Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

Hispanic (any race), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States 6 Yes 106.8 (106.4, 107.3) N/A 44,330 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.2, -1.1)
Vermont Yes 72.0 (47.0, 104.2) 47 (6, 51) 6
*
*
South Dakota Yes 81.0 (58.2, 108.5) 37 (6, 51) 10
*
*
North Dakota Yes 112.0 (80.1, 150.7) 10 (2, 48) 11
*
*
Maine Yes 73.6 (55.7, 94.9) 45 (12, 51) 12
*
*
West Virginia Yes 52.7 (40.3, 67.5) 51 (44, 51) 13
*
*
Alaska Yes 93.2 (74.5, 114.5) 24 (4, 48) 21
*
*
Montana Yes 84.3 (68.4, 102.5) 32 (9, 49) 22 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.2, -2.5)
New Hampshire 6, 7 Yes 80.9 (66.1, 97.7) 39 (14, 49) 25
*
*
District of Columbia Yes 72.3 (61.0, 84.9) 46 (26, 51) 34 falling falling trend -2.6 (-5.1, -0.6)
Mississippi Yes 65.8 (56.2, 76.4) 49 (37, 51) 37 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.1, 16.1)
Delaware Yes 92.1 (79.7, 105.6) 26 (9, 46) 47 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.0)
Wyoming No 128.0 (111.9, 145.6) 4 (2, 14) 49 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.0)
Kentucky Yes 68.3 (60.1, 77.3) 48 (36, 50) 60 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.6, -3.6)
Alabama Yes 55.7 (49.3, 62.7) 50 (47, 51) 65 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.2, 2.1)
Iowa Yes 81.7 (72.4, 91.8) 36 (20, 48) 69 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 9.9)
Arkansas Yes 74.3 (66.3, 83.0) 44 (30, 49) 80 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 1.5)
Rhode Island Yes 77.6 (69.8, 86.0) 42 (28, 48) 82 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.7)
Nebraska Yes 82.7 (74.0, 92.0) 35 (20, 47) 83 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.1)
Idaho Yes 89.1 (80.7, 98.0) 27 (14, 43) 101 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.7)
Hawaii 8 No 192.8 (176.0, 210.6) 1 (1, 1) 121 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.3, 9.3)
Missouri Yes 85.9 (79.0, 93.3) 30 (19, 44) 126 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 6.0)
Minnesota Yes 95.7 (87.6, 104.3) 20 (10, 35) 131 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 1.0)
South Carolina Yes 88.2 (80.9, 96.0) 29 (17, 43) 132 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 2.2)
Tennessee Yes 77.1 (70.8, 83.8) 43 (29, 48) 142 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.7, 2.4)
Louisiana 6, 7 Yes 79.8 (74.0, 85.9) 40 (27, 47) 145 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 4.1)
Wisconsin Yes 100.4 (93.4, 107.6) 15 (9, 28) 192 rising rising trend 0.7 (0.1, 1.6)
Kansas Yes 113.0 (105.5, 120.8) 8 (4, 16) 199 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Oklahoma 6, 7 Yes 106.8 (99.7, 114.2) 12 (6, 21) 212
*
*
Utah Yes 99.9 (93.4, 106.7) 16 (10, 27) 213 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.6)
Ohio Yes 85.1 (80.0, 90.4) 31 (24, 43) 232 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.6)
Indiana Yes 97.0 (91.1, 103.1) 19 (12, 30) 243 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.1, 0.0)
Oregon Yes 94.8 (89.1, 100.7) 21 (13, 32) 260 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.8, -1.0)
Maryland Yes 79.7 (75.2, 84.3) 41 (30, 46) 288 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Michigan Yes 117.2 (111.5, 123.1) 6 (4, 11) 356 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.7, -0.9)
North Carolina Yes 81.0 (76.8, 85.3) 38 (29, 45) 366 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.3, 3.1)
Virginia Yes 84.1 (79.8, 88.4) 33 (25, 43) 371 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.0, -1.0)
Connecticut Yes 97.6 (93.0, 102.5) 18 (13, 28) 372 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.6)
Georgia Yes 83.1 (79.1, 87.2) 34 (27, 44) 421 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.2, 1.9)
Washington Yes 104.1 (99.5, 108.9) 14 (9, 21) 470 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Massachusetts Yes 93.4 (89.5, 97.4) 23 (16, 31) 483 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.7)
Nevada Yes 93.4 (89.5, 97.4) 22 (16, 31) 502 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.7, 0.2)
Pennsylvania Yes 106.2 (102.2, 110.4) 13 (9, 17) 599 falling falling trend -1.2 (-3.1, -0.2)
Colorado No 129.9 (126.1, 133.7) 2 (2, 5) 978 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.0, -0.7)
New Mexico No 129.8 (126.6, 133.1) 3 (2, 5) 1,290 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -1.0)
New Jersey Yes 88.7 (86.5, 91.0) 28 (23, 34) 1,295 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.1, -1.3)
Illinois Yes 98.6 (96.1, 101.1) 17 (14, 24) 1,360 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.4, -0.6)
Arizona Yes 118.2 (115.6, 120.9) 5 (4, 9) 1,709 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
New York Yes 92.7 (91.2, 94.2) 25 (19, 29) 3,074 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.4)
Florida Yes 108.0 (106.8, 109.2) 11 (9, 14) 6,264 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -1.0)
Texas Yes 115.6 (114.5, 116.7) 7 (5, 10) 8,904 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.2)
California Yes 112.6 (111.7, 113.6) 9 (7, 11) 12,055 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Puerto Rico 8 ***
¶¶¶
N/A
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/22/2024 3:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

7 Data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) for this state and the user is cautioned against drawing conclusions from such data. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


¶¶¶ Data for Puerto Rico is only available for All Races (includes Hispanics). For more information see data not available.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
NHIA (NAACCR Hispanic Identification Algorithm) was used for Hispanic Ethnicity (see Technical Notes section of the USCS).
Statistics for minorities may be affected by inconsistent race identification between the cancer case reports (sources for numerator of rate) and data from the Census Bureau (source for denominator of rate); and from undercounts of some population groups in the census.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top