Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Comparison Options

Death Rate Report by State

Breast, 2019-2023

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Count

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States No 19.2 (19.1, 19.3) N/A 42,257 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
Alaska No 17.3 (15.4, 19.4) 41 (13, 51) 64 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7)
Wyoming No 19.6 (17.6, 21.8) 26 (2, 46) 73 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2)
North Dakota No 16.1 (14.4, 17.8) 50 (33, 51) 77 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.5)
Vermont No 16.7 (15.0, 18.5) 46 (27, 51) 83 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.3)
District of Columbia No 23.2 (21.0, 25.5) 2 (1, 20) 87 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.8)
South Dakota No 17.3 (15.8, 19.0) 42 (20, 51) 102 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Rhode Island No 16.2 (14.9, 17.6) 49 (37, 51) 130 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Montana No 18.1 (16.7, 19.6) 37 (14, 49) 141 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8)
Delaware No 22.0 (20.5, 23.7) 4 (1, 21) 163 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 4.5)
Hawaii No 16.8 (15.6, 18.0) 45 (34, 51) 177 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.3)
New Hampshire No 17.9 (16.7, 19.1) 38 (22, 50) 183 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
Maine No 17.2 (16.1, 18.4) 43 (30, 50) 193 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Idaho No 19.0 (17.9, 20.2) 30 (11, 42) 218 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.5, -0.2)
Nebraska No 20.1 (19.0, 21.3) 17 (4, 37) 253 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.2)
New Mexico No 19.3 (18.2, 20.3) 28 (11, 40) 283 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
West Virginia No 20.8 (19.7, 22.0) 11 (2, 29) 285 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Utah No 20.3 (19.3, 21.3) 14 (5, 34) 308 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.4)
Kansas No 19.7 (18.7, 20.6) 23 (9, 37) 376 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Iowa No 17.4 (16.6, 18.3) 40 (33, 49) 385 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Arkansas No 20.1 (19.2, 21.0) 16 (6, 33) 405 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Nevada No 21.4 (20.4, 22.3) 8 (2, 19) 407 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.6)
Puerto Rico No 15.4 (14.7, 16.1) N/A 424 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.2, 3.5)
Connecticut No 16.6 (15.9, 17.4) 47 (38, 50) 447 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 1.7)
Mississippi No 23.6 (22.6, 24.6) 1 (1, 4) 462 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 1.9)
Oklahoma No 22.2 (21.4, 23.1) 3 (1, 10) 556 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Oregon No 19.3 (18.6, 20.0) 27 (13, 38) 566 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Kentucky No 21.7 (20.9, 22.5) 6 (2, 13) 646 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 2.7)
Louisiana No 21.8 (21.0, 22.6) 5 (2, 13) 649 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Colorado No 18.8 (18.2, 19.5) 32 (19, 40) 650 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 2.0)
Minnesota No 17.2 (16.5, 17.8) 44 (37, 49) 650 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -0.4)
Wisconsin No 17.4 (16.8, 18.0) 39 (36, 48) 702 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.5)
Alabama No 20.4 (19.7, 21.1) 12 (7, 27) 714 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
South Carolina No 21.0 (20.4, 21.8) 9 (3, 19) 759 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Massachusetts Yes 15.2 (14.7, 15.7) 51 (48, 51) 762 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.0, -2.4)
Maryland No 19.7 (19.1, 20.3) 21 (11, 33) 818 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.5)
Missouri No 20.2 (19.5, 20.8) 15 (9, 28) 857 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.3)
Indiana No 20.3 (19.7, 20.9) 13 (8, 27) 899 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 1.3)
Washington No 18.8 (18.2, 19.3) 33 (22, 40) 912 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Arizona No 18.7 (18.2, 19.3) 34 (22, 40) 924 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.3, 0.2)
Tennessee No 21.5 (20.9, 22.2) 7 (2, 13) 993 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.3)
Virginia No 19.9 (19.4, 20.5) 19 (11, 30) 1,130 stable stable trend -1.2 (-1.6, 0.3)
New Jersey No 18.9 (18.4, 19.4) 31 (23, 39) 1,225 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.1)
Georgia No 21.0 (20.5, 21.5) 10 (4, 16) 1,368 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.7)
Michigan No 19.7 (19.2, 20.1) 24 (13, 32) 1,374 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.2)
North Carolina No 19.8 (19.3, 20.3) 20 (12, 30) 1,398 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Ohio No 20.1 (19.6, 20.5) 18 (11, 27) 1,649 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
Illinois No 19.7 (19.3, 20.1) 22 (13, 30) 1,671 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.8)
Pennsylvania No 19.2 (18.8, 19.6) 29 (19, 35) 1,871 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.0, -1.6)
New York No 16.6 (16.3, 16.9) 48 (42, 50) 2,329 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.2)
Florida No 18.7 (18.4, 19.0) 35 (27, 39) 3,158 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Texas No 19.6 (19.3, 20.0) 25 (15, 30) 3,165 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.1)
California No 18.7 (18.4, 18.9) 36 (28, 39) 4,540 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.5)

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/06/2026 1:36 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.


† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (20 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85-89, 90+).

The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal.

Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top