Yes 76.3 (70.2, 82.8) 41 (29, 47) 127 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 7.7)
North Carolina Yes 78.5 (74.6, 82.5) 40 (30, 44) 401 rising rising trend 1.2 (0.5, 2.4)
Vermont Yes 79.4 (55.2, 109.7) 39 (6, 51) 8
*
*
South Carolina Yes 79.5 (73.1, 86.2) 38 (26, 46) 143 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 1.2)
Iowa Yes 79.7 (70.8, 89.3) 37 (22, 47) 72 stable stable trend -1.6 (-2.9, 0.1)
Rhode Island Yes 80.0 (72.2, 88.3) 36 (23, 47) 87 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.1, 0.1)
Ohio Yes 80.3 (75.6, 85.2) 35 (28, 44) 245 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.2)
Virginia Yes 81.4 (77.4, 85.5) 34 (27, 42) 396 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.2, 5.4)
Georgia Yes 81.5 (77.8, 85.4) 33 (28, 42) 451 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.7, 5.9)
South Dakota Yes 82.3 (59.6, 109.7) 32 (6, 51) 11
*
*
Nebraska Yes 83.6 (75.1, 92.7) 31 (16, 44) 88 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.1)
Delaware Yes 84.5 (73.3, 96.7) 30 (13, 46) 49 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -0.1)
New Jersey Yes 85.0 (82.9, 87.1) 29 (26, 36) 1,313 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
New Hampshire Yes 86.5 (71.4, 103.4) 28 (9, 48) 27 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.5, 2.6)
New York Yes 90.0 (88.6, 91.5) 27 (22, 31) 3,053 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.5)
Indiana Yes 90.4 (85.0, 95.9) 26 (15, 34) 257 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 1.3)
Idaho Yes 92.7 (84.3, 101.7) 25 (11, 36) 110 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.4)
Oregon Yes 92.8 (87.4, 98.4) 24 (14, 31) 275 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.1)
Massachusetts Yes 92.8 (89.0, 96.8) 23 (15, 30) 496 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Illinois Yes 95.0 (92.6, 97.4) 22 (15, 27) 1,396 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.8, -0.8)
Minnesota Yes 95.1 (87.4, 103.2) 21 (11, 32) 145 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.2)
Wisconsin Yes 95.3 (88.8, 102.1) 20 (11, 31) 198 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 0.3)
Montana Yes 96.4 (79.6, 115.5) 19 (5, 44) 25 stable stable trend 12.4 (-0.4, 21.1)
Nevada Yes 96.9 (92.9, 100.9) 18 (12, 27) 529 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.3)
Connecticut Yes 97.2 (92.7, 101.9) 17 (12, 27) 391 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Oklahoma Yes 98.2 (91.7, 105.0) 16 (10, 29) 213 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Utah Yes 98.7 (92.5, 105.1) 15 (10, 28) 231 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.3)
Washington Yes 99.6 (95.2, 104.1) 14 (11, 24) 485 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Pennsylvania Yes 102.7 (98.8, 106.7) 13 (10, 19) 608 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.9, -0.6)
Florida Yes 107.6 (106.5, 108.8) 12 (8, 14) 6,418 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.8)
Kansas Yes 108.3 (101.2, 115.8) 11 (6, 18) 204 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.2)
Alaska Yes 110.6 (89.2, 135.0) 10 (2, 38) 22 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 1.1)
California Yes 112.8 (111.9, 113.8) 9 (6, 11) 12,327 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.7)
Michigan Yes 113.0 (107.5, 118.7) 8 (5, 13) 364 falling falling trend -2.0 (-7.2, -0.4)
North Dakota Yes 115.7 (82.6, 155.9) 7 (2, 47) 11
*
*
Texas Yes 117.2 (116.1, 118.3) 6 (5, 9) 9,165 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.1, -0.3)
Arizona No 123.2 (120.5, 125.9) 5 (4, 7) 1,771 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.8, 0.2)
Colorado No 130.6 (126.8, 134.5) 4 (2, 6) 1,013 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.8, 0.1)
Wyoming No 130.9 (114.4, 148.8) 3 (2, 12) 49 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.0, 9.9)
New Mexico No 133.9 (130.6, 137.3) 2 (2, 5) 1,299 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Hawaii No 226.9 (206.9, 248.1) 1 (1, 1) 125 rising rising trend 3.2 (0.9, 10.5)
Puerto Rico ***
¶¶¶
N/A
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/07/2026 11:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

¶¶¶ Data for Puerto Rico is only available for All Races (includes Hispanics). For more information see data not available.

NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top