Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

Asian/Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic, Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank

State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States 6 Yes 93.0 (92.4, 93.6) N/A 20,018 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.2)
New Hampshire 6, 7 Yes 57.3 (45.4, 71.1) 51 (42, 51) 18
*
*
West Virginia Yes 59.2 (43.9, 78.2) 50 (29, 51) 10
*
*
Connecticut Yes 66.7 (60.5, 73.4) 49 (41, 51) 92 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -2.0)
New Jersey Yes 70.9 (68.5, 73.5) 48 (41, 50) 658 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -1.2)
South Carolina Yes 71.8 (63.8, 80.6) 47 (32, 51) 63 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.6)
Michigan Yes 74.0 (69.5, 78.7) 46 (38, 49) 211 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5)
New Mexico Yes 74.8 (63.2, 88.1) 45 (18, 51) 31 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -0.9)
Alabama Yes 75.7 (66.3, 86.0) 44 (24, 50) 52 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 1.2)
Delaware Yes 76.0 (64.2, 89.3) 43 (18, 51) 30 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 1.2)
Indiana Yes 77.8 (70.2, 86.0) 42 (24, 49) 87 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.4)
Illinois Yes 80.7 (77.9, 83.6) 41 (30, 44) 627 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.4, -1.1)
Ohio Yes 82.5 (77.2, 88.1) 40 (21, 45) 190 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.1)
North Dakota Yes 82.9 (50.8, 125.3) 39 (1, 51) 5
*
*
Maryland Yes 83.6 (79.9, 87.5) 38 (23, 43) 384 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -0.9)
New York Yes 83.7 (81.9, 85.5) 37 (27, 41) 1,683 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Texas Yes 84.1 (81.8, 86.4) 36 (25, 42) 1,119 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Pennsylvania Yes 84.5 (80.5, 88.7) 35 (22, 42) 354 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
North Carolina Yes 85.3 (80.0, 90.9) 34 (18, 43) 213 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5)
Florida Yes 85.6 (82.6, 88.6) 33 (22, 41) 657 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.3, 0.4)
Virginia Yes 86.5 (83.1, 90.1) 32 (20, 40) 497 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.3)
Missouri Yes 88.2 (80.4, 96.5) 31 (11, 43) 101 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.0)
Mississippi Yes 88.4 (73.7, 105.0) 30 (5, 49) 28 falling falling trend -6.0 (-15.5, -1.6)
Colorado Yes 89.2 (82.9, 95.7) 29 (13, 41) 161 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.7)
Maine Yes 89.2 (70.0, 112.1) 28 (1, 50) 16
*
*
Kentucky Yes 89.5 (77.7, 102.3) 27 (6, 47) 48 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.4)
Rhode Island Yes 89.9 (74.8, 107.0) 26 (3, 49) 27 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.4, -0.3)
District of Columbia Yes 90.6 (72.5, 111.6) 25 (1, 49) 18 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.7)
Montana Yes 90.7 (65.0, 122.7) 24 (1, 51) 9
*
*
Tennessee Yes 91.0 (82.8, 99.7) 23 (9, 42) 101 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.3)
Georgia Yes 91.4 (87.1, 96.0) 22 (14, 33) 366 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 2.4)
Massachusetts Yes 91.7 (87.5, 96.0) 21 (14, 33) 375 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.7)
Vermont Yes 92.2 (64.2, 127.4) 20 (1, 51) 8
*
*
Kansas Yes 92.4 (82.2, 103.5) 19 (6, 43) 64 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 1.0)
Wisconsin Yes 93.9 (85.4, 102.9) 18 (7, 39) 101 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.2, -2.1)
Arkansas Yes 94.2 (80.9, 108.8) 17 (3, 44) 41 stable stable trend -1.1 (-1.8, 0.2)
Nebraska Yes 95.0 (80.0, 111.7) 16 (2, 47) 31 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.4)
Arizona Yes 96.0 (90.6, 101.6) 15 (8, 29) 250 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 4.1)
Washington Yes 99.7 (96.4, 103.0) 14 (7, 21) 744 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
California Yes 100.2 (99.1, 101.2) 13 (8, 19) 7,674 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.1)
Idaho Yes 100.2 (83.2, 119.5) 12 (1, 45) 27 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.4)
Louisiana 6, 7 Yes 100.9 (91.3, 111.4) 11 (2, 31) 86 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.5)
Alaska Yes 103.5 (90.9, 117.2) 10 (1, 35) 54 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.4)
Nevada Yes 103.9 (99.2, 108.7) 9 (4, 18) 393 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.1)
Oregon Yes 104.4 (98.1, 111.0) 8 (3, 19) 216 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.9)
Utah Yes 109.7 (99.6, 120.5) 7 (1, 19) 96 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.4)
Iowa Yes 111.2 (97.5, 126.2) 6 (1, 25) 55 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.7, 0.2)
Wyoming Yes 112.5 (73.9, 163.0) 5 (1, 51) 6
*
*
Hawaii 8 Yes 113.7 (111.2, 116.3) 4 (1, 8) 1,639 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.1)
Minnesota Yes 114.0 (106.7, 121.6) 3 (1, 12) 204 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.4)
Oklahoma 6, 7 Yes 115.3 (104.2, 127.2) 2 (1, 16) 89
*
*
South Dakota Yes 117.2 (78.8, 165.4) 1 (1, 50) 8
*
*
Puerto Rico 8 ***
¶¶¶
N/A
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
¶¶¶
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/06/2024 5:31 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

7 Data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2022) for this state and the user is cautioned against drawing conclusions from such data. This was based on the NCHS Policy.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


¶¶¶ Data for Puerto Rico is only available for All Races (includes Hispanics). For more information see data not available.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top